Liquid vapor equilibria for an ab initio model for water

Role of nonadditive forces on the structure and properties of liquid water

The role of nonadditive interactions on the structure and dielectric properties of water is investigated at different temperatures using molecular dynamics. A new intermolecular potential is developed which contains an ab initio description of two-body additive interactions plus nonadditive contributions from both three-body interactions and polarization. Polarization is the main nonadditive influence, resulting in improved agreement with experiment for the radial distribution function, dielectric constant, and dipole moment. A comparison is also made with other widely used intermolecular potentials. The new potential provides a superior prediction of the dielectric constant and dipole moment. It also predicts the relative contribution of hydrogen bonding better than the SPC/E potential [Berendsen et al., J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987)].

Influence of bond flexibility on the vapor-liquid phase equilibria of water

The authors performed Gibbs ensemble simulations on the vapor-liquid equilibrium of water to investigate the influence of incorporating intramolecular degrees of freedom in the simple point charge (SPC) water model. Results for vapor pressures, saturation densities, heats of vaporization, and the critical point for two different flexible models are compared with data for the corresponding rigid SPC and SPC/E models. They found that the introduction of internal vibrations, and also their parametrization, has an observable effect on the prediction of the vapor-liquid coexistence curve. The flexible SPC/Fw model, although optimized to describe bulk diffusion and dielectric constants at ambient conditions, gives the best prediction of saturation densities and the critical point of the examined models.

Water liquid-vapor equilibria predicted by refined ab initio derived potentials

Coexistence properties for water near the critical point using several ab initio models were calculated using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations with multiple histogram reweighting techniques. These models, that have proved to yield a good reproduction of the water properties at ambient conditions, perform rather well, improving the performance of a previous ab initio model. It is also shown that bulk geometry and dipole values, predicted by the simulation, can be used and a good approximation obtained with a polarizable rigid water model but not when polarization is excluded.

The melting temperature of the most common models of water

The melting temperature of ice I(h) for several commonly used models of water (SPC, SPC/E,TIP3P,TIP4P, TIP4P/Ew, and TIP5P) is obtained from computer simulations at p = 1 bar. Since the melting temperature of ice I(h) for the TIP4P model is now known [E. Sanz, C. Vega, J. L. F. Abascal, and L. G. MacDowell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 255701 (2004)], it is possible to use the Gibbs-Duhem methodology [D. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 4149 (1993)] to evaluate the melting temperature of ice I(h) for other potential models of water. We have found that the melting temperatures of ice I(h) for SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP4P/Ew, and TIP5P models are T = 190 K, 215 K, 146 K, 232 K, 245 K, and 274 K, respectively. The relative stability of ice I(h) with respect to ice II for these models has also been considered. It turns out that for SPC, SPC/E, TIP3P, and TIP5P the stable phase at the normal melting point is ice II (so that ice I(h) is not a thermodynamically stable phase for these models). For TIP4P and TIP4P/Ew, ice I(h) is the stable solid phase at the standard melting point. The location of the negative charge along the H-O-H bisector appears as a critical factor in the determination of the relative stability between the I(h) and II ice forms. The methodology proposed in this paper can be used to investigate the effect upon a coexistence line due to a change in the potential parameters.