1
|
Mocanu M, Procopciuc D, Gheucă-Solovăstru DF, Popescu IA, Olinici DT, Pătrașcu AI, Vâță D, Gheucă-Solovăstru L. An Overview of Methotrexate Indications in Skin Diseases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1024. [PMID: 39064453 PMCID: PMC11279115 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Methotrexate is an immunosuppressive drug with remarkable therapeutic results in the treatment of autoimmune and proliferative skin diseases. Although it has been more than half a century since it was first introduced into the therapeutic arsenal of dermatologists, there are currently no standardized therapeutic protocols regarding the prescription of methotrexate in dermatology, with the exception of psoriasis treatment. This review aims to highlight the indications and benefits of methotrexate beyond psoriasis, with a focus on a wide range of inflammatory, vesiculobullous, and proliferative dermatological pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mădălina Mocanu
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Dorina Procopciuc
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | | | - Ioana Adriana Popescu
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Doinița Temelie Olinici
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Adriana Ionela Pătrașcu
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Dan Vâță
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Laura Gheucă-Solovăstru
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan D, Borucki R, Sontheimer RD, Werth VP. Candidate drug replacements for quinacrine in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med 2020; 7:7/1/e000430. [PMID: 33082164 PMCID: PMC7577055 DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a disfiguring and potentially disabling disease that causes significant morbidity in patients. Antimalarials are an important class of medication used to treat this disease and have been the first-line systemic therapy since the 1950s. Quinacrine, in particular, is used as an adjuvant therapy to other antimalarials for improved control of CLE. Quinacrine is currently unavailable in the USA, which has taken away an important component of the treatment regimen of patients with CLE. This paper reviews the evidence of available local and systemic therapies in order to assist providers in choosing alternative treatments for patients who previously benefited from quinacrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Yan
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert Borucki
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard D Sontheimer
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Department of Dermatology, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA .,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borucki R, Werth VP. Expert Perspective: An Evidence-Based Approach to Refractory Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72:1777-1785. [PMID: 32776469 DOI: 10.1002/art.41480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of skin manifestations and have a dramatic effect on a patient's quality of life. Effective treatment options for this disease are limited, and the efficacy of these treatments is often supported by low levels of evidence. This makes the treatment of refractory disease especially challenging, as it is difficult to achieve a consensus on the appropriate progression of treatment beyond first- and second-line treatment options. The treatment of refractory CLE often involves some degree of immunosuppression, which carries some risk for patients and requires a thoughtful approach to the selection of medications. Some treatments that have proven to be effective in systemic disease may not be as effective in cutaneous disease, making it difficult to extrapolate from the available evidence on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ultimately, the increased use of objective skin measurements in SLE clinical trials is necessary to understand drug efficacy in CLE and develop new treatments for this challenging disease. Here, we provide clinical examples of the challenges involved in treating refractory CLE, examine the evidence currently available for treatment options, and provide an algorithmic approach to the treatment of refractory disease based on this evidence. Novel therapies under development for CLE are also discussed, as they may soon be part of the accepted treatment regimen for refractory CLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Borucki
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou X, Yan J, Lu Q, Zhou H, Fan L. The pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: The aberrant distribution and function of different cell types in skin lesions. Scand J Immunol 2020; 93:e12933. [PMID: 32654170 DOI: 10.1111/sji.12933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease with a broad range of cutaneous manifestations. In skin lesions of CLE, keratinocytes primarily undergo apoptosis. Interferon-κ(IFN-κ) is belonged to type I interferons (type I IFNs) and is selectively produced by keratinocytes. Recently, keratinocytes selectively produced IFN-κ is identified to be a key to trigger type I interferon responses in CLE. Other immune cells such as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are identified to be relevant origin of type I interferons (type I IFNs) which are central to the development of CLE lesions and responsible for mediating Th1 cell activity. Other types of cells such as neutrophils, B cells and Th17 cells also are involved in the development of this disease. The close interaction of those cells composes a comprehensive and complicated network in CLE. In this review, we discussed the aberrant distribution and function of different cells types involved in this disease and will offer a new direction for research and therapy in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinli Yan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qianjin Lu
- Department of Dermatology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenomics, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Honghao Zhou
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lan Fan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durcan L, O'Dwyer T, Petri M. Management strategies and future directions for systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. Lancet 2019; 393:2332-2343. [PMID: 31180030 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30237-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 295] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the loss of self-tolerance and formation of nuclear autoantigens and immune complexes resulting in inflammation of multiple organs. The clinical presentation of SLE is heterogeneous, can involve one or more organs, including the skin, kidneys, joints, and nervous system, and take a chronic or relapsing and remitting disease course. SLE is most common in women and in those of non-white ethnicity. Because of the multitude of presentations, manifestations, and serological abnormalities in patients with SLE, diagnosis can be challenging. Therapeutic approaches predominantly involve immunomodulation and immunosuppression and are targeted to the specific organ manifestation, with the aim of achieving low disease activity. Despite many treatment advances and improved diagnostics, SLE continues to cause substantial morbidity and premature mortality. Current management strategies, although helpful, are limited by high failure rates and toxicity. An overreliance on corticosteroid therapy contributes to much of the long-term organ damage. In this Seminar, we outline the classification criteria for SLE, current treatment strategies and medications, the evidence supporting their use, and explore potential future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Durcan
- Department of Rheumatology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Medicine, The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Tom O'Dwyer
- School of Physiotherapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michelle Petri
- Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chang J, Werth VP. Therapeutic options for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent advances and future prospects. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2016; 12:1109-21. [PMID: 27249209 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2016.1188006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment and prevention are of critical importance in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), as the disease can have a devastating effect on patient well-being and quality of life. AREAS COVERED We conducted a selective search of the PubMed database for articles published between December 2010 and November 2015. This review encompasses both non-pharmaceutical (photoprotection, smoking cessation, drug withdrawal, and vitamin D replacement) and pharmaceutical (topicals, antimalarials, immunosuppressives, biologics, etc.) interventions used in the treatment of CLE. Expert Commentary: Recent work has expanded our understanding of established therapies as well as introduced new treatments for consideration, though existing medications still prove inadequate for a subset of patients. Changes in trial design may help to alleviate this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Chang
- a Dermatology Section, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Philadelphia VA Medical Center , Philadelphia , PA , USA.,b Department of Dermatology , Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| | - Victoria P Werth
- a Dermatology Section, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Philadelphia VA Medical Center , Philadelphia , PA , USA.,b Department of Dermatology , Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with variable clinical manifestations. While the clearest guidelines for the treatment of SLE exist in the context of lupus nephritis, patients with other lupus manifestations such as neuropsychiatric, hematologic, musculoskeletal, and severe cutaneous lupus frequently require immunosuppression and/or biologic therapy. Conventional immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide are widely used in the management of SLE with current more rationalized treatment regimens optimizing the use of these agents while minimizing potential toxicity. The advent of biologic therapies has advanced the treatment of SLE particularly in patients with refractory disease. The CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the anti-BLyS agent belimumab are now widely in use in clinical practice. Several other biologic agents are in ongoing clinical trials. While immunosuppressive and biologic agents are the foundation of inflammatory disease control in SLE, the importance of managing comorbidities such as cardiovascular risk factors, bone health, and minimizing susceptibility to infection should not be neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Jordan
- Department of Rheumatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - David D'Cruz
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pascoe VL, Fenves AZ, Wofford J, Jackson JM, Menter A, Kimball AB. The spectrum of nephrocutaneous diseases and associations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74:247-70; quiz 271-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Revised: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
9
|
Janíková-Bandžuchová L, Šelešovská R. Determination of Methotrexate at a Silver Solid Amalgam Electrode by Differential Pulse Voltammetry. ANAL LETT 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2014.996812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
10
|
Treatment of Bullous Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Immunol Res 2015; 2015:167064. [PMID: 26090480 PMCID: PMC4451988 DOI: 10.1155/2015/167064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is an autoantibody-mediated vesiculobullous disease in patients with SLE. Autoimmunity in BSLE is characterized by the presence of circulating anti-type VII collagen antibodies. BSLE patients often present with multiple, tense, clear fluid-filled vesicles and bullae overlying erythematous edematous plaques. Skin biopsy from BSLE patients shows subepidermal bullae with numerous neutrophils and only occasional eosinophils. Furthermore, immunofluorescence examination showed linear deposition of lgG, lgA, C3, and C1q along the basement membrane zone. BSLE patients with corticosteroids treatment constantly do not receive a marked improvement, while dapsone generally dramatically improved the skin condition. Recently, it has been reported that quite a few cases of BSLE were successfully treated with other immune suppressive drugs. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of BSLE would be beneficial to cure the disease.
Collapse
|
11
|
Šelešovská R, Janíková-Bandžuchová L, Chýlková J. Sensitive Voltammetric Sensor Based on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode for Determination of the Chemotherapeutic Drug Methotrexate in Pharmaceutical and Biological Samples. ELECTROANAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/elan.201400326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
12
|
Lutalo PMK, Jordan N, D'Cruz DP. Which dose of steroids and which cytotoxics for severe lupus? Presse Med 2014; 43:e157-65. [PMID: 24882275 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been a number of major advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus and we are now in the era of biologic therapies for this multisystem autoimmune disorder. There has been a greater awareness of the toxicities of the traditional therapies including the recognition that the doses of corticosteroids used in the past have been excessive, resulting in unacceptable toxicities. Other advances have included the development of lower cumulative doses of cyclophosphamide and the widespread acceptance of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of lupus nephritis. This review addresses the current management of severe lupus with corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela M K Lutalo
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; King's College School of Medicine, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, 2nd Floor, Borough Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Jordan
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom; Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology of Inflammation King's College London - Guy's Campus New Hunt's House, 1st Floor, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | - David P D'Cruz
- Louise Coote Lupus Unit, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. david.d'
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ziemer M, Milkova L, Kunz M. Lupus erythematosus. Part II: clinical picture, diagnosis and treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12:285-301; quiz 302. [PMID: 24423191 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 10/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an important dermatologic autoimmune disease. In many respects, it may be regarded as a model autoimmune disease due to its spectrum of autoimmune antibodies and involvement of different organ systems, as well as response to immunosuppressive agents which target B cells and T cells and their cytokines. A recently published article in this Journal summarized the most important knowledge about epidemiology, genetics, and immunology of LE. Here, the different clinical manifestations, diagnostic procedures and current therapeutic approaches will be described. Special emphasis is placed on different cutaneous manifestations of LE. In regard to treatment, the classic treatment approaches such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine will be described. Lastly, new therapeutic approaches with specific monoclonal antibodies which are currently used in systemic LE, such as belimumab (Benlysta®), will be addressed. The most recent developments in this area could have implications even for purely cutaneous forms of LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Ziemer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Sigges J, Biazar C, Landmann A, Ruland V, Patsinakidis N, Amler S, Bonsmann G, Kuhn A. Therapeutic strategies evaluated by the European Society of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (EUSCLE) Core Set Questionnaire in more than 1000 patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 2013; 12:694-702. [DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2012] [Accepted: 10/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune condition that can significantly impact quality of life. Treatment is focused on reducing clinical inflammation and preventing scarring. The choice of treatment should be guided based on the severity of disease. Mild or localized disease can be treated with sun protection and topical agents. Antimalarials are the initial treatment of choice if systemic therapy is required. Patients with severe or unresponsive disease can also be treated with a number of other immunomodulating or immunosuppressive agents. Clinicians should be aware of their potential adverse effects and appropriate dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher B Hansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shen S, O’Brien T, Yap LM, Prince HM, McCormack CJ. The use of methotrexate in dermatology: a review. Australas J Dermatol 2011; 53:1-18. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00839.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
18
|
Kuhn A, Ruland V, Bonsmann G. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Update of therapeutic options. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:e195-213. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2010] [Revised: 05/28/2010] [Accepted: 06/04/2010] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
19
|
Gammon B, Hansen C, Costner MI. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in antimalarial-resistant cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65:717-721.e2. [PMID: 21641078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2010] [Revised: 08/04/2010] [Accepted: 08/08/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunomodulatory drug shown to be effective in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Several anecdotal reports have suggested that MMF may be efficacious in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). OBJECTIVES Our objective was to summarize and report our experience with the use of MMF in patients with CLE recalcitrant to antimalarial therapy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed our open-label observations of 24 patients with CLE refractory to antimalarial therapy. The records of all patients visiting the Rheumatic Skin Disease Clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas from January 1, 2001, to July 1, 2006, were reviewed. RESULTS MMF was tolerated well and, in conjunction with other therapies, was highly effective in the treatment of antimalarial-resistant CLE. With the addition of MMF to the existing regimen, a majority of patients achieved full control of disease signs and symptoms. All patients experienced some degree of improvement. LIMITATIONS This is an open-label retrospective review. Severity of disease was assessed by qualitative assessment of the clinician. MMF was not used as monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that MMF, used as an additional agent in conjunction with standard therapy, is both well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment of refractory CLE. Despite the obvious limitations of the study, we believe this represents further evidence that MMF should be considered early in the treatment of patients refractory to antimalarial therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Gammon
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Christopher Hansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Melissa I Costner
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
In patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and mild skin involvement, local therapy consisting of topically applied pharmacological agents, e.g., topical/intralesional steroids, may be sufficient. Recent reports have also shown efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors in patients with CLE, particularly on the face. Special attention receives consistent sun protection through photoresistant clothing and application of light-shielding substances with highly potent chemical or physical UVA- and UVB-protective filters. These substances should be applied in sufficient amount (ca. 2 mg/cm(2)) at least 20-30 minutes before sun exposure in order to avoid induction and exacerbation of cutaneous lesions. The mainstay of treatment for disfiguring and widespread skin manifestations in patients with CLE, irrespective of the subtype of the disease, is antimalarial agents. Our understanding of the use of combinations of antimalarials and proper dosing according to the ideal bodyweight limits problems with toxicity. Further therapies, such as methotrexate, or retinoids, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and thalidomide in selected cases, can be helpful for patients with resistant disease; however, side effects need to be taken into consideration. Recent advances in biotechnology resulted in the development of novel systemic agents, but randomized controlled trials are necessary for the approval of new therapeutic strategies in CLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuhn
- Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) may present in a variety of clinical forms. Three recognized subtypes of cutaneous LE are acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE), and chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). ACLE may be localized (most often as a malar or 'butterfly' rash) or generalized. Multisystem involvement as a component of systemic LE (SLE) is common, with prominent musculoskeletal symptoms. SCLE is highly photosensitive, with predominant distribution on the upper back, shoulders, neck, and anterior chest. SCLE is frequently associated with positive anti-Ro antibodies and may be induced by a variety of medications. Classic discoid LE is the most common form of CCLE, with indurated scaly plaques on the scalp, face, and ears, with characteristic scarring and pigmentary change. Less common forms of CCLE include hyperkeratotic LE, lupus tumidus, lupus profundus, and chilblain lupus. Common cutaneous disease associated with, but not specific for, LE includes vasculitis, livedo reticularis, alopecia, digital manifestations such as periungual telangiectasia and Raynaud phenomenon, photosensitivity, and bullous lesions. The clinical presentation of each of these forms, their diagnosis, and the inter-relationships between cutaneous LE and SLE are discussed. Common systemic findings in SLE are reviewed, as are diagnostic strategies, including histopathology, immunopathology, serology, and other laboratory findings. Treatments for cutaneous LE initially include preventive (e.g. photoprotective) strategies and topical therapies (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). For skin disease not controlled with these interventions, oral antimalarial agents (most commonly hydroxychloroquine) are often beneficial. Additional systemic therapies may be subdivided into conventional treatments (including corticosteroids, methotrexate, thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone, and azathioprine) and newer immunomodulatory therapies (including efalizumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab). We review evidence for the use of these medications in the treatment of cutaneous LE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hobart W Walling
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Huber A, Tüting T, Bauer R, Bieber T, Wenzel J. Methotrexate treatment in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: subcutaneous application is as effective as intravenous administration. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155:861-2. [PMID: 16965455 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07431.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
23
|
Clayton TH, Ogden S, Goodfield MDJ. Treatment of refractory subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus with efalizumab. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54:892-5. [PMID: 16635677 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2005] [Revised: 07/27/2005] [Accepted: 08/15/2005] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
We report the case of a 47-year-old woman who first presented with erythematous plaques on the upper portion of her right arm, which developed into an annular eruption involving the face, upper portion of the trunk, and limbs in a predominantly photosensitive distribution. Findings from histopathologic evaluation of a lesion from her arm were consistent with the clinical diagnosis of SCLE. After years of unsuccessful treatment with conventional medications for SCLE, she began therapy with efalizumab and experienced dramatic improvement in her cutaneous lesions after 6 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy H Clayton
- Department of Dermatology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wenzel J, Brähler S, Bauer R, Bieber T, Tüting T. Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus: results of a retrospective study in 43 patients. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153:157-62. [PMID: 16029342 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06552.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The therapy of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is often challenging, especially in patients resistant to topical treatment and established first-line systemic drugs such as antimalarials. Systemic corticosteroids are effective, but their use is limited due to well-known side-effects, especially in long-term treatment. In recent years several other immunosuppressive agents have been successfully applied in CLE. However, there are no large studies or explicit guidelines on the use of these drugs in CLE. OBJECTIVES To perform a retrospective investigation of the efficacy of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of CLE. METHODS One hundred and thirty-nine patients with CLE were seen at our department between 2001 and 2003, of whom 43 patients required low-dose MTX. All had histologically confirmed CLE lesions. Clinical data including disease activity, additional treatment, laboratory parameters and side-effects were recorded carefully at the time of presentation. Statistical analyses were performed by paired nonparametric Wilcoxon test and Student's t-test using SPSS 11 software. RESULTS MTX led to a highly significant (P < 0.01) decline in disease activity. An improvement of the cutaneous lesions was recorded in nearly all patients treated with MTX (42 of 43; 98%). Severe side-effects necessitating discontinuation of MTX treatment were recorded in seven patients (16%), which quickly resolved when MTX was discontinued. Life-threatening complications were not observed. Intravenous application was tolerated better than oral administration. Interestingly, we observed a significant increase in circulating lymphocyte numbers in patients with lymphopenia (< 1.0 x 10(9) cells L(-1)) prior to MTX treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports earlier findings reporting the efficacy of low-dose MTX in CLE lesions, particularly in recalcitrant clinical courses. MTX treatment appears to be safe if patients are carefully selected and monitored, with particular attention to side-effects and contraindications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Wenzel
- Department of Dermatology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Bezerra ELM, Vilar MJP, da Trindade Neto PB, Sato EI. Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of clofazimine compared with chloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 52:3073-8. [PMID: 16200586 DOI: 10.1002/art.21358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of clofazimine (CFZ) compared with chloroquine diphosphate (CDP) for the treatment of cutaneous involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out in SLE patients with active cutaneous lesions, of whom 16 were randomized to receive CFZ at 100 mg/day and 17 received CDP at 250 mg/day for 6 months. All drugs had a similar appearance to avoid identification. Both groups received broad-spectrum sunscreens twice a day and the prednisone dose was kept stable during the study. Cutaneous lesions were evaluated by 2 blinded observers at baseline and at months 1, 2, 4, and 6. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were randomized to a treatment group, of whom 27 completed 6 months of treatment. The groups were homogeneous and comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Five CFZ-treated patients and 1 CDP-treated patient (P = 0.15) dropped out due to development of severe lupus flare. At the end of the study, 12 CFZ-treated patients (75%) and 14 CDP-treated patients (82.4%) had complete or near-complete remission of skin lesions; intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the response rates between groups. Side effects, mainly skin and gastrointestinal events, were frequent in both groups, but no patients had to discontinue their treatment. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that CFZ is equally as effective as CDP in controlling cutaneous lesions in SLE patients. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that the CFZ itself could be the cause of systemic lupus flare.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
This paper reviews the latest treatments for cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It focuses on evidence-based guidance for the management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, with identification of the strength of evidence available at this time. In addition, I have briefly reviewed the epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and evaluation of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. This review reflects data available from the Cochrane Library, Medline, literature searches, and the experience of the author managing patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus for over 25 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Callen
- Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
&NA;. Treat cutaneous lupus erythematosus primarily with topical corticosteroids and systemic antimalarials. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2004. [DOI: 10.2165/00042310-200420070-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) includes a variety of lupus erythematosus (LE)-specific skin lesions that are subdivided into three categories - chronic CLE (CCLE), subacute CLE (SCLE) and acute CLE (ACLE) - based on clinical morphology, average duration of skin lesions and routine histopathologic examination. This paper describes our personal experience in the management of CLE over the last 30 years, with details on preferential therapeutic options related to clinical, histologic and immunopathologic aspects of each clinical subset of the disease. Effective sunscreening and sun protection are considered the first rule in the management of CLE because of the high degree of photosensitivity of the disease. Antimalarial agents are crucial in the treatment of CLE and are the first-line systemic agents, particularly in discoid LE (DLE) and SCLE. Dapsone is the drug of choice for bullous systemic LE (BSLE) as well as for LE in small dermal vessels (e.g. leukocytoclastic vasculitis). Retinoids, known as second-line drugs for systemic therapy, are sometimes used to treat chronic forms of CLE and are particularly successful in treating hypertrophic LE. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are required to manage the underlying systemic LE disease activity in patients with ACLE. These drugs, especially azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine, together with corticosteroids, constitute third-line systemic therapy of CLE. In our experience, oral prednisone or parenteral 'pulsed' methylprednisolone are useful in exacerbations of disease activity. Thalidomide provides one of the most useful therapeutic alternatives for chronic refractory DLE, although its distribution is limited to a few countries because of the risk of teratogenicity and polyneuropathy. However, medical treatment with local corticosteroids remains the mainstay of CLE treatment, especially for DLE. Patient education regarding the disease is also important in the management of CLE, because it helps relieve undue anxiety and to recruit the patient as an active participant in the treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fabbri
- Department of Dermatological Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wenzel J, Bieber T, Uerlich M, Tüting T. Systemische Therapie des kutanen Lupus erythematodes. Systemic treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2003; 1:694-704. [PMID: 16285276 DOI: 10.1046/j.1610-0387.2003.03024.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remains a therapeutic challenge. In many cases, systemic treatment of the disease is necessary, especially in cases resistant to topical treatment or with internal organ involvement. Even though many different agents can be employed in this situation, most are not approved in Germany for the treatment of CLE. We give an overview of the agents used in the systemic treatment of CLE and review their mechanisms of action, indications and their practical use in cutaneous LE based on literature results and our own experience. We discuss corticosteroids, antimalarials, dapsone, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, retinoids, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, sulfasalazine, thalidomide, clofazimine, tacrolimus, immunoglobulins, monoclonal antibodies, plasmapheresis, etanercept, infliximab, feflunomid, gold and interferon-alpha.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg Wenzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|