Compulsory HIV testing for exit from and entry to China: effectiveness, cost, and stigma - a policy update

Clinical application evaluation of two fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening assays in West China Hospital

BACKGROUND

Fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening assays have been used in many laboratories. The Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay is a new kind of fourth-generation HIV screening assay developed to allow earlier detection of seroconversion.

METHODS

A total of 271,845 routine specimens were detected using the Elecsys® HIV combi assay and Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay from September 2010 to December 2012 in a large university hospital. Repeatedly, reactive screening samples were confirmed according to recommended confirmatory algorithms.

RESULTS

The false-positive rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of two assays are 0.08 and 78.35%, respectively, for the Elecsys® HIV combi assay and 0.07 and 82.21% for the Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay. Ninety-four percent cases with cutoff index ratio <15.0 were false-positive. When we set the specificity as 95.0 and 99.0%, PPV could increase to 98.7, 99.6, 98.8, and 99.7%, and sensitivity reduced to 99.2, 98.4, 98.5, and 96.8% for the Elecsys® HIV combi assay and the Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Elecsys® HIV combi PT assay shows a better performance in specificity than the Elecsys® HIV combi assay. Most weakly reactive results were false-positive, this means it still need to be improved and it will need laboratory personnel to communicate with the clinical doctor and patients more properly about the result of the assay.

Comparative performance of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and EIA for HIV screening in a multiethnic region of China

Background

The recent approval of 4th generation HIV tests has forced many laboratories to decide whether to shift from 3rd to these tests. There are limited published studies on the comparative evaluation of these two different assays. We compare the performance of fourth-generation electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ChIA) and third-generation enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening and gauge whether the shift from EIA to ChIA could be better in a multiethnic region of China.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We identified a large number of routine specimens (345,492) using two different assays from Jan 2008 to Aug 2011 in a teaching hospital with high sample throughput. Of the 344,596 specimens with interpretable HIV test results, 526(0.23%) of 228,761 using EIA and 303(0.26%) of 115,835 using ChIA were HIV-1 positive. The false-positive rate of EIA was lower than that of ChIA [0.03% vs. 0.08%, odds ratio 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.24, 0.45)]. The positive predictive value (PPV) of EIA (89.6%) was significantly higher than that of ChIA (76.1%) (<0.001), reflecting the difference between the two assays. The clinical sensitivities of two assays in this study were 99.64% for EIA and 99.88% for ChIA.

Conclusion

Caution is needed before shifting from 3rd to 4th generation HIV tests. Since none of these tests are perfect, different geographic and ethnic area probably require different considerations with regard to HIV testing methods, taking into account the local conditions.