Cultured Cells and ROCK Inhibitor for Bullous Keratopathy

Corneal endothelial wound healing: understanding the regenerative capacity of the innermost layer of the cornea

Currently, there are very few well-established treatments to stimulate corneal endothelial cell regeneration in vivo as a cure for corneal endothelial dysfunctions. The most frequently performed intervention for a damaged or dysfunctional corneal endothelium nowadays is corneal endothelial keratoplasty, also known as lamellar corneal transplantation surgery. Newer medical therapies are emerging and are targeting the regeneration of the corneal endothelium, helping the patients regain their vision without the need for donor tissue. Alternatives to donor tissues are needed as the aging population requiring transplants, has further exacerbated the pressure on the corneal eye banking system. Significant ongoing research efforts in the field of corneal regenerative medicine have been made to elucidate the underlying pathways and effector proteins involved in corneal endothelial regeneration. However, the literature offers little guidance and selective attention to the question of how to fully exploit these pathways. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of wound healing characteristics from a biochemical level in the lab to the regenerative features seen in the clinic. Studying the pathways involved in corneal wound healing together with their key effector proteins, can help explain the effect on the proliferation and migration capacity of the corneal endothelial cells.

Corneal Oedema: Aetiology, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatment

Corneal oedema results from an underlying pathology, which can be diverse in origin, and may be mechanical, dystrophic, or inflammatory, and affect any layer of the cornea. Diagnostic tools such as Scheimpflug imaging and anterior segment optical coherence tomography have standardised quantification of corneal oedema and have become important aids in clinical practice. Timely diagnosis and treatment are key to preventing irreversible damage to the corneal ultrastructure, such as anterior corneal fibrosis or endothelial cell damage. The oedema usually resolves quickly when the underlying cause has been addressed. Symptomatic treatment using hyperosmolar agents has failed to show any benefits in oedema resolution or improvement in visual acuity compared to placebo. In contrast, rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitors offer a promising option for medical treatment in cases of endothelial dysfunction, but their safety and efficacy must be further validated in large scale clinical trials. Until then, endothelial or penetrating keratoplasties remain the mainstay treatment where structural changes to the cornea have occurred.

New Therapies for Corneal Endothelial Diseases: 2020 and Beyond

ABSTRACT

Penetrating keratoplasty used to be the only surgical technique for the treatment of end-stage corneal endothelial diseases. Improvements in surgical techniques over the past decade have now firmly established endothelial keratoplasty as a safe and effective modality for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases. However, there is a worldwide shortage of corneal tissue, with more than 50% of the world having no access to cadaveric tissue. Cell injection therapy and tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty may potentially offer comparable results as endothelial keratoplasty while maximizing the use of cadaveric donor corneal tissue. Descemet stripping only, Descemet membrane transplantation, and selective endothelial removal are novel therapeutic modalities that take this a step further by relying on endogenous corneal endothelial cell regeneration, instead of allogenic corneal endothelial cell transfer. Gene therapy modalities, including antisense oligonucleotides and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based gene editing, offer the holy grail of potentially suppressing the phenotypic expression of genetically determined corneal endothelial diseases at the asymptomatic stage. We now stand at the crossroads of exciting developments in medical technologies that will likely revolutionize the way we treat corneal endothelial diseases over the next 2 decades.

Approaches for corneal endothelium regenerative medicine

The state of the art therapy for treating corneal endothelial disease is transplantation. Advances in the reproducibility and accessibility of surgical techniques are increasing the number of corneal transplants, thereby causing a global deficit of donor corneas and leaving 12.7 million patients with addressable visual impairment. Approaches to regenerate the corneal endothelium offer a solution to the current tissue scarcity and a treatment to those in need. Methods for generating corneal endothelial cells into numbers that could address the current tissue shortage and the possible strategies used to deliver them have now become a therapeutic reality with clinical trials taking place in Japan, Singapore and Mexico. Nevertheless, there is still a long way before such therapies are approved by regulatory bodies and become clinical practice. Moreover, acellular corneal endothelial graft equivalents and certain drugs could provide a treatment option for specific disease conditions without the need of donor tissue or cells. Finally, with the emergence of gene modulation therapies to treat corneal endothelial disease, it would be possible to treat presymptomatic patients or those presenting early symptoms, drastically reducing the need for donor tissue. It is necessary to understand the most recent developments in this rapidly evolving field to know which conditions could be treated with which approach. This article provides an overview of the current and developing regenerative medicine therapies to treat corneal endothelial disease and provides the necessary guidance and understanding towards the treatment of corneal endothelial disease.

Proliferation Increasing Genetic Engineering in Human Corneal Endothelial Cells: A Literature Review

The corneal endothelium is the inner layer of the cornea. Despite comprising only a monolayer of cells, dysfunction of this layer renders millions of people visually impaired worldwide. Currently, corneal endothelial transplantation is the only viable means of restoring vision for these patients. However, because the supply of corneal endothelial grafts does not meet the demand, many patients remain on waiting lists, or are not treated at all. Possible alternative treatment strategies include intracameral injection of human corneal endothelial cells (HCEnCs), biomedical engineering of endothelial grafts and increasing the HCEnC density on grafts that would otherwise have been unsuitable for transplantation. Unfortunately, the limited proliferative capacity of HCEnCs proves to be a major bottleneck to make these alternatives beneficial. To tackle this constraint, proliferation enhancing genetic engineering is being investigated. This review presents the diverse array of genes that have been targeted by different genetic engineering strategies to increase the proliferative capacity of HCEnCs and their relevance for clinical and research applications. Together these proliferation-related genes form the basis to obtain a stable and safe supply of HCEnCs that can tackle the corneal endothelial donor shortage.

Translational and Regulatory Challenges of Corneal Endothelial Cell Therapy: A Global Perspective

Cell therapies are emerging as a unique class of clinical therapeutics in medicine. In 2015, Holoclar (ex vivo expanded autologous human corneal epithelial cells containing stem cells) gained the regulatory approval for treating limbal stem cell deficiency after chemical eye burn. This has set a precedent in ophthalmology and in medicine, reinforcing the therapeutic promise of cell therapy. However, to generalize and commercialize cell therapies on a global scale, stringent translational and regulatory requirements need to be fulfilled at both local and international levels. Over the past decade, the Singapore group has taken significant steps in developing human corneal endothelial cell (HCEnC) therapy for treating corneal endothelial diseases, which are currently the leading indication for corneal transplantation in many countries. Successful development of HCEnC therapy may serve as a novel solution to the current global shortage of donor corneas. Based on the experience in Singapore, this review aims to provide a global perspective on the translational and regulatory challenges for bench-to-bedside translation of cell therapy. Specifically, we discussed about the characterization of the critical quality attributes (CQA), the challenges that can affect the CQA, and the variations in the regulatory framework embedded within different regions, including Singapore, Europe, and the United States. Impact statement Functional corneal endothelium is critical to normal vision. Corneal endothelial disease-secondary to trauma, surgery, or pathology-represents an important cause of visual impairment and blindness in both developed and developing countries. Currently, corneal transplantation serves as the current gold standard for treating visually significant corneal endothelial diseases, although limited by the shortage of donor corneas. Over the past decade, human corneal endothelial cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for treating corneal endothelial diseases. To allow widespread application of this therapy, significant regulatory challenges will need to be systematically overcome.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the most common primary corneal endothelial dystrophy and the leading indication for corneal transplantation worldwide. FECD is characterized by the progressive decline of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) and the formation of extracellular matrix (ECM) excrescences in Descemet's membrane (DM), called guttae, that lead to corneal edema and loss of vision. FECD typically manifests in the fifth decades of life and has a greater incidence in women. FECD is a complex and heterogeneous genetic disease where interaction between genetic and environmental factors results in cellular apoptosis and aberrant ECM deposition. In this review, we will discuss a complex interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and exogenous factors in inciting oxidative stress, auto(mito)phagy, unfolded protein response, and mitochondrial dysfunction during CEC degeneration. Specifically, we explore the factors that influence cellular fate to undergo apoptosis, senescence, and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These findings will highlight the importance of abnormal CEC-DM interactions in triggering the vicious cycle of FECD pathogenesis. We will also review clinical characteristics, diagnostic tools, and current medical and surgical management options for FECD patients. These new paradigms in FECD pathogenesis present an opportunity to develop novel therapeutics for the treatment of FECD.

Corneal endothelial dysfunction: Evolving understanding and treatment options

The cornea is exquisitely designed to protect the eye while transmitting and focusing incoming light. Precise control of corneal hydration by the endothelial cell layer that lines the inner surface of the cornea is required for optimal transparency, and endothelial dysfunction or damage can result in corneal edema and visual impairment. Advances in corneal transplantation now allow selective replacement of dysfunctional corneal endothelium, providing rapid visual rehabilitation. A series of technique improvements have minimized complications and various adaptations allow use even in eyes with complicated anatomy. While selective endothelial keratoplasty sets a very high standard for safety and efficacy, a shortage of donor corneas in many parts of the world restricts access, prompting a search for alternatives. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the potential for self-recovery after removal of dysfunctional central endothelium in patients with healthy peripheral endothelium. Various approaches to using cultured human corneal endothelial cells are also in clinical trials; these aim to multiply cells from a single donor cornea for use in potentially hundreds of patients. Pre-clinical studies are underway with induced pluripotent stem cells, endothelial stem cell regeneration, gene therapy, anti-sense oligonucleotides, and various biologic/pharmacologic approaches designed to treat, prevent, or retard corneal endothelial dysfunction. The availability of more therapeutic options will hopefully expand access around the world while also allowing treatment to be more precisely tailored to each individual patient.

Corneal dystrophies

Corneal dystrophies are broadly defined as inherited disorders that affect any layer of the cornea and are usually progressive, bilateral conditions that do not have systemic effects. The 2015 International Classification of Corneal Dystrophies classifies corneal dystrophies into four classes: epithelial and subepithelial dystrophies, epithelial-stromal TGFBI dystrophies, stromal dystrophies and endothelial dystrophies. Whereas some corneal dystrophies may result in few or mild symptoms and morbidity throughout a patient's lifetime, others may progress and eventually result in substantial visual and ocular disturbances that require medical or surgical intervention. Corneal transplantation, either with full-thickness or partial-thickness donor tissue, may be indicated for patients with advanced corneal dystrophies. Although corneal transplantation techniques have improved considerably over the past two decades, these surgeries are still associated with postoperative risks of disease recurrence, graft failure and other complications that may result in blindness. In addition, a global shortage of cadaveric corneal graft tissue critically limits accessibility to corneal transplantation in some parts of the world. Ongoing advances in gene therapy, regenerative therapy and cell augmentation therapy may eventually result in the development of alternative, novel treatments for corneal dystrophies, which may substantially improve the quality of life of patients with these disorders.

A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy

Donor corneas with low endothelial cell densities (ECD) are deemed unsuitable for corneal endothelial transplantation. This study evaluated a two-step incubation and dissociation harvesting approach to isolate single corneal endothelial cells (CECs) from donor corneas for corneal endothelial cell-injection (CE-CI) therapy. To isolate CECs directly from donor corneas, optimization studies were performed where donor Descemet’s membrane/corneal endothelium (DM/CE) were peeled and incubated in either M4-F99 or M5-Endo media before enzymatic digestion. Morphometric analyses were performed on the isolated single cells. The functional capacities of these cells, isolated using the optimized simple non-cultured endothelial cells (SNEC) harvesting technique, for CE-CI therapy were investigated using a rabbit bullous keratopathy model. The two control groups were the positive controls, where rabbits received cultured CECs, and the negative controls, where rabbits received no CECs. Whilst it took longer for CECs to dislodge as single cells following donor DM/CE incubation in M5-Endo medium, CECs harvested were morphologically more homogenous and smaller compared to CECs obtained from DM/CE incubated in M4-F99 medium (p < 0.05). M5-Endo medium was hence selected as the DM/CE incubation medium prior to enzymatic digestion to harvest CECs for the in vivo cell-injection studies. Following SNEC injection, mean central corneal thickness (CCT) of rabbits increased to 802.9 ± 147.8 μm on day 1, gradually thinned, and remained clear with a CCT of 385.5 ± 38.6 μm at week 3. Recovery of corneas was comparable to rabbits receiving cultured CE-CI (p = 0.40, p = 0.17, and p = 0.08 at weeks 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Corneas that did not receive any cells remained significantly thicker compared to both SNEC injection and cultured CE-CI groups (p < 0.05). This study concluded that direct harvesting of single CECs from donor corneas for SNEC injection allows the utilization of donor corneas unsuitable for conventional endothelial transplantation.

Exploring the Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome for Corneal Endothelial Proliferation

Ex vivo grown human corneal endothelial cells (HCEnC) are a new emerging treatment option to treat visually impaired patients aimed at alleviating the current global donor shortage. Expanding HCEnC is still challenging, and obtaining cells in sufficient quantities is a limiting factor. It is already known that conditioned medium obtained from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can stimulate the proliferation of endothelial cells. The aim of this study was to take this work a step further to identify some of the underlying factors responsible. We confirmed the stimulatory effect of the mesenchymal stem cell secretome seen previously and separated the exosomes from the soluble proteins using size exclusion chromatography. We demonstrated the presence of exosomes and soluble proteins in the early and late fractions, respectively, with transmission electron microscopy and protein assays. Proliferation studies demonstrated that growth stimulation could be reproduced with the later protein-rich fractions but not with the exosome-rich fraction. Antibody assays revealed the presence of the secreted proteins EGF, IGFBP2, and IGFBP6 in protein-high fractions, but the growth enhancement was not seen with purified protein formulations. In conclusion, we confirmed the stimulatory effect of stem cell-conditioned medium and have determined that the effect was attributable to the proteins rather than to the exosomes. We were not able to reproduce the growth stimulation, however, with the pure recombinant protein candidates tested. Specific identification of the underlying proteins using proteomics could render a bioactive protein that can be used for ex vivo expansion of cells or as an in vivo drug to treat early corneal endothelial damage.

The future of keratoplasty: cell-based therapy, regenerative medicine, bioengineering keratoplasty, gene therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on the state of development of novel therapeutic modalities for the treatment of corneal diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel corneal therapeutics may be broadly classified as cell therapy, regenerative medicine, bioengineered corneal grafts and gene therapy. Cell therapy encompasses cultivation of cells, such as corneal endothelial cells (CECs) and keratocytes to replenish the depleted native cell population. Regenerative medicine is mainly applicable to the corneal endothelium, and is dependent on the ability of native, healthy CECs to restore the corneal endothelium following trauma or descemetorhexis; this approach may be effective for the treatment of Peter's anomaly and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Bioengineered corneal grafts are synthetic constructs designed to replace cadaveric corneal grafts; tissue-engineered endothelial-keratoplasty grafts and bioengineered stromal grafts have been experimented in animal models with favourable results. Gene therapy with antisense oligonucleotide and CRISPR endonucleases, including deactivated Cas9, may potentially be used to treat FECD and TGFBI-related corneal dystrophies.

SUMMARY

These novel therapeutic modalities may potentially supersede keratoplasty as the standard of care in the future.