Chloramphenicol resistance in meningococci

Meningococcal vaccines: a progress report

Neisseria meningitidis causes a wide range of human disease and remains a common cause of septicaemia and meningitis. Meningococcal serogroups A, B, C and Y cause the majority of cases of invasive disease in the US and throughout the world, with epidemics usually caused by serogroups A and C. Most patients with meningococcaemia, with or without meningitis, respond to standard antimicrobial therapy with either penicillin or ampicillin, but the recent emergence of meningococcal strains that are intermediately resistant to penicillin may alter these recommendations in the future. Given the devastating nature of meningococcal disease and emergence of these resistant strains, prevention (specifically through vaccination) remains the best approach to control this serious infection. A polysaccharide meningococcal vaccine is efficacious against disease caused by serogroups A, C, Y and W135, but is not effective in infants and children aged <2 years, and the duration of efficacy decreases markedly during the first 3 years after a single dose of the vaccine. Conjugate meningococcal vaccines have been developed to address these concerns. Initial studies with the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine have shown that the vaccine is safe and immunogenic and provides a T cell-dependent antigen that can be boosted by further doses of vaccine, or following exposure to the homologous organism or cross-reacting antigens. The UK recently implemented routine vaccination with the meningococcal C conjugate vaccine to all infants, and to all persons aged >1 year in a catch-up programme to immunise all school-aged children and young adults up to 20 years of age. Early postlicensure data indicate that this vaccine has shown significant efficacy in reduction of invasive meningococcal disease in these age groups. The full impact of vaccination will be determined once all age groups are immunised.

The microbial genetics of antibiotic cycling

Cycling of currently available antibiotics to reduce resistance is an attractive concept. For cycling strategies to be successful, their implementation must have a demonstrable impact on the prevalence of resistance determinants already dispersed throughout the hospital and associated healthcare facilities. While antibiotic use in hospitals clearly constitutes a stimulus for the emergence of resistance, it is by no means the only important factor. The incorporation of resistance determinants into potentially stable genetic structures, including bacteriophages, plasmids, transposons, and the more newly discovered movable elements termed integrons and gene cassettes, forces some degree of skepticism about the potential for such strategies in institutions where resistance determinants are already prevalent. In particular, the expanding role of integrons may pose an ultimate threat to formulary manipulations such as cycling. Despite these concerns, the crisis posed by antimicrobial resistance warrants investigation of any strategy with the potential for reducing the prevalence of resistance. Over the next decade, new studies with carefully designed outcomes should determine the utility of antibiotic cycling as one control measure for nosocomial resistance.