In search of left septal fascicular block

Alternating anterior and posterior fascicular block and left septal fascicular block

Electrocardiogram of a patient affected by hypertensive cardiomyopathy showed an anterior fascicular block pattern and in right precordial leads an anterior displacement of QRS complex, characterised by a well evident jump of r wave from V1 to V2. Lead V2 showed qR morphology with embryonic q wave and very tall R wave. Septal q waves were not present in leads I and aVL. A subsequent electrocardiogram showed a posterior fascicular block pattern and the same findings in right precordial leads. Septal q waves were not present in inferior leads. Other causes of anterior displacement of QRS complex were ruled out by clinical/instrumental investigation. These findings are highly suggestive of left septal (middle) fascicular block coexisting with anterior and posterior fascicular block.

Different degrees of anterior displacement of QRS complex

Electrocardiogram of a patient affected by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy showed normal PR and QRS intervals and signs of left ventricular hypertrophy. In leads I,V5 and V6 the initial q waves were absent. A subsequent electrocardiogram revealed the appearance of prominent anterior QRS forces expressed by a change from rS to R pattern in leads V2 and V3 with a tall R wave in V2. PR and QRS intervals and QRS axis remained substantially unchanged. Other electrocardiograms showed day-to-day variations of the anterior displacement of QRS complex. The different degrees of anterior displacement appear to be an expression of an underlying left septal fascicular block, but a diagnosis cannot be made with certainty.

Intermittent isolated anterior displacement of QRS complex - Differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The proposed criteria for diagnosis of left septal (middle) fascicular block (LSFB) appear to be conflicting. Moreover, it has been claimed that isolated anterior displacement (AD) of QRS complex could be a manifestation of a conduction delay of the right bundle branch, besides of LSFB. The purpose of the present study was to better define the etiology of AD through an analysis of the case reports dealing with intermittent AD, published up to now.

METHODS

PubMed search was performed to include all case reports dealing with intermittent AD occurring spontaneously, with an available 12‑lead electrocardiographic recording. Pertinent data were extracted from the papers for further analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen case reports were found in the literature; in all cases intermittent AD was attributed to LSFB. In all cases AD was associated to changes of initial QRS forces, characterized by disappearance of septal q waves (in I and V6) and/or appearance of a small q wave in leads V1-V3. Morphology of terminal QRS forces, analysed for the first time, was unchanged in 90% of cases. Some Isolated ADs observed during induction of premature atrial extra-stimuli and recorded by vectorcardiographic tracing and some electrocardiographic leads were attributed to a conduction delay of the right bundle branch. In this case, initial QRS forces did not change and terminal QRS forces shifted to the right.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of intermittent isolated AD, a differential diagnosis between LSFB and a conduction delay of the right bundle branch appears to be possible by the analysis of initial and terminal QRS forces. Instead, the diagnosis of permanent LSFB remains a challenge.

Unknown QRS Morphology Change at Peak Exercise: To Stop or to Continue?

Electrocardiogram changes during stress tests are well standardized and understood. We present and explain a reversible QRS morphology change at peak exercise previously unreported. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Fascicular Blocks: Update 2019

Many advances in the knowledge of medical science are due to the observation of an unknown phenomenon that remains an open question. A plausible hypothesis must be demonstrated and proved through a scientific method in order to be accepted by the scientific community and the same results must be reached by following either the same or different techniques. The original case described by Rosenbaum MB et al., in this review triggered a series of anatomic and physiologic investigations with clinical and experimental observations that supported the trifascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system of the heart and the concept of hemiblocks. The recognition and description of the left fascicular blocks made by the Argentinian School of Electrocardiology bridged an important gap in electrocardiography and many electrocardiograms that could not be explained until that moment could finally be understood. This review intends to redefine reliable criteria for the electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of left fascicular blocks [hemiblocks]. The anatomy of the left bundle branch is also discussed to better understand the incidence, prevalence, clinical significance and main causes of left anterior and left posterior hemiblock either isolated or associated with right bundle branch block. This review offers the reader a reappraisal of the trifascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system regarding the anatomy of the left bundle branch system and its pathophysiological and clinical significance.

Bradyarrhythmias and Physiologic Pacing in the ICU

Bradyarrhythmias represent a common pathology in the intensive care unit (ICU) with etiologies of varying severity. Treatment has often been focused on correcting underlying causes and may require pacing for urgent hemodynamic support. In recent years, there has been interest in physiologic pacing modalities which avoid the dyssynchrony from right ventricular (RV) only pacing. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) through biventricular pacing is a well-established device-based electrical therapy in patients with wide QRS and heart failure. Recently, it has been shown that biventricular pacing may also be pursued for hemodynamic rescue in the ICU setting. Efforts to re-engage the conduction system with His bundle pacing or further downstream have also emerged as alternative means to deliver resynchronization, with early applications in the ICU now being reported. The goal of the review is to examine bradyarrhythmia causes and management in the ICU as well as investigate new approaches in physiologic pacing and their potential roles in critically ill patients.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects

Cardiac pacing is an effective therapy for treating patients with bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block. However, traditional right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) causes electric and mechanical dyssynchrony, which is associated with increased risk for atrial arrhythmias and heart failure. Therefore, there is a need to develop a physiological pacing approach that activates the normal cardiac conduction and provides synchronized contraction of ventricles. Although His bundle pacing (HBP) has been widely used as a physiological pacing modality, it is limited by challenging implantation technique, unsatisfactory success rate in patients with wide QRS wave, high pacing capture threshold, and early battery depletion. Recently, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), defined as the capture of left bundle branch (LBB) via transventricular septal approach, has emerged as a newly physiological pacing modality. Results from early clinical studies have demonstrated LBBP's feasibility and safety, with rare complications and high success rate. Overall, this approach has been found to provide physiological pacing that guarantees electrical synchrony of the left ventricle with low pacing threshold. This was previously specifically characterized by narrow paced QRS duration, large R waves, fast synchronized left ventricular activation, and correction of left bundle branch block. Therefore, LBBP may be a potential alternative pacing modality for both RVAP and cardiac resynchronization therapy with HBP or biventricular pacing (BVP). However, the technique's widespread adaptation needs further validation to ascertain its safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of LBBP.

Intraventricular Delay and Blocks

From the atrioventricular node, electrical activation is propagated to both ventricles by a system of specialized conducting fibers, His Purkinje System (HPS), guaranteeing a fast, synchronous depolarization of both ventricles. From the predivisional common stem, a right and left branch separate, subdividing further in a fairly predictable fashion. Synchronous ventricular activation results in a QRS with specific characteristics and duration of less than 110 milliseconds. Block or delay in any part of the HPS changes the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology. This article discusses the use and limitations of standard ECG in detecting abnormal ventricular propagation in specific areas of the HPS.

The normal variants in the left bundle branch system

This article reviewed the main anatomic and physiopathological aspects of the left bundle branch from its origin in the His bundle and its intraventricular distribution on the left endocardial surface. The results are based on the relevant literature and on personal observations executed on 206 hearts distributed as follows: 67 dogs, 60 humans, 45 sheep, 22 pigs, 10 cows, 2 monkeys, 1 guanaco, and 1 sea lion. The main anatomical features of the His-Purkinje conducting system may be summarized as follows: The bundle of His is composed by two segments: the penetrating and branching portions. LBB originates in the branching portion located underneath the membranous septum. There is no true bifurcation of the bundle of His in a human heart. Short after its origin the LBB gives rise to its two main fascicles, anterior and posterior, both heading the anterior and posterior papillary muscles, respectively. The anterior division is thinner and longer than the posterior one. The RBB and the most anterior fibers of the LBB arise at the end of the branching portion. In some cases a well-defined left septal fascicle can be identified, usually arising from the posterior division. Each division gives off small fibers and false tendons crossing the left ventricular cavity connecting the papillary between them or the papillary muscles with the septal surface. From each division of the LBB, their corresponding Purkinje networks emerge covering the subendocardium of the septum and the free wall of the left ventricles. There are critical relationships of the proximal segments of the His-Purkinje system with the surrounding cardiac structures whose pathologic processes may damage the conducting tissue.

A case report of different degrees of the left anterior, septal and posterior fascicular branch block

We present a rare case of various conduction defects involving the left anterior, septal, and posterior branch in one patient. The different degrees of block of anterior, septal, and posterior fascicular of the left bundle branch indicate pathological changes in left ventricle. However, the values of this electrocardiographic presentation indicating the left ventricular function still need more investigations.

Prognostic significance of the absence of normal septal Q waves before aortic valve replacement

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of absence of septal Q waves in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis were retrospectively evaluated. Septal Q waves were defined as Q waves of<2mm in amplitude and<40ms in width and absence of septal Q waves was defined as simultaneous loss of Q waves from at least three of the leads I, aVL, V5 and V6. Septal Q waves were absent in 17 patients (Group AQ, 27.8%) and were present in 44 patients (Group PQ, 72.1 %) preoperatively. Newly developed AV block>1st degree and newly developed left bundle branch block were primary endpoints.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, absence of normal septal Q waves was significantly associated with increased risk of postoperative AV block (HR: 11.18, range 1.37-91.21, 95% CI, p=0.02) whereas it was not associated with increased risk for newly developed LBBB (HR: 3.15 0.62-15.83, 95% CI, p=0.16).

CONCLUSION

Absence of normal septal Q waves in the preoperative ECG may predict further delay in conduction which might develop in the early postoperative course of aortic valve replacement.

Electrocardiographic manifestation of the middle fibers/septal fascicle block: a consensus report

There are fibers in the left ventricle (LV) (LV middle network) that in around one third of cases may be considered a true septal fascicle that arises from the common left bundle. Its presence and the evidence that there are 3 points of activation onset in the LV favor the quadrifascicular theory of the intraventricular activation of both ventricles. Since the 70s, different authors have suggested that the block of the left middle fibers (MS)/left septal fascicle may explain different electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The 2 hypothetically based criteria that are in some sense contradictory include: a) the lack of septal "q" wave due to first left and later posteriorly shifting of the horizontal plane loop and b) the presence of RS in lead V(2) (V(1)-V(2)) due to some anterior shifting of the horizontal plane vectorcardiogram loop. However, there are many evidence that the lack of septal q waves can be also explained by predivisional first-degree left bundle-branch block and that the RS pattern in the right precordial leads may be also explained by first-degree right bundle-branch block. The transient nature of these patterns favor the concept that some type of intraventricular conduction disturbance exists but a doubt remains about its location. Furthermore, the RS pattern could be explained by many different normal variants. To improve our understanding whether these patterns are due to MF/left septal fascicle block or other ventricular conduction disturbances (or both), it would be advisable: 1) To perform more histologic studies (heart transplant and necropsy) of the ventricular conduction system; 2) To repeat prior experimental studies using new methodology/technology to isolate the MF; and 3) To change the paradigm: do not try to demonstrate if the block of the fibers produces an ECG change but to study with new electroanatomical imaging techniques, if these ECG criteria previously described correlate or not with a delay of activation in the zone of the LV that receives the activation through these fibers or in other zones.

Electrovectorcardiographic diagnosis of left septal fascicular block: anatomic and clinical considerations

Several publications considering anatomical, histological, pathological, electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic, and electrophysiologic studies have shown that the left bundle branch splits into three fascicles or in a "fan-like interconnected network" in the vast majority of human hearts. The left His system is trifascicular with a left anterior, a left posterior, and a left septal fascicle (LSF). Consequently, the classic term "hemiblock," to describe the block of one of the fascicles, established several decades ago by the Rosembaum's school, should be updated. Electrovectorcardiographic changes resulting from conduction abnormalities of the left anterior and left posterior fascicles are commonly diagnosed, mainly by their changes in the frontal plane. However, the existence of conduction defects of the LSF remains controversial. The ECG/VCG hallmark of LSF block is prominent anterior QRS forces (PAF) on the horizontal plane. This ECG/VCG phenomena should be distinguished from other conditions that also produce anterior QRS shift in the HP as: normal variants, right ventricular enlargement, misplaced precordial leads, lateral myocardial infarction, right bundle branch block, Wolff-Parkinson-White, obstructive and nonobstructive forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopahty, diastolic left ventricular enlargement, endomiocardial fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and dextroposition. The two highly frequent etiologies of LSFB are ischemia (coronary artery disease (CAD) with critical proximal obstruction of the left anterior descending coronary artery) and, in Latin America, Chagas' cardiomyopathy. The aims of this review are to revise the evidence of the existence of a trifascicular left Hissian system and to help in the ECG/VCG recognition of the LSFB.

Predictive Value of Absent Septal q Wave in Patients with Significant Stenosis of Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery

Aims:

There is conflicting data about the predictive value of absent septal q wave in patients with significant stenosis of proximal Left Anterior Descending coronary artery. To clarify the exact role of this simple electrocardiographic sign we conducted this prospective descriptive study.

Methods:

Patients who were referred for coronary angiography in Milad Hospital between December 2008 and September 2009 were chosen randomly. Standard ECG was performed and reviewed for presence or absence of septal q wave, and then the coronary angiography was done and reported by another cardiologist.

Results:

Of 148 patients with absent septal q wave in ECG, 85 patients (57%) had significant stenosis of proximal LAD in coronary angiography. Statistical analysis showed that significant stenosis of proximal LAD could be predicted by absence of septal q wave in ECG with sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 47%. However, Kappa statistic (Kappa = 0.36) showed low agreement between them.

Conclusion:

Absence of normal septal q wave in ECG could be a low value predictor of coronary artery disease mainly significant proximal LAD stenosis.

Hemiblocks Revisited

The trifascicular nature of the intraventricular conduction system and the concept of trifascicular block and hemiblock were described by Rosenbaum and his coworkers in 1968. Since then, anatomic, pathological, electrophysiological, and clinical studies have confirmed the original description and scarce advances have been developed on the subject. In the present study, we attempt to review and redefine reliable criteria for the electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of left anterior and posterior hemiblock. One of the most important problems related to hemiblocks is that they may simulate or conceal the electrocardiographic signs of myocardial infarction or myocardial ischemia and may mask or simulate ventricular hypertrophy. Illustrative examples of these associations are shown to help the interpretation of electrocardiograms. The incidence and prevalence of the hemiblocks is presented based on studies performed in hospital patients and general populations. One of the most common causes of hemiblocks is coronary artery disease, and there is a particularly frequent association between anteroseptal myocardial infarction and left anterior hemiblock. The second most important cause is arterial hypertension, followed by cardiomyopathies and Lev and Lenègre diseases. The hemiblocks may also occur in aortic heart disease and congenital cardiopathies. Left anterior hemiblock is more common in men and increases in frequency with advancing age. Evidence is presented regarding the relationship of spontaneous closure of ventricular septal defects, which may explain the finding of this and other conduction defects in young populations. Isolated left anterior hemiblock is a relatively frequent finding in subjects devoid of evidence of structural heart disease. Conversely, isolated left posterior hemiblock is a very rare finding; its prognostic significance is unknown and is commonly associated with right bundle-branch block. The most remarkable feature of this association is that the prognosis is much more serious with a great propensity to develop complete atrioventricular block and Adams-Stoke seizures.

Ventricular Activation Onset-Triggered Left Ventricular Pacing:. Safety and Feasibility in Initial Clinical Experience

Ventricular activation onset-triggered (VAOT) left ventricular pacing modalities synchronize left ventricular paced activation with existing intrinsic ventricular activation, in patients with complete LBBB and adequate rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of VAOT pacing with one left ventricular pacing lead, during temporary pacing in the postoperative period following open heart surgery. VAOT pacing was studied in five patients with LBBB and two patients with previously implanted right ventricular pacemakers. The VAOT pacing system used was assembled by modifying the function of existing equipment and its programming is described in detail. Comparative ECGs are reported, documenting the changes in ventricular activation produced by VAOT pacing. Stability of surface ECG acquisition was found to be essential to the success of temporary VAOT pacing and inappropriate pacing due to ECG instability is described. Patients were studied at rest and none experienced congestive heart failure. In the comparison of cardiac output, with and without VAOT pacing, no significant differences were found in LBBB patients or those with right ventricular pacemakers. In the comparison of arterial pressure, with and without VAOT pacing, no significant differences were found in six patients, however, in one LBBB patient with intrinsic predominant ventricular trigeminy, VAOT pacing was observed to have an antiarrhythmic effect resulting in suppression of ventricular ectopy and stabilization of arterial pressure. All patients survived VAOT pacing and the postoperative period without complications requiring additional intervention or treatment.

Clinical significance of QS complexes in V1 and V2 without other electrocardiographic abnormality

BACKGROUND

In the absence of other electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, QS deflections simultaneously in both of the leads V1-V2 may have multiple possible causes. Despite much information in the literature indicating that this is an unlikely pattern for pure septal infarction, such an ECG diagnosis is frequently given.

METHODS

Ninety-nine cases having QS deflections in both leads V1 and V2 but no other ECG abnormality were compared to 99 other patients with entirely normal ECGs, to whom they were matched by age, gender, and the presence or absence of septal Q waves. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed to determine the nature of any cardiovascular disease in these two groups, and to find a possible explanation for the ECG abnormality.

RESULTS

Because of its intermittence in subjects with multiple ECGs, QS deflections in leads V1-V2 appeared most often to be an artifact of precordial lead placement. Prior myocardial infarction, or presence of clinical coronary disease was present in only about 20% of the cases. Neither the intermittence of Q wave in V2 on repeated ECGs nor the absence of septal Q waves was useful in distinguishing between those with and without coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This ECG pattern is a sign of prior myocardial infarction in only a minority of cases, and in the latter, infarction limited to the interventricular septum is exceptional. This ECG finding should be interpreted as a nonspecific QRS abnormality with multiple possible causes. Clinical correlation and repeat tracings with attention to lead placement will help to clarify its significance.