Neue Wege in der psychiatrischen Diagnostik?

[A case of Bleuler's disease? 100 years of dementia praecox or group of schizophrenias]

Approximately 100 years ago Eugen Bleuler published the most significant contribution to psychiatry by conceptualizing the term schizophrenia as a diagnostic entity. In modern diagnostic manuals Bleuler's concept is only reflected in subordinated criteria, i.e. the negative symptoms. On the occasion of the anniversary of Bleuler's essential publication, the present work aims to exemplify the differences in diagnostic concepts and it will be illustrated that Bleuler's intention to establish his so-called basic symptom as a guideline for diagnostics has to be considered as failed from a present day viewpoint.

[Deconstructing schizophrenia. Dimensional models or division into subtypes?]

Against the background of the arrangements of ICD-11 and DSM-V, future approaches in order to diagnose schizophrenic psychoses are currently being discussed. In this context, the current concepts of schizophrenia are questioned because attempts at neurobiological validation and validation based on family and follow-up studies have not succeeded. Therefore, dimensional diagnostic models or a division into subtypes are suggested. Both of these proposals would imply a deconstruction of the current concept of schizophrenia. A historical review shows that the psychopathological roots of the current discussion can be traced back to Kurt Schneider's nominalistic concept of schizophrenia which is based upon the so-called first-rank symptoms. In contrast, the psychopathological foundation of dimensional concepts and a division into several subtypes date from contributions of Klaus Conrad and Karl Leonhard. A triaxial diagnostic system with the axes of syndromes, course types and aetiology could provide a bridge between the different approaches.

Schizoaffective disorder--an ongoing challenge for psychiatric nosology

OBJECTIVE

Schizoaffective disorder is a common diagnosis in mental health services. The present article aims to provide an overview of diagnostic reliability, symptomatology, outcome, neurobiology and treatment of schizoaffective disorder.

METHOD

Literature was identified by searches in "Medline" and "Cochrane Library".

RESULTS

The diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder has a low reliability. There are marked differences between the current diagnostic systems. With respect to psychopathological symptoms, no clear boundaries were found between schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and affective disorders. Common neurobiological factors were found across the traditional diagnostic categories. Schizoaffective disorder according to ICD-10 criteria, but not to DSM-IV criteria, shows a more favorable outcome than schizophrenia. With regard to treatment, only a small and heterogeneous database exists.

CONCLUSION

Due to the low reliability and questionable validity there is a substantial need for revision and unification of the current diagnostic concepts of schizoaffective disorder. If future diagnostic systems return to Kraepelin's dichotomous classification of non-organic psychosis or adopt a dimensional diagnostic approach, schizoaffective disorder will disappear from the psychiatric nomenclature. A nosological model with multiple diagnostic entities, however, would be compatible with retaining the diagnostic category of schizoaffective disorder.