Ketoconazole to reduce the need for cyclosporine after cardiac transplantation

Real-world outcomes of generic elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (gETI) in South Africans (SA) with CF using standard versus clarithromycin-boosted gETI, modulator-sparing strategies to reduce cost

OBJECTIVE

Access to highly effective modulator therapies (HEMT) in resource-limited countries is limited by prohibitive cost and restrictive patents. We report the clinical outcomes of a cost-reduction strategy in South Africa (SA), where generic elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (gETI) was pharmacokinetically enhanced with clarithromycin (gETI/c) for people with CF (pwCF) eligible for HEMT.

METHODS

A multi-center observational study from December 2021 to May 2024. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear mixed effects analyses were conducted to describe and compare change in sweat chloride (SC), FEV1pp, BMI (m/kg2) and adverse events (AE) over 18-months follow-up for different gETI dose categories: a) standard, full or b) modulator sparing dose (gETI/c at 25-50 % recommended dose, twice/thrice weekly).

RESULTS

70/413 (17 %) eligible pwCF [median age 27 years (range 6-52); 68 (97 %) with ≥ one copy F508del] received gETI with standard (n = 38) or modulator-sparing doses (n = 32); 29 changed dosing regimens across the study period. The overall mean (SD) reduction in SC after 1-month of treatment was -52.9 (16.9) mmol/L (p < 0.001), with no evidence of difference between dose groups (p = 0.2). Overall mean (SD) FEV1pp and BMI increased at 1-month by 14.9 (95 % CI 11.49-18.40) and 0.84 (95 % CI 0.16-1.49), respectively. Improvements in FEV1pp and BMI were sustained throughout follow-up, with no evidence of difference between dosing groups. No serious AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our experience with gETI is similar to real-world reports using the originator product. Boosting ETI with CYP3A-inhibitors is a safe and effective strategy to increase access to ETI in settings where access to HEMT is restricted.

Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Transplantation: Pros, Cons, and Perspectives

ABSTRACT

The concept of pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) emerged after the FDA approval of cyclosporine-A. Several studies followed, and the proof of concept was well established by the late 1990s. This also continued for the next blockbuster immunosuppressant, tacrolimus. The driver for such research was an endeavor to save costs, as both drugs were expensive due to patent protection. Two CYP inhibitors, ketoconazole and diltiazem, have been extensively studied in this context and continue to be prescribed off-label along with the CNI. It has been observed that using ketoconazole reduces the dose requirement of tacrolimus by about 50% and 30% with diltiazem, which is in conformity with their pharmacological actions. Off-label co-prescription of these drugs with CNI is often encountered in low and middle-income countries. The foremost reason cited is economic. This article collates the evidence from the clinical studies that evaluate the PK-boosting effects of CNI and also reviews the gaps in the current evidence base. The current knowledge prevents the transplant community from making meaningful inferences about the risks and benefits of such strategies. Although the PK-boosting strategy can lead to serious adverse events, emerging evidence suggests that it may be advantageous for individuals with high CNI dose requirements. Hence, PK boosting may be an unmet need in the therapeutics of CNI. Nevertheless, there are several unanswered questions surrounding such use, and therefore, this merits testing in well-designed clinical studies. Moreover, drugs with better safer profiles and a history of successful PK boosting may be considered for evaluation with CNI.

Is it safe to proceed with heart transplant in a patient with active tuberculosis? Strategies and challenges based on a case report

Transplant candidates are at increased risk of developing active tuberculosis (TB), and its diagnosis and treatment may be especially challenging. Although screening and treatment for TB are recommended in heart transplant candidates, there is lack of evidence on how to manage active TB infection in this scenario. Herein, we report challenges of performing a heart transplant in a 69-year-old patient with progressive heart failure and active, symptomatic TB infection. We aimed to emphasize the importance of proper screening of TB in solid organ transplant candidates, as well as to suggest that, in selected patients, it may be safe to proceed with transplant after an initial period of treatment with antituberculous agents.

Efficacy and safety of ketoconazole combined with calmodulin inhibitor in solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

What is known and objective

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) can significantly improve the results of solid organ transplantation regarding graft and patient survival. However, the high cost, chronic nephrotoxicity and other side effects are major challenges for the long‐term use of these drugs. Ketoconazole can significantly increase the plasma concentration of CNIs by inhibiting the activity of the cytochrome P450 enzyme. The combination of ketoconazole‐CNIs can reduce the cost of medication for patients by reducing the dosage of CNIs, but its safety is still controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials on ketoconazole and CNI (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) co‐administration in solid organ transplantation. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The meta‐analysis was performed in RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019118796.

Results and discussion

Five relevant trials with 326 patients were included. Compared with the controls, ketoconazole combined with CNIs can significantly reduce the dose of CNIs in patients receiving solid organ transplantation (WMD = −203.04 mg/day; 95% CI: −310.51 to −95.57, P = .0002). There was no significant difference in serum creatinine between the experimental group and the control group (WMD = −0.19 mg/mL; 95% CI: −0.52 to 0.14, P = .26). In addition, there was no significant difference in the number of rejections between the two groups (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.22, P = .15).

What's new and conclusion

The co‐administration of ketoconazole and CNIs can significantly reduce the dose of CNIs. This combination may be safely used as a CNI‐sparing agent from the time of solid organ transplantation with low‐dose ketoconazole, based on the findings of this review.

A Single Dose of Baicalin Has No Clinically Significant Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine A in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Despite its narrow therapeutic window and large interindividual variability, cyclosporine A (CsA) is the first-line therapy following organ transplantation. Metabolized mainly by CYP3A and being a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), CsA is susceptible to drug–drug interactions. Baicalin (BG) is a drug used for adjuvant therapy of hepatitis in traditional Chinese medicine. Since its aglycone baicalein (B) inhibits CYP3A and P-gP, co-administration might affect CsA pharmacokinetics. This study investigated the effect of BG on CsA pharmacokinetics. In a two-period study, 16 healthy volunteers received a single 200 mg oral CsA dose alone (reference period) or in combination with 500 mg BG (test period). Pharmacokinetic evaluation of CsA was carried out using non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and population pharmacokinetics (popPK). Treatments were compared using the standard bioequivalence method. Based on NCA, 90% CIs of AUC and C_max test-to-reference ratios were within bioequivalence boundaries. In the popPK analysis, a two-compartment model (clearance/F 62.8 L/h, central and peripheral volume of distribution/F 254 L and 388 L) with transit compartments for absorption appropriately described CsA concentrations. No clinically relevant effect of 500 mg BG co-administration on CsA pharmacokinetics was identified and both treatments were well tolerated.

Baicalin reduces ciclosporin bioavailability by inducing intestinal p-glycoprotein in rats

Objectives

To investigate the effects of multiple doses of baicalin (BG) on the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin (CsA) in rats and the potential mechanisms.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic parameters of CsA were determined in male rats after administration of CsA (3 mg/kg, i.g. or i.v.) to rats in the presence and absence of BG (80 mg/kg, i.g. or i.v.) for 7 days. The livers and intestines of rats were isolated and the CYP3A and p-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression were analysed. The effect of BG on the intestinal absorptive behaviour of CsA was also investigated using in-vitro everted rat gut sac model.

Key findings

Baicalin (80 mg/kg, i.v., 7 days) had no effect on the intravenously administered CsA. However, BG (80 mg/kg, i.g., 7 days) significantly decreased the Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ of orally administered CsA by 38, 26 and 25%, respectively (P &lt; 0.01 or P &lt; 0.05). Further study revealed that the expression of P-gp in intestine increased in oral multiple doses of BG-treated rats. The in-vitro everted rat gut sac model demonstrated BG (10 μm) significantly decreased the absorption of CsA (10 μm) in intestine (P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

Multiple doses of BG decreased the oral bioavailability of CsA in rats significantly, which may be mainly attributable to inhibition of absorption of CsA in intestine and induction of P-gp. The interaction between BG and CsA may occur when BG and CsA were co-administered for long-term use. The dosage adjustment and blood concentration monitoring of CsA may be required in clinic.

Review and Management of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients with Immune Disorders

Immune disorders are associated with acne or acneiform lesions secondary to the occurrence of acne vulgaris or acneiform eruptions arising as a result of immunosuppressive medication or infection. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of acne and acneiform eruptions that can arise in the immunosuppressed host. Tips for differentiating between various acneiform entities are discussed, as well as a brief overview of treatment considerations.

Immunosuppressive and Cytotoxic Drugs in Dermatology: A Practical Overview and Personal Perspective

Background:

Cytotoxic/immunosuppressive drugs are regularly used to treat proliferative diseases of the skin and immunologically mediated inflammatory disorders.

Objective:

The rational use of cytotoxic/immunosuppressive drugs, which depends on the proper selection of both the patient and the drug, is discussed.

Conclusion:

Methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, cyclosporine, and other related drugs have potential benefits in the treatment of severe recalcitrant cutaneous disease. Patients may survive otherwise fatal disorders, or may improve their life-style and become productive again. However, the beneficial effect of these agents is achieved when the blood level is at or near toxic level. Thus, the prescribing physician should have a familiarity with the potential toxicities and a knowledge of proper monitoring techniques.

Combining cytochrome P-450 3A4 modulators and cyclosporine or everolimus in transplantation is successful

AIM: To describe the long term follow-up of kidney allograft recipients receiving ketoconazole with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) alone or combined with everolimus.

METHODS: This is an open-label, prospective observational clinical trial in low immunologic risk patients who, after signing an Institutional Review Board approved consent form, were included in one of two groups. The first one (n = 59) received everolimus (target blood level, 3-8 ng/mL) and the other (n = 114) azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day or mycophenolate mofetyl (MMF) 2 g/d. Both groups also received tapering steroids, the cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) modulator, ketoconazole 50-100 mg/d, and cyclosporine with C0 targets in the everolimus group of 200-250 ng/mL in 1 mo, 100-125 ng/mL in 2 mo, and 50-65 ng/mL thereafter, and in the azathioprine or MMF group of 250-300 ng/mL in 1 mo, 200-250 ng/mL in 2 mo, 180-200 ng/mL until 3-6 mo, and 100-125 ng/mL thereafter. Clinical visits were performed monthly the first year and quarterly thereafter by treating physicians and all data was extracted by the investigators.

RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of these two cohorts were similar. During the follow up (66 + 31 mo), both groups showed comparable clinical courses, but the biopsy proven acute rejection rate during the full follow-up period seemed to be lower in the everolimus group (20% vs 36%; P = 0.04). The everolimus group did not show a higher surgical complication rate than the other group. By the end of the follow-up period, the everolimus group tended to show a higher glomerular filtration rate. Nevertheless, we found no evidence of a consistent negative slope of the temporal allograft function estimated by the modification of the diet in renal disease formula in any of both groups. At 6 years of follow-up, the uncensored and death-censored graft survivals were 91% and 93%, and 91% and 83% in the everolimus plus cyclosporine, and cyclosporine alone groups, respectively. The addition of ketoconazole saved 80% of cyclosporine and 56% of everolimus doses.

CONCLUSION: Combining CYP3A4 modulators with CNI or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients is feasible, effective, safe and affordable even in the long term.

Liver injury associated with ketoconazole: review of the published evidence

The azole antifungal agent ketoconazole has been available since 1981 for the treatment of fungal infections. In 2013, the American Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency issued warnings or prohibitions against the clinical use of oral ketoconazole due to the risk of liver injury which may lead to liver transplantation or death. From the available published evidence it is difficult to determine the actual incidence or prevalence of liver injury during clinical use of ketoconazole as an antifungal. Hepatic injury, when it occurs, is generally evident as asymptomatic and reversible abnormalities of liver function tests. However, serious liver injury has been reported. Alternatives to ketoconazole (such as itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, and terbinafine) are available, but improved safety with respect to liver injury risk is not clearly established. We are not aware of published reports of significant ketoconazole-associated liver injury in volunteer study participants when ketoconazole has been used as a CYP3A inhibitor in the context of clinical research on drug metabolism. Possible alternatives to ketoconazole as prototype CYP3A inhibitors include ritonavir and potentially itraconazole, but not clarithromycin.

Cyclosporine/ketoconazole reduces treatment costs for nephrotic syndrome

Cyclosporine A (CyA) is an effective agent for the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (GCDNS), but costs are prohibitive in resource-poor societies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reducing the dose of CyA by co-administering ketoconazole. A prospective study targeting children 2-18 years of age with GCDNS in remission with CyA monotherapy was conducted. CyA dose was reduced by 50% and ketoconazole was added at 25% of the recommended therapeutic dose, and the drug levels and therapeutic and adverse effects (AE) were monitored. Continued combined therapy after completion of the 4-week trial period was offered. Ten patients (median age 9.5 years, range 3.0-16.0 years) were enrolled in the study. At week 4, the CyA dose was 2.2 ± 0.7 mg/kg/day compared with 5.6 ± 0.9 mg/kg/day at enrolment (P < 0.0001). No AE were noted. All patients continued ketoconazole treatment for at least 3 months. CyA drug cost savings were 61%, and approximately 60% with ketoconazole cost included. The combination of an expensive immunosuppressive drug with a cheap metabolic inhibitor reduced the treatment costs by> 50% without increased adverse events or drug monitoring needs. This intervention demonstrates how access of patients with limited resources to needed drugs can be improved by interference with physiological drug elimination.

Metabolism by N-Acetyltransferase 1 In Vitro and in Healthy Volunteers: A Prototype for Targeted Inhibition

Inhibition of drug metabolism is generally avoided but can be useful in limited circumstances, such as reducing the formation of toxic metabolites. Acetylation is a major pathway for drug elimination that can also convert substrates into toxic species, including carcinogens. Sulfamethoxazole, a widely used antibiotic, is metabolized via arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1. p-Aminosalicylate, used for antitubercular treatment, is also metabolized by N-acetyltransferase 1 and could potentially inhibit sulfamethoxazole metabolism. Human hepatocytes from 4 donors were incubated in vitro with sulfamethoxazole and paminosalicylate at clinically achievable concentrations. p-Aminosalicylate competitively reduced the acetylation of sulfamethoxazole in vitro by 61% to 83% at 200 microM. Four healthy volunteers were studied following doses of 500 mg sulfamethoxazole either alone or during administration of paminosalicylate (4 g ter in die). Plasma concentrations of paminosalicylate exceeded 100 microM. With each subject as his or her own control, p-aminosalicylate reduced by 5-fold the ratio of plasma concentrations of acetylsulfamethoxazole relative to parent drug (P < .001). Metabolic drug-drug interaction studies in vitro successfully predicted inhibition of acetylation via N-acetyltransferase 1 in vivo. Although no specific toxic species was investigated in this work, the potential was demonstrated for improving the therapeutic index of drugs that have toxic metabolites.

Dose adjustment strategy of cyclosporine A in renal transplant patients: evaluation of anthropometric parameters for dose adjustment and C0 vs. C2 monitoring in Japan, 2001-2010

The optimal use and monitoring of cyclosporine A (CyA) have remained unclear and the current strategy of CyA treatment requires frequent dose adjustment following an empirical initial dosage adjusted for total body weight (TBW). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate age and anthropometric parameters as predictors for dose adjustment of CyA; and the secondary aim was to compare the usefulness of the concentration at predose (C0) and 2-hour postdose (C2) monitoring. An open-label, non-randomized, retrospective study was performed in 81 renal transplant patients in Japan during 2001-2010. The relationships between the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC0-9) of CyA and its C0 or C2 level were assessed with a linear regression analysis model. In addition to age, 7 anthropometric parameters were tested as predictors for AUC0-9 of CyA: TBW, height (HT), body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), ideal body weight (IBW), lean body weight (LBW), and fat free mass (FFM). Correlations between AUC0-9 of CyA and these parameters were also analyzed with a linear regression model. The rank order of the correlation coefficient was C0 > C2 (C0; r=0.6273, C2; r=0.5562). The linear regression analyses between AUC0-9 of CyA and candidate parameters indicated their potential usefulness from the following rank order: IBW > FFM > HT > BSA > LBW > TBW > BMI > Age. In conclusion, after oral administration, C2 monitoring has a large variation and could be at high risk for overdosing. Therefore, after oral dosing of CyA, it was not considered to be a useful approach for single monitoring, but should rather be used with C0 monitoring. The regression analyses between AUC0-9 of CyA and anthropometric parameters indicated that IBW was potentially the superior predictor for dose adjustment of CyA in an empiric strategy using TBW (IBW; r=0.5181, TBW; r=0.3192); however, this finding seems to lack the pharmacokinetic rationale and thus warrants further basic and clinical investigations.

The concentration of cyclosporine metabolites is significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is prevalent among kidney transplant recipients. The activity of drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters may be altered by diabetes leading to changes in the concentration of parent drug or metabolites. This study was aimed to characterize the effect of diabetes on the concentration of cyclosporine (CsA) and metabolites.

METHODS

Concentration-time profiles of CsA and metabolites (AM1, AM9, AM4N, AM1c, AM19, and AM1c9) were characterized over a 12-hour dosing interval in 10 nondiabetic and 7 diabetic stable kidney transplant recipients. All patients were male, had nonfunctional CYP3A5*3 genotype, and were on combination therapy with ketoconazole.

RESULTS

The average daily dose (±SD) of CsA was 65 ± 21 and 68 ± 35 mg in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects, respectively (P = 0.550). Cyclosporine metabolites that involved amino acid 1 (AM1, AM19, AM1c) exhibited significantly lower dose-normalized values of area under the concentration-time curve in patients with diabetes. Moreover, during the postabsorption phase (≥3 hours after dose), metabolite-parent concentration ratios for all metabolites, except AM4N, was significantly lower in diabetic patients. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ketoconazole were similar between the 2 groups thus excluding inconsistent ketoconazole exposure as a source of altered CsA metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that diabetes mellitus significantly affects the concentration of CsA metabolites. Because CsA is eliminated as metabolites via the biliary route, the decrease in the blood concentration of CsA metabolites during postabsorption phase would probably reflect lower hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme activity. However, other mechanisms including altered expression of transporters may also play a role. Results of cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in diabetic patients must be interpreted with caution when nonspecific assays are used.

Drug interactions with mitotane by induction of CYP3A4 metabolism in the clinical management of adrenocortical carcinoma

Mitotane [1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane, (o,p'-DDD)] is the only drug approved for the treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and has also been used for various forms of glucocorticoid excess. Through still largely unknown mechanisms, mitotane inhibits adrenal steroid synthesis and adrenocortical cell proliferation. Mitotane increases hepatic metabolism of cortisol, and an increased replacement dose of glucocorticoids is standard of care during mitotane treatment. Recently, sunitinib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has been found to be rapidly metabolized by CYP3A4 during mitotane treatment, indicating clinically relevant drug interactions with mitotane. We here summarize the current evidence concerning mitotane-induced changes in hepatic monooxygenase expression, list drugs potentially affected by mitotane-related CYP3A4 induction and suggest alternatives. For example, using standard doses of macrolide antibiotics is unlikely to reach sufficient plasma levels, making fluoroquinolones in many cases a superior choice. Similarly, statins such as simvastatin are metabolized by CYP3A4, whereas others like pravastatin are not. Importantly, in the past, several clinical trials using cytotoxic drugs but also targeted therapies in ACC yielded disappointing results. This lack of antineoplastic activity may be explained in part by insufficient drug exposure owing to enhanced drug metabolism induced by mitotane. Thus, induction of CYP3A4 by mitotane needs to be considered in the design of future clinical trials in ACC.

Everolimus versus azathioprine in a cyclosporine and ketoconazole-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant: 3-year follow-up of an open-label, prospective, cohort, comparative clinical trial

In cyclosporine-based protocols, everolimus is more effective than azathioprine to reduce acute rejection. Ketoconazole may reduce cyclosporine and everolimus requirements. We compared kidney transplant patients treated with everolimus or azathioprine in a ketoconazole- and cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen. This open-label, prospective trial of low immunologic risk patients. Included one group (n = 11) who received everolimus (target blood level, 3-8 ng/mL) and the other (n = 11) azathioprine (2.0-2.5 mg/kg/d). Both received steroids, ketoconazole, and cyclosporine with C(0) targets (ng/mL) in the everolimus group of 200-250, 100-125, and 50-65 for months 1 and 2 and thereafter and in the azathioprine group of 250-300 in month 1, 200-250 in month 2, 180-200 until month 6, and 100-125 thereafter. Their baseline characteristics were similar. Two biopsy-proven acute rejections occurred in each group. Three-year graft and patient survival in both groups was 100%. Creatinine clearances at months 6, 12, 24, and 36 were 63.7 +/- 25.4, 58.9 +/- 24.9, 56.0 +/- 22.9, and 57.0 +/- 27.6 in the everolimus group versus 72.6 +/- 20, 68.6 +/- 21.3, 71.4 +/- 23.2, and 68.4 +/- 19.2 in the azathioprine group (NS for every comparison). Major complications were rare and similar in both groups. Five patients in the everolimus group received simvastatin versus 4 in the azathioprine cohort (P = .53). The average cyclosporine doses to achieve targets were 0.8-1.2 mg/kg in the everolimus group and 1.6-2.2 mg/kg in the azathioprine group. The average everolimus dose after month 2 was 0.75-0.9 mg/d. We concluded that with cyclosporine, ketoconazole, and steroids, everolimus was as effective and safe as azathioprine. Cyclosporine reduction with everolimus did not influence graft survival or function at 3 years.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity

The use of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus led to major advances in the field of transplantation, with excellent short-term outcome. However, the chronic nephrotoxicity of these drugs is the Achilles' heel of current immunosuppressive regimens. In this review, the authors summarize the clinical features and histologic appearance of both acute and chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity in renal and nonrenal transplantation, together with the pitfalls in its diagnosis. The authors also review the available literature on the physiologic and molecular mechanisms underlying acute and chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, and demonstrate that its development is related to both reversible alterations and irreversible damage to all compartments of the kidneys, including glomeruli, arterioles, and tubulo-interstitium. The main question--whether nephrotoxicity is secondary to the actions of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on the calcineurin-NFAT pathway--remains largely unanswered. The authors critically review the current evidence relating systemic blood levels of cyclosporine and tacrolimus to calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, and summarize the data suggesting that local exposure to cyclosporine or tacrolimus could be more important than systemic exposure. Finally, other local susceptibility factors for calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity are reviewed, including variability in P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4/5 expression or activity, older kidney age, salt depletion, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and genetic polymorphisms in genes like TGF-beta and ACE. Better insight into the mechanisms underlying calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity might pave the way toward more targeted therapy or prevention of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity.

Fungal infections in solid organ transplantation

Renal, liver, heart and lung transplantation are now considered to be the standard therapeutic interventions in patients with end-stage organ failure. Infectious complications following transplantation are relatively common due to the transplant recipients overall immunosuppressed status. The incidence of invasive mycoses following solid organ transplant ranges from 5 to 42% depending on the organ transplanted. These mycoses are associated with high overall mortality rates. Candida and Aspergillus spp. produce most of these infections. This article will review the risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant patients, and evaluate the role of prophylactic therapy in this group of patients.

Concentrations of Mycophenolic Acid and Glucuronide Metabolites Under Concomitant Therapy With Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus

Mycophenolate mofetil [MMF, the prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA)] is usually administered at double doses with cyclosporine than with tacrolimus because it is believed that MPA exposure is lower during cyclosporine therapy. This study aimed to compare 12 hour, steady-state concentration-time profiles of MPA and its phenol- and acyl-glucuronide metabolites (MPAG and AcMPAG, respectively) in stable kidney transplant recipients maintained either on cyclosporine (n = 12) or tacrolimus (n = 12). During the absorption phase in the cyclosporine group, dose-normalized concentrations of total and free MPA were significantly higher but the overall area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-12) was not significantly different. Additionally, exposure to AcMPAG was higher in the cyclosporine group (P < 0.05). Ten of 12 patients in the cyclosporine group were on ketoconazole therapy; however, the exposure to MPA or MPAG was not different when MMF was given orally to Sprague-Dawley rats with or without ketoconazole. In conclusion, cyclosporine modulates the disposition of MPA and metabolites differently from tacrolimus; however, patients on cyclosporine may not require double doses of MMF to achieve the same exposure.

Impact of the cyclosporine-ketoconazole interaction in children with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome experience serious side effects from steroid therapy. Cyclosporine A (CsA), which is an effective agent in the treatment of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, is expensive and, consequently, often unaffordable in developing countries. Many studies have documented the benefit of ketoconazole administration in transplant adults treated with CsA. We have conducted a retrospective study with the objective of addressing cost-savings, safety, and the efficacy of the co-administration of ketoconazole and CsA to children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

This study included 102 nephrotic patients who were steroid-dependent and who received cyclosporine therapy. The commonest pathologic lesions were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (64 patients) and minimal change disease (36 patients). Among the patients participating in the study, 78 received daily ketoconazole therapy (ketoconazole group) in the form of a 50-mg dose accompanied by an initial one-third decrease in the CsA dose, while 24 received CsA alone (non- ketoconazole group). All of the patients were children (below 18 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The mean duration of treatment was 22.9 months. The characteristics of both groups were comparable.

RESULTS

Co-administration of ketoconazole significantly reduced mean doses of CsA by 48% with a net cost savings of 38%. It also resulted in a significant improvement in the CsA response and a more successful steroid withdrawal as well as a decrease in the frequency of renal impairment. Liver function tests remained normal in both groups up to and including the final follow-up (mean of 33.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of ketoconazole to CsA in children with idiopathic steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome safely results in a significant reduction in CsA cost, which causes great concern in developing countries. It may also improve CsA response.

Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients Receiving Tacrolimus (FK 506): Efficacy and Drug Interaction

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole is often given for fungal prophylaxis to lung transplant recipients after transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of interaction between tacrolimus and itraconazole in lung transplant recipients and the efficacy of itraconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

The study group included 40 lung transplant recipients followed for at least 12 months. All received prophylactic itraconazole, 200 mg twice a day, for the first 6 months after transplantation. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared during and after itraconazole therapy. Rejection rate, fungal infection rate, and renal function were assessed. The mean cost per daily treatment of the itraconazole/tacrolimus combination and tacrolimus alone was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean tacrolimus dose during itraconazole treatment was 3.26 +/- 2.1 mg/day compared with 5.74 +/- 2.9 mg/day after itraconazole was stopped (p < 0.0001) for a mean total daily dose elevation of tacrolimus of 76%. When the cost of itraconazole was taken into account, the average total daily cost of the combined treatment was US5.86 dollars less than the treatment with tacrolimus alone. No differences in the rejection or fungal infection rate, or in renal toxicity, were observed between the periods with and without itraconazole treatment, although less positive fungal isolates were identified during itraconazole therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis therapy with itraconazole is highly effective. Itraconazole reduces the dose of tacrolimus and therefore lowers the cost of therapy without causing an increase in rejection rate and with renal function preservation.

Frequency of potential azole drug-drug interactions and consequences of potential fluconazole drug interactions

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency of potential azole-drug interactions and consequences of interactions between fluconazole and other drugs in routine inpatient care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for systemic fungal infections with an oral or intravenous azole medication between July 1997 and June 2001 in a tertiary care hospital. We recorded the concomitant use of medications known to interact with azole antifungals and measured the frequency of potential azole drug interactions, which we considered to be present when both drugs were given together. We then performed a chart review on a random sample of admissions in which patients were exposed to a potential moderate or major drug interaction with fluconazole. The list of azole-interacting medications and the severity of interaction were derived from the DRUGDEX System and Drug Interaction Facts.

RESULTS

Among the 4,185 admissions in which azole agents (fluconazole, itraconazole or ketoconazole) were given, 2,941 (70.3%) admissions experienced potential azole-drug interactions, which included 2,716 (92.3%) admissions experiencing potential fluconazole interactions. The most frequent interactions with potential moderate to major severity were co-administration of fluconazole with prednisone (25.3%), midazolam (17.5%), warfarin (14.7%), methylprednisolone (14.1%), cyclosporine (10.7%) and nifedipine (10.1%). Charts were reviewed for 199 admissions in which patients were exposed to potential fluconazole drug interactions. While four adverse drug events (ADEs) caused by fluconazole were found, none was felt to be caused by a drug-drug interaction (DDI), although in one instance fluconazole may have contributed.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential fluconazole drug interactions were very frequent among hospitalized patients on systemic azole antifungal therapy, but they had few apparent clinical consequences.

Effects of berberine on the blood concentration of cyclosporin A in renal transplanted recipients: clinical and pharmacokinetic study

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of berberine (BBR) on the blood concentration and pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A (CsA) in renal-transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a randomized and controlled clinical trial, 52 renal-transplant recipients were treated with CsA and 0.2 g BBR three times daily for 3 months, while another 52 subjects received CsA without BBR co-administration. Blood trough concentration of CsA and biochemistry indexes for hepatic and renal functions were determined. For the pharmacokinetic study, six renal-transplant recipients were included with a 3-mg/kg dosage of CsA twice daily before and after oral co-administration of 0.2 g BBR three times daily for 12 days.

RESULTS

The trough blood concentrations and the ratios of concentration/dose of CsA in the BBR-treated group increased by 88.9% and 98.4%, respectively, compared with those at baseline (P < 0.05). As for the BBR-free group, they rose by 64.5% and 69.4%, respectively, relative to those at baseline (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, the final blood concentrations and the ratios of concentration/dose of CsA in BBR-treated patients were still 29.3% and 27.8%, respectively, higher than those in BBR-free patients (P < 0.05). No significant effects on liver or renal functions were observed under coadministration of BBR. After co-administration of BBR in six patients for 12 days, the mean AUC of CsA was increased by 34.5% (P < 0.05). The mean time taken to reach the peak blood concentration (t(max)) and the mean half-life (t(1/2)) of CsA were increased by 1.7 h and 2.7 h, respectively (P < 0.05). The average percentage increases in the steady-state drug concentration (Css) and minimum blood concentration (Cmin) were 34.5% and 88.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). In addition, the average percentage decrease in CL/F was 40.4% (P < 0.05) and the peak-to-through fluctuation index was significantly reduced (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The BBR can markedly elevate the blood concentration of CsA in renal-transplant recipients in both clinical and pharmacokinetic studies. This combination may allow a reduction of the CsA dosage. The mechanism for this interaction is most likely explained by inhibition of CYP3A4 by BBR in the liver and/or small intestine.

The effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on chronic allograft rejection

Hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have pleiotropic actions that affect many systems other than lowering blood cholesterol concentrations. Hypercholesterolaemia is an adverse effect of immunosuppressive drug therapy and hence it is a common finding after organ transplantation. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors lower cholesterol concentrations in transplant recipients but they also offer additional benefits. Since they impair the production of mevalonate, they reduce the concentrations of downstream products including farnesyl and geranyl phosphate. These isoprenoid moieties are required for protein prenylation and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair this function in some cells. This action affects the immune system, especially in patients taking cyclosporin, and has been proposed as the mechanism whereby these drugs increase the half-life of transplanted organs. Other mechanisms have also been proposed including an increase in the free fraction of cyclosporin and a reduction in the time that low density lipoprotein (LDL) spends in blood. The latter effect reduces the extent of oxidation of LDL and hence reduces the damage caused by oxidised LDL. Chronic rejection is poorly understood but appears to involve both immune and non-immune processes. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors affect both processes. At present, the evidence of benefit from statin prescription is confined to heart and kidney transplant recipients but it is likely that recipients of other organ transplants would also benefit. Drug interactions between cyclosporin and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are a limiting factor to their use. Pravastatin appears to be the best HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor for organ transplant recipients because of its lesser potential to interact with cyclosporin and hence cause myositis, which may thus allow higher doses to be used. Other, non-immunosuppressive drugs (including diltiazem and ketoconazole) have been shown to reduce transplant organ damage by unknown mechanisms and are widely prescribed in some transplant centres. More specific inhibitors of protein prenylation may afford useful immunosuppression, thereby prolonging transplant organ half-lives and also reducing the risk of cancer.

Co-administration of cyclosporine and ketoconazole in children with minimal change nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The use of cyclosporine A (CsA) in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome was firstly reported in 1986. On the other hand, many studies have documented the benefit of ketoconazole (keto) administration in renal and cardiac transplant adults treated with CsA, but this co-administration has not been reported in children with minimal change disease (MCD). Thus, deliberate use of keto to reduce the need for cyclosporine is not new, but it is particularly relevant because of the high cost of cyclosporine.

METHODS

This study included 46 children with MCD who were steroid resistant or dependent and received CsA. Among them, 31 received daily keto therapy (keto group) in a dose of 50 mg with concomitant decrease of the CsA dose by one third while 15 patients received CsA alone (non-keto group).

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) duration of CsA treatment was 25.7 +/- 13.7 months. The characteristics of both groups were comparable. Co-administration of keto significantly improved the response to CsA therapy (from 60 to 94%) and decreased the frequency of renal impairment (from 27 to 3%). Hepatic function remained within the normal range in both groups. Co-administration of keto significantly reduced mean doses of CsA with overall net cost savings of about 34%.

CONCLUSION

From this study, we may conclude that co-administration of low dose ketoconazole to cyclosporine in children with idiopathic MCD is safe. This combination significantly reduces CsA cost and, moreover, keto may improve the response to cyclosporine and may have a favorable effect on the kidney function.

Combined use of sirolimus and voriconazole in renal transplantation: A report of two cases

Voriconazole is currently contraindicated for use with sirolimus. We report our experience with voriconazole/sirolimus in two renal transplant recipients. To our knowledge, this is the first experience with voriconazole/sirolimus. An interaction requiring a 75% to 87.5% sirolimus dose reduction was noted, but goal trough levels and clinical tolerability were achieved.

Co-administration of cyclosporine and ketoconazole in idiopathic childhood nephrosis

The concomitant use of cyclosporine (CsA) and ketoconazole (keto) in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) has never been reported in the literature. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate cost saving, safety, and efficacy of co-administration of keto and CsA in children with NS. The study included 186 nephrotic children receiving CsA therapy. Most were steroid dependent or resistant, and the most common pathology was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (62%). Among our patients, 137 received daily keto therapy (keto group) 50 mg/day in addition to CsA, while 49 received CsA alone (non-keto group). The characteristics of both groups were comparable and the mean (+/-SD) duration of treatment was 22.9 +/- 8.1 months. Co-administration of keto significantly reduced the mean dose of CsA with an overall net cost saving of 37%. It also resulted in a significant improvement of CsA response, more successful steroid withdrawal, and decreased the frequency of renal impairment. Keto was generally well tolerated and safe. We conclude that co-administration of low-dose keto with CsA in children with idiopathic NS is safe, significantly reduces the cost of CsA therapy, and may improve the patient outcome.

Drug interactions in gastroenterology: mechanisms, consequences, and how to avoid

Drug interactions are an important avoidable cause of illness. With an increasing array of medications available to treat human disease and an increasing number of patients taking many medications, the risk of clinically significant drug interactions increases. This review describes some examples of common drug interactions in gastroenterology. The underlying mechanisms are discussed, and strategies are proposed to avoid drug interactions in clinical practice.

Limited utility of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in heart transplant recipients receiving ketoconazole

The aim of the study was to compare 2 hours postdose concentration (C2) of CyA in stable patients receiving ketoconazole concomitantly late after heart transplantation (OHT) with patients not receiving ketoconazole. Routine C2 and C1 (1 hour postdose concentration) of CyA monitoring (FPIA, AxSYM, Abbott) along with C0 (trough level) were performed in 64 elective patients. The KETO group consisted of 29 patients receiving 200 mg of ketoconazole daily along with CyA; the remaining 35 patients were included into the control group. Patient characteristics (KETO vs control group) were as follows: age, 49 +/- 11 versus 48 +/- 12 years; percentage of male patients, 93 versus 80; follow-up post-OHT, 4.3 +/- 2 versus 5.3 +/- 2 years. Target C0 of CyA was 175 to 225 ng/mL; CyA doses remained stable for at least 1 month. We compared maintenance doses of CyA, C0, C1, C2 of CyA, number of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (AR) during the one year and after the first year post-OHT, and creatinine in both groups. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney U test. Results were as follows (KETO versus control group): CyA dose, 53 +/- 30 versus 216 +/- 69 mg, P <.000001; C0, 181 +/- 77 versus 160 +/- 53 ng/mL, NS; C1, 406 +/- 78 versus 803 +/- 317 ng/mL, P =.000001); C2, 397 +/- 174 versus 689 +/- 284 ng/mL, P =.000001, AR during the first year after OHT, 2.8 +/- 1.9 versus 2.3 +/- 1.6, NS; AR beyond first year after OHT, 0.2 +/- 0.5 versus 0.7 +/- 0.9, P =.03); creatinine, 181 +/- 50 versus 160 +/- 114 micromol/L NS. In conclusion; C2 monitoring in stable heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine and ketoconazole concomitantly late after procedure does not seem to be sufficient to estimate the immunosuppressive effect of this combination.

Concomitant administration of cyclosporine and ketoconazole in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The deliberate use of ketoconazole to reduce the need for cyclosporine (CsA) is not new, but it is particularly relevant because of the high cost of CsA. Many studies have documented this benefit in renal and cardiac transplants, but this co-administration has not been reported in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 207 nephrotic patients who were steroid resistant, dependent or frequent relapsers and received CsA therapy. Among these patients 153 received daily ketoconazole therapy in a dose of 50 mg with concomitant decrease of one-third of the CsA dose while 54 patients received CsA alone. The majority of our cases were children (179 were below 18 years) and male to female ratio was 1.7:1.

RESULTS

The great majority of the study population received the drugs for 1-2 years. Patients who received CsA and ketoconazole were comparable with those who received CsA alone regarding age, sex, duration of renal disease, renal pathology, severity of nephrotic syndrome, renal function, hepatic function and steroid response. Co-administration of ketoconazole significantly reduced mean doses of CsA by 37% after 1 month and 47% at 1 year with overall net cost savings of 37%. Hepatic functions remained within the normal range in both groups. Additionally, co-administration of ketoconazole significantly improved the response to CsA therapy, successful steroid withdrawal and decreased the frequency of renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of keto with CsA in idiopathic nephrotic patients significantly reduces CsA costs and may improve its response.

A phase I trial of pharmacokinetic modulation of carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) with ketoconazole in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) is a novel antineoplastic agent in clinical development with limited oral bioavailability. In vitro, ketoconazole has been demonstrated to inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of CAI. We performed this phase I trial to determine if ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition would lead to favorable alteration of CAI pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the safety, toxicity and tolerability of the proposed combination.

DESIGN

Forty-seven patients were treated using a standard three patients per cohort CAI dose-escalation scheme. In cycle 1, CAI was administered alone on day-6 followed by a single dose of ketoconazole (200 mg) on day 0. CAI and ketoconazole (200 mg/day) were subsequently coadministered on days 1 and 3-28. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained following the doses on days-6 and 1. All subsequent cycles were of 28-day duration, and consisted of daily CAI and ketoconazole coadministration.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on samples from 44 patients. In most patients administration of ketoconazole produced an increase in CAI AUC and Cmax with a decrease in CAI clearance. Seven patients experienced stable disease for up to 12 months. Gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities were the most common toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of CAI with ketoconazole increased CAI exposure in most of the patients without altering the toxicity profile of CAI. The highest CAI dose administered on the trial was 300 mg/day. The clinical utility of such a modulation strategy might be explored in future clinical trials of CAI.

The interaction of the diltiazem with oral and intravenous cyclosporine in rats

This study investigated the effect of diltiazem on the bioavailability of oral and intravenous cyclosporine (CsA) in rats. While control rats received normal saline, experimental groups received 60 or 90 mg/kg diltiazem orally for 3 days. Each group divided into 2 equal groups that received a single oral dose or i.v. injection of CsA. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by nonparametric analysis of variance. Pretreatment with 60 or 90 mg/kg diltiazem decreased the area under the blood CsA concentration-time curve (AUC) of oral CsA compared to control group (54.5% and 65.5% for AUC(0-24), 57.6% and 62.2% for AUC(0-infinity), respectively, p<0.05). Mean CsA maximum concentration (Cmax) decreased from 0.4 +/- 0.1 microg/ml to 0.1 +/- 0.0 microg/mL in rats pretreated with 90 mg/kg diltiazem (p<0.05). The absolute bioavailability after oral administration (F(p.o.)) in the 60 or 90 mg/kg diltiazem groups were lower than the control group (9.6% and 8.5% versus 22.6%). Pretreatment with 90 mg/kg but not 60 mg/kg of diltiazem increased the AUC(0-infinity), elimination half-life (t1/2) of intravenous CsA (116.0%, 219.2%, respectively, p<0.05) and decreased the intravenous CsA clearence (CL(i.v.)) (62.9%, p<0.05). Diltiazem decreased the bioavailability of oral CsA, while it increased the bioavailability of intravenous CsA. One must consider this interaction when administering oral or intravenous CsA concomitantly with diltiazem.

Cyclosporine and low-dose ketoconazole in renal transplant recipients: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The high cost of cyclosporine A (CsA) is an impediment for low-income patients. Previous studies have used ketoconazole at doses between 200 and 400 mg/day to lower CsA consumption.

METHODS

Ketoconazole and CsA were administered prospectively to renal transplant patients. Patients treated historically with CsA were used as a reference group. At different intervals posttransplant, clinical and laboratory data were recorded.

RESULTS

The reference group (n=14) was treated with CsA from 1992 to 1997 and the CsA plus ketoconazole group (n=17) from 1998 to 2002. Follow-up was 76+/-22 and 29+/-14 months, respectively. CsA doses throughout the study were 4.0+/-1.3 and 1.6+/-0.6 mg/kg/day (a 60% reduction, P =0.00). Trough levels of CsA were 194+/-87 and 193+/-69 ng/mL, respectively. The ketoconazole dose was 54+/-17 mg/day. The monthly cost of CsA was reduced by 60%, including the cost of ketoconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

CsA with ketoconazole resulted in a substantial dose and cost reduction that proved safe and effective.

Effect of concomitant administration of cyclosporine and ketoconazole in children with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Focal segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGS) is now the most common primary glomerulonephritis that leads to end-stage renal disease in both adults and children. Cyclosporine (CsA) is a well-known and effective immunosuppressive agent that has become a cornerstone of immunotherapy in solid organ transplantation and it has been used in the treatment of FSGS for over 15 years. The deliberate use of ketoconazole (keto) to reduce the need for CsA is not new, but it is particularly relevant because of the high cost of CsA. Many studies have documented this benefit in renal and cardiac transplants, but this co-administration has not been reported in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS).

METHODS

This study included 116 children (below 18 years of age) with primary FSGS who were steroid resistant or dependent and received CsA therapy. Among them, 88 received daily keto therapy (keto group) in a dose of 50 mg with concomitant decrease of CsA dose by one third, while 28 patients received CsA alone (non-keto group). Mean (+/-SD) age was 6.17 +/- 4.68 years and male to female ratio was 1.9:1. The great majority of the study population received the drugs for 1-2 years. The characteristics of both groups were comparable.

RESULTS

Co-administration of keto significantly reduced mean doses of CsA by 46% at 1 year with overall net cost savings of 36%. It also significantly improved the response to CsA therapy and decreased the frequency of renal impairment. No significant side effects for keto were observed.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of keto and CsA in idiopathic FSGS children is safe. This combination not only reduces the costs but also may improve the response to CsA and stabilize the renal function.

Risk factors of invasive aspergillosis after heart transplantation: protective role of oral itraconazole prophylaxis

The study was designed to identify a subset of heart transplant (HT) recipients who could benefit from the administration of targeted antifungal prophylaxis and to evaluate the efficacy of oral itraconazole as the preventive drug. We have analyzed the risk factors for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in our entire population of HT recipients (1988-2002) and also the role of oral itraconazole prophylaxis that was provided to all patients since 1995 [400 mg q.d. of itraconazole oral (PO) for 3-6 months]. There were 24 cases of IA. Our main results indicate that the independent risk factors for IA after heart transplantation are: re-operation (RR 5.8; 95% CI 1.8-18, p=0.002), cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (RR 5.2; 95% CI 2-13.9, p=0.001), post-transplant hemodialysis (RR 4.9; 95% CI 1.2-18, p=0.02), and the existence of an episode of IA in the HT program 2 months before or after the transplantation date (RR 4.6; 95% CI 1.5-14.4, p=0.007). Itraconazole prophylaxis showed an independent protective value against developing IA (RR 0.2; 95% CI 0.07-0.9, p=0.03) and also determined a significantly prolonged 1-year survival (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8, p=0.01). We believe that antifungal prophylaxis in heart transplant patients should be offered at least to patients with one or more of these predisposing conditions.

Pharmacologic issues in the critically ill

The pharmacotherapy of critically ill patients poses numerous challenges to the ICU team. Polypharmacy and alterations in drug disposition are common in the ICU; critically ill patients have limited physiologic reserve to deal with adverse drug events. Careful prescribing, based upon sound pharmacologic principles, decreases the potential for preventable adverse events and maximizes the opportunity for successful therapy. A systematic approach to reporting, analysis, and prevention of errors is a further step in our ultimate goal to provide optimal care for the vulnerable patients whom we support in our ICUs.

Antifungal agents for preventing fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to systematically identify and summarise the effects of antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (1966-June 2003), and EMBASE (1980-June 2003) were searched. Reference lists, abstracts of conference proceedings and scientific meetings (1998-2003) were handsearched. Authors of included studies and pharmaceutical manufacturers were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages comparing the prophylactic use of any antifungal agent or regimen with placebo, no antifungal, or another antifungal agent or regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data using an intention-to-treat approach. Differences were resolved by discussion. Data were synthesised using the random effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen unique trials with 1497 randomised participants were included. Antifungal prophylaxis did not reduce mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.44). In liver transplant recipients, a significant reduction in IFIs was demonstrated for fluconazole (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.57). Although less data were available for itraconazole and liposomal amphotericin B, indirect comparisons and one direct comparative trial suggested similar efficacy. Fluconazole prophylaxis did not significantly increase invasive infections or colonisation with fluconazole-resistant fungi. In renal and cardiac transplant recipients, neither ketoconazole nor clotrimazole significantly reduced invasive infections. Overall, the strength and precision of comparisons however were limited by a paucity of data.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

For liver transplant recipients, antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole significantly reduces the incidence of IFIs with no definite mortality benefit. Given a 10% incidence of IFI, 14 liver transplant recipients would require fluconazole prophylaxis to prevent one infection. In transplant centres where the incidence of IFIs is high, or in situations where the individual risk is great, antifungal prophylaxis should be considered.

Tacrolimus dosage requirements after initiation of azole antifungal therapy in pediatric thoracic organ transplantation

Azole antifungals inhibit the metabolism of tacrolimus mediated by CYP3A4. Upon initiation of azole therapy, the required dose reduction of tacrolimus is unknown. We reviewed our experience with azole antifungals in our pediatric thoracic transplant population receiving tacrolimus. Tacrolimus levels and dosage requirements were compared before and during azole therapy. Thirty-one patients received both tacrolimus and an azole antifungal (fluconazole = 9, itraconazole = 22). The tacrolimus dose was empirically reduced by approximately one-third when azole therapy was initiated. Mean tacrolimus dose requirements decreased by 68% within the first month of therapy (pre-azole: 0.27 +/- 0.14 mg/kg/day; 30 day post-azole: 0.087 +/- 0.069 mg/kg/day; p < 0.001). Despite a mean decrease in tacrolimus dose from baseline of 33, 42, and 55% on day 1, 2, and 4 of azole therapy, respectively, there was still an unintended 38% increase in tacrolimus levels during the first month of azole therapy. A calculated dose-reduction protocol of 50% on day of azole initiation, 70% on day 3, and 75% on day 14 should result in minimal mean changes in the tacrolimus levels. There was no difference in tacrolimus dose reduction between fluconazole and itraconazole groups. Azole antifungals markedly decrease tacrolimus requirements within the first few days of therapy. An initial reduction in tacrolimus dose by one-third is insufficient, and dose reduction of at least 50% upon azole initiation seems warranted. Once azole antifungal therapy is initiated, frequent therapeutic drug monitoring is required.

Interaction with indinavir to enhance systemic exposure of an investigational HIV protease inhibitor in rats, dogs and monkeys

1. The use of a beneficial interaction between indinavir and compound A, a potent investigational HIV protease inhibitor to enhance systemic exposure of compound A, was investigated. 2. When administrated alone, compound A underwent extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism in rats and monkeys, resulting in low oral bioavailability. 3. In vitro studies with liver microsomes revealed that compound A metabolism was mediated exclusively by CYP3A enzymes in rats, dogs and monkeys. Indinavir, which also was metabolized predominantly by CYP3A enzymes, extensively inhibited compound A metabolism in microsomes, whereas compound A showed weak inhibitory potency on indinavir metabolism. 4. Consistent with in vitro observations, co-administration of the two compounds resulted in a 17-fold increase in oral AUC of compound A in rats owing to the inhibition of metabolism of compound A by indinavir, whereas compound A did not affect indinavir metabolism as indicated by the unchanged indinavir AUC. Similarly, the systemic exposure of compound A in dogs and monkeys was increased substantially following oral co-administration with indinavir by 7- and > 50-fold, respectively. 5. Enhancement in compound A systemic exposure by indinavir in humans, as predicted based on the in vivo animal and in vitro human liver microsomal data, was confirmed in subsequent clinical studies.

Coadministration of tacrolimus and ketoconazole in renal transplant recipients: cost analysis and review of metabolic effects

BACKGROUND

The high cost of tacrolimus is a major problem in Mexico. Ketoconazole increases tacrolimus bioavailability by inhibiting cytochrome P450 3A4 and glycoprotein-p.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that the coadministration of tacrolimus and ketoconazole allows a significant dose and cost reduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study administered tacrolimus and ketoconazole to renal transplant recipients with dose adjustment according to tacrolimus blood levels. At 0-1, 1-6, 6-12, and 12-24 months posttransplant demographic, transplant type, immunosuppression, and clinical data were reviewed. The cost of tacrolimus treatment was calculated based on the dose used as compared to the recommended dose (0.15-0.20 mg/kg/d).

RESULTS

Eleven patients with an age of 40 years (range, 13-71) were studied from May 2000 to August 2002. Follow-up was 15 +/- 10 months. Graft source was living donor in six patients and cadaveric in five. All patients received tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisone. The mean ketoconazole dose was 87 mg/d. Since the dose of tacrolimus was 0.04 mg/kg/d versus the recommended dose of 0.15-0.20 mg/kg/d, there was a 78% cost reduction (P =.000). Tacrolimus blood levels remained in the therapeutic range. There were no drug-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of tacrolimus and ketoconazole results in a substantial dose and cost reduction while maintaining therapeutic levels. No adverse metabolic consequences were seen with this combination.

Effects of liquid and freeze-dried grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of praziquantel and its metabolite 4′-hydroxy praziquantel in beagle dogs

Grapefruit juice changes the pharmacokinetic parameters of a variety of drugs metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 3A. In a three-phase crossover study, six male beagle dogs were administered 100 ml of water (control), 100 ml of commercial liquid grapefruit juice, or 10 g of freeze-dried grapefruit juice (equivalent to 100 ml of liquid grapefruit juice) with 100 ml of water, followed after 2 h by single oral dose of praziquantel (30 mg kg(-1)). After treatment, the dogs were sampled at different times. Determination of praziquantel and its metabolite 4'-hydroxy praziquantel (identified by GC/MS) was performed by HPLC. Liquid and freeze-dried grapefruit juice preadministration increased the C(max) of praziquantel about three-fold and the AUC 2.5- and 2.3-fold, respectively. The T(max) (0.75 h) was unaffected by liquid or freeze-dried grapefruit juice, while T(1/2) was 2.3- and 1.7-fold higher compared with controls. The amount of 4'-hydroxy praziquantel was also affected by both liquid and freeze-dried grapefruit juice administration: the AUC and C(max) increased four- and three-fold, respectively and the T(max) was significantly enhanced. These findings demonstrate that both freeze-dried grapefruit juice and commercial liquid grapefruit juice significantly increase plasma concentrations and T(1/2) of praziquantel in dogs.