1
|
Skaarup KG, Lassen MCH, Modin D, Johansen ND, Loiacono MM, Harris RC, Lee JKH, Dufournet M, Vardeny O, Peikert A, Claggett B, Solomon SD, Jensen JUS, Biering-Sørensen T. The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials. J Infect 2024; 89:106187. [PMID: 38795774 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarize current evidence of high-dose influenza vaccine (HD-IV) vs standard-dose (SD-IV) regarding severe clinical outcomes. METHODS A prespecified meta-analysis was conducted to assess relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IV vs SD-IV in reducing the rates of (1) pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalization, (2) all hospitalizations, and (3) all-cause death in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized controlled trials. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using fixed-effects models with the inverse variance method. RESULTS Five randomized trials were included encompassing 105,685 individuals. HD-IV vs SD-IV reduced P&I hospitalizations (rVE: 23.5 %, [95 %CI: 12.3 to 33.2]). HD-IV vs SD-IV also reduced rate of all-cause hospitalizations (rVE: 7.3 %, [95 %CI: 4.5 to 10.0]). No significant differences were observed in death rates (rVE = 1.6 % ([95 %CI: -2.0 to 5.0]) in HD-IV vs SD-IV. Sensitivity analyses omitting trials with participants sharing the same comorbidity, trials with ≥ 100 events, and random-effects models provided comparable estimates for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS HD-IV reduced the incidence of P&I and all-cause hospitalization vs SD-IV in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized trials, through no significant difference was observed in all-cause death rates. These findings, supported by evidence from several randomized studies, can benefit from replication in a fully powered, individually randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Modin
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niklas Dyrby Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Orly Vardeny
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Alexander Peikert
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Brian Claggett
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
- Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lassen MCH, Johansen ND, Modin D, Nealon J, Samson S, Dufournet M, Loiacono MM, Larsen CS, Jensen AMR, Landler NE, Claggett BL, Solomon SD, Landray MJ, Gislason GH, Køber L, Jensen JUS, Sivapalan P, Vestergaard LS, Krause TG, Biering-Sørensen T. Effects of high-dose versus standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine among patients with diabetes: A post-hoc analysis of the DANFLU-1 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:1821-1829. [PMID: 38586966 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
AIM High-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) has been shown to be more effective than standard-dose (QIV-SD) in reducing influenza infection, but whether diabetes status affects relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) is unknown. We aimed to assess rVE on change in glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c (∆HbA1c)], incident diabetes, total all-cause hospitalizations (first + recurrent), and a composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for pneumonia or influenza. METHODS DANFLU-1 was a pragmatic, open-label trial randomizing adults (65-79 years) 1:1 to QIV-HD or QIV-SD during the 2021/22 influenza season. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate rVE against incident diabetes and the composite endpoint, negative binomial regression to estimate rVE against all-cause hospitalizations, and ANCOVA when assessing rVE against ∆HbA1c. RESULTS Of the 12 477 participants, 1162 (9.3%) had diabetes at baseline. QIV-HD, compared with QIV-SD, was associated with a reduction in the rate of all-cause hospitalizations irrespective of diabetes [overall: 647 vs. 742 events, incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.87, 95% CI (0.76-0.99); diabetes: 93 vs. 118 events, IRR: 0.80, 95% CI (0.55-1.15); without diabetes: 554 vs. 624 events, IRR: 0.88, 95% CI (0.76-1.01), pinteraction = 0.62]. Among those with diabetes, QIV-HD was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome [2 vs. 11 events, HR: 0.18, 95% CI (0.04-0.83)] but had no effect on ∆HbA1c; QIV-HD adjusted mean difference: ∆ + 0.2 mmol/mol, 95% CI (-0.9 to 1.2). QIV-HD did not affect the risk of incident diabetes [HR 1.18, 95% CI (0.94-1.47)]. CONCLUSIONS In this post-hoc analysis, QIV-HD versus QIV-SD was associated with an increased rVE against the composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for pneumonia/influenza, and the all-cause hospitalization rate irrespective of diabetes status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mats C Højbjerg Lassen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Niklas Dyrby Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Modin
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Carsten Schade Larsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine-Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Marie Reimer Jensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nino Emanuel Landler
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brian L Claggett
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin J Landray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gunnar H Gislason
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
- Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Tyra Grove Krause
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falsey AR, Maggi S, Biering-Sørensen T. Podcast: Need for Quality Evidence for Decision-Making on Seasonal Influenza Vaccines. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:659-666. [PMID: 38485847 PMCID: PMC11058138 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Seasonal influenza is usually considered an acute respiratory infection with a full recovery within a week. In addition to the traditional outcomes, there is now evidence of indirect effects in terms of neurological and functional complications. Major organ systems can be affected, underlining the need for preventative measures against infection. The aim of this podcast, featuring Dr. Ann Falsey, Dr. Stefania Maggi, and Dr. Tor Biering-Sørensen, is to outline influenza complications beyond acute respiratory disease, as well as discussing the need for quality of evidence when evaluating influenza vaccines. Assessing the benefits of vaccination can be challenging. To ensure a high quality of evidence, the innovative randomization of patients within the study design to avoid bias and the assessment of additional outcomes beyond immunogenicity as well as the inclusion of a broad population-including frail or vulnerable individuals-are essential. Studies leveraging nationwide registries such as the DANFLU-2 trial in Denmark highlight the advantages of a digitalized healthcare system for conducting large-scale randomized trials. Furthermore, large-scale trials such as the Gravenstein study have supplied a sizable body of evidence supporting the use of high-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. In conclusion, achieving a high quality of evidence is key for decision-making on seasonal influenza vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann R Falsey
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.
| | - Stefania Maggi
- Aging Branch, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Edwards KM, Griffin MR. Postmarketing Vaccine Safety Assessments: Important Work in Progress. JAMA 2024; 331:915-917. [PMID: 38502085 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.26630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marie R Griffin
- School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bollaerts K, Wyndham-Thomas C, Miller E, Izurieta HS, Black S, Andrews N, Rubbrecht M, Van Heuverswyn F, Neels P. The role of real-world evidence for regulatory and public health decision-making for Accelerated Vaccine Deployment- a meeting report. Biologicals 2024; 85:101750. [PMID: 38360428 DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2024.101750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid evidence generation to inform public health decisions beyond the limitations of conventional clinical trials. This report summarises presentations and discussions from a conference on the role of Real-World Evidence (RWE) in expediting vaccine deployment. Attended by regulatory bodies, public health entities, and industry experts, the gathering was a collaborative exchange of experiences and recommendations for leveraging RWE for vaccine deployment. RWE proved instrumental in refining decision-making processes to optimise dosing regimens, enhance guidance on target populations, and steer vaccination strategies against emerging variants. Participants felt that RWE was successfully integrated into lifecycle management, encompassing boosters and safety considerations. However, challenges emerged, prompting a call for improvements in data quality, standardisation, and availability, acknowledging the variability and potential inaccuracies in data across diverse healthcare systems. Regulatory transparency should also be prioritised to foster public trust, and improved collaborations with governments are needed to streamline data collection and navigate data privacy regulations. Moreover, building and sustaining resources, expertise, and infrastructure in LMICs emerged as imperative for RWE-generating capabilities. Continued stakeholder collaboration and securing adequate funding emerged as vital pillars for advancing the use of RWE in shaping responsive and effective public health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elizabeth Miller
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), United Kingdom
| | | | - Steve Black
- Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN), New Zealand
| | - Nick Andrews
- UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Pieter Neels
- International Alliance of Biological Standardization (IABS-EU), Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johansen ND, Modin D, Skaarup KG, Nealon J, Samson S, Dufournet M, Loiacono MM, Harris RC, Larsen CS, Jensen AMR, Landler NE, Claggett BL, Solomon SD, Landray MJ, Gislason GH, Køber L, Jensen JUS, Sivapalan P, Vestergaard LS, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sørensen T. Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine against recurrent hospitalizations and mortality in relation to influenza circulation: A post-hoc analysis of the DANFLU-1 randomized clinical trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024:S1198-743X(24)00039-9. [PMID: 38286177 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relative effectiveness of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) versus standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV-SD) against recurrent hospitalizations and its potential variation in relation to influenza circulation. METHODS We did a post-hoc analysis of a pragmatic, open-label, randomized trial of QIV-HD versus QIV-SD performed during the 2021-2022 influenza season among adults aged 65-79 years. Participants were enrolled in October 2021-November, 2021 and followed for outcomes from 14 days postvaccination until 31 May, 2022. We investigated the following outcomes: Hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza, respiratory hospitalizations, cardio-respiratory hospitalizations, cardiovascular hospitalizations, all-cause hospitalizations, and all-cause death. Outcomes were analysed as recurrent events. Cumulative numbers of events were assessed weekly. Cumulative relative effectiveness estimates were calculated and descriptively compared with influenza circulation. The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05048589. RESULTS Among 12,477 randomly assigned participants, receiving QIV-HD was associated with lower incidence rates of hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza (10 vs. 33 events, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.64]; p 0.002) and all-cause hospitalizations (647 vs. 742 events, IRR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-0.99]; p 0.032) compared with QIV-SD. Trends favouring QIV-HD were consistently observed over time including in the period before active influenza transmission; i.e. while the first week with a ≥10% influenza test positivity rate was calendar week 10, 2022, the first statistically significant reduction in hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza was already observed by calendar week 3, 2022 (5 vs. 15 events, IRR 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.94]; p 0.037). DISCUSSION In a post-hoc analysis, QIV-HD was associated with lower incidence rates of hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza and all-cause hospitalizations compared with QIV-SD, with trends evident independent of influenza circulation levels. Our exploratory results correspond to a number needed to treat of 65 (95% CI 35-840) persons vaccinated with QIV-HD compared with QIV-SD to prevent one additional all-cause hospitalization per season. Further research is needed to confirm these hypothesis-generating findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Dyrby Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Modin
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joshua Nealon
- School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Carsten Schade Larsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Marie Reimer Jensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nino Emanuel Landler
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brian L Claggett
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J Landray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunnar H Gislason
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark; The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
- Department of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Section, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Department of Medicine, Respiratory Medicine Section, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Palle Valentiner-Branth
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tyra Grove Krause
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fonseca HAR, Zimerman A, Monfardini F, Guimarães HP, Pedrosa RP, Patriota RDLS, Couto Patriota TLG, Passos LCS, Dall'Orto FTC, Hoffmann Filho CR, Nascimento BR, Baldissera FA, Pereira CAC, Caramori PRA, Andrade PB, Okoshi MP, Polanczyk CA, Silveira FS, Villacorta AS, Nicolau JC, Rizzo LV, Berwanger O. In-Hospital influenza vaccination to prevent cardiorespiratory events in the first 45 days after acute coronary syndrome: A prespecified analysis of the VIP-ACS trial. Vaccine 2024; 42:496-504. [PMID: 38154990 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination prevents major cardiovascular events in individuals presenting a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), however the early effect of an in-hospital double-dose vaccination strategy remains uncertain. METHODS The VIP-ACS was a randomized, pragmatic, multicenter, open-label trial with a blinded-adjudication endpoint. Patients with ACS ≤ 7 days of hospitalization were randomized to an in-hospital double-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (double-dose) or a standard-dose influenza vaccine at 30 days post-randomization. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for respiratory infections, analyzed with the win ratio (WR) method in short-term follow-up (45-days after randomization). RESULTS The trial enrolled 1,801 patients (≥18 years old). Median participant age was 57 years, 70 % were male. There were no significant differences between groups on the primary hierarchical endpoint: there were 5.7 % wins in the double-dose in-hospital group and 5.5 % wins in the standard-dose delayed vaccination group (WR: 1.03; 95 % CI: 0.70---1.53; P = 0.85). In a sensitivity analysis including COVID-19 infection in the hospitalizations for respiratory infections endpoint, overall results were maintained (WR: 1.03; 95 % CI 0.71---1.51; P = 0.87). Results were consistent for major cardiovascular events only (WR: 0.82; 95 % CI: 0.48---1.39; P = 0.46). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION In patients with recent ACS, in-hospital double-dose influenza vaccination did not significantly reduce cardiorespiratory events at 45 days compared with standard-dose vaccination at 30 days post-randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - André Zimerman
- TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Frederico Monfardini
- Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Hélio Penna Guimarães
- Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cesar A C Pereira
- Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Carisi Anne Polanczyk
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | - José Carlos Nicolau
- Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luiz V Rizzo
- Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Otávio Berwanger
- Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Biering-Sørensen T. Nudging a Nation - The Danish NUDGE Trial Concept. NEJM EVIDENCE 2024; 3:EVIDctw2300024. [PMID: 38320517 DOI: 10.1056/evidctw2300024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Danish NUDGE Trial ConceptRandomized encouragement trials randomize to an opportunity to receive treatment instead of to the treatment. Here, Johansen and colleagues combine randomized encouragement trials with several advantages inherent in the Danish health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Dyrby Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| | - Muthiah Vaduganathan
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
| | - Ankeet S Bhatt
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Froes F, Timóteo A, Almeida B, Raposo JF, Oliveira J, Carrageta M, Duque S, Morais A. Influenza vaccination in older adults and patients with chronic disorders: A position paper from the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology, the Portuguese Society of Diabetology, the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, the Portuguese Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, the Study Group of Geriatrics of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine, and the Portuguese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology. Pulmonology 2023:S2531-0437(23)00201-5. [PMID: 38129238 DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Influenza affects millions of people worldwide each year and can lead to severe complications, hospitalizations, and even death, especially among vulnerable populations such as older adults and those with chronic medical conditions. Annual vaccination is considered the most effective measure for preventing influenza and its complications. Despite the widespread availability of influenza vaccines, however, vaccination coverage rates remain suboptimal in several countries. Based on the latest scientific evidence and expert opinions on influenza vaccination in older people and patients with chronic disease, the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (SPP), the Portuguese Society of Diabetology (SPD), the Portuguese Society of Cardiology (SPC), the Portuguese Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SPGG), the Study Group of Geriatrics of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine (NEGERMI-SPMI), and the Portuguese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SPDIMC) discussed best practices for promoting vaccination uptake and coverage and drew up several recommendations to mitigate the impact of influenza. These recommendations focus on the efficacy and safety of available vaccines; the impact of influenza vaccination on older adults; patients with chronic medical conditions, namely cardiac and respiratory conditions, diabetes, and immunosuppressive diseases; and health care professionals, optimal vaccination timing, and strategies to increase vaccination uptake and coverage. The resulting position paper highlights the critical role that vaccinations play in promoting public health, raising awareness, and encouraging more people to get vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Froes
- Torax Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal; Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (SPP), Portugal
| | - A Timóteo
- Cardiology Department, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal; Portuguese Society of Cardiology (SPC), Portugal
| | - B Almeida
- APDP Diabetes, Lisbon, Portugal; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - J F Raposo
- NOVA Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal; APDP Diabetes, Lisbon, Portugal; Portuguese Society of Diabetology (SPD), Portugal
| | - J Oliveira
- Infection Control and Prevention and Antimicrobial Resistance Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Portuguese Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SPDIMC), Portugal
| | - M Carrageta
- Institute of Preventive Cardiology, Almada, Portugal; Portuguese Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SPGG), Portugal
| | - S Duque
- Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisboa, Portugal; Institute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; Study Group of Geriatrics of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine (NEGERMI-SPMI), Portugal
| | - A Morais
- Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (SPP), Portugal; Nova Medical School, Lisbon Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Pulmonology Department, Hospital de São João, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; i3S - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grohskopf LA, Blanton LH, Ferdinands JM, Chung JR, Broder KR, Talbot HK. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2023–24 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep 2023; 72:1-25. [PMCID: PMC10468199 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7202a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This report updates the 2022–23 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) concerning the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States ( MMWR Recomm Rep 2022;71[No. RR-1]:1–28). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. All seasonal influenza vaccines expected to be available in the United States for the 2023–24 season are quadrivalent, containing hemagglutinin (HA) derived from one influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, one influenza A(H3N2) virus, one influenza B/Victoria lineage virus, and one influenza B/Yamagata lineage virus. Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) are expected to be available. For most persons who need only 1 dose of influenza vaccine for the season, vaccination should ideally be offered during September or October. However, vaccination should continue after October and throughout the season as long as influenza viruses are circulating and unexpired vaccine is available. Influenza vaccines might be available as early as July or August, but for most adults (particularly adults aged ≥65 years) and for pregnant persons in the first or second trimester, vaccination during July and August should be avoided unless there is concern that vaccination later in the season might not be possible. Certain children aged 6 months through 8 years need 2 doses; these children should receive the first dose as soon as possible after vaccine is available, including during July and August. Vaccination during July and August can be considered for children of any age who need only 1 dose for the season and for pregnant persons who are in the third trimester during these months if vaccine is available ACIP recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications receive a licensed and age-appropriate seasonal influenza vaccine. With the exception of vaccination for adults aged ≥65 years, ACIP makes no preferential recommendation for a specific vaccine when more than one licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine is available. ACIP recommends that adults aged ≥65 years preferentially receive any one of the following higher dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccines: quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV4), quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), or quadrivalent adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV4). If none of these three vaccines is available at an opportunity for vaccine administration, then any other age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be used Primary updates to this report include the following two topics: 1) the composition of 2023–24 U.S. seasonal influenza vaccines and 2) updated recommendations regarding influenza vaccination of persons with egg allergy. First, the composition of 2023–24 U.S. influenza vaccines includes an update to the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 component. U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines will contain HA derived from 1) an influenza A/Victoria/4897/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for cell culture-based and recombinant vaccines); 2) an influenza A/Darwin/9/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Darwin/6/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for cell culture-based and recombinant vaccines); 3) an influenza B/Austria/1359417/2021 (Victoria lineage)-like virus; and 4) an influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yamagata lineage)-like virus. Second, ACIP recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months with egg allergy should receive influenza vaccine. Any influenza vaccine (egg based or nonegg based) that is otherwise appropriate for the recipient’s age and health status can be used. It is no longer recommended that persons who have had an allergic reaction to egg involving symptoms other than urticaria should be vaccinated in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting supervised by a health care provider who is able to recognize and manage severe allergic reactions if an egg-based vaccine is used. Egg allergy alone necessitates no additional safety measures for influenza vaccination beyond those recommended for any recipient of any vaccine, regardless of severity of previous reaction to egg. All vaccines should be administered in settings in which personnel and equipment needed for rapid recognition and treatment of acute hypersensitivity reactions are available This report focuses on recommendations for the use of vaccines for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza during the 2023–24 influenza season in the United States. A brief summary of the recommendations and a link to the most recent Background Document containing additional information are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/flu.html . These recommendations apply to U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines used according to Food and Drug Administration–licensed indications. Updates and other information are available from CDC’s influenza website ( https://www.cdc.gov/flu ). Vaccination and health care providers should check this site periodically for additional information.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee JK, Lam GK, Yin JK, Loiacono MM, Samson SI. High-dose influenza vaccine in older adults by age and seasonal characteristics: Systematic review and meta-analysis update. Vaccine X 2023; 14:100327. [PMID: 37333054 PMCID: PMC10276206 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
This updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies published up to April 2023 assessed the relative performance of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) and standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD-IIV) against influenza-associated outcomes in older adults (≥65 years). The analysis included studies conducted over 12 influenza seasons (2009/2010 to 2019/2020, 2021/2022), including over 45 million individuals aged ≥ 65 years, and showed that HD-IIV provided significantly better protection than SD-IIV against influenza-like illness and influenza-related hospitalizations, as well as cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory, and all-cause hospitalizations. Subgroup analyses showed HD-IIV consistently provided better protection than SD-IIV against influenza outcomes across the age range (65+, 75+ 85+ years), and regardless of the predominantly circulating influenza strain and vaccine antigenic match/mismatch. Randomized studies continue to drive high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine relative to SD-IIV against severe influenza outcomes in adults aged ≥ 65 years, supported by observational data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K.H. Lee
- Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sanofi, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gary K.L. Lam
- Leslie Dan School of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sanofi, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J. Kevin Yin
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sanofi, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Johansen ND, Vaduganathan M, Bhatt AS, Lee SG, Modin D, Claggett BL, Dueger EL, Samson S, Loiacono MM, Køber L, Solomon SD, Sivapalan P, Jensen JUS, Valentiner-Branth P, Krause TG, Biering-Sørensen T. Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic letter system for increasing inFLUenza vaccine uptake (NUDGE-FLU): Study protocol for a nationwide randomized implementation trial. Am Heart J 2023; 260:58-71. [PMID: 36801265 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Annual influenza vaccination is widely recommended in older adults and other high-risk groups including patients with cardiovascular disease. The real-world effectiveness of influenza vaccination is limited by suboptimal uptake and effective strategies for increasing vaccination rates are therefore needed. The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether behavioral nudges digitally delivered via the Danish nationwide mandatory governmental electronic letter system can increase influenza vaccination uptake among older adults. METHODS The NUDGE-FLU trial is a randomized implementation trial randomizing all Danish citizens aged 65 years and above without an exemption from the Danish mandatory governmental electronic letter system to receive no digitally delivered behavioral nudge (usual care arm) or to receive one of 9 electronic letters (intervention arms) each leveraging different behavioral science strategies. The trial has randomized 964,870 participants with randomization clustered at the household level (n = 691,820 households). Intervention letters were delivered on September 16, 2022, and follow-up is currently ongoing. All trial data are captured using the nationwide Danish administrative health registries. The primary end point is the receipt of an influenza vaccine on or before January 1, 2023. The secondary end point is time to vaccination. Exploratory end points include clinical events such as hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia, cardiovascular events, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION The nationwide randomized NUDGE-FLU trial is one of the largest implementation trials ever conducted and will provide important insights into effective communication strategies to maximize vaccination uptake among high-risk groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05542004, registered September 15, 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05542004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Dyrby Johansen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Muthiah Vaduganathan
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ankeet S Bhatt
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA
| | - Simin Gharib Lee
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Cardiometabolic Implementation Science, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel Modin
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Brian L Claggett
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Lars Køber
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Scott D Solomon
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pradeesh Sivapalan
- Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
- Respiratory Medicine Section, Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Palle Valentiner-Branth
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tyra Grove Krause
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tor Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacob J, Biering-Sørensen T, Holger Ehlers L, Edwards CH, Mohn KGI, Nilsson A, Hjelmgren J, Ma W, Sharma Y, Ciglia E, Mould-Quevedo J. Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination of Older Adults with an MF59®-Adjuvanted Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine Compared to Standard-Dose and High-Dose Vaccines in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040753. [PMID: 37112667 PMCID: PMC10145635 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Individuals aged 65 years and above are at increased risk of complications and death from influenza compared with any other age group. Enhanced vaccines, as the MF59®-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) and the high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (HD-QIV), provide increased protection for older adults in comparison to the traditional standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccines (SD-QIV). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of aQIV compared to SD-QIV and HD-QIV in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden for adults aged ≥65 years. A static decision tree model was used to evaluate costs and outcomes of different vaccination strategies from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. This model projects that compared to SD-QIV, vaccination with aQIV could prevent a combined total of 18,772 symptomatic influenza infections, 925 hospitalizations, and 161 deaths in one influenza season across the three countries. From a healthcare payer perspective, the incremental costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained with aQIV versus SD-QIV were EUR 10,170/QALY in Denmark, EUR 12,515/QALY in Norway, and EUR 9894/QALY in Sweden. The aQIV was cost saving compared with HD-QIV. This study found that introducing aQIV to the entire population aged ≥65 years may contribute to reducing the disease and economic burden associated with influenza in these countries.
Collapse
|