1
|
Harken AD, Deoli NT, Perez Campos C, Ponnaiya B, Garty G, Lee GS, Casper MJ, Dhingra S, Li W, Johnson GW, Amundson SA, Grabham PW, Hillman EMC, Brenner DJ. Combined ion beam irradiation platform and 3D fluorescence microscope for cellular cancer research. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS 2024; 15:2561-2577. [PMID: 38633084 PMCID: PMC11019671 DOI: 10.1364/boe.522969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
To improve particle radiotherapy, we need a better understanding of the biology of radiation effects, particularly in heavy ion radiation therapy, where global responses are observed despite energy deposition in only a subset of cells. Here, we integrated a high-speed swept confocally-aligned planar excitation (SCAPE) microscope into a focused ion beam irradiation platform to allow real-time 3D structural and functional imaging of living biological samples during and after irradiation. We demonstrate dynamic imaging of the acute effects of irradiation on 3D cultures of U87 human glioblastoma cells, revealing characteristic changes in cellular movement and intracellular calcium signaling following ionizing irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Harken
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, New York 10533, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Naresh T Deoli
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, New York 10533, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Citlali Perez Campos
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Brian Ponnaiya
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, New York 10533, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Guy Garty
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, New York 10533, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Grace S Lee
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Malte J Casper
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Shikhar Dhingra
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Wenze Li
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Gary W Johnson
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Sally A Amundson
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Peter W Grabham
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Elizabeth M C Hillman
- Laboratory for Functional Optical Imaging, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Radiology, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute and Kavli Institute for Brain Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 136 S. Broadway, P.O. Box 21, Irvington, New York 10533, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Enhanced Cell Inactivation and Double-Strand Break Induction in V79 Chinese Hamster Cells by Monochromatic X-Rays at Phosphorus K-Shell Absorption Peak. QUANTUM BEAM SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/qubs4040038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The cell inactivation and DNA double-strand break (DSB) induction by K-shell ionization of phosphorus atoms and Auger electrons were investigated. Monochromatic X-rays of on and below the phosphorus K-shell absorption peak, 2.153 keV and 2.147 keV were exposed to Chinese hamster lung fibroblast V79 cells. Survival fractions were plotted against exposure, Ψ [nC/kg] and the linear-quadratic model was adapted to estimate the parameters, α and β, of the survival curves. DSB induction rate [DSB/cell/Ψ] was estimated from the measured fractions of induced DNA fragments below 4.6 Mbp (Find(k < 4.6)), which were determined using pulse field gel electrophoresis. As results, cell inactivation and DSB induction rate of on the peak were significantly higher compared to that of the below. However, when converting Ψ to absorbed dose (Gy) of cell nucleus, the enhanced effect was only observed for parameter α, and not for a survival dose (Gy) of 37%, 10%, and 1% nor for a DSB induction rate. Our findings indicate that enhancement of cell inactivation and DSB induction were due to the additional dose delivered to the DNA and more complex DSB lesions were induced due to the release of phosphorus K-shell photoelectrons and Auger electrons.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Even though the first ultraviolet microbeam was described by S. Tschachotin back in 1912, the development of sophisticated micro-irradiation facilities only began to flourish in the late 1980s. In this article, we highlight significant microbeam experiments, describe the latest microbeam irradiator configurations and critical discoveries made by using the microbeam apparatus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Modern radiological microbeams facilities are capable of producing a beam size of a few micrometers, or even tens of nanometers in size, and can deposit radiation with high precision within a cellular target. In the past three decades, a variety of microbeams has been developed to deliver a range of radiations including charged particles, X-rays, and electrons. Despite the original intention for their development to measure the effects of a single radiation track, the ability to target radiation with microbeams at sub-cellular targets has been extensively used to investigate radiation-induced biological responses within cells. RESULTS Studies conducted using microbeams to target specific cells in a tissue have elucidated bystander responses, and further studies have shown reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) play critical roles in the process. The radiation-induced abscopal effect, which has a profound impact on cancer radiotherapy, further reaffirmed the importance of bystander effects. Finally, by targeting sub-cellular compartments with a microbeam, we have reported cytoplasmic-specific biological responses. Despite the common dogma that nuclear DNA is the primary target for radiation-induced cell death and carcinogenesis, studies conducted using microbeam suggested that targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular stress, and genomic instability. A more recent development in microbeam technology includes application of mouse models to visualize in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. CONCLUSIONS Microbeams are making important contributions towards our understanding of radiation responses in cells and tissue models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhua Wu
- a Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University , New York , NY , USA
| | - Tom K Hei
- a Center for Radiological Research, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.,b Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kodaira S, Konishi T, Kobayashi A, Maeda T, Ahmad TAFT, Yang G, Akselrod MS, Furusawa Y, Uchihori Y. Co-visualization of DNA damage and ion traversals in live mammalian cells using a fluorescent nuclear track detector. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2015; 56:360-365. [PMID: 25324538 PMCID: PMC4380042 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Revised: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 09/13/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The geometric locations of ion traversals in mammalian cells constitute important information in the study of heavy ion-induced biological effect. Single ion traversal through a cellular nucleus produces complex and massive DNA damage at a nanometer level, leading to cell inactivation, mutations and transformation. We present a novel approach that uses a fluorescent nuclear track detector (FNTD) for the simultaneous detection of the geometrical images of ion traversals and DNA damage in single cells using confocal microscopy. HT1080 or HT1080-53BP1-GFP cells were cultured on the surface of a FNTD and exposed to 5.1-MeV/n neon ions. The positions of the ion traversals were obtained as fluorescent images of a FNTD. Localized DNA damage in cells was identified as fluorescent spots of γ-H2AX or 53BP1-GFP. These track images and images of damaged DNA were obtained in a short time using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The geometrical distribution of DNA damage indicated by fluorescent γ-H2AX spots in fixed cells or fluorescent 53BP1-GFP spots in living cells was found to correlate well with the distribution of the ion traversals. This method will be useful for evaluating the number of ion hits on individual cells, not only for micro-beam but also for random-beam experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Kodaira
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Teruaki Konishi
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Alisa Kobayashi
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Takeshi Maeda
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | | | - Gen Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
| | - Mark S Akselrod
- Landauer Inc., Crystal Growth Division, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
| | - Yoshiya Furusawa
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Yukio Uchihori
- Research, Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Byrne HL, Domanova W, McNamara AL, Incerti S, Kuncic Z. The cytoplasm as a radiation target: an in silico study of microbeam cell irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:2325-37. [PMID: 25715947 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We performed in silico microbeam cell irradiation modelling to quantitatively investigate ionisations resulting from soft x-ray and alpha particle microbeams targeting the cytoplasm of a realistic cell model. Our results on the spatial distribution of ionisations show that as x-rays are susceptible to scatter within a cell that can lead to ionisations in the nucleus, soft x-ray microbeams may not be suitable for investigating the DNA damage response to radiation targeting the cytoplasm alone. In contrast, ionisations from an ideal alpha microbeam are tightly confined to the cytoplasm, but a realistic alpha microbeam degrades upon interaction with components upstream of the cellular target. Thus it is difficult to completely rule out a contribution from alpha particle hits to the nucleus when investigating DNA damage response to cytoplasmic irradiation. We find that although the cytoplasm targeting efficiency of an alpha microbeam is better than that of a soft x-ray microbeam (the probability of stray alphas hitting the nucleus is 0.2% compared to 3.6% for x-rays), stray alphas produce more ionisations in the nucleus and thus have greater potential for initiating damage responses therein. Our results suggest that observed biological responses to cytoplasmic irradiation include a small component that can be attributed to stray ionisations in the nucleus resulting from the stochastic nature of particle interactions that cause out-of-beam scatter. This contribution is difficult to isolate experimentally, thus demonstrating the value of the in silico approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H L Byrne
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bigelow AW, Ponnaiya B, Targoff KL, Brenner DJ. UV microspot irradiator at Columbia University. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2013; 52:411-417. [PMID: 23708525 PMCID: PMC3723145 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0474-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The Radiological Research Accelerator Facility at Columbia University has recently added a UV microspot irradiator to a microbeam irradiation platform. This UV microspot irradiator applies multiphoton excitation at the focal point of an incident laser as the source for cell damage, and with this approach, a single cell within a 3D sample can be targeted and exposed to damaging UV. The UV microspot's ability to impart cellular damage within 3D is an advantage over all other microbeam techniques, which instead impart damage to numerous cells along microbeam tracks. This short communication is an overview, and a description of the UV microspot including the following applications and demonstrations of selective damage to live single cell targets: DNA damage foci formation, patterned irradiation, photoactivation, targeting of mitochondria, and targeting of individual cardiomyocytes in a live zebrafish embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan W Bigelow
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grad M, Bigelow AW, Garty G, Attinger D, Brenner DJ. Optofluidic cell manipulation for a biological microbeam. THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 2013; 84:014301. [PMID: 23387672 PMCID: PMC3562345 DOI: 10.1063/1.4774043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2012] [Accepted: 12/11/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
This paper describes the fabrication and integration of light-induced dielectrophoresis for cellular manipulation in biological microbeams. An optoelectronic tweezers (OET) cellular manipulation platform was designed, fabricated, and tested at Columbia University's Radiological Research Accelerator Facility (RARAF). The platform involves a light induced dielectrophoretic surface and a microfluidic chamber with channels for easy input and output of cells. The electrical conductivity of the particle-laden medium was optimized to maximize the dielectrophoretic force. To experimentally validate the operation of the OET device, we demonstrate UV-microspot irradiation of cells containing green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged DNA single-strand break repair protein, targeted in suspension. We demonstrate the optofluidic control of single cells and groups of cells before, during, and after irradiation. The integration of optofluidic cellular manipulation into a biological microbeam enhances the facility's ability to handle non-adherent cells such as lymphocytes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that OET cell handling is successfully implemented in a biological microbeam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Grad
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|