Exact long-range Coulombic energy calculation for net charged systems neutralized by uniformly distributed background charge using fast multipole method and its application to efficient free energy calculation

Non-Ewald methods for evaluating the electrostatic interactions of charge systems: similarity and difference

In molecular simulations, it is essential to properly calculate the electrostatic interactions of particles in the physical system of interest. Here we consider a method called the non-Ewald method, which does not rely on the standard Ewald method with periodic boundary conditions, but instead relies on the cutoff-based techniques. We focus on the physicochemical and mathematical conceptual aspects of the method in order to gain a deeper understanding of the simulation methodology. In particular, we take into account the reaction field (RF) method, the isotropic periodic sum (IPS) method, and the zero-multipole summation method (ZMM). These cutoff-based methods are based on different physical ideas and are completely distinguishable in their underlying concepts. The RF and IPS methods are "additive" methods that incorporate information outside the cutoff region, via dielectric medium and isotropic boundary condition, respectively. In contrast, the ZMM is a "subtraction" method that tries to remove the artificial effects, generated near the boundary, from the cutoff sphere. Nonetheless, we find physical and/or mathematical similarities between these methods. In particular, the modified RF method can be derived by the principle of neutralization utilized in the ZMM, and we also found a direct relationship between IPS and ZMM.

Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers

Absolute binding free-energy (ABFE) calculations are playing an increasing role in drug design, especially as they can be performed on a range of disparate compounds and direct comparisons between them can be made. It is, however, especially important to ensure that they are as accurate as possible, as unlike relative binding free-energy (RBFE) calculations, one does not benefit as much from a cancellation of errors during the calculations. In most modern implementations of ABFE calculations, a particle mesh Ewald scheme is typically used to treat the electrostatic contribution to the free energy. A central requirement of such schemes is that the box preserves neutrality throughout the calculation. There are many ways to deal with this problem that have been discussed over the years ranging from a neutralizing plasma with a post hoc correction term through to a simple co-alchemical ion within the same box. The post hoc correction approach is the most widespread. However, the vast majority of these studies have been applied to a soluble protein in a homogeneous solvent (water or salt solution). In this work, we explore which of the more common approaches would be the most suitable for a simulation box with a lipid bilayer within it. We further develop the idea of the so-called Rocklin correction for lipid-bilayer systems and show how such a correction could work. However, we also show that it will be difficult to make this generalizable in a practical way and thus we conclude that the use of a “co-alchemical ion” is the most useful approach for simulations involving lipid membrane systems.