Prophylactic platelet transfusions in acute myeloid leukemia

Profound thrombocytopenia and survival of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients without clinically significant bleeding, using prophylactic platelet transfusion triggers of 10 x 10(9) or 20 x 10(9) per L

BACKGROUND

A trigger of 10 x 10(9) per L for prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusions is generally recommended for stable thrombocytopenic patients who receive chemotherapy, based on studies showing similar incidence, severity, and fatality of bleeding compared with the 20 x 10(9) per L trigger. The outcome of thrombocytopenic nonbleeding patients has not been well described. This retrospective analysis evaluates thrombocytopenia and survival of 381 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients without clinically significant bleeding, with 10 x 10(9) and 20 x 10(9) per L prophylactic triggers.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 170 patients who received prophylactic PLT transfusions at 20 x 10(9) per L (1997-1998, SP1) and 211 patients who had prophylaxis at 10 x 10(9) per L (1999-2001, SP2) were identified as nonbleeding patients. PLT counts and clinical complications were assessed within 100 days from HSCT.

RESULTS

PLT counts less than or equal to 10 x 10(9) per L were found in 69.2 percent of patients in SP2 and 38.3 percent in SP1 (p < 0.001). Profound thrombocytopenia (4+ PLT counts <or=10 x 10(9)/L) was found in 19.0 percent of patients in SP2 and 7.0 percent in SP1 (p = 0.001). Patients with profound thrombocytopenia had significantly increased early mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-8.07) and significantly reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.28-2.97) compared to patients with 0 to 3 PLT counts less than or equal to 10 x 10(9) per L. The association of profound thrombocytopenia with early mortality was more notable in SP2.

CONCLUSION

The 10 x 10(9) per L transfusion trigger is associated with significantly greater exposure to low PLT counts. Nonbleeding patients with profound thrombocytopenia were at significantly greater risk of dying compared with nonthrombocytopenic patients. These results suggest that safety of the 10 x 10(9) per L trigger should be more thoroughly evaluated.

Methodologic issues in the use of bleeding as an outcome in transfusion medicine studies

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic platelet transfusions are given to thrombocytopenic patients to prevent bleeding. The benefit of platelet transfusions has frequently been assessed by measuring the count increment; however, more recently, an assessment of bleeding has been used because it is a more clinically relevant outcome measure. The purpose of this study was to identify platelet transfusion trigger studies that used bleeding as an outcome measure, compare and contrast methods used to document bleeding and analyze bleeding outcomes, and identify and discuss methodologic issues to consider when bleeding is used as a study outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic search to identify platelet transfusion trigger studies was performed. Relevant articles were reviewed to identify how bleeding data was captured and analyzed, and methodologic considerations were identified.

RESULTS

Seven articles meeting the predefined entry criteria were identified. Methods used to document bleeding included chart review and clinical assessment. The frequency of assessment and the type of personnel performing the assessment were variable. Four approaches to analysis were identified: descriptive; comparison of the proportions of patients having at least one bleed; comparison of patient days with bleeding expressed as a proportion of the total days at risk of bleeding; and time-to-event (first bleed) analysis.

CONCLUSION

Methodologic issues for consideration when designing a clinical study with bleeding as the outcome measure included approaches to minimize bias in the documentation and classification of bleeding and selection of an analysis approach that is appropriate to the question being asked. The need for development of a valid and reliable bleeding scale was also identified.