A density functional for core-valence correlation energy

A larger basis set describes atomization energy core-valence correction better than a higher-order coupled-cluster method

The accuracy of coupled-cluster methods for the computation of core-valence correction to atomization energy was assessed. Truncation levels up to CCSDTQP were considered together with (aug-)cc-pwCVnZ (n = D, T, Q, 5) basis sets and three different extrapolation techniques (canonical and flexible Helgaker formula and Riemann zeta function extrapolation). With the exception of CCSD, a more accurate correction can be obtained from a larger basis set using a lower-level coupled-cluster method, and not vice versa. For the CCSD(T) level, it also implies faster computations with modern codes. We also discussed the importance of moving to higher-order or all-electron methods for geometry optimizations. The present study provides the general knowledge needed for the most accurate state-of-the-art computations.

Projected Hybrid Density Functionals: Method and Application to Core Electron Ionization

This work introduces a new class of hybrid density functional theory (DFT) approximations, which incorporate different fractions of nonlocal exact exchange in predefined states such as core atomic orbitals (AOs). These projected hybrid density functionals are related to range-separated hybrid functionals, which incorporate different fractions of nonlocal exchange at different electron-electron separations. This work derives projected hybrids using the Adiabatic Projection formalism. One projects the electron-electron interaction operator onto the chosen predefined states, introduces the projected operator into the noninteracting Kohn-Sham reference system, and employs a formally exact density functional to model the remaining electron-electron interactions. Projected hybrids, like range-separated hybrids, approximate the partially interacting reference system's ground-state wave function as a single Slater determinant. Projected hybrids are readily implemented into existing density functional codes, requiring only a projection of the one-particle density matrices and exchange operators entering existing routines. This work also presents an application to core electron ionization. Projecting onto core atomic orbitals allows us to introduce additional nonlocal exchange into atomic core regions. This reduces the impact of self-interaction error on computed core electron properties. Benchmark studies are reported for PBE0c70, a core-projected variant of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof global hybrid PBE0, in which the fraction of nonlocal exchange is increased from 25% to 70% in atomic core regions. PBE0c70-predicted core orbital energies accurately recover nonrelativistic core-electron binding energies of second-period elements Li-Ne and third-period elements Na-Ar, without degrading the good performance of PBE0 for atomization energies and valence ionization potentials.

Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies

While the title question is a clear "yes" from purely theoretical arguments, the case is less clear for practical calculations with finite (one-particle) basis sets. To shed further light on this issue, the convergence to the basis set limit of CCSD (coupled cluster theory with all single and double excitations) and of different approximate implementations of CCSD-F12 (explicitly correlated CCSD) has been investigated in detail for the W4-17 thermochemical benchmark. Near the CBS ([1-particle] complete basis set) limit, CCSD and CCSD(F12^*) agree to within their respective uncertainties (about ±0.04 kcal/mol) due to residual basis set incompleteness error, but a nontrivial difference remains between CCSD-F12b and CCSD(F12^*), which is roughly proportional to the degree of static correlation. The observed basis set convergence behavior results from the superposition of a rapidly converging, attractive, CCSD[F12]-CCSD-F12b difference (consisting mostly of third-order terms) and a more slowly converging, repulsive, fourth-order difference between CCSD(F12^*) and CCSD[F12]. For accurate thermochemistry, we recommend CCSD(F12^*) over CCSD-F12b if at all possible. There are some indications that the nZaPa family of basis sets exhibits somewhat smoother convergence than the correlation consistent family.