A comparison of three initial antiretroviral AIDS regimens

Antiretroviral drug use by individuals living with HIV/AIDS and compliance with the Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines

Objective

To describe antiretroviral treatment regimens prescribed and their compliance with the Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines of the Ministry of Health for the management of HIV infection.

Methods

Observational and descriptive study. Secondary data of the state of Paraná (Brazil) on drugs, treatment regimens, lines of treatment and number of individuals on treatment, from January to June 2018, were accessed at the Antiretroviral Agents Logistic Control System. Combinations of antiretroviral drugs (treatment regimens) were compared according to the current Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines and non-compliances were classified and quantified.

Results

In Paraná, 35,127 individuals with HIV were treated with 253 different treatment regimens. Of the prescribed regimens, 19.1% were first-line, 27.4% second-line and 48.5% third-line. Among non-compliances, the most prevalent were absence of association of protease inhibitors and ritonavir (42.8%), low efficacy triple therapy (36.9%), double therapy (26.1%), monotherapy (20.3%), and triple therapy of nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (17.1%).

Conclusion

Most individuals receiving HIV treatment in the state of Paraná are on treatment regimens established in the current Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines, which contributes to successful therapy. However, associations not provided by the current Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines were identified in the initial treatment lines, which could lead to ineffectiveness, virologic failure and viral resistance.

When to start, what to start and other treatment controversies in pediatric HIV infection

Over the last decade there have been dramatic changes in the management of pediatric HIV infection. Whilst observational studies and several randomized control trials (RCTs) have addressed some questions about when to start antiretroviral therapy (ART) in children and what antiretrovirals to start, many others remain unanswered. In infants, early initiation of ART greatly reduces mortality and disease progression. Treatment guidelines now recommend ART in all infants younger than 1 or 2 years of age depending on geographical setting. In children >1 year of age, US, European (Paediatric European Network for Treatment of AIDS; PENTA) and WHO guidelines differ and debate is ongoing. Recent data from an RCT in Thailand in children with moderate immune suppression indicate that it is safe to monitor asymptomatic children closely without initiating ART, although earlier treatment was associated with improved growth. Untreated HIV progression in children aged over 5 years is similar to that in adults, and traditionally adult treatment thresholds are applied. Recent adult observational and modeling studies showed a survival advantage and reduction of age-associated complications with early treatment. The current US guidelines have lowered CD4+ cell count thresholds for ART initiation for children aged >5 years to 500 cells/mm3. Co-infections influence the choice of drugs and the timing of starting ART. Drug interactions, overlapping toxicities and adherence problems secondary to increased pill burden are important issues. Rapid changes in the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in the first years of life, limited pharmacokinetic data in children and genetic variation in metabolism of many antiretrovirals make correct dosing difficult. Adherence should always be addressed prior to starting ART or switching regimens. The initial ART regimen depends on previous exposure, including perinatal administration for prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT), adherence, co-infections, drug availability and licensing. A European cohort study in infants indicated that treatment with four drugs produced superior virologic suppression and immune recovery. Protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART has the advantage of a high barrier to viral resistance. A recent RCT conducted in several African countries showed PI-based ART to be advantageous in children aged <3 years compared with nevirapine-based ART irrespective of previous nevirapine exposure. Another trial in older children from resource rich settings showed both regimens were equally effective. Treatment interruption remains a controversial issue in children, but one study in Europe demonstrated no short-term detrimental effects. ART in children is a rapidly evolving area with many new antiretrovirals being developed and undergoing trials. The aim of ART has shifted from avoiding mortality and morbidity to achieving a normal life expectancy and quality of life, minimizing toxicities and preventing early cancers and age-related illnesses.

Antiretroviral therapy for treatment-naïve patients: a review of recent literature and the updated guidelines

The improved efficacy and safety of antiretroviral agents have fundamentally changed the face of HIV infection. Advances in antiretroviral therapy have dramatically improved the prognosis of HIV infection, which is now on a par with other chronic illnesses. This article addresses the optimal timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation and the optimal drug choices for initial regimens, with a focus on recent data and published guidelines issued by the US Department of Health and Human Services and the International AIDS Society-USA.

[AIDS Study Group/Spanish AIDS Plan consensus document on antiretroviral therapy in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (updated January 2010)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy recommendations for adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations a panel made up of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (Gesida, AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS, Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in the current understanding of the pathophysiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the efficacy and safety of clinical trials, and cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not to recommend ART was established in each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, the treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs of two different classes, including 2 nucleosides or nucleotide analogs (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside (NNRTI) or 1 boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r), but other combinations are possible. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4 lymphocyte counts, plasma viral load and patient co-morbidities, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4 counts below 350 cells/microl; 2) When CD4 counts are between 350 and 500 cells/microl, therapy should be started in case of cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, high cardiovascular risk, HIV nephropathy, HIV viral load above 100,000 copies/ml, proportion of CD4 cells under 14%, and in people aged over 55; 3) Therapy should be deferred when CD4 are above 500 cells/microl, but could be considered if any of previous considerations concurs. Treatment should be initiated in case of hepatitis B requiring treatment and should be considered for reduce sexual transmission. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited after ART failures but undetectable viral loads maybe possible with the new drugs even in highly drug experienced patients. Genotype studies are useful in these situations. Drug toxicity of ART therapy is losing importance as benefits exceed adverse effects. Criteria for antiretroviral treatment in acute infection, pregnancy and post-exposure prophylaxis are mentioned as well as the management of HIV co-infection with hepatitis B or C.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4 cells counts, viral load and patient co-morbidities are the most important reference factors to consider when initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the ability to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized therapy approach in order to achieve undetectable viral load under any circumstances.

Pre-existing minority drug-resistant HIV-1 variants, adherence, and risk of antiretroviral treatment failure

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of detecting minority drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants is uncertain.

METHODS

To determine the effect of pre-existing minority nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant variants on the risk of virologic failure, we reanalyzed a case-cohort substudy of efavirenz recipients in AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol A5095. Minority K103N or Y181C populations were determined by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction in subjects without NNRTI resistance by population sequencing. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for recent treatment adherence estimated the relative risk of virologic failure in the presence of NNRTI-resistant minority variants.

RESULTS

The evaluable case-cohort sample included 195 subjects from the randomly selected subcohort (51 with virologic failure, 144 without virologic failure), plus 127 of the remaining subjects who experienced virologic failure. Presence of minority K103N or Y181C mutations, or both, was detected in 8 (4.4%), 54 (29.5%), and 11 (6%), respectively, of 183 evaluable subjects in the random subcohort. Detection of minority Y181C mutants was associated with an increased risk of virologic failure in the setting of recent treatment adherence (hazard ratio, 3.45 [95% confidence interval, 1.90-6.26]) but not in nonadherent subjects (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% confidence interval, 0.58-3.29]). Of note, 70% of subjects with minority Y181C variants achieved long-term viral suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In adherent patients, pre-existing minority Y181C mutants more than tripled the risk of virologic failure of first-line efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00013520.