Esmolol: a unique drug with ED applications

Evaluation of esmolol for heart rate control in patients with acute aortic dissection

PURPOSE

Acute aortic dissection is a serious and life-threatening condition that requires prompt, effective management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esmolol for heart rate control in patients with acute aortic dissection in the Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive analysis of patients treated for type A or type B acute aortic dissection in the ED at an academic medical center. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving strict (≤60 bpm) or lenient (≤80 bpm) heart rate control within the first 60 min of therapy at the study site. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure of ≤60 mmHg.

RESULTS

Of 266 patients screened, 40 patients met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients (82.5%) attained lenient rate control within the first 60 min of esmolol therapy. Eleven patients (27.5%) achieved a strict heart rate goal within the first 60 min of esmolol therapy. Five patients (12.5%) experienced an episode of hypotension during the first 3 h of esmolol therapy.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with esmolol infusion for acute aortic dissection, a lenient HR goal was achieved in most patients. In contrast, esmolol was not associated with attainment of strict HR control in most patients included in this sample. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the exact role of esmolol in acute aortic dissection in a larger patient population.

Diltiazem-Associated Cardiogenic Shock in Thyrotoxic Crisis

CLINICAL FEATURES

The patient we present is a 39-year-old woman with a history of hyperthyroidism who developed fast atrial fibrillation secondary to thyrotoxic storm. After the initiation of intravenous diltiazem drip, she developed hypotension, bradycardia, then asystole cardiac arrest.

THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGE

It is well known that calcium channel blockers and beta blockers should be used with extreme caution if the patient with thyroid storm has decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Despite this, it is recognized that guidelines for the management of thyroid storm do not include an algorithm of action in this situation. Thus, dealing with low-output failure during thyroid storm may pose a critical challenge.

SOLUTION

A significant portion of patients with thyrotoxic storm have an underlying low-output cardiac failure. Early identification, proper hemodynamic monitoring, and administration of the agents with appropriate pharmacodynamic profile and therapeutic potentials are essential to avoid treatment-induced cardiogenic shock.

Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH): rationale and design

This trial is a multicenter open-labeled pilot trial to determine the tolerability and safety of three escalating levels of antihypertensive treatment goals for acute hypertension in 60 subjects with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The pilot trial is the natural development of numerous case series evaluating the effect of antihypertensive treatment of acute hypertension in subjects with ICH. The proposed trial will have important public health implications by providing necessary information for a definitive phase III study regarding the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment of acute hypertension in subjects with ICH. The specific aims of the present pilot study are to: (1) Determine the tolerability of the treatment as assessed by achieving and maintaining three different systolic blood pressure goals with intravenous nicardipine infusion for 18 to 24 hours postictus in subjects with ICH who present within 6 hours of symptom onset; (2) Define the safety, assessed by the rate of neurological deterioration during treatment and serious adverse events, of three escalating systolic blood pressure treatment goals using intravenous nicardipine infusion; and (3) Obtain preliminary estimates of the treatment effect using the rate of hematoma expansion (within 24 hours) and modified Rankin scale and Barthel index at 3 months following symptom onset.

Inadequate hemodynamic management in patients undergoing interfacility transfer for suspected aortic dissection

The study goal was the analysis of effectiveness of hemodynamic management of patients undergoing interfacility transport for suspected acute aortic dissection (SAAD). Our retrospective, consecutive-case review examined 62 nonhypotensive patients transported by an air emergency medical services (EMS) service during 1998 to 2002, with referral hospital diagnosis of SAAD. Of patients with systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120 upon air EMS arrival, antihypertensives had been given in only 23/42 (54.8%). In 19 cases where pretransport SBP is less than 120, with no referral hospital antihypertensive therapy given, median pretransport SBP was 158 (range, 122-212). In 20/62 cases (32.3%), the air EMS agency instituted antihypertensive therapy, which was successful; of 42 cases with pretransport SBP less than 120, mean intratransport SBP decrement was 24 (95% confidence interval, 16-32). In patients undergoing transport for SAAD, pretransport hemodynamic therapy was frequently omitted and often inadequate, generating an opportunity for air EMS intervention. Education to improve SAAD care should focus upon both referral hospitals and transport services.

Antidysrhythmic agents at the turn of the twenty-first century: a current review

The use of class IA agents is gradually on the decline, primarily as a result of its unfavorable risk-to-benefit ratio. Lidocaine, a class IB agent, has been widely used in the acute treatment of VT. However, alternate drugs are being considered increasingly as first-line agents in the acute treatment of VT. Class IC drugs are contraindicated in patients with structural cardiac abnormalities and have a limited usefulness in the management of dysrhythmias. Beta-blockers continue to increase their role in cardiology, and subsequently their use in managing dysrhythmias. Class III agents, including amiodarone, sotalol, ibutilide, and dofetilide, are among the most widely used antidysrhythmics. Class IV calcium channel blockers have a limited usefulness in tachydysrhythmias. Digoxin and adenosine have unique antidysrhythmic properties and will likely retain their roles as antidysrhythmic agents. In the wake of the effectiveness of amiodarone, the drug that crosses all classes, some now question the benefit of pure agents that block a single, specific ion channel in the heart. After CAST8 demonstrated that antidysrhythmics can increase mortality while seemingly suppressing dysrhythmias, new drugs will continue to undergo intense scrutiny with regard to their efficacy, safety, and usefulness in treating dysrhythmias.