1
|
Multi-frequency passive and active microrheology with optical tweezers. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13917. [PMID: 34230533 PMCID: PMC8260820 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Optical tweezers have attracted significant attention for microrheological applications, due to the possibility of investigating viscoelastic properties in vivo which are strongly related to the health status and development of biological specimens. In order to use optical tweezers as a microrheological tool, an exact force calibration in the complex system under investigation is required. One of the most promising techniques for optical tweezers calibration in a viscoelastic medium is the so-called active–passive calibration, which allows determining both the trap stiffness and microrheological properties of the medium with the least a-priori knowledge in comparison to the other methods. In this manuscript, we develop an optimization of the active–passive calibration technique performed with a sample stage driving, whose implementation is more straightforward with respect to standard laser driving where two different laser beams are required. We performed microrheological measurements over a broad frequency range in a few seconds implementing an accurate multi-frequency driving of the sample stage. The optical tweezers-based microrheometer was first validated by measuring water, and then exemplarily applied to more viscous medium and subsequently to a viscoelastic solution of methylcellulose in water. The described method paves the way to microrheological precision metrology in biological samples with high temporal- and spatial-resolution allowing for investigation of even short time-scale phenomena.
Collapse
|
2
|
Enhanced Signal-to-Noise and Fast Calibration of Optical Tweezers Using Single Trapping Events. MICROMACHINES 2021; 12:mi12050570. [PMID: 34067843 PMCID: PMC8156233 DOI: 10.3390/mi12050570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The trap stiffness us the key property in using optical tweezers as a force transducer. Force reconstruction via maximum-likelihood-estimator analysis (FORMA) determines the optical trap stiffness based on estimation of the particle velocity from statistical trajectories. Using a modification of this technique, we determine the trap stiffness for a two micron particle within 2 ms to a precision of ∼10% using camera measurements at 10 kfps with the contribution of pixel noise to the signal being larger the level Brownian motion. This is done by observing a particle fall into an optical trap once at a high stiffness. This type of calibration is attractive, as it avoids the use of a nanopositioning stage, which makes it ideal for systems of large numbers of particles, e.g., micro-fluidics or active matter systems.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bailey MLP, Yan H, Surovtsev I, Williams JF, King MC, Mochrie SGJ. Covariance distributions in single particle tracking. Phys Rev E 2021; 103:032405. [PMID: 33862686 PMCID: PMC9115892 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.103.032405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Several recent experiments, including our own experiments in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, have characterized the motions of gene loci within living nuclei by measuring the locus position over time, then proceeding to obtain the statistical properties of this motion. To address the question of whether a population of such single-particle tracks, obtained from many different cells, corresponds to a single mode of diffusion, we derive theoretical equations describing the probability distribution of the displacement covariance, assuming the displacement itself is a zero-mean multivariate Gaussian random variable. We also determine the corresponding theoretical means, variances, and third central moments. Bolstering the theory is good agreement between its predictions and the results obtained for various simulated and measured data sets, including simulated particle trajectories undergoing simple and anomalous diffusion, and the measured trajectories of an optically trapped bead in water, and in a viscoelastic polymer solution. We also show that, for sufficiently long tracks, each covariance distribution in all of these examples is well-described by a skew-normal distribution with mean, variance, and skewness given by the theory. However, for the experimentally measured motion of a gene locus in S. pombe, we find that the first two covariance distributions are wider than predicted, although the third and subsequent covariance distributions are well-described by theory. This observation suggests that the origin of the theory-experiment discrepancy in this case is associated with localization noise, which influences only the first two covariances. Thus, we hypothesized that the discrepancy is caused by locus-to-locus heterogeneity in the localization noise, of independent measurements of the same tagged site. Indeed, simulations implementing heterogeneous localization noise revealed that the excess covariance widths can be largely recreated on the basis of heterogeneous noise. Thus, we conclude that the motion of gene loci in fission yeast is consistent with a single mode of diffusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Lou P. Bailey
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Hao Yan
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Ivan Surovtsev
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Jessica F. Williams
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Megan C. King
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Simon G. J. Mochrie
- Integrated Graduate Program in Physical and Engineering Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|