A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Helvetica Investigators

High on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) and the subsequent risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with predominantly drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND

The association between HAPR and subsequent risk of restenosis after PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 4839 patients undergoing PCI (02/2007-12/2011) in the setting of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) registry. Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry using the multi-plate analyzer immediately before PCI and after intravenous administration of aspirin (500 mg). The primary outcome was clinical restenosis, defined as target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

The upper quintile cut-off of platelet reactivity measurements (191 AU × min) was used to categorize patients into a group with HAPR (platelet reactivity > 191 AU × min; n = 952) and a group without HAPR (platelet reactivity ≤ 191 AU × min; n = 3887). The primary outcome occurred in 94 patients in the HAPR group and 405 patients without HAPR (cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.4%; HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.77-1.19; P = 0.70). Follow-up angiography was performed in 73.2% of patients. There was no difference in binary restenosis (15.2% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.79) or late lumen loss (0.32 ± 0.57 vs. 0.32 ± 0.59 mm; P = 0.93) between patients with HAPR versus those without HAPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an association between HAPR, measured at the time of PCI, and clinical restenosis at 1 year after PCI.

Interplay Between Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor and Thrombin Receptor Revealed by Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer Assay

The key hormone of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), angiotensin II (AngII), and thrombin are known to play major roles in the vascular system and its related disorders. Previous studies reported connections between AngII and thrombin in both physiological and pathophysiological models. However, the molecular mechanisms controlling such interplay at the level of their receptors belonging to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated the functional interaction between the AngII type 1 receptor (AT1R) and the thrombin receptor [or protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1)] in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. For this, we used various bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) proximity-based assays to profile the coupling to the heterotrimeric Gαq protein, β-arrestin recruitment, and receptor internalization and trafficking in intact cells. The overall dose-response and real-time kinetic BRET data demonstrated the specific molecular proximity between AT1R and PAR1 resulting in their functional interaction. This was characterized by thrombin inducing BRET increase within AT1R/Gαq and AT1R/β-arrestin pairs and synergistic effects observed upon the concomitant activation of both receptors suggesting a positive allosteric interaction. The BRET data corroborated with the data on the downstream Gαq/inositol phosphate pathway. Moreover, the selective pharmacological blockade of the receptors revealed the implication of both AT1R and PAR1 protomers in such a synergistic interaction and the possible transactivation of AT1R by PAR1. Interestingly, the positive action of PAR1 on AT1R activation was contrasted with its apparent inhibition of AT1R internalization and its endosomal trafficking. Finally, BRET saturation and co-immunoprecipitation assays supported the physical AT1-PAR1 interaction in HEK293 cells. Our study reveals for the first time the functional interaction between AT1R and PAR1 in vitro characterized by a transactivation and positive allosteric modulation of AT1R and inhibition of its desensitization and internalization. This finding may constitute the molecular basis of the well-known interplay between RAS and thrombin. Thus, our data should lead to revising some findings on the implication of RAS and thrombin in vascular physiology and pathophysiology revealing the importance to consider the functional and pharmacological interaction between AT1R and thrombin receptors.

Noncanonical Matrix Metalloprotease 1-Protease-Activated Receptor 1 Signaling Drives Progression of Atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is classically activated by thrombin and is critical in controlling the balance of hemostasis and thrombosis. More recently, it has been shown that noncanonical activation of PAR1 by matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP1) contributes to arterial thrombosis. However, the role of PAR1 in long-term development of atherosclerosis is unknown, regardless of the protease agonist.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We found that plasma MMP1 was significantly correlated (R=0.33; P=0.0015) with coronary atherosclerotic burden as determined by angiography in 91 patients with coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention. A cell-penetrating PAR1 pepducin, PZ-128, currently being tested as an antithrombotic agent in the acute setting in the TRIP-PCI study (Thrombin Receptor Inhibitory Pepducin-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), caused a significant decrease in total atherosclerotic burden by 58% to 70% (P<0.05) and reduced plaque macrophage content by 54% (P<0.05) in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. An MMP1 inhibitor gave similar beneficial effects, in contrast to the thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin that gave no improvement on atherosclerosis end points. Mechanistic studies revealed that inflammatory signaling mediated by MMP1-PAR1 plays a critical role in amplifying tumor necrosis factor α signaling in endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that targeting the MMP1-PAR1 system may be effective in tamping down chronic inflammatory signaling in plaques and halting the progression of atherosclerosis.

Bolus injections of novel thrombogenic site-targeted fusion proteins comprising annexin-V and Kunitz protease inhibitors attenuate intimal hyperplasia after balloon angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Systemic administrations of conventional antithrombotics reduce neointima formation after angioplasty in experimental animals. However, clinical translation of these results has not been successful due to high risk for bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether novel annexin-V (ANV)-Kunitz protease inhibitor fusion proteins, TAP-ANV and ANV-6L15, can specifically target to vascular injury site and limit neointima formation without inducing systemic hypo-coagulation in a rat carotid artery balloon angioplasty injury model.

METHODS

Near infrared imaging was carried out after balloon-injury and injection of fluorescent ANV or ANV-6L15 to examine their bio-distributions. For peri-procedure treatment, TAP-ANV or ANV-6L15 was administered as i.v. boluses 3 times: 30-minutes before balloon-injury, immediate after procedure, and 120-minutes post-balloon-injury. For extended treatment, additional i.v. bolus injection was given on day-2, day-3 and every other day thereafter. Carotid arteries were collected on day-7 and day-14 for analysis. Blood was collected for measurement of clotting parameters.

RESULTS

Near infrared imaging and immunochemistry showed that fluorescent ANV and ANV-6L15 specifically localized to injured carotid artery and significant amount of ANV-6L15 remained bound to the injured artery after 24-h. Peri-procedure injections of TAP-ANV or ANV-6L15 resulted in decrease of intima/media ratio by 56%. Extended injections of both yielded similar results. Both decreased the expression of PCNA on day-7 and increased the expression calponin on day-14 in the intima post-balloon-injury.

CONCLUSIONS

TAP-ANV and ANV-6L15 can specifically localize to balloon injured carotid arteries after i.v. bolus injections, resulting in substantial attenuation of intimal hyperplasia without inducing a state of systemic hypo-coagulation.

Preclinical Restenosis Models: Challenges and Successes

Coronary artery disease remains a major problem for Western societies. The advent of percutaneous interventions, including stents has brought clinical care to a new level of efficacy, yet problems remain. Restenosis following stenting in human coronary arteries appears at last to be yielding to therapeutic strategies, especially drug eluting stents. Because therapeutic percutaneous coronary intervention is widely dominated by the intracoronary stent, restenosis therapies must include the stented coronary artery. Animal models and in particular the porcine coronary model seem to represent the human coronary artery reaction to stenting. It mimics several clinical conditions including thrombosis and neointimal formation. A key question in the era of intravascular technologies is how well this and other models can predict clinical events. This paper discusses the models and their application.

Microfabrication for Drug Delivery

This review is devoted to discussing the application of microfabrication technologies to target challenges encountered in life processes by the development of drug delivery systems. Recently, microfabrication has been largely applied to solve health and pharmaceutical science issues. In particular, fabrication methods along with compatible materials have been successfully designed to produce multifunctional, highly effective drug delivery systems. Microfabrication offers unique tools that can tackle problems in this field, such as ease of mass production with high quality control and low cost, complexity of architecture design and a broad range of materials. Presented is an overview of silicon- and polymer-based fabrication methods that are key in the production of microfabricated drug delivery systems. Moreover, the efforts focused on studying the biocompatibility of materials used in microfabrication are analyzed. Finally, this review discusses representative ways microfabrication has been employed to develop systems delivering drugs through the transdermal and oral route, and to improve drug eluting implants. Additionally, microfabricated vaccine delivery systems are presented due to the great impact they can have in obtaining a cold chain-free vaccine, with long-term stability. Microfabrication will continue to offer new, alternative solutions for the development of smart, advanced drug delivery systems.

Tong-xin-luo capsule for patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). Restenosis, defined as a 50% reduction in luminal diameter at six months after PCI, indicates a need for revascularisation. Restenosis has proven to be a major drawback to PCI. Tong-xin-luo is one of the prophylactic strategies for cardiovascular events in patients after PCI that is widely used in China, but its efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of Tong-xin-luo capsules in preventing cardiovascular events after PCI in patients with CHD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), WanFang, Chinese Biomedical Database, Chinese Medical Current Contents, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to June 2014. We also searched other resources, including ongoing trials and research registries. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of participants with CHD after PCI were included. Participants in the intervention group received Tong-xin-luo capsules for at least three months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third review author. The primary outcomes included occurrence of angiographic restenosis and adverse events; the secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina, all cause mortality, mortality due to any cardiovascular event, use of revascularisation, patient acceptability, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Dichotomous data were measured with risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 1063 participants were identified. The risk of bias for fifteen studies was high and along with imprecision and possible publication bias, this lowered our confidence in the results. There was low quality evidence that Tong-xi-luo reduced the rates of angiographic restenosis (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34), myocardial infarction (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.66), heart failure (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.62), and use of revascularisation (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.45). There was very low quality evidence for the effect of Tong-xin-luo on all-cause mortality (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.06 to 2.56), angina (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.34) and death due to any cardiovascular event (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.12). Adverse events were seldom reported, and included gastrointestinal reactions and nausea.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Tong-xin-luo to conventional Western medicine may possibly prevent restenosis and recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with CHD after PCI. However, the data are limited by publication bias and high risk of bias for included studies. Further high-quality trials are required to evaluate the potential effects of this intervention.

Argatroban for preventing occlusion and restenosis after extracranial artery stenting

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Restenosis following extracranial artery stenting is a limitation that affects long-term outcomes. Effective and satisfying pharmacological strategies in preventing restenosis have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate whether argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, could reduce the risk of in-stent restenosis after extracranial artery stenting.

METHODS

One hundred and fourteen patients hospitalized between August 2010 and August 2011 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to argatroban (n = 58) and blank control groups (n = 56). The patients in the argatroban arm were treated with 10 mg of intravenous argatroban twice daily 2 days before and 3 days after the stenting procedures. Patients were followed for 12 months after the procedure. During follow-up, restenosis and target revascularization were analyzed. Recurrent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events and deaths were also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

One patient in the stenting group withdrew immediately after the procedure due to unsuccessful stenting. Restenosis occurred in 4 patients (7.4%) in the argatroban group and in 11 patients (21.6%) in the control group during the 6- to 9-month angiographic follow-up period (p = 0.032). Nine months after the procedures, argatroban-treated patients had a trend towards a lower incidence of target revascularization compared with the controls (5.4 vs. 13.7%, p = 0.188). No major bleeding events or other adverse events occurred in the argatroban group.

CONCLUSION

This pilot clinical trial is the first that uses argatroban to prevent restenosis in ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and suggests that intravenous administration of argatroban is effective and safe in preventing restenosis after extracranial artery stenting. Larger randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted.

Pathology consultation on monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors and overcoming their effects in bleeding patients

OBJECTIVES

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), a relatively new class of anticoagulants, present several challenges regarding monitoring of their anticoagulant effects and overcoming bleeding associated with their use. The aim of this article is to (1) briefly present the pharmacologic properties of currently available DTIs, (2) discuss approaches to laboratory assessment of these drugs, and (3) review management of bleeding associated with their use.

METHODS

Published literature on DTIs, including clinical trials, case reports, and experimental animal models, was reviewed. The primary authors also reviewed their first-hand experiences with DTI anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Based on the literature review and the practical experiences of the authors, suggestions for the monitoring of DTIs and algorithmic approaches for the management of DTI-associated bleeding were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine coagulation assays (eg, the prothrombin time) show a relatively poor correlation with the degree of anticoagulation and DTI drug concentrations. Newer assays, such as the ecarin clotting time and dilute thrombin time, may be more useful in assessing DTI anticoagulation, but these assays are not yet widely available. Low-grade DTI-associated bleeds are best managed with cessation of the drug and supportive care, while higher-grade and/or life-threatening bleeds may best be reversed by active drug removal (eg, via the administration of activated charcoal or hemodialysis). At present there is little evidence to suggest that transfusion products such as factor concentrates or thawed plasma are of any particular benefit in DTI reversal; however, these products may play a supportive role in the management of bleeding.

A randomized, open-label pilot study comparing desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis: PREVENT-HIT Study

Because of an extreme risk for thromboemboli, patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) require immediate initiation of an alternative anticoagulant. The only therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration require intravenous infusion of expensive direct thrombin inhibitors. This prospective, randomized, open-label, exploratory study compared the clinical and economic utility of subcutaneous desirudin vs argatroban, the most frequently used agent for suspected or immunologically confirmed HIT, with or without thrombosis. Sixteen patients were randomized to treatment with fixed-dose desirudin (15 or 30 mg) every 12 hours or activated partial thromboplastin time-adjusted argatroban by intravenous infusion. Arm A included 8 patients naive to direct thrombin inhibitor therapy, whereas Arm B included 8 patients on argatroban for at least 24 hours before randomization. The primary efficacy measure was the composite of new or worsening thrombosis (objectively documented), amputation, or death. Other end points included major and minor bleeding while on drug therapy, time to platelet count recovery, and pharmacoeconomics. No amputations or deaths occurred. One patient randomized to argatroban had worsening of an existing thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in 2 patients on argatroban and in none during desirudin treatment. There was 1 minor bleed in each treatment group. The average medication cost per course of treatment was $1688 for desirudin and $8250 for argatroban. Desirudin warrants further study as a potentially cost-effective alternative to argatroban in patients with suspected HIT.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists have been the primary agents used for anticoagulation in certain cardiovascular and thromboembolic diseases for over 50 years. However, they can be difficult to administer and are fraught with limitations. In response to the need for new anticoagulants, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been developed and investigated for their utility in prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), acute coronary syndromes (ACS), secondary prevention of coronary events after ACS, and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Currently, four parenteral direct inhibitors of thrombin activity are FDA-approved in North America: lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban. Of the new oral DTIs, dabigatran etexilate is the most studied and promising of these agents. This review discusses the clinical indications and efficacy of these direct thrombin inhibitors as well as future directions in anticoagulant therapy.

Looking back into the future: desirudin in acute coronary syndromes and coronary stenting

Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a highly effective modality for the management of acute coronary syndromes, it can potentiate the existing prothrombotic state around lesion areas and lead to ischaemic complications. Adjunctive pharmacologic treatment with heparin reduces the risk of ischaemic events, but the utility of heparin is limited by its unpredictable pharmacodynamic effects and its inability to modulate fibrin-bound thrombin. Additionally, a potential risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is associated with heparin use. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have emerged as potential alternatives to heparin in patients undergoing PCI. Bivalirudin is a DTI indicated for use in PCI. Results from various studies have suggested clinical benefit associated with the use of bivalirudin, driven primarily by the reduction in bleeding risks compared with the standard treatment regimens. Of concern, however, is a significant increase in acute stent thrombosis with bivalirudin monotherapy compared with heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors following primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Desirudin is a highly potent DTI with greater binding affinity than bivalirudin for thrombin. This report provides a comparative overview of the pharmacology and clinical utility of desirudin and bivalirudin in the setting of PCI.

Platelet response to clopidogrel and restenosis in patients treated predominantly with drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies suggest a relationship between early thrombotic response after vascular injury and later development of restenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of platelet response to clopidogrel on the risk of restenosis after drug-eluting stenting (DES).

METHODS

A total of 1,608 consecutive patients were previously enrolled in a study on the relation between platelet reactivity and outcomes after DES. All patients received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood samples for the assessment of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry were drawn directly before percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel low response was defined as upper quintile of multiple electrode platelet aggregometry measurements. Accordingly, 323 patients (20%) were considered as low and 1,285 (80%) as normal responders. Primary end point of the present study was target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

Target lesion revascularization rates were comparable in both groups (10.9% vs 9.5%, hazard rate [HR] 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.7, P = .441). Follow-up angiography revealed no difference in binary angiographic restenosis (13.9% vs 15.9%, P = .445) and late lumen loss (0.32 +/- 0.64 vs 0.35 +/- 0.63 mm, P = .477). Low responders had significantly more stent thromboses (2.5% vs 0.5%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-15.6, P = .002), Q wave myocardial infarctions (2.5% vs 0.6%, HR 4.0, 95% CI 1.5-10.7, P = .005), and ischemic strokes (1.3% vs 0.2%, HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2-24.0, P = .028) at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Low platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel, a known predictor of thrombotic complications, does not have a significant impact on restenosis after DES.

Rationale and design of the PREVENT-HIT study: a randomized, open-label pilot study to compare desirudin and argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Desirudin, a bivalent direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis, which may lead to pulmonary embolism, in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery. It became available in the United States in March 2010.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present article was to provide an overview of the rationale and design of the PREVENT-HIT study, a randomized, prospective, open-label, active drug-controlled, exploratory trial comparing the clinical and economic utility of desirudin versus argatroban in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with or without thrombosis.

SUMMARY

The PREVENT-HIT study was designed to enroll approximately 120 patients from 20 to 25 US centers. All eligible patients were required to be aged >or=18 years. Patients with suspected HIT with or without thrombosis were divided into 2 treatment arms and randomized to receive treatment with desirudin or argatroban in a 1:1 ratio using a block randomization method. Arm A comprised patients who were naive to DTI therapy; arm B included patients whose condition was previously stabilized with intravenous argatroban. Desirudin was administered as a fixed-dose injection (15 or 30 mg SC q12h in patients without or with thrombosis, respectively). Argatroban was administered by continuous intravenous infusion in accordance with approved prescribing information or institutional prescribing guidelines at each study site. The primary efficacy outcome measure included the occurrence of any of the following up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation: new-onset or worsening thrombosis requiring discontinuation of study drug; amputation; or all-cause mortality. Other outcomes that were assessed included platelet recovery, bleeding, and pharmacoeconomic parameters. In addition, adverse events and other safety parameters were evaluated. Study enrollment began in November 2008 and ended in December 2009 due to slow enrollment (N = 16). The study results will be published separately.

CONCLUSION

The results from the PREVENT-HIT study should enhance understanding of the comparative clinical and economic utility of desirudin and argatroban in patients with HIT with or without thrombosis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00787332.

Emerging drugs for acute myocardial infarction

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The present review is aimed at going over the pharmacological profile (and the clinical impact) of the emerging drugs involved in the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in order to provide the cardiologists who deal with these patients in the early phase with the most recent evidence on this topic.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs are the main cornerstones of therapy in the treatment of STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The main issues that clinicians have to deal with are represented by balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks. In tailoring therapy, variables such as age, sex and previous disease should be taken into account, as well as ongoing complications (such as acute renal failure) that could affect hemostasis. Despite the well-established clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents, questions remain, mainly surrounding potential for variable platelet response, which are strictly related to non-genetic (i.e., diet, drug-drug interaction, clinical factors such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and inflammation) and genetic determinants.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

In their daily practice, cardiologists cannot abstract from the knowledge and updating on the ongoing research fields as well as the newly developed drugs, which they should frame in the very patient in the attempt to the develop a personalized medical strategy. These include also the pharmacological option(s) in the treatment of the reperfusion injury, the metabolic aspects and the stem cell therapy. TAKE HOME MASSAGE: In our opinion, the goal of ongoing research on the pharmacological approach to STEMI patients is a personalized medical strategy that relies on critical clinicians who merge newly developed acquisitions on this topic and a more complete, systemic and critical approach to the patient.

New antithrombotic agents in acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute coronary syndromes still account for high mortality in many countries. Antithrombotic therapy represents a cornerstone in the therapy of acute coronary syndromes. Recent research has focussed on improving anti-ischemic potency and reducing bleeding complications as well as improving predictability of antithrombotic efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

New antithrombotic drugs such as the factor Xa antagonists and the direct thrombin inhibitors have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Fondaparinux and bivalirudin are approved for clinical use in acute coronary syndromes. They improve the risk/benefit ratio and make routine control of their antithrombotic effect unnecessary. Other agents are being developed to further improve and facilitate antithrombotic therapy in acute coronary syndromes.

SUMMARY

Antithrombotic therapy is essential in acute coronary syndrome. New drugs are being developed to enter clinical practice and improve efficacy and safety of this therapeutic strategy.

Anticoagulants in coronary artery disease

Anticoagulant therapy for acute coronary syndromes is becoming more complex as newer agents are added to unfractionated heparin and warfarin. The anticoagulants used in current clinical practice are low molecular weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors, and heparinoids. Properties of and recent clinical trial data regarding these newer anticoagulants are reviewed in reference to current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

[Argatroban: pharmacological properties and anaesthesiological aspects]

Argatroban is a direct, selective and reversible active site thrombin inhibitor derived from L-arginine. It is a representative of a new class of antithrombotic drugs which offer inhibition of clot-bound as well as fluid-phase thrombin. Argatroban is characterised by favourable pharmacokinetics (beta-elimination half-time approximately 40-50 min) undergoing hepatic metabolism and mainly biliary excretion. Renal impairment will not result in altered or delayed elimination. For many years, argatroban has been used in Japan and in the United States and is approved by the FDA for anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II). The ease of monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time, lack of induction of antibodies and adequate safety in renal failure patients, make this drug a favourable mode therapy in comparison with other anticoagulants such as lepirudin or heparinoids. Since June 2005 argatroban has been approved in Germany for the treatment of patients with HIT type II. The main characteristics of the drug with special considerations for anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians are presented in this review.

Future directions in thrombolysis

An extensive body of research conducted in the past 25 years has helped foster understanding of the mechanisms and pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes and occlusive disease. Thus, it is well established that thrombosis is caused by vascular injury and that immediate lysis of the arterial thrombus and subsequent prevention of thrombotic reocclusion are critical to the treatment of these disorders. Remarkable progress in the understanding of the biological and molecular mechanisms involved in vascular-wall-platelet interactions, platelet-platelet interactions, and coagulation has led to the identification of multiple targets for drug discovery and the development of numerous antithrombotic drugs. The purpose of this article is to review emerging antithrombotic therapies, introduce potential future molecular targets for drug discovery efforts, and discuss novel strategies for managing patients with coronary disease.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].

The challenge of defining bleeding among patients with acute coronary syndromes

Advances in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), specifically, the use of combined pharmacotherapy with antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapies and routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), have greatly reduced rates of thrombotic outcomes and mortality in these patients. However, these same therapies also can increase the risk of bleeding and transfusion use, which are predictive of poor outcomes in patients with ACS. Accurate assessment of the risk-to-benefit ratio for any therapy depends on the use of clinically relevant, preferably standardized, definitions of endpoint events. Unfortunately, clinical trials of antithrombotic therapies have used various definitions for bleeding, most of which were originally developed for trials of fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (MI). These variations in bleeding definitions have complicated cross-study comparisons and assessments of drug class effects. Further, it is unclear whether these definitions remain clinically relevant in the era of routine PCI and aggressive antithrombotic therapy for ACS. Although an argument can be made for development of a standardized bleeding definition, a more prudent approach may be to develop standardized data elements, which can then be used to tailor bleeding definitions according to the goals of future clinical investigations.

Evolution of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy: benefits and risks of contemporary pharmacologic agents and their implications for myonecrosis and bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention

Periprocedural myonecrosis, as evidenced by elevated creatine kinase-myocardial bound (CK-MB) levels, occurs in up to 25% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and has been linked with an increased risk of adverse short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Such myonecrosis arises from three main pathophysiological mechanisms: procedure-related complications, lesion-specific characteristics (e.g., large thrombus burden, plaque volume), and patient-specific characteristics (e.g., genetic predisposition, arterial inflammation). Periprocedural myonecrosis has not been definitively identified as the cause of postprocedural ischemic events, although agents that reduce or prevent thrombosis--including aspirin, thienopyridines, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors--have been shown to reduce the incidence of ischemic outcomes in this population, as have agents that reduce inflammation (aspirin, statins). At the same time, antithrombotic agents are known to increase the risk of bleeding and the use of transfusions, which have likewise been associated with worse outcomes in these patients. Thus, optimal management of patients undergoing PCI represents a balance between minimizing the risk of ischemic outcomes and simultaneously minimizing the risk of major bleeding. It may be that patients who have only minor, untreated postprocedural elevations in CK-MB level (with no clinical or angiographic signs of ischemia) might have a better prognosis than patients who have normal CK-MB levels but who suffer major bleeding complications.

Relevance of hemostasis on restenosis in clinically stable patients undergoing elective PTCA

BACKGROUND

Secondary coronary thrombus formation is considered to be co-factor in the pathogenesis of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Therefore systemic factors indicating a hypercoagulable disease state may be relevant for the process of coronary renarrowing. Even though experimental data suggest that in particular thrombin may be of major relevance for restenosis induced by mechanical injury, only little clinical data has been presented so far.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 60 consecutive patients, who had been clinical stable for at least 2 months, and who underwent elective and primarily successful PTCA, follow-up films were evaluated by means of quantitative coronary angiography in respect to a categorical and a continuous definition of restenosis, luminal narrowing >50% and late luminal loss respectively. Of the chosen laboratory variables prothrombin fragment 1+2 (1.3+/-0.5 vs. 0.9+/-0.4 mmol/l, p<0.001) red blood cell aggregation at low shear stress (13.5+/-2.9 vs. 11.6+/-2.8 units, p<0.05), and plasminogen-activator inhibitor (3.7+/-1.8 vs. 5.3+/-3.2 U/ml p<0.05) differentiated between patients with (n=18) and without restenosis (n=42). Late luminal loss correlated positively with prothrombin fragment 1+2 (r=0.41, p<0.001), plasminogen-activator inhibitor (r= -0.28, p<0.05) and plasmin-alpha2-antiplasmin complex (r=0.39, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A hypercoagulable disease state and in particular thrombin generation characterize a high-risk group prone for restenosis in clinically stable coronary artery disease.

Pharmacological antithrombotic adjuncts to percutaneous coronary intervention

Stent thrombosis is the major cause of early adverse events during percutaneous coronary intervention. Its incidence has fallen considerably in recent years, principally due to the introduction of effective antithrombotic therapies. The selection of an appropriate antithrombotic regimen is critical in achieving a balance between reducing ischaemic events and minimising bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In this article, evidence for the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies is discussed, including the thienopyridines, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, direct thrombin inhibitors and pentasaccharides.

Anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic approaches in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Over the past three decades, there has been a tremendous increase in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. However, PCI causes disruption of atherosclerotic plaque and denudation of the endothelium, leading to stimulation of platelet aggregation and activation of the coagulation cascade. Therefore, anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic agents have a pivotal role as adjuncts before, during and after PCI, in order to minimize the risk of procedural ischemic complications, such as myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and various degrees of myonecrosis. The current article presents a comprehensive review of the evolution of current anti-platelet and anticoagulation regimens used in the setting of PCI. It starts with a summary of the current perspective of the coagulation process along with platelet activation and aggregation. The review then focuses specifically on individual anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic drugs including their mechanism of action and the scientific evidence which led to their use in PCI. Finally, we present summary recommendations from the AHA/ACC guidelines for individual anticoagulant and anti-platelet regimens given peri-PCI.

Antithrombotic therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention

This article outlines the antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy used in contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions. It is a comprehensive review of past and present pharmacologic agents and includes a discussion of the more promising potential future therapies. The clinical trials that provide the basis for the current standard of care are provided, as are ongoing trials that will likely shape the future standard. This article is not intended to provide a detailed discussion of precise mechanistic or structural features of each agent but to serve as a practical clinical guide to the interventionalist when choosing specific pharmacotherapies for specific patients in the catheterization laboratory.

Clinical development of bivalirudin (Angiox): rationale for thrombin-specific anticoagulation in percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndromes

As the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been clarified in recent years, major advances have been made in the management of the disease. The magnitude of the thrombotic process triggered upon plaque disruption is modulated by different elements that determine plaque and blood thrombogenicity. Thrombin plays a pivotal role in ACS because of its extensive procoagulant and prothrombotic actions. Antithrombotic therapy and powerful antiplatelet therapies, in addition to early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), have become central in the management of ACS. A number of options for anticoagulation regimens are available. However, many agents currently used have significant limitations, recognition of which has led to the development, evaluation and clinical introduction of the class of thrombin-specific anticoagulant agents. This paper will discuss the clinical development of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin as the core anticoagulant in the contemporary PCI setting and the implications for its use in ACS.

New Anticoagulant Agents: Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

Decades of research have been devoted to developing effective, safe, and convenient anticoagulant agents. In recent years, much emphasis has been placed on the development of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that offer benefits over agents like heparin and warfarin including the inhibition of both circulating and clot-bound thrombin; a more predictable anticoagulant response, because they do not bind to plasma proteins and are not neutralized by platelet factor 4; lack of required cofactors, such as antithrombin or heparin cofactor II; inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation; and absence of induction of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Various injectable DTIs are currently available and used for many indications. In addition, research is now focusing on oral DTIs that seem promising and offer various advantages, such as oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine monitoring, no significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated syndrome associated with heparin exposure, a falling platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. Cardiovascular patients are at increased risk of HIT due to wide use of heparin in this population. Should HIT be suspected, heparin must be avoided in most situations, and anticoagulation with an alternative anticoagulant should be instituted. Preferred agents include the direct thrombin inhibitors argatroban and lepirudin, whilst bivalirudin or desirudin (other direct thrombin inhibitors) can be used in some situations. The indirect thrombin inhibitors, danaparoid and fondaparinux, can also be considered at times. These agents and their use in cardiac patients, including patients with acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary interventions, acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery, will be reviewed.

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: effect in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

We evaluated the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using the DTI Trialists' Collaboration database of 35,970 patients from 11 randomized trials of DTIs vs. heparin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with PCI as a time-dependent covariate to assess the independent impact of DTIs according to the performance of early PCI. PCI was performed in 7049 patients in the first 72 h after randomization. In trials in which PCI was not planned, DTIs were associated with a 10% relative risk reduction in death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (HR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.97). This benefit was found to be greater in patients undergoing early PCI (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.91) than those undergoing non-early PCI (HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and propensity to undergo PCI, the risk of death or myocardial infarction remained lower with DTI (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89).

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for baseline differences and propensity to undergo early PCI, DTIs appeared to be more effective than heparin in reducing death or re-infarction among patients undergoing early PCI.

Direct thrombin inhibitors: current status and future prospects

Thrombin is a pivotal enzyme in the coagulation cascade and in the pathogenesis of thrombosis, which can lead to the occurrence of a number of coronary syndromes. Thrombin inhibition, by either recombinant or synthetic inhibitors, has now been recognised as a possible mechanism by which to modulate thrombosis; a cause of considerable mortality and morbidity, particularly in the western world. This approach represents a departure from established antithrombotic therapy, the mainstay therapies for which are aspirin, heparin or warfarin. There is now a body of clinical evidence with recombinant peptide or protein based thrombin inhibitors, and, to a lesser extent, synthetic agents, which give useful insights into the potential therapeutic impact of direct thrombin inhibitors. As well as defining the key clinical parameters where these drugs can be beneficial, clinical studies have also highlighted specific areas which need to be addressed by newer compounds in this class. A number of examples of low molecular weight and potentially orally available compounds are now in early clinical development; they may serve to answer many of the questions raised by Phase III trials with compounds based on hirudin.

Determination of prothombinase activation after adding human purified prothrombin to human clot: comparison of hirudin, an activated factor II inhibitor, with DX9065a, an activated factor X inhibitor, on clot-associated thrombin and on prothrombin activation

Clot-associated prothrombinase and thrombin activities may contribute to thrombus extension after thrombolytic and anticoagulant treatment. We studied prothrombin activation after adding human purified prothrombin to human clot. By using two different drugs with an exclusive direct anti-activated factor X activity (DX9065a) or anti-activated factor II activity (r-hirudin), we tried to determine whether clot-bound thrombin and prothrombinase could be inhibited in our experimental system when human purified prothrombin was added. Standard clots were prepared from platelet-poor human plasma after addition of calcium. We measured clot-bound thrombin or free thrombin using a direct simple chromogenic assay. In parallel, prothrombin fragment 1+2 measurement was used to monitor prothrombin activation. For this, two protocols were used. We introduced the direct inhibitors before starting the activation process (protocol A) or at the time of the activation process (protocol B). We found a direct correlation between thrombin generation and prothrombin fragment 1+2 with an increase of thrombin activity on clots and in the incubation mixtures when clots were incubated in human purified pothrombin alone. Two protocols were used: in the first, clots were pre-incubated in presence of drugs before adding prothrombin; and in the second, clots were incubated in the presence of prothrombin and drugs. Prothrombin activation was not inhibited when clots were incubated with r-hirudin and consequently thrombin generation still occurred. However, added r-hirudin blocks thrombin activity on the clots and in the incubation mixture, but does not prevent prothrombin activation, as shown by the increase of prothrombin fragment 1+2. In contrast, DX9065a did not suppress clot-bound thrombin. However, DX9065a blocks prothrombin activation whichever protocol was used. The results show that hirudin is a poor inhibitor of thrombin generation in contrast to DX9065a. On the other hand, DX9065a cannot inhibit thrombin bound to clot in contrast to hirudin.