A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis

Acute appendicitis and its treatment: a historical overview

PURPOSE

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the leading cause of acute abdomen worldwide, with an incidence of 90-100 cases per 100,000 individuals annually and a lifetime risk of 7-12%. Despite its prevalence, historical accounts of AA are limited, particularly when compared to conditions like haemorrhoids, likely due to the appendix's internal location. This article traces the historical evolution of AA treatment from ancient times to the present, highlighting key contributions.

METHODS

A review of common research databases and relevant literature on AA was conducted.

RESULTS

Evidence from ancient Egypt suggests early recognition of the appendix, referring to it as the "worm of the bowel." However, detailed anatomical descriptions and treatment approaches for AA did not emerge until the Renaissance, particularly with contributions from Leonardo da Vinci and Berengario da Carpi. The article traces the progression of AA management, including the first autopsies and surgeries, the development of surgical techniques predating anaesthesia and antisepsis, and advancements achieved from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. The shift from conservative to surgical approaches is discussed, alongside innovations such as laparoscopic appendicectomy, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AA treatment, including adaptations in medical practices, is also explored.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the significant historical developments in AA treatment and its pivotal role in advancing abdominal surgery.

Parsimonious clinical prediction model for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis

Objective

To develop a logistic regression model that combines clinical and radiological parameters for prediction of complicated appendicitis.

Methods

248 patients with histologically proven uncomplicated (n = 214) and complicated (n = 34) acute appendicitis were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had undergone a presurgical abdominal and/or pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan, assessed by two radiologists. A model using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses was developed, and the strength of association between independent predictors and complicated acute appendicitis was evaluated by adjusted odds radio. Clinical parameters were gender, age, anorexia, vomiting, duration of symptoms, right lower abdominal quadrant (RLQ) tenderness, rebound tenderness, body temperature, white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil ratio. Radiological parameters were appendix diameter, appendicolith, caecal wall thickening, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, extraluminal air, abscess, fat stranding, and periappendicular fluid.

Results

Four features (body temperature＞37.2 °C, vomiting, appendicolith, and periappendiceal fluid) were included in the logistic regression model, and yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-0.93), sensitive of 88%, and specificity of 74%.

Conclusion

The logistic regression model makes an accurate and simple prediction of complicated appendicitis possible.

Evolving Trends in the Management of Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Waves: The ACIE Appy II Study

BACKGROUND

In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak.

METHODS

From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study.

RESULTS

A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM.

CONCLUSION

Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide.