Thermodynamics and its correlation with dynamics in a mean-field model and pinned systems: A comparative study using two different methods of entropy calculation

Is the glassy dynamics same in 2D as in 3D? The Adam Gibbs relation test

It has been recognized of late that even amorphous, glass-forming materials in two dimensions (2D) are affected by Mermin-Wagner-type long wavelength thermal fluctuation, which is inconsequential in three dimensions (3D). We consider the question of whether the effect of spatial dimension on dynamics is only limited to such fluctuations or if the nature of glassy dynamics is intrinsically different in 2D. To address it, we study the relationship between dynamics and thermodynamics using the Adam-Gibbs (AG) relation and the random first order transition (RFOT) theory. Using two model glass-forming liquids, we find that even after removing the effect of long wavelength fluctuations, the AG relation breaks down in two dimensions. Next, we consider the effect of anharmonicity of vibrational entropy-a second factor that affects the thermodynamics but not dynamics. Using the potential energy landscape formalism, we explicitly compute the configurational entropy, both with and without the anharmonic correction. We show that even with both the corrections, the AG relation still breaks down in 2D. The extent of deviation from the AG relation crucially depends on the attractive vs repulsive nature of interparticle interactions, choice of representative timescale (diffusion coefficient vs α-relaxation time), and implies that the RFOT scaling exponents also depend on these factors. Thus, our results suggest that some differences in the nature of glassy dynamics between 2D and 3D remain that are not explained by long wavelength fluctuations.

Effect of the presence of pinned particles on the structural parameters of a liquid and correlation between structure and dynamics at the local level

Pinning particles at the equilibrium configuration of the liquid is expected not to affect the structure and any property that depends on the structure while slowing down the dynamics. This leads to a breakdown of the structure dynamics correlation. Here, we calculate two structural quantities: the pair excess entropy, S2, and the mean field caging potential, the inverse of which is our structural order parameter (SOP). We show that when the pinned particles are treated the same way as the mobile particles, both S2 and SOP of the mobile particles remain the same as those of the unpinned system, and the structure dynamics correlation decreases with an increase in pinning density, "c." However, when we treat the pinned particles as a different species, even if we consider that the structure does not change, the expression of S2 and SOP changes. The microscopic expressions show that the interaction between a pinned particle and a mobile particle affects S2 and SOP more than the interaction between two mobile particles. We show that a similar effect is also present in the calculation of the excess entropy and is the primary reason for the well-known vanishing of the configurational entropy at high temperatures. We further show that, contrary to the common belief, the pinning process does change the structure. When these two effects are considered, both S2 and SOP decrease with an increase in "c," and the correlation between the structural parameters and the dynamics continues even for higher values of "c."

Dynamic heterogeneity in polydisperse systems: A comparative study of the role of local structural order parameter and particle size

In polydisperse systems, describing the structure and any structural order parameter (SOP) is not trivial as it varies with the number of species we use to describe the system, M. Depending on the degree of polydispersity, there is an optimum value of M = M0 where we show that the mutual information of the system increases. However, surprisingly, the correlation between a recently proposed SOP and the dynamics is highest for M = 1. This effect increases with polydispersity. We find that the SOP at M = 1 is coupled with the particle size, σ, and this coupling increases with polydispersity and decreases with an increase in M. Careful analysis shows that at lower polydispersities, the SOP is a good predictor of the dynamics. However, at higher polydispersity, the dynamics is strongly dependent on σ. Since the coupling between the SOP and σ is higher for M = 1, it appears to be a better predictor of the dynamics. We also study the Vibrality, an order parameter independent of structural information. Compared to SOP, at high polydispersity, we find Vibrality to be a marginally better predictor of the dynamics. However, this high predictive power of Vibrality, which is not there at lower polydispersity, appears to be due to its stronger coupling with σ. Therefore, our study suggests that for systems with high polydispersity, the correlation of any order parameter and σ will affect the correlation between the order parameter and dynamics and need not project a generic predictive power of the order parameter.

Delayed collapse transitions in a pinned polymer system

Employing Langevin dynamics simulations, we investigated the kinetics of the collapse transition for a polymer of length N when a particular monomer at a position 1≤X≤N is pinned. The results are compared with the kinetics of a free polymer. The equilibrium θ-point separating the coil from the globule phase is located by a crossover in 〈R_{g}^{2}〉/N plots of different chain lengths. Our simulation supports a three-stage mechanism for free and pinned polymer collapse: the formation of pearls, the coarsening of pearls, and the formation of a compact globule. Pinning the central monomer has negligible effects on the kinetics as it does not break the symmetry. However, pinning a monomer elsewhere causes the process to be delayed by a constant factor ϕ_{X} depending linearly upon X. The total collapse time scales with N as τ_{c}∼ϕ_{X}N^{1.60±0.03}, which implies τ_{c} is maximum when an end monomer is pinned (X=1 or N), while when pinning the central monomer (X=N/2) it is minimum and identical to that of a free polymer. The average cluster size N_{c}(t) grows in time as t^{z}, where z=1.00±0.04 for a free particle, whereas we identify two time regimes separated by a plateau for pinned polymers. At longer times, z=1.00±0.04, while it deviates in early time regimes significantly, depending on the value of X.