MOPSA: A microfluidics-optimized particle simulation algorithm

Automated design of a 3D passive microfluidic particle sorter

Microfluidic chips that can sort mixtures of cells and other particles have important applications in research and healthcare. However, designing a sorter chip for a given application is a slow and difficult process, especially when we extend the design space from 2D into a 3D scenario. Compared to the 2D scenario, we need to explore more geometries to derive the appropriate design due to the extra dimension. To evaluate sorting performance, the simulation of the particle trajectory is needed. The 3D scenario brings particle trajectory simulation more challenges of runtime and collision handling with irregular obstacle shapes. In this paper, we propose a framework to design a 3D microfluidic particle sorter for a given application with an efficient 3D particle trajectory simulator. The efficient simulator enables us to simulate more samples to ensure the robustness of the sorting performance. Our experimental result shows that the sorter designed by our framework successfully separates the particles with the targeted size.

Machine learning for microfluidic design and control

Microfluidics has developed into a mature field with applications across science and engineering, having particular commercial success in molecular diagnostics, next-generation sequencing, and bench-top analysis. Despite its ubiquity, the complexity of designing and controlling custom microfluidic devices present major barriers to adoption, requiring intuitive knowledge gained from years of experience. If these barriers were overcome, microfluidics could miniaturize biological and chemical research for non-experts through fully-automated platform development and operation. The intuition of microfluidic experts can be captured through machine learning, where complex statistical models are trained for pattern recognition and subsequently used for event prediction. Integration of machine learning with microfluidics could significantly expand its adoption and impact. Here, we present the current state of machine learning for the design and control of microfluidic devices, its possible applications, and current limitations.

Computational and Experimental Model to Study Immunobead-Based Assays in Microfluidic Mixing Platforms

In immunobead-based assays, micro/nanobeads are functionalized with antibodies to capture the target analytes, which can significantly improve the assay's performance. The immunobead-based assays have been recently combined with microfluidic mixing devices and customized for a variety of applications. However, device design and process optimization to achieve the best performance remain a substantial technological challenge. Here, we introduce a computational model that enables the rational design and optimization of the immunobead-based assay in a microfluidic mixing channel. We use numerical methods to examine the effect of the flow rates, channel geometry, bead's trajectory, and the analyte and reagent characteristics on the efficiency of analyte capture on the surface of microbeads. This model accounts for different bead movements inside the microchannel, with the goal of simulating an actual active binding environment. The model is further validated experimentally where different microfluidic channels are tested to capture the target analytes. Our experimental results are shown to meet theoretical predictions. While the model is demonstrated here for the analysis of IgG capture in simple and herringbone-structured microchannels, it can be readily adapted to a broad range of target molecules and different device designs.

Machine learning enables design automation of microfluidic flow-focusing droplet generation

Droplet-based microfluidic devices hold immense potential in becoming inexpensive alternatives to existing screening platforms across life science applications, such as enzyme discovery and early cancer detection. However, the lack of a predictive understanding of droplet generation makes engineering a droplet-based platform an iterative and resource-intensive process. We present a web-based tool, DAFD, that predicts the performance and enables design automation of flow-focusing droplet generators. We capitalize on machine learning algorithms to predict the droplet diameter and rate with a mean absolute error of less than 10 μm and 20 Hz. This tool delivers a user-specified performance within 4.2% and 11.5% of the desired diameter and rate. We demonstrate that DAFD can be extended by the community to support additional fluid combinations, without requiring extensive machine learning knowledge or large-scale data-sets. This tool will reduce the need for microfluidic expertise and design iterations and facilitate adoption of microfluidics in life sciences.

Finding the optimal design of a passive microfluidic mixer

The ability to thoroughly mix two fluids is a fundamental need in microfluidics. While a variety of different microfluidic mixers have been designed by researchers, it remains unknown which (if any) of these mixers are optimal (that is, which designs provide the most thorough mixing with the smallest possible fluidic resistance across the mixer). In this work, we automatically designed and rationally optimized a microfluidic mixer. We accomplished this by first generating a library of thousands of different randomly designed mixers, then using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to optimize the random chips in order to achieve Pareto efficiency. Pareto efficiency is a state of allocation of resources (e.g. driving force) from which it is impossible to reallocate so as to make any one individual criterion better off (e.g. pressure drop) without making at least one individual criterion (e.g. mixing performance) worse off. After 200 generations of evolution, Pareto efficiency was achieved and the Pareto-optimal front was found. We examined designs at the Pareto-optimal front and found several design criteria that enhance the mixing performance of a mixer while minimizing its fluidic resistance; these observations provide new criteria on how to design optimal microfluidic mixers. Additionally, we compared the designs from NSGA-II with some popular microfluidic mixer designs from the literature and found that designs from NSGA-II have lower fluidic resistance with similar mixing performance. As a proof of concept, we fabricated three mixer designs from 200 generations of evolution and one conventional popular mixer design and tested the performance of these four mixers. Using this approach, an optimal design of a passive microfluidic mixer is found and the criteria of designing a passive microfluidic mixer are established.