3D cross sectional view to investigate the morphology of internal carotid artery plaques. Is 3D ultrasound superior to 2D ultrasound?

Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of carotid artery plaque surface irregularity

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US) in determining the surface irregularity of carotid artery plaques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 50 patients (20 females and 30 males) aged between 56 and 82 years with plaques in the carotid artery which were detected during routine neck ultrasound. Simultaneously these cases were evaluated in terms of plaque echogenicities and surface characteristics with 2D and 3D US.

RESULTS

3D imaging was successfully performed in 45 of the 50 cases and the technical success rate was 90%. A single plaque was detected in 64.4% of the patients, with the remaining 35.6% having more than one plaque. The lengths of the plaques ranged from 2 to 12 mm (mean: 3.98 ±1.70 mm); the widths ranged from 1.8 to 3.2 mm (mean: 2.11 ±0.37 mm). No significant difference was found between 2D and 3D plaque echo-structures (observer 1, p = 0.317; observer 2, p = 0.276), but there were significant differences between 2D and 3D plaque surface irregularities (observer 1, p = 0.002; observer 2, p = 0.004). The inter-observer agreement on 2D and 3D plaque echo-structure and surface irregularity was very good (k coefficients were 0.89 and 0.83, respectively, for echo-structure, and 0.91 and 0.95, respectively, for surface irregularity).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that 3D US examination is a valuable non-invasive method for investigation of surface irregularity of carotid artery plaques.

Observer performance in characterization of carotid plaque texture and surface characteristics with 3D versus 2D ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) over two-dimensional (2D) US in characterizing atherosclerotic carotid plaques using inter- and intra-observer agreement metrics.

METHODS

A Total of 51 patients with 105 carotid artery plaques were screened using 3D and 2D US probes attached to the same US scanner. Two independent observers characterized the plaques based on the morphological features namely echotexture, echogenicity and surface characteristics. The scores assigned to each morphological feature were used to determine intra- and inter-observer performance. The level of agreement was measured using Kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The first observer with 2D US showed fair (k=0.4-0.59) and very strong (k>0.8) with 3D US intra-observer agreements using three morphological features. The second observer indicated moderate strong (k=0.6-0.79) with 2D US and very strong with 3D US (k>0.8) intra-observer performances. Moderate strong (k=0.6-0.79) and very strong (k>0.8) inter-observer agreements were reported with 2D US and 3D US respectively. The results with 2D and 3D US were correlated 62% using only echotexture and 56% using surface morphology coupled with echogenicity. 3D US gave a lower score than 2D 71% of the time (p=0.005) in disagreement cases.

CONCLUSION

High reproducibility in carotid plaque characterization was obtained using 3D US rather than 2D US. Hence, it can be a preferred imaging modality in routine or follow up plaque screening of patients with carotid artery disease.

Inter-rater reliability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque quantification by 3-dimensional sonography

OBJECTIVES

Embolization from atherosclerotic carotid plaques is the most common cause of ischemic stroke; therefore, identification of high-risk plaques by sonography is important. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between 2 investigators in the evaluation of sonographic parameters relating to plaque stability.

METHODS

The following plaque parameters were assessed: echogenicity, homogeneity, surface, maximum content, and total volume. Serial 2-dimensional (2D) image sequences were obtained. Linear motion of the probe was automatically synchronized with the electrocardiogram. The edges of the plaque in each image were manually identified by the investigators. The total plaque volume was calculated after computer transformation of 2D images into a 3-dimensinoal (3D) format. Inter-rater reliability for echogenicity, homogeneity, and the surface was assessed by the weighted κ coefficient. Parametric values were tested by a paired t test.

RESULTS

We enrolled 30 patients (22 male; mean age ± SD, 72 ± 13 years) in the study and evaluated 28 atherosclerotic plaques. Inter-rater agreement values were as follows: homogeneity, 96% (κ = 0.84; P < .001); surface, 90% (κ = 0.77; P < .001); and echogenicity, 86% (κ = 0.60; P < .001). The significance values for plaque content and volume measurement agreement were P = .311 and .312, respectively, and the correlation coefficient was 0.808.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the agreement between 2 examiners in the evaluation of 2D and 3D sonographic parameters related to plaque stability was good to excellent. The sonographic measurement of plaque volume growth was the most accurate parameter; therefore, 3D sonography may be used for risk assessment of plaques in the future.