Abacavir hypersensitivity

Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common malignant gynaecological tumour. However, as survival rates have improved, increasing attention has focused on the quality of the survivors' sex lives. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence and severity of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in women with CC. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wang Fang databases, and extracted data from all studies published up to December 2020 that evaluated sexual dysfunction in patients with CC with the female sexual function index (FSFI). Studies were screened according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the qualities of the included studies were evaluated. Sixteen studies with a total of 2009 women with CC, including 1306 women with FSD, were included in the meta-analysis. Among patients with CC, the incidence of FSD was 80% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.74-0.87) and the average FSFI score was 20.25 (95%CI 18.96-21.53). These results revealed a high prevalence of FSD and poor sexual function among women with CC, suggesting a need to assess sexual function regularly in these women with CC to improve early recognition of FSD and thereby allow appropriate interventions to enhance the sex life of affected patients.

HLA-B*57: 01 genotyping in the prevention of hypersensitivity to abacavir: 5 years of experience

INTRODUCTION

Most of the cost-effectiveness analyses are based on estimations to make decisions on the future implementation of a test. However, the model should be verified with real data to prove that previous estimations have been successfully fulfilled.

OBJECTIVE

To study the economic impact of the systematic HLA-B*57:01 genotyping in preventing hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in the patient population of a tertiary-care hospital treated with abacavir (ABC) using retrospective data of 5 years of experience.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out with two cohorts including 780 and 473 patients before and after the implementation of the systematic HLA-B*57:01 genotyping before ABC treatment. Cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out by the parameter 'cost per HSR avoided'. The clinical utility of the test was verified by evaluating the differences in HSR incidence between both cohorts. Finally, a sensitivity analysis including all variables was carried out.

RESULTS

In the population studied, systematic genotyping represents an additional cost of &OV0556;306 per HSR avoided. In the sensitivity analysis, pharmacological therapy cost is the major influencing factor found in the estimation of the 'cost per HSR avoided'. In terms of clinical utility, the incidence ratio was 0.040 (95% confidence interval 0.0009-0.2399) and statistically significant differences were found between both groups (P=1.40×10).

CONCLUSION

Retrospective data from 5 years of experience have confirmed the cost-effectiveness of the systematic genotyping in candidate patients for ABC therapy, and have shown that cost-effectiveness is a dynamic parameter closely linked to allele prevalence and pharmacological therapy costs.

Development of a Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test in asthma: proof of concept

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of developing a Combined Clinical and Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test, comprised of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that is associated with poor bronchodilator response (BDR).

METHODS

We genotyped SNPs that tagged the whole genome of the parents and children in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) and implemented an algorithm using a family-based association test that ranked SNPs by statistical power. The top eight SNPs that were associated with BDR comprised the Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test. The Clinical Predictive Test was comprised of baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). We evaluated these predictive tests and a Combined Clinical and Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test in three distinct populations: the children of the CAMP trial and two additional clinical trial populations of asthma. Our outcome measure was poor BDR, defined as BDR of less than 20th percentile in each population. BDR was calculated as the percent difference between the prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator (two puffs of albuterol at 180 microg/puff) FEV1 value. To assess the predictive ability of the test, the corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were calculated for each population.

RESULTS

The AUROC values for the Clinical Predictive Test alone were not significantly different from 0.50, the AUROC of a random classifier. Our Combined Clinical and Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test comprised of genetic polymorphisms in addition to FEV1 predicted poor BDR with an AUROC of 0.65 in the CAMP children (n = 422) and 0.60 (n = 475) and 0.63 (n = 235) in the two independent populations. Both the Combined Clinical and Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test and the Pharmacogenetic Predictive Test were significantly more accurate than the Clinical Predictive Test (AUROC between 0.44 and 0.55) in each of the populations.

CONCLUSION

Our finding that genetic polymorphisms with a clinical trait are associated with BDR suggests that there is promise in using multiple genetic polymorphisms simultaneously to predict which asthmatics are likely to respond poorly to bronchodilators.

Successful translation of pharmacogenetics into the clinic: the abacavir example

Abacavir hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is a potentially life-threatening illness occurring in 4-8% of those initiating the drug. Early studies identified a strong association between the MHC class I allele HLA-B*5701 and AHS. These studies suggested that HLA-B*5701 holds promise as a screening test to prevent AHS, but concern arose from HLA-B*5701-negative cases with a clinical diagnosis of AHS, and particularly from early reports of apparently low sensitivities of HLA-B*5701 for AHS in patients of non-White race. However, open screening studies suggested that HLA-B*5701 screening can largely eliminate AHS. Furthermore, skin-patch testing was used in later-generation studies to separate those patients with true immunologically mediated AHS from those with false-positive clinical diagnoses. Currently, high-level evidence suggests that HLA-B*5701 has a negative predictive value of 100% for patch-test-confirmed AHS, which is generalizable across White and Black populations. Current HIV treatment guidelines have been revised to reflect the recommendation that HLA-B*5701 screening be incorporated into routine care for patients who may require abacavir. New laboratory techniques such as PCR and flow cytometric methods, as well as an international quality assurance program, have evolved to ensure the availability of cost-effective screening methods whose consistency and standard can be maintained over time. An elegant body of basic science has evolved, which supports and complements the clinical research in suggesting that AHS is specifically and exquisitely restricted by HLA-B*5701 and mediated by CD8+ lymphocytes. Abrogating factors explaining why 45% of those carrying HLA-B*5701 can tolerate abacavir remain to be defined. The research approach applied to AHS has led to a genetic screening test being successfully implemented globally in primary HIV clinical practice. The abacavir 'example' can be applied to other drugs to facilitate the development and operationalization of genetic tests that may be useful to predict and prevent otherwise unpredictable drug reactions.