Non-adiabatic current densities, transitions, and power absorbed by a molecule in a time-dependent electromagnetic field

Quantum transition probabilities due to overlapping electromagnetic pulses: Persistent differences between Dirac's form and nonadiabatic perturbation theory

The probability of transition to an excited state of a quantum system in a time-dependent electromagnetic field determines the energy uptake from the field. The standard expression for the transition probability has been given by Dirac. Landau and Lifshitz suggested, instead, that the adiabatic effects of a perturbation should be excluded from the transition probability, leaving an expression in terms of the nonadiabatic response. In our previous work, we have found that these two approaches yield different results while a perturbing field is acting on the system. Here, we prove, for the first time, that differences between the two approaches may persist after the perturbing fields have been completely turned off. We have designed a pair of overlapping pulses in order to establish the possibility of lasting differences, in a case with dephasing. Our work goes beyond the analysis presented by Landau and Lifshitz, since they considered only linear response and required that a constant perturbation must remain as t → ∞. First, a "plateau" pulse populates an excited rotational state and produces coherences between the ground and excited states. Then, an infrared pulse acts while the electric field of the first pulse is constant, but after dephasing has occurred. The nonadiabatic perturbation theory permits dephasing, but dephasing of the perturbed part of the wave function cannot occur within Dirac's method. When the frequencies in both pulses are on resonance, the lasting differences in the calculated transition probabilities may exceed 35%. The predicted differences are larger for off-resonant perturbations.

Quantum transition probabilities during a perturbing pulse: Differences between the nonadiabatic results and Fermi's golden rule forms

For a perturbed quantum system initially in the ground state, the coefficient c_k(t) of excited state k in the time-dependent wave function separates into adiabatic and nonadiabatic terms. The adiabatic term a_k(t) accounts for the adjustment of the original ground state to form the new ground state of the instantaneous Hamiltonian H(t), by incorporating excited states of the unperturbed Hamiltonian H₀ without transitions; a_k(t) follows the adiabatic theorem of Born and Fock. The nonadiabatic term b_k(t) describes excitation into another quantum state k; b_k(t) is obtained as an integral containing the time derivative of the perturbation. The true transition probability is given by b_k(t) ², as first stated by Landau and Lifshitz. In this work, we contrast b_k(t) ² and c_k(t) ². The latter is the norm-square of the entire excited-state coefficient which is used for the transition probability within Fermi's golden rule. Calculations are performed for a perturbing pulse consisting of a cosine or sine wave in a Gaussian envelope. When the transition frequency ω_k0 is on resonance with the frequency ω of the cosine wave, b_k(t) ² and c_k(t) ² rise almost monotonically to the same final value; the two are intertwined, but they are out of phase with each other. Off resonance (when ω_k0 ≠ ω), b_k(t) ² and c_k(t) ² differ significantly during the pulse. They oscillate out of phase and reach different maxima but then fall off to equal final values after the pulse has ended, when a_k(t) ≡ 0. If ω_k0 < ω, b_k(t) ² generally exceeds c_k(t) ², while the opposite is true when ω_k0 > ω. While the transition probability is rising, the midpoints between successive maxima and minima fit Gaussian functions of the form a exp[-b(t - d)²]. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of nonadiabatic transition probabilities during a perturbing pulse.

Non-local real-space analysis of chiral optical signals

A spatially non-local response tensor description of linear chiral signals such as circular dichroism is developed.

A spatially non-local response tensor description of linear chiral signals such as circular dichroism is developed. By working directly with the vector potential rather that the electric and magnetic fields, we recast the signals in terms of correlation functions of charge and current densities and avoid the tedious expansion in multipoles.

Gauge-invariant expectation values of the energy of a molecule in an electromagnetic field

In this paper, we show that the full Hamiltonian for a molecule in an electromagnetic field can be separated into a molecular Hamiltonian and a field Hamiltonian, both with gauge-invariant expectation values. The expectation value of the molecular Hamiltonian gives physically meaningful results for the energy of a molecule in a time-dependent applied field. In contrast, the usual partitioning of the full Hamiltonian into molecular and field terms introduces an arbitrary gauge-dependent potential into the molecular Hamiltonian and leaves a gauge-dependent form of the Hamiltonian for the field. With the usual partitioning of the Hamiltonian, this same problem of gauge dependence arises even in the absence of an applied field, as we show explicitly by considering a gauge transformation from zero applied field and zero external potentials to zero applied field, but non-zero external vector and scalar potentials. We resolve this problem and also remove the gauge dependence from the Hamiltonian for a molecule in a non-zero applied field and from the field Hamiltonian, by repartitioning the full Hamiltonian. It is possible to remove the gauge dependence because the interaction of the molecular charges with the gauge potential cancels identically with a gauge-dependent term in the usual form of the field Hamiltonian. We treat the electromagnetic field classically and treat the molecule quantum mechanically, but nonrelativistically. Our derivation starts from the Lagrangian for a set of charged particles and an electromagnetic field, with the particle coordinates, the vector potential, the scalar potential, and their time derivatives treated as the variables in the Lagrangian. We construct the full Hamiltonian using a Lagrange multiplier method originally suggested by Dirac, partition this Hamiltonian into a molecular term Hm and a field term Hf, and show that both Hm and Hf have gauge-independent expectation values. Any gauge may be chosen for the calculations; but following our partitioning, the expectation values of the molecular Hamiltonian are identical to those obtained directly in the Coulomb gauge. As a corollary of this result, the power absorbed by a molecule from a time-dependent, applied electromagnetic field is equal to the time derivative of the non-adiabatic term in the molecular energy, in any gauge.