1
|
Zulfiqar M, Ludwig DR, Strnad B, McVay M, Rengarajan A, Kushnir V, Mellnick V. Imaging features of marginal ulcers on multidetector CT. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:227-233. [PMID: 36376111 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the inter-reader agreement and frequency of various imaging findings of marginal ulcers on computed tomography (CT) in a series of patients with endoscopically or surgically confirmed marginal ulcer disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis involving a single academic institution. Eighty patients with a gastro-enteric anastomosis with confirmed marginal ulcer on endoscopy or surgery and multidetector (MD)CT performed within a month reviewed by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists to assess for the presence or absence of predetermined imaging characteristics categorised under signs of inflammation, signs of penetration, signs of perforation, and signs of obstruction. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using the Cohen kappa test. RESULTS Findings of perforation had moderate to substantial agreement, including the presence of extraluminal air, extraluminal fluid, and leakage of oral contrast medium (kappa 0.83 [0.61, 1.05], 0.57 [0.35, 0.79] and 0.75 [0.18, 1.31], respectively) although these were present relatively infrequently (23-26%, 30-43%, 3-4%, respectively). Additional imaging characteristics with moderate agreement were the presence of perienteric fat stranding, a dilated stomach proximal to the anastomosis, and penetration into adjacent organ (kappa 0.45 [0.23, 0.69], 0.47 [0.26, 0.69], and 0.47 [0.25, 0.69], respectively) which were variably present (80-88%, 11-16%, 5%, respectively). Wall thickening and contour abnormalities, although frequently present (61-90% and 60-80%, respectively) had only slight to fair agreement (kappa 0.09 [-0.14, 0.30] and 0.29 [0.07, 0.51]). CONCLUSION Signs of perforation have high inter-reader agreement but occur relatively infrequently. Fat stranding, wall thickening, and contour abnormalities are much more common; however, only fat stranding had moderate agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zulfiqar
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona, AZ, USA.
| | - D R Ludwig
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - B Strnad
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - M McVay
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - A Rengarajan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - V Kushnir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - V Mellnick
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mansour J, Zulfiqar M, Umer A, Zurcher KS, Heeger A, Menias CO. Abdominal Imaging Manifestations of Recreational Drug Use. Radiographics 2020; 40:1895-1915. [PMID: 33064622 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Recreational drug use is a burgeoning health issue worldwide, with a variety of presenting symptoms and complications. These complications can be secondary to the toxic effects of the drug itself, drug impurities, and nonsterile injection. The abdominal radiologist is likely to encounter patients who use drugs recreationally and may be responsible for recognizing and reporting these acute conditions, which in some cases can be life threatening. Because these patients often present with an altered mental state and may deny or withhold information on drug use, the underlying cause may be difficult to determine. The most commonly used drugs worldwide include cocaine, cannabinoids, opioids, and amphetamines and their derivatives. Complications of use of these drugs that can be seen at abdominopelvic CT can involve multiple organ systems, including the soft tissue and gastrointestinal, genitourinary, vascular, and musculoskeletal systems. A diverse range of abdominal complications associated with these drugs can be seen at imaging, including disseminated infections, gastrointestinal ischemia, and visceral infarction. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings of these complications to accurately diagnose these entities and help guide workup and patient treatment. ©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mansour
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| | - Maria Zulfiqar
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| | - Affan Umer
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| | - Kenneth S Zurcher
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| | - Allen Heeger
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| | - Christine O Menias
- From the Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, 3635 Vista Ave, 2nd Floor, Deslodge Tower, St Louis, MO 63103-2097 (J.M., A.U.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (J.M., M.Z.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S.Z., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|