1
|
Haugnes HS, Kjaeve H, Bjerkaas E, Hellesnes R, Hjelle L, Larsen M. Real-world data on utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: impact on surgical complications and oncological efficacy. Acta Oncol 2025; 64:13-21. [PMID: 39748656 PMCID: PMC11711492 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2025.42052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recommended treatment of urothelial muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy, but there are challenges with low utilization of NAC. We aimed to evaluate the utilization of NAC, perioperative complications and oncological efficacy in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients operated with radical cystectomy at the University Hospital of North Norway during 2011-2021 for MIBC were included. NAC consisted of three cycles of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (ddMVAC) every second week. Complications after cystectomy (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 3 within 30 days), histopathologic NAC response, cancer recurrence, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and cause of death were reported. RESULTS We included 124 patients, median observation time of 4 years. Fifty-nine patients (48%) received NAC. Most common causes for not receiving NAC were age ≥ 75 years (n = 38; 31%), cardiovascular disease (n = 7; 5.6%), and reduced kidney function (n = 6; 4.8%). Overall 34 patients (27%) had a ≥ grade 3 complication. The 5-year actuarial OS rate was higher among patients treated with NAC than those without NAC (67% vs. 45%, p = 0.02). Among NAC-treated patients, 29 (49%) were downstaged to non-muscle invasive stage (≤pT1), and the 5-year actuarial RFS and OS were higher among patients with ≤pT1 in the post-cystectomy specimen than those with ≥ pT2 (92% vs. 35%, and 94% vs. 39%, both p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION The utilization of NAC was high in this real-world setting. Treatment with ddMVAC with achieved downstaging to ≤pT1 was associated with considerably improved RFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege S Haugnes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT- The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | | | | | - Ragnhild Hellesnes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT- The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Line Hjelle
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT- The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Magnus Larsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, UIT- The Arctic University, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Urology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vignot S, Bellesoeur A, Bouleuc C, Cohen R, Courtier B, Crozier C, De Nonneville A, Delom F, Evrard S, Firmin N, Gandemer V, Khettab M, Magné N, Orbach D, Pellier I, Rodrigues M, Wislez M, Bay JO. [A 2024 inventory in oncology news]. Bull Cancer 2025; 112:19-34. [PMID: 39690092 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024]
Abstract
The editorial board of the Bulletin du cancer has compiled a summary of the news from 2024 in oncology, based on the main results presented at international congresses or published over the past year. After a year marked by the success of the Olympic Games, the selection of data is presented and discussed in podiums of three main results by topic. Emphasis is placed on studies that have an immediate impact on practice and on data that raise important questions for the year 2025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphane Vignot
- UR7509 IRMAIC, université Reims Champagne Ardenne, 1, rue du Maréchal-Juin, 51100 Reims, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Godinot, 1, rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France.
| | | | - Carole Bouleuc
- Département de soins de support, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Paris, France; Inserm, unité mixte de recherche scientifique 938 et SIRIC CURAMUS, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, équipe instabilite des microsatellites et cancer, Paris, France
| | | | - Carolyne Crozier
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Frédéric Delom
- ARTiSt Lab, Inserm U1312, université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, université de Bordeaux, Inserm BRIC 1312, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nelly Firmin
- ICM Montpellier et Inserm U1194, IRCM, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Virginie Gandemer
- Service d'onco-hématologie pédiatrie, CHU hôpital sud, université Rennes 1, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35203 Rennes, France
| | - Mohamed Khettab
- Service d'hémato-oncologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de la Réunion, groupe hospitalier Sud Réunion, Saint-Pierre, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- UMR CNRS5822/IP2I Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, université de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France; Département de radiothérapie, institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Daniel Orbach
- Centre intégré de soins et de recherche en oncologie de l'enfant, adolescent et jeune adulte (SIREDO), université PSL, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Pellier
- Unité d'onco-hématologie et immunologie pédiatrique, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Manuel Rodrigues
- Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Marie Wislez
- Service de pneumologie, unité d'oncologie thoracique, AP-HP centre, hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Jacques-Olivier Bay
- UE7453 CHELTER, Inserm CIC-501, site Estaing, service de thérapie cellulaire et d'hématologie clinique adulte, service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geynisman DM, Abbosh PH, Ross E, Zibelman MR, Ghatalia P, Anari F, Mark JR, Stamatakis L, Hoffman-Censits JH, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Churilla TM, Horwitz EM, Hallman MA, Smaldone MC, Uzzo R, Chen DYT, Kutikov A, Plimack ER. Phase II Trial of Risk-Enabled Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (RETAIN 1). J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2401214. [PMID: 39680823 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Mutations in DNA damage repair genes are associated with pathologic downstaging after NAC. We hypothesized that a combination of biomarker selection and clinical staging would identify patients for cystectomy-sparing active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a single-arm, phase II, noninferiority trial to evaluate a risk-adapted approach for MIBC. Patients with cT2-T3N0M0 MIBC underwent NAC with accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (AMVAC). Pre-NAC transurethral bladder tumor specimens were sequenced for mutations in ATM, ERCC2, FANCC, and RB1. Patients with ≥1 mutation and cT0 post-NAC began AS. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 2 years for the entire cohort with the null hypothesis rejected if the lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI exceeds 64%. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 (47%) had a mutation, and 25 (36%) began per-protocol AS. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year MFS for all patients was 72.9% (lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI, 62.8). The 2-year MFS was 76.0% in the AS group (95% CI, 54.2 to 88.4) and 71.1% (95% CI, 55.5 to 82.1) in the remaining patients. In the AS group, 17 patients (68%) had some recurrence and 12 (48%) were metastasis-free with an intact bladder. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 84.3% (95% CI, 73.4 to 91.0); OS was 88.0% (95% CI, 67.3 to 96.0) and 82.2% (95% CI, 67.6 to 90.7) in the AS and not-AS groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with MIBC treated with AMVAC followed by a risk-adapted approach to local consolidation achieved a 2-year MFS rate of 73%. The primary end point was not met, but 17% of all enrolled patients and 48% of the AS group avoided cystectomy without metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Fern Anari
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James R Mark
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mittal K, Joshi M. Perioperative immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma: AMBASSADOR charts the path forward. MED 2024; 5:1449-1451. [PMID: 39674168 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
The AMBASSADOR trial revealed improvement in disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma compared to observation.1 In this Viewpoint, we discuss the clinical implications of these findings in the context of prior data from the CheckMate-274 and the recently published NIAGARA trial, envisioning the path forward for perioperative immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kriti Mittal
- University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raggi D, Huddart RA. Transformative or transitional? Deciphering the role of NIAGARA in shaping future practice. MED 2024; 5:1456-1458. [PMID: 39674170 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/16/2024]
Abstract
The phase 3 NIAGARA trial1 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in event-free and overall survival in cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with perioperative durvalumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The combination was manageable and did not adversely impact surgery. NIAGARA positions perioperative durvalumab with chemotherapy as a potential new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Raggi
- Genitourinary Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, London, UK.
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Genitourinary Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khorasanchi A, Jatwani K, Meng L, Collier KA, Sundi D, Dason S, Singer EA, Gopalakrishnan D, Mortazavi A, Chatta G, Yang Y. Role of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Genitourinary Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4127. [PMID: 39766027 PMCID: PMC11674059 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Genitourinary (GU) malignancies are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In patients with localized GU cancers, surgical resection or definitive radiation remain the mainstays of treatment. Despite definitive treatment, many patients with high-risk localized disease experience recurrence. There is growing interest in using neoadjuvant immunotherapy to improve outcomes. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with localized high-risk GU cancers including renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, prostate cancer, penile squamous cell carcinoma, and testicular germ cell tumors. We also discuss ongoing clinical trials and candidate biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Khorasanchi
- Division of Hospital Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Karan Jatwani
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (K.J.); (D.G.); (G.C.)
| | - Lingbin Meng
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (L.M.); (K.A.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Katharine A. Collier
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (L.M.); (K.A.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Debasish Sundi
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (D.S.); (S.D.); (E.A.S.)
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Shawn Dason
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (D.S.); (S.D.); (E.A.S.)
| | - Eric A. Singer
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (D.S.); (S.D.); (E.A.S.)
| | - Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (K.J.); (D.G.); (G.C.)
| | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (L.M.); (K.A.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Gurkamal Chatta
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (K.J.); (D.G.); (G.C.)
| | - Yuanquan Yang
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (L.M.); (K.A.C.); (A.M.)
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He J, Zhang B, Zhou S, Yang Y, Han Z, Wu T, Qiao Q, Yang H, He X, Wang N. Phase II study of perioperative camrelizumab and XELOX for locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci 2024. [PMID: 39656600 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown promising efficacy in treating gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma in the neoadjuvant setting. This phase II trial (NCT05715632) aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of perioperative camrelizumab plus XELOX in patients with locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Treatment-naive patients with cT3-4aN1-3 M0 resectable locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were recruited to receive camrelizumab (200 mg, intravenously) on Day 1 combined with XELOX (oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 and capecitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1-14) every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant camrelizumab combined with XELOX every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate. From September 2020 to January 2023, 46 patients were enrolled, and all patients completed neoadjuvant therapy. Among them, 43 underwent D2 resection. In the intention-to-treat population, pCR was achieved in nine patients (19.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.9%-34.4%), and the major pathological response was achieved in 25 patients (54.3%, 95% CI: 39.2%-68.8%). The objective response rate was 69.6%, of which 12 patients achieved a complete response and 20 patients achieved a partial response. The 1-year event-free survival and disease-free survival rates were both 93.1%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 42 (91.3%) patients, and grade 3 TRAEs occurred in nine (19.6%) patients. No grades 4-5 TRAEs were observed. Perioperative camrelizumab combined with XELOX showed promising pathological response with an acceptable safety profile in patients with resectable locally advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxing He
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Shuai Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Ying Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhuo Han
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Qing Qiao
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Haicheng Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Xianli He
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pignot G, Barthélémy P, Borchiellini D. Sex Disparities in Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:4100. [PMID: 39682286 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Gender differences in prevalence, tumor invasiveness, response to treatment, and clinical outcomes exist in different types of cancer. The aim of this article is to summarize the sex disparities in bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment and try to suggest areas for improvement. Although men are at a higher risk of developing bladder tumors, women tend to be diagnosed with more advanced stages at diagnosis and are more likely to present with upfront muscle-invasive disease. Non-urothelial histological subtypes are more frequently reported in women. Regarding non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), several studies have shown that women have a higher risk of disease recurrence after treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, due to different immunogenicities. In localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy are less likely to be performed on women and sexual-sparing procedures with neobladder diversion are rarely offered. Finally, women appear to have a poorer prognosis than men, potentially due to the sex-associated intrinsic features of hosts and tumors that may drive differential therapeutic responses, particularly to immune-based therapies. Women are also more likely to develop severe adverse events related to systemic therapies and are underrepresented in randomized studies, leading to a gap between the real world and trials. In conclusion, studies investigating the role of sex and gender are urgently needed to improve the management of urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Géraldine Pignot
- Department of Surgical Oncology 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, ICANS, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Borchiellini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rosenberg JE, Galsky MD, Powles T, Petrylak DP, Bellmunt J, Loriot Y, Necchi A, Hoffman-Censits J, Perez-Gracia JL, van der Heijden MS, Dreicer R, Durán I, Castellano D, Drakaki A, Retz M, Sridhar SS, Grivas P, Yu EY, O'Donnell PH, Burris HA, Mariathasan S, Shi Y, Goluboff E, Bajorin D. Atezolizumab monotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: final analysis from the phase II IMvigor210 trial. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103972. [PMID: 39642637 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The IMvigor210 trial demonstrated clinical benefit and manageable toxicity with atezolizumab monotherapy [anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)] in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) in primary analyses. Final efficacy and safety results after long-term follow-up are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II single-arm trial of atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced UC included two cohorts: untreated patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (cohort 1; n = 119) and those previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (cohort 2; n = 310). Atezolizumab was administered i.v. (1200 mg every 21 days) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were independent review facility-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 in cohort 1 and independent review facility-assessed ORR per RECIST 1.1 and investigator-assessed modified (m)RECIST in cohort 2. Overall survival (OS), efficacy by PD-L1 status, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS At data cut-off (1 June 2023), the median survival follow-up was 96.4 months (range, 0.2-103.4 months) in cohort 1 and 46.2 months [0.2 (censored)-54.9 months] in cohort 2. In cohort 1, the ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 23.5% (16.2% to 32.2%) in all patients and 28.1% (13.8% to 46.8%) in the PD-L1 tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC)2/3 subgroup. Median OS (95% CI) was 16.3 months (10.4-24.5 months) overall and 12.3 months (6.0-49.8 months) in the PD-L1 IC2/3 subgroup. In cohort 2, the ORR (95% CI) was 16.5% (12.5% to 21.1%) per RECIST 1.1 and 19.7% (95% CI 15.4% to 24.6%) per mRECIST in all patients and 27.0% (18.6% to 36.8%) and 28.0% (19.5% to 37.9%), respectively, in the PD-L1 IC2/3 subgroup. Median OS (95% CI) was 7.9 months (6.7-9.3 months) in all patients and 11.9 months (9.0-22.8 months) in the IC2/3 subgroup. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 21.8% (cohort 1) and 18.7% (cohort 2); one treatment-related death occurred in cohort 1. CONCLUSIONS With long-term follow-up, atezolizumab monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with durable responses in a subset of patients with metastatic UC; there were no new safety signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| | - M D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - T Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London ECMC, Barts Health, London, UK
| | | | - J Bellmunt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, PSMAR-IMIM Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Y Loriot
- Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - J Hoffman-Censits
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - J L Perez-Gracia
- Department of Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - R Dreicer
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, USA
| | - I Durán
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain
| | | | - A Drakaki
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M Retz
- Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - P Grivas
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - E Y Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA
| | | | - H A Burris
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, USA
| | | | - Y Shi
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - E Goluboff
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D Bajorin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Milowsky MI. Toward Curing More Patients with Bladder Cancer - A New Perioperative Strategy. N Engl J Med 2024; 391:1848-1849. [PMID: 39536232 DOI: 10.1056/nejme2411608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew I Milowsky
- From the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu Y, Zhang C, Chen H, Zhang J, Ouyang J, Zhang Z. Efficacy and safety analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1479743. [PMID: 39555083 PMCID: PMC11564151 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1479743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study examined the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with MIBC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023, assigned to either chemotherapy (gemcitabine with cisplatin) or combination (chemotherapy plus toripalimab or tislelizumab) groups based on the neoadjuvant treatment regimen. Key metrics, including pathological downstaging rate (PDR), pathological complete response rate (PCRR), and incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), were compared between groups. Results This study included 53 patients (mean age: 67.21 years). In the combination group, 14 patients (51.85%) achieved pathological complete remission (ypT0), and seven (25.93%) achieved partial remission (ypT1), resulting in a PDR and PCRR of 77.78 and 51.85%, respectively. In the chemotherapy group, six patients (23.08%) achieved complete remission, and five (19.23%) achieved partial remission, resulting in a PDR and PCRR of 42.31 and 23.08%, respectively. Differences between groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in pathological downstaging or complete remission rates among subgroups in the combination group (p > 0.05). No serious allergic reactions or fatal AEs were detected in either group, with no grade 4 AEs. Grade 3 AE rates were 22.22 and 20.83% in the combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively, although non-significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy had enhanced efficacy and manageable safety in patients with MIBC, suggesting its potential for integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
12
|
Romero D. Adding perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides benefit in MIBC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:766. [PMID: 39327535 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00951-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
|
13
|
Klein C, Mebroukine S, Madéry M, Moisand A, Boyer T, Larmonier N, Robert G, Domblides C. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Bladder Cancer: An Emerging Target. Cells 2024; 13:1779. [PMID: 39513886 PMCID: PMC11544784 DOI: 10.3390/cells13211779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer remains a prevalent and challenging malignancy. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have emerged as key contributors to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, facilitating tumor progression, immune evasion, and resistance to therapies. This review explores the role of MDSC in bladder cancer, highlighting their involvement in immune regulation; tumor progression; and resistance to therapies such as bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We also discuss their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets, with current evidence suggesting that targeting MDSCs, either alone or in combination with existing treatments such as BCG and ICIs, may enhance anti-tumor immunity and improve clinical outcomes. However,, challenges remain, particularly regarding the identification and therapeutic modulation of MDSC subpopulations. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate their role in bladder cancer and to optimize MDSC-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Klein
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Samy Mebroukine
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Madéry
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Alexandra Moisand
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Thomas Boyer
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nicolas Larmonier
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Charlotte Domblides
- CNRS UMR 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Biological and Medical Sciences Department, University of Bordeaux, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (C.K.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.M.); (T.B.); (N.L.); (G.R.)
- Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|