1
|
Burke SE, Continetti RE. Submicrometer Particle Impact Dynamics and Chemistry. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2024; 75:67-88. [PMID: 38941529 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-083122-122157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Experimental studies of the collision phenomena of submicrometer particles is a developing field. This review examines the range of phenomena that can be observed with new experimental approaches. The primary focus is on single-particle impact studies enabled by charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) implemented using the Aerosol Impact Spectrometer (AIS) at the University of California, San Diego. The AIS combines electrospray ionization, aerodynamic lens techniques, CDMS, and an electrostatic linear accelerator to study the dynamics of particle impact over a wide range of incident velocities. The AIS has been used for single-particle impact experiments on positively charged particles of diverse composition, including polystyrene latex spheres, tin particles, and ice grains, over a wide range of impact velocities. Detection schemes based on induced charge measurements and time-of-flight mass spectrometry have enabled measurements of the impact inelasticity through the determination of the coefficient of restitution, measurements of the angular distributions of scattered submicrometer particles, and the chemical composition and dissociation of solute molecules in hypervelocity ice grain impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally E Burke
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; ,
| | - Robert E Continetti
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harper CC, Miller ZM, Lee H, Bischoff AJ, Francis MB, Schaffer DV, Williams ER. Effects of Molecular Size on Resolution in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry. Anal Chem 2022; 94:11703-11712. [PMID: 35961005 PMCID: PMC10389281 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Instrumental resolution of Fourier transform-charge detection mass spectrometry instruments with electrostatic ion trap detection of individual ions depends on the precision with which ion energy is determined. Energy can be selected using ion optic filters or from harmonic amplitude ratios (HARs) that provide Fellgett's advantage and eliminate the necessity of ion transmission loss to improve resolution. Unlike the ion energy-filtering method, the resolution of the HAR method increases with charge (improved S/N) and thus with mass. An analysis of the HAR method with current instrumentation indicates that higher resolution can be obtained with the HAR method than the best resolution demonstrated for instruments with energy-selective optics for ions in the low MDa range and above. However, this gain is typically unrealized because the resolution obtainable with molecular systems in this mass range is limited by sample heterogeneity. This phenomenon is illustrated with both tobacco mosaic virus (0.6-2.7 MDa) and AAV9 (3.7-4.7 MDa) samples where mass spectral resolution is limited by the sample, including salt adducts, and not by instrument resolution. Nevertheless, the ratio of full to empty AAV9 capsids and the included genome mass can be accurately obtained in a few minutes from 1× PBS buffer solution and an elution buffer containing 300+ mM nonvolatile content despite extensive adduction and lower resolution. Empty and full capsids adduct similarly indicating that salts encrust the complexes during late stages of droplet evaporation and that mass shifts can be calibrated in order to obtain accurate analyte masses even from highly salty solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conner C. Harper
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
| | - Zachary M. Miller
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
| | - Hyuncheol Lee
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
| | - Amanda J. Bischoff
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - Matthew B. Francis
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Berkeley, California 94720
| | - David V. Schaffer
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
| | - Evan R. Williams
- College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720-1460
- California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460
| |
Collapse
|