Endoscopic treatment of post-liver transplantation biliary leaks with stent placement across the leak site

Long-term (15 y) complications and outcomes after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: Impact of donor and recipient factors

With longer survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) undergoing liver transplantation (LT), the frequency and risk factors associated with vascular and biliary complications in the allograft and the impact on long-term outcomes are poorly understood. To assess frequency and risk factors for long-term outcomes in patients after LT for PSC, all recipients of LT for advanced stage PSC for a non-cholangiocarcinoma indication from 1984 to 2012, with follow-up through March 2022 (>10+ y follow-up), were identified. One-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative risks of complications were estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method, where death was considered a competing risk. Two hundred ninety-three patients (mean age, 47.3 ± 12 y) formed our study cohort. One hundred and thirty-four patients received LT before 1995, and 159 were transplanted after 1995. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 15.0 (10.3-22.1) years, LT was complicated by hepatic artery thrombosis (N = 30), portal vein stenosis/thrombosis (N = 48), biliary leak (N = 47), biliary strictures (N = 87), recurrent PSC (N=107), and graft failure (N=70). The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative incidence of recurrent PSC was 1.0%, 8.0%, 23.5%, and 34.3%, respectively. The type of donor and older donor age were associated with an increased risk of biliary strictures. Donor age >60 years was associated with an increased risk of recurrent PSC. Long-term patient and graft survival have not changed significantly for patients transplanted for PSC. Controlling transplant-related factors, such as donor age, prompt identification of vascular and biliary complications early, and long-term rigorous follow-up, is recommended to continue to improve on these outcomes.

Stent placement can achieve same prognosis as endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in treatment of bile leakage after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Both stent placement and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) are commonly used for treating bile leakage following liver transplantation. However, little research has compared the advantages of both methods.

AIM

To compare the prognosis of stent placement and ENBD in treating bile leakage following liver transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data for patients with bile leakage after liver transplantation in our center. The efficiency and prognosis were compared between the stent placement and ENBD groups.

RESULTS

We retrospectively collected data from 50 patients diagnosed with bile leakage within 1 month after liver transplantation. Forty patients underwent ENBD and nine received stent placement. Baseline patient characteristics, except white blood cell count, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin levels, were comparable between the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the rates of reconveyance or postoperative biliary stricture.

CONCLUSION

Stent placement and ENBD are recommended for treating bile leakage after liver transplantation, with similar efficacy and prognosis.

Urgent Endoscopic Biliary Procedures: "Run Like the Wind"?

Emergency endoscopy is an activity that must be guaranteed 7 days a week and 24 h a day. The pathologies of endoscopic interest that require emergency intervention are mainly hemorrhages of the upper digestive tract, the removal of foreign bodies, and the ingestion of caustics. The emergency endoscopist must therefore be experienced in the management of these pathologies. Nowadays, however, we know that even some biliary tract pathologies must be managed within a variable period between 12 and 72 h, in particular acute cholangitis (Ach), acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), biliary duct leaks (BDLs), and acute cholecystitis (AC). If, on one hand, there is little awareness among doctors about which pathologies of the biliary tract really deserve urgent treatment, on the other, the international guidelines, although not uniformly, have acquired the results of the studies and have clarified that only severe Ach should be treated within 12 h; in other cases, endoscopic treatment can be delayed up to 72 h according to the specific condition. This obviously has a significant organizational implication, as not all endoscopists have training in biliary tract endoscopy, and guaranteeing the availability of a biliary endoscopist 24/7 may be incompatible with respecting the working hours of individual professionals. This review aims to evaluate which pathologies of the biliary tract really require an endoscopic approach in emergency or urgency and the organizational consequences that this can determine. Based on the guidelines, we can conclude that a daytime availability for urgent biliary tract procedures 7 days a week should be provided for the management of severe ACh. Patients with ABP, AC unfit for surgery, and not responsive to medical therapy or BDLs can be treated over a longer period, allowing its scheduling on the first available day of the week.

Endoscopic Management of Benign Pancreaticobiliary Disorders

Endoscopic management of benign pancreaticobiliary disorders encompasses a range of procedures designed to address complications in gallstone disease, choledocholithiasis, and pancreatic disorders. Acute cholecystitis is typically treated with cholecystectomy or percutaneous drainage (PT-GBD), but for high-risk or future surgical candidates, alternative decompression methods, such as endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETP-GBD), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), are effective. PT-GBD is associated with significant discomfort as well as variable adverse event rates. EUS-GBD leverages lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for direct access to the gallbladder, providing the ability to treat an inflamed GB internally. Choledocholithiasis is primarily managed with ERCP, utilizing techniques to include balloon extraction, mechanical lithotripsy, or advanced methods such as electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy in cases of complex stones. Altered anatomy from bariatric procedures like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may necessitate specialized approaches, including balloon-assisted ERCP or EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE). Post-operative complications, including bile leaks and strictures, are managed endoscopically using sphincterotomy and stenting. Post-liver transplant anastomotic and non-anastomotic strictures often require repeated stent placements or advanced techniques like magnetic compression anastomosis in refractory cases. In chronic pancreatitis (CP), endoscopic approaches aim to relieve pain and address structural complications like pancreatic duct (PD) strictures and calculi. ERCP with sphincterotomy and stenting, along with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), achieves effective ductal clearance for PD stones. When traditional approaches are insufficient, direct visualization with peroral pancreatoscopy-assisted lithotripsy is utilized. EUS-guided interventions, such as cystgastrostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, and celiac plexus blockade, offer alternative therapeutic options for pain management and drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. EUS plays a diagnostic and therapeutic role in CP, with procedures tailored for high-risk patients or those with complex anatomy. As techniques evolve, endoscopic management provides minimally invasive alternatives for patients with complex benign pancreaticobiliary conditions, offering high clinical success and fewer complications.

Does T-tube indwelling prolong the procedure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for healing duct-to-duct anastomotic bile leakage after liver transplantation?

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the preferred treatment for duct-to-duct anastomotic bile leakage (D-D aBL) after liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to compare the time required for ERCP and D-D aBL recovery in post-LT patients with and without T-tube drainage. A total of 40 patients (11 with T-tube drainage and 29 without T-tube drainage) with confirmed D-D aBLs treated successfully with ERCP from July 2016 to September 2021 were reviewed. The mean interval from LT to initial ERCP was significantly longer in patients with T-tube drainage than in those without T-tube drainage (41.9 vs 25.1 days, P < .05). However, there was no significant difference in the time required for ERCP to result in D-D aBL healing between patients with T-tube drainage and those without T-tubes (33.4 vs 23.0 days). T-tube indwelling did not significantly prolong the course required for ERCP to resolve D-D aBL in post-LT patients.

[Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree]

Endoscopic methods are nowadays a priceless tool for the treatment of postoperative complications after hepatobiliary, pancreatic and thoracic surgery. Endoscopic decompression of the biliary tract is the treatment of choice for biliary duct leakage after cholecystectomy, hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Postoperative biliary duct stenosis can also be successfully treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation and implantation of various endoprostheses in most of the patients. In the case of pancreatic fistulas, especially those occurring after central or distal pancreatic resections, endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct can significantly contribute to rapid healing. Additionally, interventional endosonography provides a valuable treatment option for transgastric drainage of postoperative fluid collections, which often accompany a pancreatic fistula. Various treatment alternatives have been described for the bronchoscopic treatment of bronchopleural and tracheoesophageal fistulas, which often lead to the rapid alleviation of symptoms and often to the definitive closure of the fistula.

Anastomotic biliary stricture following liver transplantation and management analysis: 15 years of experience at a high-volume transplant center

INTRODUCTION

The occurrence of anastomotic biliary stricture (BS) remains an essential issue following liver transplantation (LT). The present study aimed to compare our findings regarding the incidence of anastomotic BS to what is known.

METHODS

The present study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of a total number of 717 consecutive patients (426 men and 291 women) who had undergone LT from January 2001 to March 2016. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors associated with anastomotic BS development.

RESULTS

Post-transplant anastomotic BS developed in 70 patients (9.8%). In the Cox multivariate analysis (a stepwise forward conditional method), factors including biliary leak (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-17.58, p < 0.001), hepatic artery thrombosis (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.03-5.88; p = 0.003), and acute rejection (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.16-3.37; p = 0.006) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of anastomotic BS. Surgery in 6 cases (66.7%), followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ECRP) with a metal stent in 18 cases (62.1%), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in 9 (20.9%), and ERCP with a single plastic stent in 8 (18.2%), had the highest effectiveness rates in the management of BS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors including biliary leak, hepatic artery thrombosis, and acute rejection were independently associated with an anastomotic BS. ERCP with a metal stent may be considered as an effective treatment procedure with a relatively low complication rate in the management of benign post-LT anastomotic BS.

Management of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplant Recipients

Biliary complications are often referred to as the Achilles' heel of liver transplantation (LT). The most common of these complications include strictures, and leaks. Prompt diagnosis and management is key for preservation of the transplanted organ. Unfortunately, a number of factors can lead to delays in diagnosis and make adequate treatment a challenge. Innovations in advanced endoscopic techniques have increased non-surgical options for these complications and in many cases is the preferred approach.

Biliary Complications Following Adult Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Risk Factors and Implications at a High-volume US Center

Biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures comprise the majority of biliary complications (BCs) following liver transplantation (LT). Currently, there are few large contemporary case series of BCs in adult deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the pretransplant and intraoperative risk factors associated with BCs at a high-volume tertiary care center and determine the impact of these BCs on their posttransplant course and long-term transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients undergoing a DDLT from a donor after brain death (DBD) at Emory University between January 2015 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 647 adult patients underwent DDLT from a DBD during the study period and were included in analyses. The median length of follow-up posttransplant was 2.5 y. There were a total of 27 bile leaks (4.2%) and 69 biliary strictures (10.7%). Recipient age and cold ischemic time were identified as risk factors for biliary leak, whereas alcoholic cirrhosis as transplant indication was a risk factor for biliary stricture. Placement of a biliary stent was associated with the development of both biliary leaks and anastomotic strictures. Posttransplant, biliary leaks were a significant risk factor for future episodes of acute rejection but did not impact overall survival. In contrast, biliary strictures were associated with a significantly reduced overall survival at 1- and 4-y post DDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

BCs are a major source of morbidity and mortality following DDLT, with strictures and leaks associated with distinct posttransplant complications.

Efficacy of Nasobiliary Tubes and Biliary Stents in Management of Patients with Bile Leak after Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Background/Aims

Bile leak is one of the most common complications of liver transplantation. The treatment options for bile leaks include conservative management, surgical re-intervention, percutaneous drainage and endoscopic drainage. We aimed to perform a systematic review to identify the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in the resolution of post-transplant bile leaks.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed systematic literature search in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, grey literature and relevant references in May 2017. Human studies in English with documented post-liver transplant bile leaks were included.

Results

Thirty-four studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled efficacy of biliary stents for the resolution of post-transplant bile leaks was 82.43% compared with 87.15% efficacy of nasobiliary tubes. The efficacy of biliary stents was lower for anastomotic leaks (69.23%) compared to T-tube (90.9%) or cut-surface/ cystic duct stump related leaks (92.8%). Similarly, the efficacy of nasobiliary tube was also lower for anastomotic leaks (58.33%) compared to T-tube or cut-surface related leaks (100%).

Conclusions

In this systematic review, the overall efficacy was 82.43% in biliary stent group, and 87.15% in nasobiliary tube group. Both biliary stent and nasobiliary tube were more effective in managing non-anastomotic leaks compared to anastomotic leaks.

Endoscopic Management of Biliary Issues in the Liver Transplant Patient

Biliary complications remain a common problem after liver transplantation (LT). The therapeutic endoscopist encounters a variety of situations in LT including strictures at the duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, strictures elsewhere in the biliary tree caused by an ischemic injury, and bile leaks at the anastomosis or from the cut surface and stone disease. Biliary complications lead to significant morbidity and occasionally reduced graft and patient survival. Several factors increase the risk of strictures and leaks. Endoscopic intervention in experienced hands is successful in the management of biliary complications following LT and percutaneous or surgical correction should seldom be required.

A Review on the Management of Biliary Complications after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinomas. Biliary complications are the most common complications seen after transplantation, with an incidence of 10-25%. These complications are seen both in deceased donor liver transplant and living donor liver transplant. Endoscopic treatment of biliary complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (commonly known as ERCP) has become a mainstay in the management post-transplantation. The success rate has reached 80% in an experienced endoscopist's hands. If unsuccessful with ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography can be an alternative therapy. Early recognition and treatment has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality in post-liver transplant patients. The focus of this review will be a learned discussion on the types, diagnosis, and treatment of biliary complications post-orthotopic liver transplantation.

Bile Leakage after Liver Transplantation

Objective

To evaluate the risk factors and outcome of bile leak after liver transplantation.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver transplantation in our institution between January 2010 and January 2014. The characteristics and survival rate of patients with or without bile leak were compared.

Results

Bile leak was observed in sixteen patients after liver transplantation (2.7% of the total number of patients transplanted). Total operating time and bile duct reconstruction technique (duct-to-duct anastomosis or Rouxen-Y cholangiojejunostomy) were found to differ significantly between patients with and without bile leak in univariate (p = 0.001 and 0.024, respectively) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.012 and 0.026, respectively). There was no difference in the one-year patient survival rate between the two groups. However, two-year patient survival rate was significantly lower in the bile leak group (p = 0.003). Both one-year and two-year graft survival rates were significantly lower in the bile leak group (p = 0.049 and <0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Cholangiojejunostomy and prolonged total operating time are risk factors for bile leak after deceased donor liver transplantation. Bile leak reduces graft and patient survival rates after deceased donor liver transplantation.

Endoscopic management of bile leaks after liver transplantation: An analysis of two high-volume transplant centers

Background

Bile leak after liver transplantation (LT) is commonly treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); however, there are limited data regarding the optimal treatment strategy.

Objective

We aimed to examine the role of ERCP in LT recipients with bile leaks at two large institutions.

Methods

We reviewed all ERCPs performed in LT recipients with bile leak and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis at two high-volume transplant centers.

Results

Eighty patients were included. Forty-seven (59%) patients underwent ERCP with plastic stent placement (with or without sphincterotomy) and 33 patients (41%) underwent sphincterotomy alone. Complete resolution was obtained in 94% of the stent group vs. 58% of the sphincterotomy group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in three-month survival among both groups. Percutaneous transhepatic therapy and surgery were required in 4% and 6% in the stent group vs. 12% and 42% in the sphincterotomy group, respectively (p = 0.22 and p < 0.001). The only predictive factor of bile leak resolution was stent placement.

Conclusion

ERCP with plastic stent placement is highly successful and more effective than sphincterotomy alone for post-LT bile leak treatment. These results indicate that ERCP and plastic stent placement should be considered the standard of care for the treatment of bile leaks in LT.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation; recent developments in etiology, diagnosis and endoscopic treatment

Biliary complications are considered to be the Achilles' heel of liver transplantation. The most common complications are leaks and bile duct strictures. Strictures can arise at the level of the anastomosis (anastomotic strictures; AS) or at other locations in the biliary tree (non-anastomotic strictures; NAS). Endoscopic treatment via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered to be the preferred therapy for these complications. This review will focus on the diagnostic modalities, new insights in etiology of biliary complications and outcomes after different endoscopic therapies, in both deceased donor transplantation and living-donor liver transplantations. Advances in recent therapies, such as the use of self-expendable metal stents (SEMS) and endoscopic therapy for patients with a bilio-digestive anastomosis will be discussed.

Location of a biliary leak after liver resection determines success of endoscopic treatment

BACKGROUND

Bile leaks after hepatic resection are serious complications associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the therapeutic success of endoscopic treatment of biliary leakage after liver resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Grade B biliary leaks were considered for endoscopic treatment in patients after liver resection between 1/09 and 4/12. Endoscopic treatment (sphincterotomy only, plastic stent distal to leak or bridging) was defined as successful when the patient remained without symptoms after drain removal and without extravasation follow-up ERC 8 weeks later.

RESULTS

Overall rate of biliary leak was 7.4 % (61/826). 35 patients with a grade B bile leak were considered for endoscopic treatment. 22 (63 %) had bile leaks that were peripherally located, and 13 (37 %) had bile leaks at central location. In 3 patients, sphincterotomy only was performed; in 19 patients, a stent distal to the leak and in 13 patients, a bridging stent was inserted. The overall success rate was 74 % (26/35 patients). Endoscopic treatment failed in 26 % (9/35), and mortality rate was 11 % (4/35). In all patients with leaks located at the right or left hepatic duct, treatment with the bridging stent was successful.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic therapy for biliary leakage after liver resection is safe and effective and should be considered as a first-line therapy in patients who are suitable for an interventional, non-surgical approach. Patients with a centrally located leak who are treated with a bridging stent are more likely to benefit from endoscopic intervention.

Percutaneous interventional management of biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation: A 16-year single-institution experience

The aim of the study was to investigate the BiCx after the pediatric OLT and to assess the efficacy of the fluoroscopic-guided PBI in the patients with BiCx as compared to the SR. A total of 340 OLTs were performed in 302 patients over the last 16 years. The inclusion criteria were the presence of BS or BL as a complication after OLT. The management of the BiCx was studied. Graft revision, graft loss, and survival were evaluated following PBI and SR. BiCx occurred in 17.1% (58/339) of the transplants; 6.2% (21/339) of transplants demonstrated BL and 12.7% (43/339) of the transplants had BS. Overall graft survival rates at 1 and 3 years in OLT with BL treated with PBI were 75.0% and 68.8% as compared with 75% and 66.7% in OLT treated with SR (P>.05). Overall graft survival rates at 1 and 3 years in OLT with BS treated with PBI were 70.6% and 54.5% as compared with 71.4% and 50% in OLT with SR or ERCP, respectively (P>.05). Based on the results, we conclude that PBI is as effective as SR in patients with the BL and BS after OLT.

Endoscopic management of bile leakage after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can be an effective treatment for bile leakage after liver transplantation. We evaluated the efficacy of endoscopic treatment in liver transplantation in patients who developed bile leaks.

METHODS

Forty-two patients who developed bile leaks after liver transplantation were included in the study. If a bile leak was observed on ERCP, a sphincterotomy was performed, and a nasobiliary catheter was then inserted. If a bile leak was accompanied by a bile duct stricture, either the stricture was dilated with balloons, followed by nasobiliary catheter insertion across the bile duct stricture, or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage was performed.

RESULTS

In the bile leakage alone group (22 patients), endoscopic treatment was technically successful in 19 (86.4%) and clinically successful in 17 (77.3%) cases. Among the 20 patients with bile leaks with bile duct strictures, endoscopic treatment was technically successful in 13 (65.0%) and clinically successful in 10 (50.0%) cases. Among the 42 patients who underwent ERCP, technical success was achieved in 32 (76.2%) cases and clinical success was achieved in 27 (64.3%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for bile leaks after liver transplantation. ERCP should be considered as an initial therapeutic modality in post-liver transplantation patients.

Role of endoscopy in the conservative management of biliary complications after deceased donor liver transplantation

The clinical outcome of patients receiving liver transplantation could be significantly affected by biliary complications, including strictures, leaks, stones and bilomas; early diagnosis and treatment of these conditions lead to markedly reduction in morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic gold standard is represented by conservative approaches, both endoscopic and percutaneous, based on the type of biliary reconstruction, the local availability of the procedures and specific expertise. In patients with previous transplantation, the difficult biliary access and the possible presence of concomitant complications (mainly strictures) further restrict the efficacy of the endoscopic and percutaneous treatments; on the other hand, surgery should generally be avoided because of the even increased morbidity and mortality due to technical and clinical issues. Here we review the most common biliary complications occurring after liver transplantation and discuss available treatment options including future perspectives such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access in patients with Roux-en-Y choledocho-jejunostomy or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult stones.

Fully covered, self-expandable metal stents for first-step endoscopic treatment of biliary leaks secondary to hepato-biliary surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fully covered self-expanding metal stents are now being used to treat benign biliary diseases.

AIMS

To assess the outcomes of these stents as first-step therapy in patients with biliary leaks secondary to hepato-biliary surgery.

METHODS

Thirty patients (56.7% males; mean age: 60.2 ± 13 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The data collected included technical and clinical success, adverse events and follow-up findings (1, 3 and 6 months).

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 100%. One early mild post-procedure pancreatitis occurred and resolved spontaneously. Three late stent distal migrations occurred, however cholangiography showed correct leak sealing in all patients. Stents were removed after a mean of 55.9 days. During follow-up no other complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

In our experience fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement was safe and efficacious as first-step therapy for post-operative biliary leaks. However, prospective comparative studies with plastic stents are required to validate these findings.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with post-liver transplant biliary complications: results of a cohort study with long-term follow-up

Background/Aims

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard approach for the management of biliary complications in liver transplant patients; however, its safety and efficacy have not been established in this setting. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of ERCP in transplant patients.

Methods

The case reports of 1,500 liver transplant patients were reviewed. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients were matched 1:2 with non-OLT patients and followed-up for long-term outcome (median, 7.4 years).

Results

Of the 1,500 liver transplant patients, 94 (6.3%) underwent 150 ERCPs after OLT. Anastomotic strictures were present in 45 patients, biliary stones in 24, biliary leaks in 7, papillary stenosis in 2, and primary sclerosing cholangitis in 1. An ERCP success rate of 90.7% was achieved; biliary stenting led to resolution of the bile leak in 7/7 (100%) patients, and biliary stones were removed in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. In addition, 34 of 45 patients with anastomotic stricture underwent endoscopic dilation. We obtained complete resolution in 22/34 (64.7%) patients. OLT patients did not show a higher probability of complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.04), of pancreatitis (OR, 0.80) or of bleeding (OR, 1.34).

Conclusions

ERCP is safe and effective for the treatment of post-OLT biliary complications, has a low rate of pancreatitis and results in a durable effect.

Plastic biliary stents for benign biliary diseases

Biliary plastic stenting plays a key role in the endoscopic management of benign biliary diseases. Complications following surgery of the biliary tract and liver transplantation are amenable to endoscopic treatment by plastic stenting. Insertion of an increasing number of plastic stents is currently the method of choice to treat postoperative biliary strictures. Benign biliary strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis may benefit from plastic stenting in select cases. There is a role for plastic stent placement in nonoperative candidates with acute cholecystitis and in patients with irretrievable bile duct stones.

Predictors of endoscopic treatment outcomes in the management of biliary problems after liver transplantation at a high-volume academic center

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract problems are the most common complications after liver transplantation. ERCP is increasingly being used to address posttransplantation biliary problems.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of endoscopic treatment outcomes in the management of post-liver transplantation complications.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

All adult patients who underwent liver transplantation at the University of California, San Francisco between January 1999 and December 2008 were reviewed.

DESIGN

A multivariate regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Identification of donor and recipient factors as well as technical considerations that predicted success or failure in the endoscopic management of posttransplantation biliary complications.

RESULTS

In 1062 patients who underwent liver transplantation, there were 224 biliary complications. ERCP was the primary treatment modality and was successful in the majority of patients treated. Patients with biliary complications who had take-back surgery for a nonbiliary indication during the first month after liver transplantation (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; P = .03), particularly for bleeding (OR, 0.18; P = .02), were less likely to respond to endoscopic therapy. Those who received a graft from a donor after cardiac death (OR, 0.15; P = .02) or a living donor (OR, 0.11; P < .01) were also less likely to respond to endoscopic therapy. Take-back surgery for a nonbiliary indication in the first month after liver transplantation was also identified as a novel risk factor for the development of biliary complications (OR, 1.80; P = .02).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP can be used to treat the majority of posttransplantation biliary problems. However, endoscopic therapy is less efficacious in the treatment of complications associated with ischemia.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation: A review

After liver transplantation, the prevalence of complications related to the biliary system is 6-35%. In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of biliary problems has changed markedly. The two standard methods of biliary reconstruction in liver transplant recipients are the duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy and the Roux-en-Y-hepaticojejunostomy. Biliary leakage occurs in approximately 5-7% of transplant cases. Leakage from the site of anastomosis, the T-tube exit site and donor or recipient remnant cystic duct is well described. Symptomatic bile leakage should be treated by stenting of the duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTCD). Biliary strictures can occur at the site of the anastomosis (anastomotic stricture; AS) or at other locations in the biliary tree (non-anastomotic strictures; NAS). AS occur in 5-10% of cases and are due to fibrotic healing. Treatment by ERCP or PTCD with dilatation and progressive stenting is successful in the majority of cases. NAS can occur in the context of a hepatic artery thrombosis, or with an open hepatic artery (ischaemic type biliary lesions or ITBL). The incidence is 5-10%. NAS has been associated with various types of injury, e.g. macrovascular, microvascular, immunological and cytotoxic injury by bile salts. Treatment can be attempted with multiple sessions of dilatation and stenting of stenotic areas by ERCP or PTCD. In cases of localized diseased and good graft function, biliary reconstructive surgery is useful. However, a significant number of patients will need a re-transplant. When biliary strictures or ischaemia of the graft are present, stones, casts and sludge can develop.

Subcapsular liver hematoma after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a liver transplant recipient

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed in patients after liver transplantation. The most common indications for ERCP include treatment of bile leaks and anastomotic and nonanastomotic biliary strictures. In this report we describe an unusual complication of ERCP in a liver transplant recipient with a bile leak two months after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). After confirming a bile leak, a hydrophilic guide wire was placed in the intrahepatic duct, an endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed, and a biliary plastic stent was successfully placed over the wire across the bile leak. Within the following 24 hours the patient developed a sharp right-sided upper quadrant pain and a drop in his hemoglobin level. An abdominal CT scan demonstrated a subcapsular hepatic hematoma that was successfully managed conservatively.

Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies

Biliary complications are still the major source of morbidity for liver transplant recipients. The reported incidence of biliary strictures is 5%-15% after deceased donor liver transplantation and 28%-32% after right-lobe live donor surgery. Presentation is usually within the first year, but the incidence is known to increase with longer follow-up. The anastomotic variant is due to technical factors, whereas the nonanastomotic form is due to immunological and ischemic events, which later may lead to graft loss. Endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures achieves a success rate of 70%-100%; it drops to 50%-75% for nonanastomotic strictures with a higher recurrence rate. Results of endoscopic maneuvers are disappointing for biliary strictures after live donor liver transplantation, and the success rate is 60%-75% for anastomotic strictures and 25%-33% for the nonanastomotic variant. Preventive strategies in the cadaveric donor include the standardization of the type of anastomosis and maintenance of a vascularized ductal stump. In right-lobe live donor livers, donor liver duct harvesting also involves a major risk. The concept of high hilar intrahepatic Glissonian dissection, dissecting the artery and the duct as one unit, use of microsurgical techniques for smaller ducts, use of ductoplasty, and flexibility in the performance of double ductal anastomosis are the critical components of the preventive strategies in the recipient. In the case of live donors, judicious use of intraoperative cholangiograms, minimal dissection of the hilar plate, and perpendicular transection of the duct constitute the underlying principals for obtaining a vascularized duct.

Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous treatment of bile leaks in hepaticojejunostomy or split-liver transplantation without dilatation of the biliary tree

Biliary leaks complicating hepaticojejunostomy (HJA) or fistulas from cut surface are severe complications after liver transplantation (LT) and split-liver transplantation (SLT). The aim of the study was to describe our experience about the safety and efficacy of radiological percutaneous treatment without dilatation of intrahepatic biliary ducts. From 1990 to 2006, 1595 LTs in 1463 patients were performed in our center. In 1199 LTs (75.2%), a duct-to-duct anastomosis was performed, and in 396 (24.8%), an HJA was performed. One hundred twenty-nine anastomotic or cut-surface bile leakages occurred in 115 patients. Sixty-two biliary leaks occurred in 54 patients with HJA; in 48 cases, an anastomotic fistula was found. Cut-surface fistulas occurred in 14 cases: 5 in right SLTs and 5 in left SLTs. Twenty-two patients were treated with 23 percutaneous approaches for 17 HJA fistulas and 6 cut-surface leaks without intrahepatic bile duct dilatation. Two percutaneous therapeutic approaches were used: percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for fistula alone and PTBD with percutaneous drainage of biliary collection in patients with both complications. PTBD was successful in 21 cases (91.3%); the median delay from catheter insertion and leak resolution was 10.3 days (range: 7-41). The median maintenance of drainage was 14.8 days. In 1 patient, fistula recurrence after PTBD needed a surgical approach; after that, an anastomotic fistula was still found, and a new PTBD was successfully performed. In another patient, PTBD was immediately followed by retransplantation for portal vein thrombosis. There were no complications related to the interventional procedure. In conclusion, biliary fistulas after HJA in LT or after SLT can be successfully treated by PTBD. The absence of enlarged intrahepatic biliary ducts should not be a contraindication for percutaneous treatment.

Rapid-sequence endoscopic management of posttransplant anastomotic biliary strictures

BACKGROUND

Post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures generally have been managed through ERCP with gradual balloon dilation and placement of multiple stents over an extended period of time.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the long-term outcome of rapid sequence dilation and to shorten the duration of stenting as a therapy for anastomotic biliary strictures.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

INTERVENTIONS

ERCP with rapid-sequence balloon dilation of post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures followed by stenting with multiple stents over a short time period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Long-term anastomotic stricture resolution.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were prospectively enrolled into a standardized ERCP treatment protocol. The mean number of ERCPs per patient was 3.4 (range 2-6), the mean number of maximum stents inserted was 2.5 (range 1-6), and the mean total stenting period was 107 days (range 20-198 days); the mean follow-up time from completion of the endoscopic therapy was 360 days (range 140-1347 days). Long-term stricture resolution was achieved in 33 of the 38 (87%) patients.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of control group, relatively small patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated dilation and shorter total length of stenting leads to long-term success in the majority of patients with post-liver-transplant anastomotic biliary strictures.

Management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: The role of endoscopy

Biliary complications are significant causes of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The estimated incidence of biliary complications after OLT ranges between 10%-25%, however, these numbers continue to decline due to improvement in surgical techniques. The most common biliary complications are strictures (both anastomotic and non-anastomotic) and bile leaks. Most of these problems can be appropriately managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Other complications such as bile duct stones, bile casts, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and hemobilia, are less frequent and also can be managed with ERC. This article will review the risk factors, diagnosis, and endoscopic management of the most common biliary complications after OLT.

Management of biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation

Biliary complications are a major cause of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation with an overall incidence between 11% and 25%. The most common complications are biliary leaks, strictures, and stones. These complications have an impact on graft survival, length of hospital stay, recovery, and overall cost of care. Therefore, knowledge of these complications and their management is important to the practicing gastroenterologist. Historically, biliary complications after liver transplantation have been managed surgically. However, with the growth of therapeutic endoscopic and percutaneous radiologic methods, most of these complications can now be managed less invasively. This article focuses on the incidence, timing, mechanism, and endoscopic management of biliary leak, strictures, stones, sludge, casts, and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction following liver transplantation.

Current management of biliary leaks

Biliary leak is a troubling complication that arises after a broad range of interventions on the gallbladder, bile ducts, and liver as well as after liver trauma. Fortunately, most biliary leaks are minor. Advances in imaging and minimally invasive interventional techniques have facilitated nonoperative treatment in most cases. The specific clinical scenario dictates diagnosis and treatment of a biliary leak. Prompt diagnosis and treatment lead to optimal clinical outcomes.

Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: causes and consequences

We retrospectively studied the prevalence, presentation, results of treatment, and graft and patient survival of grafts developing an anastomotic biliary stricture (AS) in 531 adult liver transplantations performed between 1979 and 2003. Clinical and laboratory information was obtained from the hospital files, and radiological studies were re-evaluated. Twenty-one possible risk factors for the development of AS (variables of donor, recipient, surgical procedure, and postoperative course) were analyzed in a univariate and stepwise multivariate model. Forty-seven grafts showed an anastomotic stricture: 42 in duct-to-duct anastomoses, and 5 in hepaticojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomoses. The cumulative risk of AS after 1, 5, and 10 years was 6.6%, 10.6%, and 12.3% respectively. Postoperative bile leakage (P = 0.001), a female donor/male recipient combination (P = 0.010), and the era of transplantation (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for the development of an AS. In 47% of cases, additional (radiologically minor) nonanastomotic strictures were diagnosed. All patients were successfully treated by 1 or more treatment modalities. As primary treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was successful in 24 of 36 (67%) cases and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in 4 of 11 (36%). In the end 15 patients (32%) were operated, all with long-term success. AS presenting more than 6 months after transplantation needed more episodes of stenting by ERCP, and more stents per episode compared to those presenting within 6 months and recurred more often. Graft and patient survival were not impaired by AS.

Effectiveness of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage for Postoperative Bile Leakage after Hepatic Resection

The effectiveness of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for postoperative bile leakage after hepatic resection was investigated retrospectively. Between 1997 and 2002 a series of 486 hepatectomies without biliary reconstruction were performed. Bile leakage was divided into two categories. Type A was defined as bile leakage communicating with the main bile tree fistulographically or endoscopic cholangiographically, and type B was bile leakage without such a patency of bile flow. Bile leakage developed in 31 patients (6.4%) (types A/B = 16/15). Type A frequently occurred at the major Glisson's sheath. In contrast, most type B cases occurred at the peripheral bile duct at the cut surface of the liver. Among the type A patients, 10 of 11 were effectively treated with ENBD. For the type B patients, 12 of 15 patients were successfully treated with intraabdominal drainage via surgical drains inserted during the operation or percutaneous tubes newly inserted for biliary fluid collection. ENBD was effective in two of three type B patients. The duration of bile leakage significantly shortened after initiation of ENBD in type A patients (15.3 +/- 6.9 vs. 25.8 +/- 13.2 days, p < 0.05). The classification based on communication with the main bile tree is useful for determining therapeutic strategy. Type A leakage has a good indication for ENBD, whereas type B can be treated with intraabdominal drainage in most cases, although ENBD may be effective in some intractable type B cases. It is preferable to initiate ENBD as early as possible to shorten the duration of bile leakage and the subsequent hospital stay.

Biliary and pancreatic stents

The use of biliary and pancreatic stents has increased significantly during the last 2 decades because of improvements in available endoscopes and endoscopic accessories, as well as better techniques. The number of endoscopists who can successfully complete these demanding procedures has also increased, as have the indications for stent therapy in biliary and pancreatic diseases. Stents are now made in various shapes and configurations from different types of polymers (plastics), various expandable metallic alloys, and bioabsorbable materials. Most of the available data relate to plastic and metallic stents for biliary tract disease; the data for pancreatic disease are fewer and involve a smaller number of patients. This article reviews the most recent available data concerning biliary and pancreatic stents and discusses possible future developments. It does not attempt to cover all data reported in biliopancreatic stent therapy.

An endoscopic approach to biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation

Biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this report, we reviewed our endoscopic experience of managing post OLT biliary complications in 79 patients over a 12-year period.

METHODS

OLT (n = 423) recipients between 10/86 and 12/98 were obtained from the transplant registry at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. OLT recipient who underwent at least one endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) were identified through a radiology database. Indications, findings and interventions performed were noted for each ERC report. Outpatient and inpatients medical records were reviewed for outcome and complications.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine (79/423, 18.7%) patients had at least one ERC for suspected biliary complication. Sixty-four (15.1%) patients had at least one or more biliary complications. The mean follow-up for patients with abnormal ERC was 33.9 months. Nineteen patients had bile leaks; 10 of these patients had leak at the exit site of the T-tube and five patients had at the anastomosis. Biliary stenting with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy led to resolution of bile leak in 16 patients. Three patients failed endoscopic therapy: one underwent surgery and two had percutaneous drainage. Twenty-five patients presented with biliary strictures. Nineteen strictures were at the anastomotic or just proximal to the anastomosis, one at the hilum (ischemic in nature) and three were at the distal, recipient common bile duct; one had strictures at the anastomosis as well as the distal recipient bile duct and another had diffuse intrahepatic strictures. Seventeen patients in the stricture group improved with endoscopic intervention. One patient was re-transplanted (diffuse intrahepatic strictures), but no patient underwent percutaneous drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

ERC is safe and effective in the diagnosis and management of biliary complications following liver transplantation with choledochocholedochal anastomosis and obviates the need for surgical or percutaneous transhepatic approaches in majority of cases.

Efficacy of endoscopic and percutaneous treatments for biliary complications after cadaveric and living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transhepatic radiologic procedures as well as ERCP-based techniques have been used to treat biliary complications after liver transplantation. However, the efficacy of these treatments has not yet been clarified, especially for complications occurring after living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to determine the frequency and types of the biliary complications after cadaveric donor liver transplantation and living donor liver transplantation. The success of ERCP and percutaneous transhepatic radiologic procedures was also evaluated. The choice of treatment approach, ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic radiologic procedures, depended on the type of biliary reconstruction and accessibility of the lesion.

RESULTS

Among 429 adult patients who underwent liver transplantation, 39 biliary complications developed in 25 patients (5.8%): biliary stricture (20), biliary stones (10), and bile leak (9). The frequency of biliary complications (5.8%; 6/103) after cadaveric donor liver transplantation was not significantly different compared with that after living donor liver transplantation (5.8%; 19/326). Success rates for treatment of biliary complications by means of ERCP and percutaneous transhepatic radiologic procedures were, respectively, 100% (11/11) and 78% (18/23). For endoscopically treated patients, balloon dilation alone for biliary strictures and nasobiliary tube placement alone for bile leaks resulted in complete resolution of the complication in, respectively, 67% (2/3) and 40% (2/5) without further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Transpapillary endoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic radiologic interventions are both effective therapies for biliary complications associated with liver transplantation. They are complementary approaches that help to avoid surgery for these complications.

A ten-year study on non-surgical treatment of postoperative bile leakage

AIM

To summarize systematically our ten-year experience in non-surgical treatment of postoperative bile leakage, and explore its methods and indications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 57 patients with postoperative bile leakage treated non-surgically from January 1991 to December 2000 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The site of the leakage was mainly the disrupted or damaged fistulous tracts of T tube in 25 patients (43.9 %), the fossae of gallbladder in 14 cases (24.6 %), the cut surface of liver in 7 cases(12.3 %), and it was undetectable in the other 2 cases. Besides bile leakage, the wrong ligation of bile ducts was found in 3 patients, residual stones of the distal bile duct in 5 patients, benign papillary strictures in 3, and biloma resulting from bile collections in 2. The diagnoses were made according to the history of surgery, clinical situation, abdominal paracentesis, ultrasonography, ERCP, PTC, MRI/MRCP, gastroscopy and percutaneous fistulography. All 57 patients were treated non-surgically at the beginning of bile leakage. The non-surgical methods included keeping original drainage unobstructed, percutaneous abdominal paracentesis or drainage, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial/biliary drainage (PTCD/PTBD),endoscopic management, traditional Chinese medicine and so on. Of the 57 patients,2 patients died,5 were converted to reoperation later, the other 50 were directly cured by non-surgical methods without any complication. The cure rate of the non-surgery was 82.5 %(50/57).

CONCLUSION

Many nonoperative methods are available to treat postoperative bile leakage. Non-surgical treatment may serve as the first choice for the treatment of bile leakage for its advantages in higher cure rate, convenience and safety in practice. It is important to choose the specific non-surgical method according to the volume, site of bile leakage and patient's condition.

Endoscopic management of biliary disease

Therapeutic biliary endoscopy continues to evolve. Key articles this year primarily involve biliary stenting and biliary stone removal, the two important maneuvers available to the biliary endoscopist. The issues addressed in this review include follow-up after the use of multiple stents for benign strictures, unilateral versus bilateral stenting for Klatskin tumors, stent types and placement positions, the timing and approach to choledocholithiasis in the context of anticipated cholecystectomy, and resistant biliary duct stones.