Biodiversity in the cyclic competition system of three species according to the emergence of mutant species

Dynamics of a linearly perturbed May-Leonard competition model

The May-Leonard model was introduced to examine the behavior of three competing populations where rich dynamics, such as limit cycles and nonperiodic cyclic solutions, arise. In this work, we perturb the system by adding the capability of global mutations, allowing one species to evolve to the other two in a linear manner. We find that for small mutation rates, the perturbed system not only retains some of the dynamics seen in the classical model, such as the three-species equal-population equilibrium bifurcating to a limit cycle, but also exhibits new behavior. For instance, we capture curves of fold bifurcations where pairs of equilibria emerge and then coalesce. As a result, we uncover parameter regimes with new types of stable fixed points that are distinct from the single- and dual-population equilibria characteristic of the original model. On the contrary, the linearly perturbed system fails to maintain heteroclinic connections that exist in the original system. In short, a linear perturbation proves to be significant enough to substantially influence the dynamics, even with small mutation rates.

Enhancing coexistence of mobile species in the cyclic competition system by wildlife refuge

We investigate evolving dynamics of cyclically competing species on spatially extended systems with considering a specific region, which is called the "wildlife refuge," one of the institutional ways to preserve species biodiversity. Through Monte-Carlo simulations, we found that the refuge can play not groundbreaking but an important role in species survival. Species coexistence is maintained at a moderate mobility regime, which traditionally leads to the collapse of coexistence, and eventually, the extinction is postponed depending on the competition rate rather than the portion of the refuge. Incorporating the extinction probability and Fourier transform supported our results in both stochastic and analogous ways. Our findings may provide valuable evidence to assist fields of ecological/biological sciences in understanding the presence and construction of refuges for wildlife with associated effects on species biodiversity.

Correlation between the formation of new competing group and spatial scale for biodiversity in the evolutionary dynamics of cyclic competition

Securing space for species breeding is important in the evolution and maintenance of life in ecological sciences, and an increase in the number of competing species may cause frequent competition and conflict among the population in securing such spaces in a given area. In particular, for cyclically competing species, which can be described by the metaphor of rock-paper-scissors game, most of the previous works in microscopic frameworks have been studied with the initially given three species without any formation of additional competing species, and the phase transition of biodiversity via mobility from coexistence to extinction has never been changed by a change of spatial scale. In this regard, we investigate the relationship between spatial scales and species coexistence in the spatial cyclic game by considering the emergence of a new competing group by mutation. For different spatial scales, our computations reveal that coexistence can be more sensitive to spatial scales and may require larger spaces for frequencies of interactions. By exploiting the calculation of the coexistence probability from Monte-Carlo simulations, we obtain that certain interaction ranges for coexistence can be affected by both spatial scales and mobility, and spatial patterns for coexistence can appear in different ways. Since the issue of spatial scale is important for species survival as competing populations increase, we expect our results to have broad applications in the fields of social and ecological sciences.

Emergence of oscillatory coexistence with exponentially decayed waiting times in a coupled cyclic competition system

Interpatch migration between two environments is generally considered as a spatial concept and can affect species biodiversity in each patch by inducing flux of population such as inflow and outflow quantities of species. In this paper, we explore the effect of interpatch migration, which can be generally considered as a spatial concept and may affect species biodiversity between two different patches in the perspective of the macroscopic level by exploiting the coupling of two systems, where each patch is occupied by cyclically competing three species who can stably coexist by exhibiting periodic orbits. For two simple scenarios of interpatch migration either single or all species migration, we found that two systems with independently stable coexisting species in each patch are eventually synchronized, and oscillatory behaviors of species densities in two patches become identical, i.e., the synchronized coexistence emerges. In addition, we find that, whether single or all species interpatch migration occurs, the waiting time for the synchronization is exponentially decreasing as the coupling strength is intensified. Our findings suggest that the synchronized behavior of species as a result of migration between different patches can be easily predicted by the coupling of systems and additional information such as waiting times and sensitivity of initial densities.

Invasion-controlled pattern formation in a generalized multispecies predator-prey system

Rock-scissors-paper game, as the simplest model of intransitive relation between competing agents, is a frequently quoted model to explain the stable diversity of competitors in the race of surviving. When increasing the number of competitors we may face a novel situation because beside the mentioned unidirectional predator-prey-like dominance a balanced or peer relation can emerge between some competitors. By utilizing this possibility in the present work we generalize a four-state predator-prey-type model where we establish two groups of species labeled by even and odd numbers. In particular, we introduce different invasion probabilities between and within these groups, which results in a tunable intensity of bidirectional invasion among peer species. Our study reveals an exceptional richness of pattern formations where five quantitatively different phases are observed by varying solely the strength of the mentioned inner invasion. The related transition points can be identified with the help of appropriate order parameters based on the spatial autocorrelation decay, on the fraction of empty sites, and on the variance of the species density. Furthermore, the application of diverse, alliance-specific inner invasion rates for different groups may result in the extinction of the pair of species where this inner invasion is moderate. These observations highlight that beyond the well-known and intensively studied cyclic dominance there is an additional source of complexity of pattern formation that has not been explored earlier.

Nonlinear dynamics with Hopf bifurcations by targeted mutation in the system of rock-paper-scissors metaphor

The role of mutation, which is an error process in gene evolution, in systems of cyclically competing species has been studied from various perspectives, and it is regarded as one of the key factors for promoting coexistence of all species. In addition to naturally occurring mutations, many experiments in genetic engineering have involved targeted mutation techniques such as recombination between DNA and somatic cell sequences and have studied genetic modifications through loss or augmentation of cell functions. In this paper, we investigate nonlinear dynamics with targeted mutation in cyclically competing species. In different ways to classic approaches of mutation in cyclic games, we assume that mutation may occur in targeted individuals who have been removed from intraspecific competition. By investigating each scenario depending on the number of objects for targeted mutation analytically and numerically, we found that targeted mutation can lead to persistent coexistence of all species. In addition, under the specific condition of targeted mutation, we found that targeted mutation can lead to emergences of bistable states for species survival. Through the linear stability analysis of rate equations, we found that those phenomena are accompanied by Hopf bifurcation which is supercritical. Our findings may provide more global perspectives on understanding underlying mechanisms to control biodiversity in ecological/biological sciences, and evidences with mathematical foundations to resolve social dilemmas such as a turnover of group members by resigning with intragroup conflicts in social sciences.

Three-species competition with non-deterministic outcomes

Theoretical and experimental research studies have shown that ecosystems governed by non-transitive competition networks tend to maintain high levels of biodiversity. The theoretical body of work, however, has mainly focused on competition networks in which the outcomes of competition events are predetermined and hence deterministic, and where all species are identical up to their competitive relationships, an assumption that may limit the applicability of theoretical results to real-life situations. In this paper, we aim to probe the robustness of the link between biodiversity and non-transitive competition by introducing a three-dimensional winning probability parameter space, making the outcomes of competition events in a three-species in silico ecosystem uncertain. While two degenerate points in this parameter space have been the subject of previous studies, we investigate the remaining settings, which equip the species with distinct competitive abilities. We find that the impact of this modification depends on the spatial dimension of the system. When the system is well mixed, it collapses to monoculture, as is also the case in the non-transitive deterministic setting. In one dimension, chaotic patterns emerge, which tend to maintain biodiversity, and a power law relates the time that species manage to coexist to the degree of uncertainty regarding competition event outcomes. In two dimensions, the formation of spiral wave patterns ensures that biodiversity is maintained for moderate degrees of uncertainty, while considerable deviations from the non-transitive deterministic setting have strong negative effects on species coexistence. It can hence be concluded that non-transitive competition can still produce coexistence when the assumption of deterministic competition is abandoned. When the system collapses to monoculture, one observes a "survival of the strongest" law, as the species that has the highest probability of defeating its competitors has the best odds to become the sole survivor.

Asymmetric interplay leads to robust coexistence by means of a global attractor in the spatial dynamics of cyclic competition

In the past decade, there have been many efforts to understand the species interplay with biodiversity in cyclic games within the macro and microscopic levels. In this direction, mobility and intraspecific competition have been found to be the main factors promoting coexistence in spatially extended systems. In this paper, we explore the relevant effect of asymmetric competitions coupled with mobility on the coexistence of cyclically competing species. By examining the coexistence probability, we have found that mobility can facilitate coexistence in the limited cases of asymmetric competition and can be well predicted by the basin structure of the deterministic system. In addition, it is found that mobility can have beneficial and harmful effects on coexistence when all competitions occur asymmetrically. We also found that the coexistence in the spatial dynamics ultimately becomes a global attractor. We hope to provide insights into the associated effects of asymmetric interplays on species coexistence in a spatially extended system and understand the biodiversity of asymmetrically competitive species under more complex competition structures.