Aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery

Aprotinin and classic wound drainage are unnecessary in total hip replacement - a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Classic wound drainage is still common in hip replacement but its benefit is doubtful. The role of systemic administration of proteinase inhibitors like aprotinin to avoid perioperative blood loss is still unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized trial, the perioperative blood loss in alloplastic hip replacement under the influence of proteinase inhibitor (aprotinin, Trasylol®) using wound drainage as well as compression treatment alone were compared. 80 patients were prospectively randomized in 4 arms. Patients received either aprotinin or placebo during surgery as well as drainage or targeted external wound compression.

RESULTS

Observing the "drug therapy" aprotinin had no effect on the intra- or postoperative blood loss (p>0.05), a trend to lower postoperative hemoglobin decline was found, but without significance. Thrombosis occurred in neither the aprotinin nor in the placebo group. Two patients had a severe allergic drug reaction and were excluded from the study. Under "non drug therapy" with compression therapy and wound drainage a significant difference in blood loss was found (p<0.001). The blood loss was higher under the wound drainage. There was no influence on the infection rate. Yet we could observe increased bruising under the sole external compression treatment.

CONCLUSION

The administration of aprotinin did not achieve the desired reduction of perioperative blood loss. Hence, costs and two severe allergic drug reactions in our study represent arguments against its use in regular treatment. Furthermore, it seems that wound drainage is neglectable in hip replacement and can be substituted by a sole compression treatment.

The year in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: selected highlights from 2008

The 2008 highlights in cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesia include the ultimate departure of aprotinin from clinical practice. However, a new antihypertensive drug, clevidipine, was approved for perioperative control of hypertension. There were also advances in pharmacologic myocardial conditioning with agents such as cyclosporine, sodium nitroprusside, and levosimendan. Furthermore, ischemic preconditioning appears ready for testing in large clinical trials designed to improve ischemic outcomes after cardiac surgery. With regard to transfusion, a landmark study suggests that transfused red blood cells stored for >2 weeks may significantly worsen major outcome after cardiac surgery. Furthermore, a second study suggests that relative rather than absolute hemoglobin reduction significantly determines adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. These studies may greatly affect future transfusion guidelines. Left-sided valve replacement has been revolutionized by transcatheter technology, which progressed significantly in 2008. Important advances in percutaneous coronary intervention included drug-eluting bioabsorbable stents and further insights into the clinical consequences of platelet resistance. These 2008 themes represent a sampling of the total highlights for the year. Many of the advances not covered have been reviewed and discussed in the literature review sections of the Journal in 2008.