Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular isovolumic contraction and relaxation with continuous wave Doppler aortic regurgitant velocity signals: an in vivo validation study

Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of the difference in left ventricular versus right ventricular stroke volume in a chronic animal model study: Improved results using C-scans for quantifying aortic regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to test the applicability of calculating the difference between left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) stroke volume (SV) for assessing the severity of aortic (Ao) regurgitation (AR) using a real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic (RT3DE) imaging system.

METHODS

The Ao valve was incised in 5 juvenile sheep, 6 to 10 weeks before the study, to produce AR (mean regurgitant fraction = 0.50). Simultaneous hemodynamic and RT3DE images were obtained on open-chest animals with Ao and pulmonary flows derived by Ao and pulmonary electromagnetic flowmeters balanced against each other. Four stages (baseline, volume loading, sodium nitroprusside, and angiotensin infusion) were used to produce a total of 16 different hemodynamic states. Epicardial scanning was done with a 2.5-MHz probe to sequentially record first the RV and then the LV cavities. Cavity volumes from the 3D echocardiography data were determined from angled sector planes (B-scans) and parallel cutting planes (C-scans, which are planes perpendicular to the direction of the volume interrogation). AR volumes were determined from 3D images by computing and then subtracting RV SVs from LV SVs and then these were compared with electromagnetic flowmeter-derived SV and regurgitant volumes.

RESULTS

There was close correlation between RV and LV SVs of the RT3DE and electromagnetic methods (C-scans: LV, r = 0.98, standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 2.62 mL, P =.0001; RV, r = 0.89, SEE = 2.67 mL, P <.0001; and B-scans: LV, r = 0.95, SEE = 3.55 mL, P =.0001; RV, r = 0.77, SEE = 2.78 mL, P =.0003). Because of the small size of the RV in this model, the correlation was closer for C-scans than B-scans for RV SV. AR volume estimation also showed that C-scan (r = 0.93, SEE = 4.23 mL, P <.0001) had closer correlation than B-scan (r = 0.89, SEE = 4.87 mL, P <.0001). However, B-scan-derived AR fraction showed closer correlation than did C-scan (r = 0.82 vs r = 0.85, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this animal model, RT3DE imaging had the ability to reliably quantify both LV (B- and C-scans) and RV SVs and to assess the severity of AR.

Strain rate acceleration yields a better index for evaluating left ventricular contractile function as compared with tissue velocity acceleration during isovolumic contraction time: an in vivo study

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate whether strain rate acceleration (SRA) during isovolumic contraction time (IVCT) could serve as a sensitive indicator of myocardial function.

METHODS

A total of 8 sheep underwent occlusion of left anterior descending coronary artery or diagonal branches and 2 sheep underwent left circumflex coronary artery occlusion to create septal, apical, or basal segment myocardial ischemia 19 to 27 weeks before the study. Baseline, volume-loading, dobutamine, and metoprolol infusion were used to produce 4 hemodynamic stages for each sheep. Doppler tissue imaging was acquired using a 5-MHz probe (GE/VingMed Vivid Five, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) on open-chest animals using the liver as a standoff at the apex. Using software (EchoPac, GE Medical Systems), SRA during IVCT was calculated and compared with tissue velocity acceleration (TVA) during IVCT from areas located in the normal and ischemic zones. Also, invasively monitored left ventricle dP/dt was measured as reference contractile function.

RESULTS

Both TVA and SRA during IVCT showed higher values for normal tissue than for ischemic area (P <.0001). SRA for normal wall segments changed significantly during the 4 stages (P =.01) with corresponding changes on high-fidelity left ventricular pressure catheters (r = 0.92). TVA over normal segments showed no significant change (P =.29) in the 4 hemodynamic stages. Both TVA and SRA of the ischemic segments showed no significant change with pharmacologic maneuvers or loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

SRA and TVA during IVCT are both useful indicators for detecting abnormal heart wall motion. However, SRA tends to be more sensitive than TVA for differentiating the response to stress conditions.