Single-operator method for double-balloon endoscopy: a pilot study

Clinical Practice Guideline for Enteroscopy

Management of small bowel diseases has evolved since the advent of capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE). One of the most common indications for enteroscopy is obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), followed by small bowel stenosis, tumors, and inflammatory bowel disease. Although enteroscopes have been regarded as useful tools, correct guidelines are required to ensure that we manipulate these enteroscopes safely and efficiently in clinical practice. Herein, the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed 'Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enteroscopy' in collaboration with the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japanese Gastroenterological Association, and the Japanese Association for Capsule Endoscopy. These guidelines are based on the evidence available until now, but small bowel endoscopy is a relatively new technology, so the guidelines include recommendations based on a consensus reached among experts when the evidence has not been considered sufficient. These guidelines were not designed to be disease-based, but focus on how we should use small bowel CE and BAE in everyday clinical practice.

Advances in balloon endoscopes

In September 2003, a double-balloon endoscope (DBE) composed of balloons attached to a scope and an overtube was released in Japan prior to becoming available in other parts of the world. The DBE was developed by Dr. Yamamoto (1), and 5 different types of scopes with different uses have already been marketed. In April 2007, a single-balloon small intestinal endoscope was released with a balloon attached only to the overtube as a subsequent model. This article presents a detailed account of the development of these scopes up to the present time.

Modified single-operator method for double-balloon endoscopy

Applications of double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) have expanded widely to areas beyond small-intestine endoscopy. Two endoscopists are required for standard insertion, but it is preferable to have DBE carried out by one endoscopist to optimize control of the procedure and because of human resources issues. We previously reported on the Single-Operator Method, but here we describe newly modified insertion techniques that facilitate and enhance the performance of DBE by a single endoscopist. Our new technique consists of Hooking Technique, Outside Support, Grasp Scope and Overtube, Continuous Overtube Infusion and Double-Overtube Method. These new techniques make it easier to carry out the Single-Operator Method.

Single-operator double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) is as effective as dual-operator DBE

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) is a new device that allows diagnosis and treatment throughout the entire small intestine. Although the originally described method requires two operators, we have recently developed a method to perform DBE by a single operator. We here assessed the clinical usefulness of this one-person method in comparison to the conventional two-person DBE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-two patients (102 men and 60 women, mean age 59 years) underwent 303 DBE procedures. Total observation time, completion rate of total intestinal and colonic observation, lesion-discovery rate, and complication rate were retrospectively compared between the one-person method and the conventional two-person method of DBE. The one-person method consists of the Grip and Pinch technique and Keep (or Hold) and Slide technique.

RESULTS

The total observation times were 95.5 +/- 35.1 min and 96.7 +/- 47.5 min by one-person and two-person antegrade DBE, respectively, and 103 +/- 29.8 min and 111 +/- 30.1 min by one-person and two-person retrograde DBE, respectively. The completion rate for examination of the entire small intestine was 74.2% in one-person DBE and 76.5% in two-person DBE, respectively. The lesion-discovery rate was 69.0% in one-person DBE and 65.5% in two-person DBE, respectively. No significant differences between two methods were found in all measures. Also, no difference was observed in complication rate of the two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-operator method for DBE was as efficient as the dual-operator DBE without any higher risk of complications and, therefore, could replace the conventional dual-operator method in the future.