Lower esophageal ring. 2

Richard Schatzki: a familiar ring

OBJECTIVE

The Schatzki ring was named for Richard Schatzki, a renowned radiologist who described the entity with his colleague, John E. Gary. The purpose of this article is to shed more light on a man who made such a significant contribution and to chronicle developments concerning this important radiologic finding.

CONCLUSION

The Schatzki ring was described long ago, but its cause is poorly understood even today.

Single-session, graded esophageal dilation without fluoroscopy in outpatients with lower esophageal (Schatzki's) rings: a prospective, long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Distal esophageal (Schatzki's) ring is a frequent cause of dysphagia. Bougienage is generally effective but relapses are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of single-session graded esophageal dilation with Savary dilators, without fluoroscopic guidance, in outpatients who presented with Schatzki's ring.

METHODS

The study was performed on 44 consecutive patients with symptomatic Schatzki's ring, detected endoscopically and/or radiologically. Graded esophageal dilation was performed as an outpatient procedure in a single session with Savary dilators, without fluoroscopic guidance. After appropriate assessment with esophageal manometry and 24 h ambulatory pHmetry, patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were treated with omeprazole continuously. All results, including clinical follow up and technical aspects of bougienage, were recorded prospectively. The necessity for re-dilation after documentation of the ring with endoscopy and/or radiology was considered as a relapse of the ring.

RESULTS

In four (9%) patients a second session was necessary to ensure complete symptom relief. Two (4.5%) patients developed post-dilation bacteremia and were managed with antibiotics as outpatients. Patients with (n = 14) or without (n = 30) GERD were comparable with respect to sex, age, body mass index, smoke and ethanol consumption, diameter of the esophageal lumen at the level of the ring, resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure, duration of dysphagia, need for taking antacids during the follow-up period, and duration of follow-up. There was no recurrence of the ring in patients with GERD during a mean follow-up period of 43.8 +/- 9.3 months (range 27-62 months); however, in patients without GERD, during a mean follow-up period of 40.6 +/- 12.2 months (range 10-58 months), 32% of patients relapsed after a mean 19.9 +/- 10.6 months (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-session graded esophageal dilation with large caliber Savary dilators without fluoroscopic guidance can be safely used for the symptomatic relief in patients with lower esophageal (Schatzki's) rings. GERD should be treated if present in order to prevent a symptomatic recurrence of the ring.

Long-term acid suppressive therapy may prevent the relapse of lower esophageal (Schatzki's) rings: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Distal esophageal (Schatzki's) rings are a frequent cause of dysphagia. Bougienage is generally effective, but relapses are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term antisecretory therapy on the relapse rate of lower esophageal rings after successful bougienage with Savary dilators.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was performed on 44 consecutive patients with symptomatic Schatzki's rings, detected endoscopically, and/or radiologically. Graded esophageal dilation was performed as an outpatient procedure in a single session. After appropriate assessment with esophageal manometry and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, patients with documented GERD (n = 14) were treated with long-term omeprazole therapy. The remaining patients were blindly randomized to receive maintenance treatment with either omeprazole (group A-15 patients) or placebo (group B-15 patients). The necessity for redilation after documentation of the ring with endoscopy and/or radiology was considered as a relapse of the ring. The relapse rate was evaluated in all groups.

RESULTS

All bougienages were performed without significant side effects. Eight patients (8 of 44, 18.2%) had one or more relapses after a mean (SD) of 19.0 (10.1) months. Patients with (n = 14) or without (n = 30) GERD were comparable with respect to sex, age, body mass index, cigarette and alcohol consumption, diameter of the esophageal lumen at the level of the ring, resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure, duration of dysphagia, need for taking antacids during the follow-up period, and duration of follow-up. There were no recurrences of Schatzki's ring in the group of patients with documented GERD (follow-up [mean +/- SD]: 43.8 +/- 9.3 months, range: 27-62). In group A (follow-up [mean +/- SD]: 37.1 +/- 17.1 months, range: 11-66), one patient relapsed after 13 months, while in group B (follow-up [mean +/- SD]: 34.3 +/- 14.6 months, range: 10-58), seven patients relapsed after a mean (SD) of 19.9 (10.6) months. The actuarial probability of relapse was higher in patients without therapy (group B) (p= 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the hypothesis that, in patients with symptomatic Schatzki's rings, acid suppressive maintenance therapy after bougienage may prevent relapse of the ring.

Lower esophageal mucosal ring: correlation of referred symptoms with radiographic findings using a marshmallow bolus

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the prevalence of lower esophageal mucosal rings and to correlate the relationship between these mucosal rings and the presence and anatomic level of symptoms evoked using a marshmallow bolus.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Our prospective study included 130 patients who underwent barium examination of the esophagus. All patients completed a questionnaire regarding the anatomic location of their symptoms of dysphagia. In addition to a multiphasic examination of the esophagus, all patients also underwent fluoroscopic observation and videotaping while swallowing a marshmallow bolus; any symptoms that were provoked were recorded.

RESULTS

Lower esophageal mucosal rings were shown in 26 (20%) of the 130 patients. The diameter of the rings was 9-12 mm in six patients, 13-20 mm in 18 patients, and larger than 20 mm in two patients. In 16 (62%) of the 26 patients, a marshmallow bolus became impacted at the ring; the impaction caused dysphagia in 12 (75%) of the 16 patients. In these 12 patients, dysphagia was referred to the neck in seven, the sternal angle in two, the mid chest in two, and the lower chest in one patient. None of the 12 patients had a pharyngeal or cervical esophageal abnormality that would account for their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Because proximal referral of symptoms is common in patients with lower esophageal mucosal rings, a thorough radiographic examination of the entire esophagus and esophagogastric region is required regardless of the level of their swallowing complaints.

The defense mechanisms of the esophagus

Gastroesophageal reflux is a normal event, and the gastrointestinal tract possesses mechanisms to deal with the refluxed content so that symptoms are not produced. When the amount of refluxed material increases, or the quality changes, or one or more of the defense mechanisms breaks down, then the consequences occur in the esophagus. The variability of symptoms, of mucosal changes, and of motility patterns in response to pathologic gastroesophageal reflux imposes difficulties when one is trying to assess this disorder objectively.

Surgical significance of the lower esophageal ring

Images