Reproducibility of exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise in healthy patients

Exercise blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

BACKGROUND

A hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) is associated with cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure (BP). A poor cardiovascular risk factor profile may underlie these associations, although this has not been systematically elucidated. Via systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the relationship between exercise BP and cardiovascular risk factors, and determine if cardiovascular risk is higher in those with an HRE vs. no-HRE across different study populations (including those with/without high BP at rest).

METHODS

Three online databases were searched for cross-sectional studies reporting data on exercise BP, an HRE and cardiovascular risk factors (including arterial structure, lipid, metabolic, inflammatory and kidney function markers). Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to calculate pooled correlations between exercise BP and each risk factor and pooled mean differences between those with/without an HRE.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies (38 295 participants, aged 50 ± 3years; 78% male) were included. Exercise SBP was associated with arterial, lipid and kidney function risk markers (P < 0.05). Those with an HRE had greater aortic stiffness (+0.80 ± 0.35 m/s), total (+0.14 ± 0.03 mmol/l) and low-density lipoprotein (+0.12 ± 0.03 mmol/l) cholesterol, triglycerides (+0.24 ± 0.04 mmol/l), glucose (+0.15 ± 0.05 mmol/l), white blood cell count (+0.49 ± 0.16 mmol/l) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (standardized mean difference: +0.97 ± 0.34), and lower flow-mediated dilation (-4.13 ± 1.02%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.04 ± 0.01 mmol/l) vs. those with no-HRE (P < 0.05 all). Results were broadly similar across study populations.

CONCLUSION

Exercise SBP is associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, which appear worse in those with an HRE vs. no-HRE. As results were similar across population groups, an HRE should be considered an important indicator of cardiovascular risk.

Impact of exaggerated blood pressure response in normotensive individuals on future hypertension and prognosis: Systematic review according to PRISMA guideline

PURPOSE

Arterial hypertension (aHT) is the leading risk factor for morbidity and mortality worldwide. Blood pressure (BP) deviation at rest is well defined and accompanies risk for cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality. A growing body of evidence emphasises that an exaggerated blood pressure response (EBPR) in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) could help to identify seemingly cardiovascular healthy and normotensive subjects, who have an increased risk of developing aHT and cardiovascular events in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed online database was searched for published studies reporting exercise-related BP and both the risk of aHT and cardiovascular events in the future.

RESULTS

We identified 18 original studies about EBPR in CPET, which included a total of 35,151 normotensive individuals for prediction of new onset of aHT in the future and 11 original studies with 43,012 enrolled subjects with the endpoint of cardiovascular events in the future. Although an EBPR under CPET is not well defined, a large number of studies emphasise that EBPR in CPET is associated with both new-onset aHT and cardiovascular events in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of studies support the hypothesis that EBPR in CPET may be a diagnostic tool to identify subjects with an elevated risk of developing aHT and cardiovascular events in the future.

Normal Myocardial Perfusion Gated SPECT and Positive Stress Test: Different Prognoses in Women and Men

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze different prognoses in women and men with normal myocardial perfusion gated SPECT, according to stress test results.

METHODS

Differences between women and men in terms of hard events (HE) (non-fatal acute myocardial infarction or cardiac death) and HE plus coronary revascularization (HE + CR) were analyzed in 2,414 consecutive patients (mean age 62.8 ± 13.5 years, 1,438 women) with a normal stress-rest gated SPECT, taking into account their stress test results.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seven patients (16.9%) (15.9% women and 17.5% men) had a positive stress test (ST-segment depression ≥1 mm and/or angina). During a follow-up of 5.1 ± 3.4 years, there were more significant HE (6.5% vs 2.3%; P = .005) and HE + CR (11.6% vs 4.8%, P = .001) in men with a positive stress test than in men with a negative stress test. These differences were not observed in women. In multivariate regression models, HE and HE + CR were also more frequent in men with a positive stress test (HR:3.3 [95% CI 1.1% to 9.5%]; HR:4.2 [95% CI 1.8% to 9.9%]; respectively) vs women with a positive stress test.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with normal gated SPECT studies have a favorable outcome, men with an abnormal stress test have a more adverse prognosis than women.

Exercise blood pressure and the risk for future hypertension among normotensive middle-aged adults

Background

The aim of the present study was to examine whether exercise blood pressure can be used to predict the development of hypertension in normotensive middle‐aged adults.

Methods and Results

We investigated 7082 normotensive subjects who were annually screened in a tertiary medical center and completed maximal treadmill exercise tests at each visit. After the initial 3 years, subjects were divided into approximate quartiles according to their average exercise systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses (≤158; 158 to 170; 170 to 183; ≥183 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and ≤73; 73 to 77; 77 to 82; ≥82 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure). Mean age of the study population was 48±9 years and 73% were men. Average baseline resting blood pressure was 120/77±12/7 mm Hg. During a follow‐up of 5±3 years, 1036 (14.6%) subjects developed hypertension. The cumulative probability of new‐onset hypertension at 5 years was significantly increased with increasing quartiles of exercise systolic blood pressure (5%, 9%, 17%, and 35%, respectively; P<0.001), with a similar association shown for diastolic blood pressure. After adjustment for baseline resting blood pressure and clinical parameters, each 5‐mm Hg increments in exercise either systolic or diastolic blood pressures were independently associated with respective 11% (P<0.001) and 30% (P<0.001) increased risk for the development of hypertension.

Conclusions

In normotensive middle‐aged individuals, blood pressure response to exercise is associated with future development of hypertension.

Exaggerated blood pressure response to exercise is not associated with masked hypertension in patients with high normal blood pressure levels

The association between exaggerated blood pressure (BP) response to exercise (ExBPR) and "masked hypertension" is unclear. Medical records of patients with high-normal BP who were evaluated in the Chaim Sheba Screening Institute Ramat Gan, Israel, during the years 2002-2007 and referred for 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and exercise test were reviewed. Data on exercise tests performed in the preceding 5 years were retrieved. Reproducible ExBPR was defined when it was recorded at least twice. BP levels on 24-hour ABPM were compared between patients with a normal BP response and those with an ExBPR (systolic BP ≥200 mm Hg). Sixty-nine normotensive patients with high normal BP levels were identified. ExBPR was recorded in 43 patients and was reproducible in 28. BP levels on 24-hour ABPM were similar in patients with and without ExBPR. In patients with high-normal BP levels, ExBPR is not associated with masked hypertension.

Prognostic value of an exaggerated exercise blood pressure response in patients with diabetes mellitus and known or suspected coronary artery disease

The prognostic value of an exaggerated exercise systolic blood pressure response (EESBPR) remains controversial. Our aim was to assess whether an EESBPR is associated with the long-term outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus and known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). From an initial population of 22,262 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent treadmill exercise electrocardiography or exercise echocardiography at our institution, 2,591 patients with a history of diabetes mellitus were selected for the present study. EESBPR was defined as systolic blood pressure >220 mm Hg during exercise. The end points were all-cause mortality and hard events (ie, death or myocardial infarction). A total of 236 patients (9.1%) developed an EESBPR during the tests. During a mean follow-up of 6.5 +/- 3.9 years, 484 patients died and 646 experienced hard events. The 10-year mortality rate was 16.6% in patients with an EESBPR compared to 30.9% in those without an EESBPR (p <0.001). The 10-year hard event rate was also lower in patients with an EESBPR (23.2% vs 38.9% in patients without an EESBPR; p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, an EESBPR remained independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.78, p = 0.001) and hard events (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 0.79; p <0.001). These results remained consistent in the subgroup of patients without a known history of CAD. In conclusion, an EESBPR was associated with improved survival and a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus and known or suspected CAD.