1
|
Sikdar O, Harris C, Greenough A. Improving early diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Expert Rev Respir Med 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38875260 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2367584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bronchopulmonary disease (BPD) is associated with long-term neurodevelopmental and cardiorespiratory complications, often requiring significant use of resources. To reduce this healthcare burden, it is essential that those at high risk of BPD are identified early so that strategies are introduced to prevent disease progression. Our aim was to discuss potential methods for improving early diagnosis in the first week after birth. AREAS COVERED A narrative review was undertaken. The search strategy involved searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from 1967 to 2024. The results of potential biomarkers and imaging modes are discussed. Furthermore, the value of scoring systems is explored. EXPERT OPINION BPD occurs as a result of disruption to pulmonary vascular and alveolar development, thus abnormal levels of factors regulating those processes are promising avenues to explore with regard to early detection of high-risk infants. Data from twin studies suggests genetic factors can be attributed to 82% of the observed difference in moderate to severe BPD, but large genome-wide studies have yielded conflicting results. Comparative studies are required to determine which biomarker or imaging mode may most accurately diagnose early BPD development. Models which include the most predictive factors should be evaluated going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oishi Sikdar
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Harris
- Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Anne Greenough
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lowe J, Gillespie D, Aboklaish A, Lau TMM, Consoli C, Babu M, Goddard M, Hood K, Klein N, Thomas-Jones E, Turner M, Hubbard M, Marchesi J, Berrington J, Kotecha S. Azithromycin therapy for prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity (AZTEC): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024:S2213-2600(24)00079-1. [PMID: 38679042 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00079-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews have reported conflicting evidence on whether macrolide antibiotics reduce rates of chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLD) in at-risk preterm infants born at less than 30 weeks' gestation, including in those colonised with pulmonary Ureaplasma spp. Since an adequately powered trial has been lacking, we aimed to assess if the macrolide azithromycin improved survival without the development of physiologically defined moderate or severe CLD in preterm infants. METHODS AZTEC was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 28 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in the UK. Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 30 weeks' gestation and had received at least 2 h of either non-invasive (continuous positive airway pressure or humidified high flow nasal cannula therapy) or invasive respiratory support (via endotracheal tube) within 72 h of birth. Eligible infants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using random permuted blocks of four to receive either intravenous azithromycin at 20 mg/kg per day for 3 days followed by 10 mg/kg for 7 days, or to placebo. Allocation was stratified by centre and gestational age at birth (<28 weeks vs ≥28 weeks). Azithromycin and placebo vials were encased in tamper-evident custom cardboard cartons to ensure masking for clinicians, parents, and the research team. The primary outcome was survival without development of physiologically defined moderate or severe CLD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Outcomes and safety were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis (all randomly allocated infants, regardless of any post-randomisation events). The study was registered with ISRCRN (11650227) and is closed. FINDINGS Infants were recruited between Oct 9, 2019, and March 22, 2022. 799 (53·1%) of 1505 eligible infants underwent random allocation; three infants were withdrawn, including consent to use their data, leaving 796 infants for analysis. Survival without moderate or severe CLD occurred in 166 (42%) of 394 infants in the intervention group and 179 (45%) of 402 in the placebo group (three-level adjusted OR [aOR] 0·84, 95% CI 0·55-1·29, p=0·43). Pulmonary Ureaplasma spp colonisation did not influence treatment effect. Overall, seven serious adverse events were reported for the azithromycin group (five graded as severe, two as moderate), and six serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group (two severe, two moderate, and two mild), as assessed by the local principal investigators. INTERPRETATION Since prophylactic use of azithromycin did not improve survival without development of physiologically-defined CLD, regardless of Ureaplasma spp colonisation, it cannot be recommended in clinical practice. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Lowe
- Centre For Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Ali Aboklaish
- Department of Child Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Claudia Consoli
- Central Biotechnology Services, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Malavika Babu
- Centre For Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mark Goddard
- Centre For Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre For Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nigel Klein
- Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Mark Turner
- Women and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marie Hubbard
- Neonatal Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Julian Marchesi
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Janet Berrington
- Neonatal Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Sailesh Kotecha
- Department of Child Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van den Anker JN. Neonatal Therapeutics: Time for a More Effective and Impactful Collaboration Between Neonatologists and Clinical Pharmacologists. J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 64:281-282. [PMID: 38356244 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- John N van den Anker
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|