Interfacial properties of the hexane + carbon dioxide + water system in the presence of hydrophilic silica

Interfacial properties of the brine + carbon dioxide + oil + silica system

Molecular dynamics simulations of the H2O + CO2 + aromatic hydrocarbon and H2O + CO2 + benzene + silica (hydrophilic) systems are performed to gain insights into CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. For comparison purposes, an overview of the previous simulation studies of the interfacial properties of the brine + CO2 + alkane + silica system is also presented. In general, the water contact angle (CA) of the H2O + CO2 + silica (hydrophilic) system increased with pressure and decreased with temperature. The CAs of the H2O + hydrocarbon + silica (hydrophilic) system are not significantly affected by temperature and pressure. The simulated CAs were in the ranges of about 58°-77° and 81°-93° for the H2O + hexane + silica (hydrophilic) and the H2O + aromatic hydrocarbon + silica (hydrophilic) systems, respectively. In general, these CAs were not significantly influenced by the addition of CO2. The simulated CAs were in the ranges of about 51.4°-95.0°, 69.1°-86.0°, and 72.0°-87.9° for the brine + CO2 + silica (hydrophilic), brine + hexane + silica (hydrophilic), and brine + CO2 + hexane + silica (hydrophilic) systems, respectively. All these CAs increased with increasing NaCl concentration. The adhesion tension of the brine + silica (hydrophilic) system in the presence of CO2 and/or hexane decreased with increasing salt concentration. The simulated CAs were in the range of about 117°-139° for the H2O + alkane + silica (hydrophobic) system. These CAs are increased by the addition of CO2. At high pressures, the distributions of H2O normal to the silica (hydrophobic) surface in the droplet region of the H2O + silica system were found to be strongly affected by the presence of CO2. These insights might be key for optimizing the performance of the miscible CO2 water-alternating-gas injection schemes widely used for EOR.

Machine learning approaches for estimating interfacial tension between oil/gas and oil/water systems: a performance analysis

Interfacial tension (IFT) is a key physical property that affects various processes in the oil and gas industry, such as enhanced oil recovery, multiphase flow, and emulsion stability. Accurate prediction of IFT is essential for optimizing these processes and increasing their efficiency. This article compares the performance of six machine learning models, namely Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forests (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Gradient Boosting (GB), Catboosting (CB), and XGBoosting (XGB), in predicting IFT between oil/gas and oil/water systems. The models are trained and tested on a dataset that contains various input parameters that influence IFT, such as gas-oil ratio, gas formation volume factor, oil density, etc. The results show that SVR and Catboost models achieve the highest accuracy for oil/gas IFT prediction, with an R-squared value of 0.99, while SVR outperforms Catboost for Oil/Water IFT prediction, with an R-squared value of 0.99. The study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models as a reliable and resilient tool for predicting IFT in the oil and gas industry. The findings of this study can help improve the understanding and optimization of IFT forecasting and facilitate the development of more efficient reservoir management strategies.

Molecular modeling of interfacial properties of the hydrogen + water + decane mixture in three-phase equilibrium

The understanding of interfacial phenomena between H2 and geofluids is of great importance for underground H2 storage, but requires further study. We report the first investigation on the three-phase fluid mixture containing H2, H2O, and n-C10H22. Molecular dynamics simulation and PC-SAFT density gradient theory are employed to estimate the interfacial properties under various conditions (temperature ranges from 298 to 373 K and pressure is up to around 100 MPa). Our results demonstrate that interfacial tensions (IFTs) of the H2-H2O interface in the H2 + H2O + C10H22 three-phase mixture are smaller than IFTs in the H2 + H2O two-phase mixture. This decrement of IFT can be attributed to C10H22 adsorption in the interface. Importantly, H2 accumulates in the H2O-C10H22 interface in the three-phase systems, which leads to weaker increments of IFT with increasing pressure compared to IFTs in the water + C10H22 two-phase mixture. In addition, the IFTs of the H2-C10H22 interface are hardly influenced by H2O due to the limited amount of H2O dissolved in nonaqueous phases. Nevertheless, positive surface excesses of H2O are seen in the H2-C10H22 interfacial region. Furthermore, the values of the spreading coefficient are mostly negative revealing the presence of the three-phase contact for the H2 + H2O + C10H22 mixture under studied conditions.

Molecular insights into fluid-solid interfacial tensions in water + gas + solid systems at various temperatures and pressures

The fluid-solid interfacial tension is of great importance to many applications including the geological storage of greenhouse gases and enhancing the recovery of geo-resources, but it is rarely studied. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations are conducted to calculate fluid-solid interfacial properties in H2O + gas (H2, N2, CH4, and CO2) + rigid solid three-phase systems at various temperatures (298-403 K), pressures (0-100 MPa), and wettabilities (hydrophilic, neutral, and hydrophobic). Our results on the H2O + solid system show that vapor-solid interfacial tension should not be ignored in cases where the fluid-solid interaction energy is strong or the contact angle is close to 90°. As the temperature rises, the magnitude of H2O's liquid-solid interfacial tension declines because the oscillation of the interfacial density/pressure profile weakens at high temperatures. However, the magnitude of H2O vapor-solid interfacial tension is enhanced with temperature due to the stronger adsorption of H2O. Moreover, the H2O-solid interfacial tension in H2O + gas (H2 or N2) + solid systems is weakly dependent on pressure, while the pressure effects on H2O-solid interfacial tensions in systems with CH4 or CO2 are significant. We show that the assumption of pressure independent H2O-solid interfacial tensions should be cautiously applied to Neumann's method for systems containing non-hydrophilic surfaces with strong gas-solid interaction. Meanwhile, the magnitude of gas-solid interfacial tension increases with pressure and gas-solid interaction. High temperatures generally decrease the magnitude of gas-solid interfacial tensions. Further, we found that the increment of contact angle due to the presence of gases follows this order: H2 < N2 < CH4 < CO2.