Nifedipine for relief of esophageal chest pain?

Hypercontractile Esophagus From Pathophysiology to Management: Proceedings of the Pisa Symposium

Hypercontractile esophagus (HE) is a heterogeneous major motility disorder diagnosed when ≥20% hypercontractile peristaltic sequences (distal contractile integral >8,000 mm Hg*s*cm) are present within the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure < upper limit of normal) on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). HE can manifest with dysphagia and chest pain, with unclear mechanisms of symptom generation. The pathophysiology of HE may entail an excessive cholinergic drive with temporal asynchrony of circular and longitudinal muscle contractions; provocative testing during HRM has also demonstrated abnormal inhibition. Hypercontractility can be limited to the esophageal body or can include the LES; rarely, the process is limited to the LES. Hypercontractility can sometimes be associated with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction and increased muscle thickness. Provocative tests during HRM can increase detection of HE, reproduce symptoms, and predict delayed esophageal emptying. Regarding therapy, an empiric trial of a proton pump inhibitor, should be first considered, given the overlap with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors have been used to reduce contraction vigor but with suboptimal symptomatic response. Endoscopic treatment with botulinum toxin injection or pneumatic dilation is associated with variable response. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy may be superior to laparoscopic Heller myotomy in relieving dysphagia, but available data are scant. The presence of EGJ outflow obstruction in HE discriminates a subset of patients who may benefit from endoscopic treatment targeting the EGJ.

Systematic review: the treatment of noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

Treatment of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) remains a challenge. This is in part due to the heterogeneous nature of this disorder. Several conditions are associated with NCCP including gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), oesophageal dysmotility, oesophageal hypersensitivity as well as others.

AIM

To determine the currently available therapeutic modalities for NCCP.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature that was published between January, 1980 and March, 2011. We identified 734 studies; 68 of them met entry criteria.

RESULTS

Patients with GERD-related NCCP should receive proton pump inhibitors (PPI) twice daily for at least 8 weeks. Smooth muscle relaxants are only recommended for temporary relief of NCCP with motility disorders. Botulinum toxin injection of the distal oesophagus may be effective in the treatment of NCCP and spastic oesophageal motility disorders. Studies assessing the value of tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in NCCP are relatively small, but suggest an oesophageal analgesic effect in NCCP patients that is limited by their side effects profile. The usage of theophylline to treat patients with non-GERD-related NCCP should be weighed against its potential toxicity. Use of complementary medicine has been scarcely studied in NCCP. Patients with coexisting psychological morbidity or those not responding to any medical therapy should be considered for psychological intervention. Cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnotherapy may be useful in the treatment of NCCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GERD-related noncardiac chest pain should be treated with at least double dose PPI. The primary treatment for non-GERD-related noncardiac chest pain, regardless if oesophageal dysmotility is present, is pain modulators.

Some extracardiac effects of diltiazem and other calcium entry blockers

Calcium entry blockers have a well documented relaxing effect of smooth muscle, vascular as well as non-vascular. Mainly as a consequence of this action, the drugs have been used for treatment of several non-cardiac disorders where hyperactivity of smooth muscle is considered to have an important role in the pathogenesis. In this short review some of these extracardiac effects of calcium entry blockers are discussed and also their clinical application.

Calcium channel blockers and motility disorders of the esophagus

In animal experiments, esophageal smooth muscle, including the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has been shown to be dependent on extracellular calcium both for tone and agonist induced contractions. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) suppress contractile activity, and block both resting and stimulated calcium influx. In normal man as well as in patients with hypercontractility disorders of the esophagus, such as achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm, CCBs have been shown to reduce LES pressure and esophageal contractions, and also to cause symptomatic improvement. Controlled clinical trials on their effectiveness are lacking, but the therapeutic principle seems promising.

Noncardiac chest pain-treatment approaches

Treatment of noncardiac chest pain is often difficult because of the heterogeneous nature of the disorder. This condition can stem from gastroesophageal reflux, visceral hyperalgesia, esophageal motility disorders, psychiatric dysfunction, abnormal biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall, sustained esophageal contractions, abnormal cerebral processing of visceral stimulation, or disrupted autonomic activity. For a treatment to be successful, diagnosis of the underlying cause is essential. This article examines three decades of studies from around the world. It concludes that new research into additional mechanisms involved in visceral pain appears promising; but that future studies using improved selective adenosine receptor antagonists and other therapeutic interventions are needed.

Treatment of spastic esophageal motility disorders

Treatment of spastic motility disorders continues to be challenging. Therapeutic options remain limited due in part to our lack of understanding of the pathophysiology and significance of these disorders. Furthermore, most of therapeutic trials to date are hampered by the poorly designed nature of the study, including the small size of the trials and the lack of placebo arm. Most of the available information suggests that there seems to be an important dissociation between symptoms (chest pain/dysphagia) and esophageal dysmotility. Drug treatment aimed at visceral sensitivity seems more effective in relieving symptoms than spasmolytic medications. Recent trials with Botox, nitric oxide derivatives, and SSRIs offer promising results. Rigorous study design that includes large placebo-controlled trials is needed in this area.

Current medical therapy for esophageal motility disorders

Treatment of patients with an esophageal source of chest pain remains a challenging problem. Although a variety of measures--including nitrates, anticholinergics, sedatives, calcium channel antagonists, esophageal dilation, and psychological reassurance--are available for the management of esophageal chest pain, none has emerged as the treatment of choice. Studies of nitrate preparations for the treatment of painful motility disorders are limited by a small number of patients and the lack of randomized, placebo-controlled investigations. The efficacy of anticholinergic drugs in hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders has not been reported. In the only prospective placebo-controlled trial using an anti-depressant, trazodone was superior to placebo in relieving symptoms in patients with a variety of esophageal motility disorders. Conflicting results have been described in placebo-controlled trials of the calcium channel antagonists nifedipine and diltiazem in patients with "nutcracker esophagus" or diffuse spasm. Information about the efficacy of verapamil and hydralazine is limited. Esophageal dilation has been useful in selected patients. For many patients, esophageal chest pain may be associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Treatment of these patients with nitrates, calcium channel antagonists, or anticholinergics may aggravate their reflux. The mechanisms of esophageal chest pain remain unknown. Recent studies have suggested that abnormal motility may not be the only factor associated with chest pain. An important number of patients have behavioral abnormalities, increased nociception, impaired coronary vasodilatory reserve, or a diffuse abnormality of smooth muscle. Research into rational therapy for chest pain patients should take into account the contribution of these other factors.

An overview of the role of calcium antagonists in the treatment of achalasia and diffuse oesophageal spasm

Early studies confirmed the beneficial effects of calcium channel blockers on the normal oesophagus, which included a decrease in lower oesophageal sphincter tone in achalasia and a decrease in oesophageal contractions and amplitude in diffuse oesophageal spasm. This resulted in the enthusiastic use of the drugs in both disorders. With further experience, and with increased recognition of side effects, the role of these drugs in the 2 disorders has been better clarified. Clinical trials in general have not reflected the improvement observed in the manometric parameters. Only a minority of patients appear to derive sustained symptomatic benefit. Calcium channel blockers may be the initial choice for high or moderate risk patients with achalasia prior to proceeding with pneumatic dilatation or surgical myotomy. In diffuse oesophageal spasm, they are a reasonable first choice for all risk categories.

Esophageal motility disorders

Esophageal motility disorders consist of a complex array of disturbances in normal esophageal function associated with dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux, and noncardiac chest pain. A thorough knowledge of normal esophageal anatomy and physiology is important to a full understanding of these motility derangements. Through a complicated interaction of neuromuscular and hormonal influences, the voluntary act of swallowing transforms into an automated sequence of peristaltic waves propelling food and liquids into the stomach in concert with coordinated relaxation of the sphincters. Anatomic and physiologic barriers exist within the esophagus protecting against gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration. With improvements in diagnostic tools such as barium contrast radiography, scintigraphy, pH measurements, and esophageal manometrics with provocative testing, motility disorders have become better defined and understood. Primary motility disorders consist of achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), "nutcracker esophagus," hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and nonspecific esophageal motility dysfunction (NEMD). A host of secondary and miscellaneous motility disorders also affect the esophagus, including scleroderma and other connective tissue diseases, diabetes mellitus, Chagas' disease, chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and neuromuscular disorders of striated muscle. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may also be promoted by associated motility disturbances. Treatment modalities include surgical myotomy; dilatation; and pharmacologic manipulations, including use of nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, H2-blockers, and psychotropic drugs where appropriate.

Low-dose trazodone for symptomatic patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Twenty-nine patients with esophageal symptoms and contraction abnormalities of the esophageal body completed a 6-wk, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of trazodone (100-150 mg/day). Measures of esophageal and psychologic symptoms were completed at entry and at each follow-up visit. Esophageal manometry was repeated at the termination of the trial. Upon completion of the treatment, patients receiving trazodone (n = 15) reported a significantly greater global improvement than those receiving placebo (n = 14; p = 0.02). Although a variable clinical response was observed, the trazodone group had less residual distress over esophageal symptoms compared with the placebo group (59% +/- 9% vs. 108% +/- 19%, p = 0.03). Manometric changes observed during the course of the trial were not influenced by treatment nor by clinical response. Remarkable reductions in ratings of chest pain were reported by both treatment groups, emphasizing the importance of controlled trials when studying this patient population. We conclude that low-dose trazodone therapy can be of benefit in the management of symptomatic patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities. In addition, our findings support recent observations that manometric abnormalities characterizing this patient group may not be solely responsible for symptoms.

Primary oesophageal motility disorders. Current therapeutic concepts

Various oesophageal manometric disorders have been associated with chest pain or dysphagia. The classic motility disorders are achalasia and diffuse oesophageal spasm. In achalasia, a disorder of aperistalsis in the oesophageal body and incomplete relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter, either surgical myotomy or pneumatic dilatation is an effective approach, although some investigators have suggested a role for pharmacological therapy. For the treatment of diffuse oesophageal spasm, a disorder of non-peristaltic motor activity in the oesophagus, various pharmacological approaches with nitrates, anticholinergics, and calcium antagonists have been used. In the presence of associated lower oesophageal sphincter dysfunction, bouginage or pneumatic dilatation may be indicated. Long oesophagomyotomy should be considered for those patients who fail to respond to these measures. Recent manometric techniques have led to the identification of patients with chest pain or dysphagia who have abnormalities of increased contractile amplitude ('nutcracker' oesophagus) or duration. An association with gastro-oesophageal reflux or with psychiatric disturbance has been suggested. Treatment directed towards these factors is indicated and may be supplemented by pharmacological intervention, e.g. by calcium antagonists or anticholinergics.

Promising uses of calcium-channel blocking agents

It is not surprising that calcium-channel blocking agents, which have numerous effects on various physiologic systems, have been employed for several "unapproved" uses. This manuscript reviews reports that have appeared within the last two years describing unapproved cardiovascular and noncardiovascular uses of the three available calcium-channel blocking agents. The cardiovascular uses discussed include hypertensive emergencies, pulmonary hypertension, congestive heart failure, aortic insufficiency, Raynaud's phenomenon, migraine headaches, antiplatelet effects and cardiac surgery. Areas of noncardiovascular use include muscular dystrophy, achalasia, esophageal spasm, dysmenorrhea, preterm labor, asthma, hyperuricemia, mania and depression and endocrinologic and oncologic conditions. While some of the data appear promising, other reports are conflicting and contradictory. Furthermore, because much of the information comes from poorly controlled trials or anecdotal reports, even the more promising uses must be studied further and compared with conventional therapy.