Severe, intractable headache after injection with botulinum a exotoxin: report of 5 cases

Is botulinum toxin a cause or a cure for headaches?

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin is used in the treatment of headache as well as cosmetic indications. In recent years, headache cases have been encountered after botulinum toxin injections for cosmetic purposes. However, no clinical studies have been conducted on this seemingly paradoxical issue.

OBJECTIVE

In our study, the aim was to evaluate the frequency of occurrence of headache and its clinical features in patients who had undergone botulinum toxin application for cosmetic purposes.

METHODS

A total of 186 patients who were treated with onabotulinum toxin A for cosmetic purposes in our clinic between January 2019 and January 2021 were retrospectively screened, and the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients who reported headache complaints were examined.

RESULTS

Headache was reported in 19 (10.2%) of the 186 patients included in the study. Of the 19 patients who reported headaches, 17 (89.4%) had the onset of the complaint within the first 24 h, the complaint was resolved within the first 3 days in 16 (84.2%), and 12 (63.1%) reported spontaneous regression without the need for painkillers. The rate of development of headache complaints after the procedure was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients diagnosed with hypertension (p = 0.000) and patients treated for bunny line (p = 0.016). Ten patients (52.6%) described constant, 17 patients (89.5%) had diffuse, and 11 patients (57.9%) had throbbing-type headaches.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin application causes diffuse, constant, throbbing-type headaches that start in the early period and ends within a short time without the need for treatment.

A Review of Complications Due to the Use of Botulinum Toxin A for Cosmetic Indications

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A (botulinum toxin A) was found to provide a wide variety of therapeutic and aesthetic benefits as one of the most potent toxins in the world. Injectable remedies, including soft tissue fillers and botulinum toxin, have become very common in wrinkling and face rejuvenation management. While these methods of treatment are relatively safe, serious side effects can occur. In this review, the complications of BoNTA are highlighted.

METHODS

A literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct) were searched using key terms, and for identification of additional relevant studies, reference lists have also been examined. Only articles published in English were included in this review with a time restriction from 2000 to 2020.

RESULTS

There are various injection-related adverse effects associated (AE) with botulinum toxins such as erythema, oedema, pain, ptosis of eyelid or brow and ecchymosis. The overall majority of adverse events identified are mild and temporary.

CONCLUSION

As the use of toxins becomes increasingly more common, adverse events can be expected to increase as well. The practitioners need to be aware of such AEs, and the patients should be informed of these before undertaking such procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Ultrasonographic and Three-Dimensional Analyses at the Glabella and Radix of the Nose for Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection Procedures into the Procerus Muscle

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are widely used for facial rejuvenation procedures, and the procerus muscle is a major target in cases of glabellar transverse lines or rhytids. Although there have been many cadaveric studies of the procerus, its depth and thickness have not been investigated thoroughly. The aim of this study was to measure the depth and thickness of the procerus and identify the location of the intercanthal vein using ultrasonographic (US) imaging and the three-dimensional scanning method, which is needed to know to avoid side effects during BoNT injections. The morphology of the procerus was classified into two types based on the US images obtained at the glabella. The procerus was located deeper below the skin surface at the glabella than the sellion (3.8 ± 0.7 mm versus 2.7 ± 0.6 mm). The width of the procerus in US images increased from the sellion (10.9 ± 0.2 mm) to the glabella (14.5 ± 4.6 mm), whereas its thickness decreased (from 1.6 ± 0.6 mm to 1.1 ± 0.5 mm). The intercanthal vein was located 5.1 ± 4.0 mm superior to the sellion and 3.0 ± 0.6 mm below the skin’s surface. The present findings provide anatomical knowledge as well as the reference location information for use when injecting BoNT into the procerus.

Complications in the Cosmetic Dermatology Patient: A Review and Our Experience (Part 1)

BACKGROUND

Over recent decades, the options available to patients for cosmetic rejuvenation have expanded dramatically. The range of options commonly available to patients now includes neuromodulators, fillers, sclerotherapy, chemical peels, liposculpture, lasers, and lights and other energy devices and continues to grow. As with all therapeutic interventions, these cosmetic dermatologic procedures are not without risk. Timely recognition of complications and intervention are paramount for optimal patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Part 1 of this review will focus on the common complications of injectable cosmetic procedures, such as neuromodulators, fillers, and sclerotherapy. The second part will discuss the complications of chemical peels, lasers, light and energy devices, and fat removal procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed on cosmetic dermatology complications from 1989 to 2015, and results are summarized. Practical considerations of these complications are also provided.

RESULTS

Reports of complications after neuromodulator, injectable hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid, polymethylmethacrylate, sclerotherapy, fat transfer, liposuction, cryolipolysis, chemical peels, lasers, and light sources, such as Q-switched laser, intense pulsed light, nonablative and ablative resurfacing lasers, were found.

CONCLUSION

Review of the literature revealed multiple management options for potential complications of the multitude of cosmetic dermatology procedures now available to patients.

Forehead carbuncle with intractable headache

Although carbuncles are commonly seen and may heal on their own or respond well to treatment, in rare conditions, bacteria from carbuncles can spread into the bloodstream and migrate to other areas of the body. Herein, we report on an elderly female who suffered from forehead carbuncle with intractable headache, later confirmed as having subgaleal abscess. Physicians should pay special attention to elderly and immune-compromised patients with carbuncles located on the middle of the face, especially when accompanied by intractable headache, to avoid poor outcome.

Safety of botulinum toxin A in aesthetic treatments: a systematic review of clinical studies

BACKGROUND

The use of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) for aesthetic treatments is growing steadily, and new safety data have been reported in recently published studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety data on the use of the three BoNT-A formulations approved for facial aesthetics from recent studies and to confirm their safety profiles.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted using three online databases restricted to the timeframe from January 2000 to June 2012. Only clinical trials, randomized or open label, with safety as the primary or secondary endpoint, were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-five papers were selected, with a total of subjects 8,787 studied. OnabotulinumtoxinA was used in 60.0% of the studies, abobotulinumtoxinA in 37.1%, and incobotulinumtoxinA in 2.8%. The glabella was the most investigated area (51.4%), followed by the upper face (25.7%), crow's feet (11.4%), and lower face (11.4%). Treatment-related adverse events were blepharoptosis (2.5%), brow ptosis (3.1%), and eye sensory disorders (3%) in the upper face and lip asymmetries and imbalances in the lower face (6.9%). All of these events resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSION

The short-term safety profile of BoNT-A in cosmetic nonsurgical procedures was confirmed for all the three commercial formulations.

Type A botulinum neurotoxin complex proteins differentially modulate host response of neuronal cells

Type A Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/A), the most potent poison known to mankind, is produced by Clostridium botulinum type A as a complex with neurotoxin-associated proteins (NAPs). Currently BoNT/A in purified and complex forms are both available in therapeutic and cosmetic applications to treat neuromuscular disorders. Whereas Xeomin(®) (incobotulinumtoxin A, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Germany) is free from complexing proteins, Botox(®) (onabotulinumtoxin A, Allergan, USA) contains NAPs, which by themselves have no known role in the intracellular biochemical process involved in the blockade of neurotransmitter release. Since the fate and possible interactions of NAPs with patient tissues after intramuscular injection are not known, it was the aim of this study to evaluate the binding of BoNT/A and/or the respective NAPs to cells derived from neuronal and non-neuronal human tissues, and to further explore neuronal cell responses to different components of BoNT/A. BoNT/A alone, the complete BoNT/A complex, and the NAPs alone, all bind to neuronal SH-SY5Y cells. The BoNT/A complex and NAPs additionally bind to RMS13 skeletal muscle cells, TIB-152 lymphoblasts, Detroit 551 fibroblasts besides the SH-SY5Y cells. However, no binding to these non-neuronal cells was observed with pure BoNT/A. Although BoNT/A, both in its purified and complex forms, bind to SH-SY5Y, the intracellular responses of the SH-SY5Y cells to these BoNT/A components are not clearly understood. Examination of inflammatory cytokine released from SH-SY5Y cells revealed that BoNT/A did not increase the release of inflammatory cytokines, whereas exposure to NAPs significantly increased release of IL-6, and MCP-1, and exposure to BoNT/A complex significantly increased release of IL-6, MCP-1, IL-8, TNF-α, and RANTES vs. control, suggesting that different components of BoNT/A complex induce significantly differential host response in human neuronal cells. Results suggest that host response to different compositions of BoNT/A based therapeutics may play important role in local and systemic symptoms in patients.

[Side effects in aesthetic medicine. Spectrum, management and avoidance]

Aesthetic medicine has become increasingly popular in the last two decades. The same trend has occurred in dermatology. Aesthetic dermatology prefers minimally invasive procedures. Nevertheless, even these procedures are not free of possible adverse effects. The spectrum of possible adverse effects, their management and prevention are discussed for four popular procedures in aesthetic dermatology, i.e. chemical peels, mesotherapy, botulinum toxin, and dermal fillers. Aesthetic procedures should only be performed by well-educated, well-trained medical doctors with an excellent medical background, never by lay persons.

Complications of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures: prevention and management

Over the past decade, facial rejuvenation procedures to circumvent traditional surgery have become increasingly popular. Office-based, minimally invasive procedures can promote a youthful appearance with minimal downtime and low risk of complications. Injectable botulinum toxin (BoNT), soft-tissue fillers, and chemical peels are among the most popular non-invasive rejuvenation procedures, and each has unique applications for improving facial aesthetics. Despite the simplicity and reliability of office-based procedures, complications can occur even with an astute and experienced injector. The goal of any procedure is to perform it properly and safely; thus, early recognition of complications when they do occur is paramount in dictating prevention of long-term sequelae. The most common complications from BoNT and soft-tissue filler injection are bruising, erythema and pain. With chemical peels, it is not uncommon to have erythema, irritation and burning. Fortunately, these side effects are normally transient and have simple remedies. More serious complications include muscle paralysis from BoNT, granuloma formation from soft-tissue filler placement and scarring from chemical peels. Thankfully, these complications are rare and can be avoided with excellent procedure technique, knowledge of facial anatomy, proper patient selection, and appropriate pre- and post-skin care. This article reviews complications of office-based, minimally invasive procedures, with emphasis on prevention and management. Practitioners providing these treatments should be well versed in this subject matter in order to deliver the highest quality care.

Complications of injectable fillers and neurotoxins

All cosmetic injectable products are associated with the risk of both early and delayed complications. Early and expected side effects include swelling, bruising, and erythema at the injection. It is of utmost importance that patients are educated on the treatment they are consenting to receive and the potential risk of these therapies. Side effects of the various cosmetic injectable products, including both injectable neurotoxins and soft tissue fillers, are often technique associated, such as placing the filler too superficial or unintentional paralysis of facial muscles. Other complications, such as necrosis, intravascular injections, and infection may not be entirely technique-dependent, and must be managed swiftly and effectively. Finally, immunologic phenomena, such as delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and foreign body granulomas, are complications that have no relationship to technique, and thus proper counseling and knowledge of management is required.

Botulinum neurotoxin A: a review

Despite its ubiquity in cosmetic circles and broad general awareness, a literature search of botulinum neurotoxin in JPRAS and BJPS yielded a mere 4 articles germane to cosmesis. A pair each detailing its application in masseteric hypertrophy(1,2) and the use of cryoanalgesia.(3,4) Given that botulinum neurotoxin A is the most commonly used cosmetic treatment, with American figures being most accurate,(5) a review of the background, development and scientific evidence would be perhaps useful, if not overdue, as Plastic Surgeons increasingly incorporate non-surgical interventions into their practices as part of a comprehensive facial rejuvenation strategy.

A review of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures

In today's society the desire to maintain a youthful appearance has driven the development of minimally invasive dermatological procedures that are designed to rejuvenate the ageing face. The aim of this review is to present evidence for the use of techniques which can easily be incorporated into outpatient dermatology practice with low overhead expenditure. For this reason, laser and light-based treatments have been omitted. This review will instead focus on chemical peels, intradermal fillers and botulinum toxin. These techniques address the main aspects of facial ageing, namely photodamage, volume loss and dynamic lines, which correlate anatomically to skin, subcutaneous fat and muscle. A combination of such techniques will provide the practitioner with a reasonable portfolio of treatments for a balanced, holistic result.

Complications With the Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Cosmetic Applications and Hyperhidrosis

In dermatology, botulinum toxin is now most often used to reduce dynamic facial creases and treat primary focal hyperhidrosis. The exemplary safety record of this medication is such that after nearly 2 decades, it is not known to have any long-term adverse events. Transient adverse events, such as mild injection pain, are typically minor and spontaneously remitting. Headache, nausea and flu-like symptoms, lid and brow ptosis after upper face injection, lower face asymmetry after perioral injection, and fine motor impairment after palmar injection are uncommon to rare. Understanding of anatomic landmarks and site-specific precautions can further mitigate the incidence of unwanted effects. Patients who do experience uncommon, transient effects can be reassured that these are not dangerous and will resolve completely without intervention.

A critical review of the use of botulinum toxin in orofacial pain disorders

This article reviews the appropriate use, cautions, and contraindication for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) and reviews the peer-reviewed literature that describes its efficacy for treatment of various chronic orofacial pain disorders. The literature has long suggested that BoNT is of value for orofacial hyperactivity and more recently for some orofacial pain disorders; however, the results are not as promising for orofacial pain. The available data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RBCTs) do not support the use of BoNT as a substantially better therapy than what is being used already. The one exception is that BoNT has reasonable RBCT data to support its use as a migraine prophylaxis therapy. The major caveat is that the use of BoNT in chronic orofacial pain is "off-label".

Botulinum Toxin—A Treatment for Migraine? A Systematic Review

Scalp injection of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) into the superficial musculature has evoked interest in the management of migraine headache. In clinical trials, prevention of migraine attacks for 3 months or more has been seen in some patients following BT-A scalp injections. In the majority of pain syndromes where BT-A is effective, inhibition of muscle spasms appears to be an important component of its activity. A direct or independent and prolonged analgesic action unrelated to skeletal muscle relaxation is believed to underlie the prophylactic efficacy of BT-A in migraine; peripheral and central modulation of pain impulses by BT-A has also been proposed. A direct peripheral antinociceptive effect was not seen in three controlled studies of BT-A in normal human volunteers. Experimental evidence for BT-A-induced analgesia in rats is suggestive but dose-dependent and lasts only 2 weeks. In migraine patients, a consistent or dose-dependent response to BT-A treatment has not been seen. Peak responses to BT-A in migraine patients are seen at 8-12 weeks, whereas BT-A-affected nerve endings in mice fully recover function between 63 and 91 days; the difference in species limits the interpretation of this dissonance. As BT-A does not normally cross the intact blood-brain barrier, meningeal nociceptors appear unlikely to be influenced by scalp injections of BT-A; the possibility of antidromic transfer of BT-A in the trigeminovascular system should be considered. The extended period for which migraine prophylaxis might be required, the antigenic and headache-provoking potential of BT-A, the inability of BT-A to affect central neuronal processes significantly, including the aura of migraine, the possible placebo effect of needling, and purely subjective outcome measures in headache studies are additional concerns in evaluating this treatment strategy. The clinical utility of BT-A has not been compared against established migraine prophylactic agents. The efficacy of BT-A in preventing migraine headache attacks remains controversial and the underlying scientific rationale is debatable.

Managing adverse events associated with botulinum toxin type A: a focus on cosmetic procedures

Botulinum toxin A (BTXA) has become a widely used drug in cosmetic dermatology, not only to treat focal hyperhidrosis but also hyperkinetic facial lines, platysma bands, décolleté bands, and other skin features. The spectrum of possible adverse effects of BTXA is broad but fortunately those that have been observed with cosmetic use of this product are generally mild and transient. The major tools for preventing adverse effects from BTXA are knowledge and skill. Use of correct injection techniques is mandatory since most unwanted effects are caused by incorrect technique. Knowledge of the target structures, e.g. the facial and extrafacial muscles, allows physicians to select the optimal dose, time and technique. The most common adverse effects are pain and hematoma. In the periocular region, lid and brow ptosis are important adverse effects. Adverse effects such as pain, hematoma, ecchymosis, and bruising may also occur in the upper and lower face and at extrafacial sites. Other possible adverse effects seen in other indications that the user of BTXA in cosmetic dermatology should be wary of include induction headaches and possible interaction with concomitant medications. Induction of neutralizing antibodies due to cosmetic BTXA treatment has not been observed. This article also outlines recommendations regarding use of BTXA. Of these, the most important for avoiding most unwanted adverse effects are the proper techniques of dilution, storage, and injection, as well as the careful exclusion of patients with any contraindications. Pain, hematoma, ecchymosis, and bruising can be prevented by cooling the skin before and after BTXA injection. Upper lid ptosis may be partly corrected using apraclonidine or phenylephrine eyedrops. If simple rules relating to the indications for and application of BTXA are followed, this is a safe and effective drug in cosmetic dermatology.

Complications of botulinum toxin A use in facial rejuvenation

The esthetic application of botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is a safe treatment modality; nevertheless complications can occur as a result of patient-and physician-related factors. Fortunately, adverse effects and undesirable sequelae after Botox injections are temporary. Complications may be more serious in patients who have more severe rhytids (which require more Botox), previous facial plastic surgery (altered anatomy), and those who have pre-existing neuromuscular disease. The physician can reduce complications by using proper injection techniques, appropriate regional Botox dosing, and by being conservative in the overall approach to Botox-mediated facial rejuvenation.

Complications with the use of botulinum toxin

This article discusses complications with the use of botulinum toxin. The following topics are explored: conditions caused by muscle spasms, resistance to botulinum toxin, cosmetic use of botulinum toxin, complications in treating hyperhidrosis, treatment of migraine headaches, and informed consent.

Botulinum toxin A: its expanding role in dermatology and esthetics

The use of botulinum toxin A in cosmetic dermatology has increased in popularity due to the efficacy and relative safety of the treatment. Botulinum toxin A is one of eight exotoxins produced by Clostridium botulinum, a Gram-positive, spore-forming anaerobe. Flaccid paralysis results from the denervation of muscle fibers at the neuromuscular junction after botulinum toxin A administration. While treating blepharospasm, the Carruthers incidentally found that botulinum toxin A improved glabellar frown lines. Dynamic rhytides occur in areas of dynamic motion. These types of lines may be improved with botulinum toxin A. There are two types of botulinum toxin A commercially available (BOTOX and Dysport); only BOTOX is currently available in the US. The efficacy and tolerability of BOTOX was best demonstrated with a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines in 264 patients. There was a significantly greater reduction in glabellar line severity with BOTOX. The effect was maintained for the duration of the study (120 days). There was low occurrence (5.4%) of mostly mild blepharoptosis in the BOTOX group. In another prospective study, it was found that about 1% of BOTOX patients reported severe headache. Botulinum toxin A can provide an alternative treatment of palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis when options such as topical agents (aluminum chloride) and iontophoresis have failed.

Complications of botulinum toxin A use in facial rejuvenation

The esthetic application of botulinum toxin type A is a safe treatment modality; nevertheless, complications can occur as a result of patient- and physician-related factors. Fortunately, adverse effects and undesirable sequelae after Botox injections are temporary. Complications may be more serious in patients who have more severe rhytids (which require more Botox), have undergone previous facial plastic surgery (altered anatomy), and those who have preexisting neuromuscular disease. The physician can reduce complications by using proper injection techniques, appropriate regional Botox dosing, and by being conservative in the overall approach to Botox-mediated facial rejuvenation.