CT screening for lung cancer

Reinventing Radiology: Big Data and the Future of Medical Imaging

PURPOSE

Today, data surrounding most of our lives are collected and stored. Data scientists are beginning to explore applications that could harness this information and make sense of it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this review, the topic of Big Data is explored, and applications in modern health care are considered.

RESULTS

Big Data is a concept that has evolved from the modern trend of "scientism." One of the primary goals of data scientists is to develop ways to discover new knowledge from the vast quantities of increasingly available information.

CONCLUSIONS

Current and future opportunities and challenges with respect to radiology are provided with emphasis on cardiothoracic imaging.

Diagnosis of Lung Cancer by SHOX2 Gene Methylation Assay

Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer in the world. Few effective and cheap methods are available so far for early detection and screening of lung cancer. Although histological and cytological examinations are gold standards in lung cancer diagnosis, patients are always at late stages when diagnosis is confirmed. Therefore, new diagnostic methods are needed urgently to increase the early diagnostic rate, enhance the confirmed diagnostic rate, and reduce mortality. The SHOX2 gene methylation assay has become a promising option for the above purposes. It has been shown to enhance the confirmed diagnostic rate of lung cancer in several clinical trials when combined with histological or cytological assays, and has the potential to become an early diagnostic tool. This article reviews the outcome of clinical trials using the SHOX2 gene methylation assay alone or in combination with other examinations, and suggests its future applications and research directions.

An up to date look at lung cancer screening

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. At the time of initial presentation, most patients are at an advance stage of disease and have a poor associated prognosis. Those diagnosed and treated at earlier stages have a significantly better outcome with 5-year survival for stage I disease approaching 75%. Ideally a screening strategy for lung cancer would detect disease at an earlier stage and allow for potential surgical cure. The purpose of this review is to examine past and current evidence as it relates to lung cancer screening.

Cost of a 5-year lung cancer survivor: symptomatic tumour identification vs proactive computed tomography screening

Background:

Our objective was to analyse the cost effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer in terms of the cost per long-term survivor, which has not been evaluated to date.

Methods:

Estimations were computed based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries covering years 1999–2003. The design framework of our model allowed for the incorporation of multiple values taken from the epidemiological and clinical literature to be utilised for cost inputs, scope of patients screened, diagnostic staging, and survival percentages applied separately to two cohorts: age 40–79 and 60–79 years. This enabled the analysis of over 1400 scenarios, each containing a unique set of input values, for which the estimated cost per 5-year survivor (CP5YS) was compared between the symptom-detected and proactive screening approaches.

Results:

Estimated CP5YS were higher for the symptom-detected approach in all 729 scenarios analysed for the cohort ages 60–79 years, ranging from approximately $5800 to $116 700 increased cost per 5-year survivor (CP5YS). For the cohort ages 40–79 years, 75% of the 729 scenarios analysed showed increased CP5YS for the symptom-detected approach ranging from $5700 to $110 000 increased CP5YS. Total costs and total 5-year survivors were higher for the proactive screening method for all scenarios analysed across both cohorts with increases ranging from 50–256% and 98–309%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The predicted increase in long-term survival with CT screening and the potential for better utilisation of health-care dollars in terms of CP5YS, particularly when screening patients over the age of 60 years, are critically important considerations in directing effective future lung cancer management strategy.

Screening for lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our review is to discuss the current state of lung cancer screening using CT in the context of defined criteria for effective screening.

CONCLUSION

Although there are hopeful developments in lung cancer screening, a number of unresolved issues must be answered before adopting screening on a large scale. Currently no data exist to suggest that lung cancer screening with CT will result in a decrease in lung cancer mortality.

Lung cancer screening

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Most patients present symptomatically when the disease is often at an advanced stage and prognosis is poor. In contrast, outcomes are significantly better in patients diagnosed at earlier stages, with a 5-year survival for stage I approaching 75%. Screening for lung cancer may detect potentially fatal cases earlier in their disease course, at a stage when a curative surgical intervention is feasible. The objective of this review is to examine the current evidence for lung cancer screening and the clinical effectiveness of screening for lung cancer by using computed tomography.

Lung cancer screening: has there been any progress? Computed tomography and autofluorescence bronchoscopy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in imaging technologies are currently being explored in the attempt to reduce lung cancer morbidity and mortality by achieving stage shift. We reviewed recent important publications on lung cancer screening.

RECENT FINDINGS

Autofluorescence bronchoscopy has established its important role in the intervention of early central airway lesions. Multidetector computed tomography (CT) and CT-positron emission tomography may facilitate diagnosis of early parenchymal lung lesions. Practical implications of screening are reaching far beyond early diagnostic efforts per se as lead-time, length-time, overdiagnosis biases combined with low specificity of screening tests undermine its cost-effectiveness in the era of healthcare budget constraints.

SUMMARY

Advanced imaging technologies may allow early detection and prudent intervention in some individuals that harbour asymptomatic early lung cancer, but disproportional expenses may be required to sieve out many more individuals at risk to attain stage shift. Confounding co-morbidities and practical hurdles may reduce screening's efficacy as it is plausible that for the majority of smokers, lung cancer may not be the ultimate cause of suffering since 90% of them will not develop lung cancer. This fact remains true despite increased use of noninvasive and minimally invasive technologies for the maximum preservation of quality of life irrespective of whether early intervention is a success or failure.