Uncovering the physical origin of the difference between aliphatic chain and aromatic ring in the “hydrophobic” effects on partial molar volume

Water-mediated interactions destabilize proteins

Proteins are folded to avoid exposure of the nonpolar groups to water because water-mediated interactions between nonpolar groups are a promising factor in the thermodynamic stabilities of proteins-which is a well-accepted view as one of the unique effects of hydrophobic interactions. This article poses a critical question for this classical view by conducting an accurate solvation free-energy calculation for a thermodynamic cycle of a protein folding using a liquid-state density functional theory. Here, the solvation-free energy for a leucine zipper formation was examined in the coiled-coil protein GCN4-p1, a typical model for hydrophobic interactions, which demonstrated that water-mediated interactions were unfavorable for the association of nonpolar groups in the native state, while the dispersion forces between them were, instead, responsible for the association. Furthermore, the present analysis well predicted the isolated helical state stabilized by pressure, which was previously observed in an experiment. We reviewed the problems in the classical concept and semiempirical presumption that the energetic cost of the hydration of nonpolar groups is a driving force of folding.

Water Depletion Enhanced by Halogenation of Benzene

The pressure dependence of the solubility of hydrophobic solutes in aqueous solutions is equivalent to volume changes upon hydrophobic hydration. This phenomenon has been attributed to the packing effects induced by the van der Waals volume difference between the solute and water. However, the volume changes may also be related to the chemical properties of the solute. In this study, we investigated hydrophobic hydration using a series of halogenated benzenes. Solution density measurements revealed negative volume changes for benzene, fluorobenzene, and chlorobenzene, whereas those for bromobenzene and iodobenzene were positive. Subsequent volumetric analyses demonstrated that the relationship between the excess particle number for hydration water and the van der Waals volume for bromobenzene and iodobenzene significantly deviated from the universal line for hydrophobic solutes. This behavior suggests that the volume changes are due to factors other than the packing effect with bromo and iodine functional groups acting as modulators of the hydration structure, resulting in enhanced water depletion.

Hydration Promoted by a Methylene Group: A Volumetric Study on Alkynes in Water

Hydrocarbons including a methylene group are generally considered a hydrophobic building block, in the sense that the density of their hydration water is lower than that of bulk water. However, is the methylene group always hydrophobic? In this study, we experimentally determined the partial molar volume of a methylene group in water as 14.01 ± 0.46 cm³ mol^-1 for 1-alkyne, 9.83 ± 0.35 cm³ mol^-1 for 2-alkyne, and 11.39 ± 0.55 cm³ mol^-1 for 3-alkyne. These values are all unusually small compared to the ∼16 cm³ mol^-1 for model compounds from the literature. The subsequent volumetric analysis on the basis of the Kirkwood-Buff parameter indicates that the hydration water is enriched by the addition of a methylene group for 2-alkyne, while it is depleted for the reported model compounds that contain hydrophilic functional groups, 1-alkyne, and 3-alkyne. Our findings suggest that the triple bonded carbons in 2-alkyne that reduce hydration water act as a hydrophobic group in 2-alkyne. Thus, the methylene group should be called "hydrophilic" in this case because it actually recovers the hydration water when placed next to more hydrophobic groups. Therefore, we conclude that the hydrophobicity of a methylene group varies depending on its hydration environment due to other functional groups in the solute.