1
|
Hu Z, Li Y, Chen K, Li M, Tian M, Xiang L, Wu X, Zeng P, Li M, Shao J, Li L, Lin N, Tang L, Deng L, Gao M, Li Y, Zhong L, Wang M, Yan J, Wu Z. The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:945-956. [PMID: 37806432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) using degenerate oligonucleotide primer PCR (DOP-PCR) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle (MALBAC)-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods has demonstrated predictable results in embryo testing. However, a considerable heterogeneity of results has been reported in numerous studies on these two WGA methods. Our aim was to evaluate the current WGA method for ni-PGT while further clarifying the applicable scenarios of ni-PGT in the fresh cycle. A total of 173 embryos were tested with trophectoderm biopsy and ni-PGT. In the whole preimplantation genetic testing, the clinical concordance rates of the detection results of DOP-PCR and MALBAC with the corresponding trophectoderm biopsy results were 64.12% (84/131) and 68.99% (89/129), respectively (P = 0.405). However, in the detection of abnormal embryos, the detection efficiency of ni-PGT is significantly improved [MALBAC: 96.55% versus 68.99% (P < 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 89.09% versus 64.12% (P < 0.001)]. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of ni-PGT in low-quality blastocysts was significantly higher than that in high-quality blastocysts [MALBAC: 95.24% versus 51.85% (P = 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 91.30% versus 48.15% (P = 0.001)]. These results contribute to further understanding ni-PGT and to clarifying its application scenario in the fresh cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixin Hu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Yonggang Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mingying Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mei Tian
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lifeng Xiang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Xiaorong Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Peng Zeng
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Minyao Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Jingyi Shao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Na Lin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lian Deng
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mengying Gao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Yunxiu Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Li Zhong
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mei Wang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Jiacong Yan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.
| | - Ze Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bay B, Ingerslev HJ, Lemmen JG, Degn B, Rasmussen IA, Kesmodel US. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:1363-1369.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
3
|
Liebaers I, Desmyttere S, Verpoest W, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Sermon K, Devroey P, Haentjens P, Bonduelle M. Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2009; 25:275-82. [PMID: 19713301 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and subsequently preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) have been introduced since 1990. The difference from the already existing in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology, using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), was the embryo biopsy at day 3 after fertilization. Although healthy children post-PGD/PGS have been born, the question of whether embryo biopsy could have any harmful effects has to be studied on large series in a prospective manner. METHODS A prospective cohort study was undertaken from 1992 until 2005, using the same approach as for the follow-up of IVF and ICSI children conceived in the same centre. Questionnaires were sent to physicians and parents at conception and at delivery. Children were examined at 2 months of age by trained clinical geneticists whenever possible. RESULTS Data collected on 581 post-PGD/PGS children showed that term, birthweight and major malformation rates were not statistically different from that of 2889 ICSI children, with overall rates of major malformation among these post-PGD/PGS and ICSI children being 2.13 and 3.38%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62; exact 95% confidence limits [95% CL]: 0.31-1.15). However, the overall perinatal death rate was significantly higher among post-PGD/PGS children compared with ICSI children (4.64 versus 1.87%; OR: 2.56; 95% CL: 1.54-4.18). When stratified for multiple births, perinatal death rates among PGD/PGS singleton and ICSI singleton children were similar (1.03 versus 1.30%; OR: 0.83; 95% CL: 0.28-2.44), but significantly more perinatal deaths were seen in post-PGD/PGS multiple pregnancies compared with ICSI multiple pregnancies (11.73 versus 2.54%; OR: 5.09; 95% CL: 2.80-9.90). The overall misdiagnosis rate was below 1%. CONCLUSIONS Embryo biopsy does not add risk factors to the health of singleton children born after PGD or PGS. The perinatal death rate in multiple pregnancies is such that both caution and long-term follow-up are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Liebaers
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Wert G, Liebaers I, Van de Velde H. The future (r)evolution of preimplantation genetic diagnosis/human leukocyte antigen testing: ethical reflections. Stem Cells 2007; 25:2167-72. [PMID: 17525240 DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There has been increasing support for combining preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for specific diseases with a test for human leukocyte antigens (HLA) because the generation of HLA-matched umbilical cord blood cells may save the life of a diseased sibling. To date, this procedure has taken place in the context of conceiving another child--PGD/HLA testing type 1. However, it may well become possible to perform PGD/HLA testing outside this context, that is, to select matched embryos from which embryonic stem cells could be derived and used in cell therapy--PGD/HLA testing type 2. A proactive ethical analysis is needed and is presented in this article. Although PGD/HLA testing type 1 can be morally justified, the risks, pitfalls, and practical limitations of this procedure make it necessary to develop alternative strategies. PGD/HLA testing type 2 may provide an alternative strategy. From an ethical point of view, the controversial issue is that this procedure creates embryos purely for instrumental use. However, given the dominant view that the preimplantation embryo has only limited moral value, this alternative may be as morally justified as PGD/HLA testing type 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido de Wert
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institute Growth & Development, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cervera A, Lillo R, García-Sánchez F, Madero L, Madero R, Vicario JL. Flow cytometric assessment of hematopoietic cell subsets in cryopreserved preterm and term cord blood, influence of obstetrical parameters, and availability for transplantation. Am J Hematol 2006; 81:397-410. [PMID: 16680748 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to characterize the lymphocyte and the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HPC) subsets of cryopreserved premature cord blood (PCB) compared to term cord blood (TCB) by flow cytometry, to study the influence of birth conditions, and to assess its availability for transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four-color flow cytometric analysis was performed on 43 PCB and 40 TCB cryopreserved samples using a panel of 24 different mAbs, directed against lymphoid and HPC surface markers. The CB volume was estimated by the weight of the newborn to determine the absolute MNC and CD34(+) cell content/CB sample. Clinical and obstetrical data were recovered. Statistical comparisons and a multiple regression analysis were performed. RESULTS No consistent differences were found in the mononuclear cell (MNC) or CD34(+) cell concentration (x10(6)/L) between PCB and TCB. The percentage of primitive HPC (CD34(+)CD38(-), CD34(+)CD38(-)CD90(-)HLA-DR(-), CD34(+)CD38(-)CD90(-)HLA-DR(+)) and primitive lymphoid progenitors (CD34(+)CD7(+), CD34(+)CD7(+)CD19(-)CD117(-)) were higher in PCB than in TCB. Correspondingly, TCB had an increased percentage of committed HPC. No sample of PCB contained >2 x 10(7) MNC/kg (and only 48% had >1 x 10(5) CD34(+) cells) for a recipient of 20 kg body wt, as the minimum threshold recommended for CB transplantation. Obstetrical factors modulated mainly lymphocyte subsets and fewer HPC subpopulations. Acute fetal distress increased CD34(+) cells, especially the immature subsets. Maternal treatment with dexamethasone and intrauterine growth retardation decreased CD3(+) cells. No other obstetrical factors played a detrimental effect on CB cells if used for transplantation. CONCLUSION PCB is richer in immature cells both in lymphocyte and HPC populations, and its use for transplantation, at least in special cases, should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurea Cervera
- Service of Pediatrics, Hospital de Móstoles, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Should we allow tissue typing of in vitro embryos in order to implant those which could provide potentially life-saving cells to an existing serious ill sibling with that tissue type? A case is made that such tissue matching does not involve unacceptable instrumentality towards or commodification of children. The key distinction is that the parents' request for tissue typing is reactive in the face of serious medical need rather than being proactive in the sense of seeking the means to specify a child with chosen desirable characteristics. Nevertheless, as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a relatively new technique, both long-term safety issues concerning effects on child development following embryo biopsy and the risks of misdiagnosis must be given due weight as must the avoidance of exploitation of couples desperate to save a sick child. The HFEA originally made a distinction, recently revoked, between allowing tissue typing after PGD to select against affected embryos and denying it when PGD is not required because the embryos are not at risk of inheriting the disease suffered by the existing sibling. If tissue typing is not inherently unethical and misdiagnosis poses a greater risk than biopsy damage, then this distinction is not ethically tenable.
Collapse
|
7
|
Frydman N, Romana S, Ray P, Hamamah S, Tachdjian G, Marcadet-Fredet S, Munnich A, Vekemans M, Frydman R. [The Paris experience in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: evaluation after the first births]. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2005; 66:294-301. [PMID: 15988395 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4266(05)81766-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the birth of the first thirteen infants conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) within the medical assistance federation of Paris. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-nine couples were enrolled between January 2000 and July 2001. They had a total of 71 oocyte pick-up cycles. The collected oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The resulting embryos were biopsied on the third day of development and the genetic analysis was performed on the same day. Most of the embryo transfers were carried out on the fourth day. RESULTS The 71 oocyte pick-up cycles yielded 872 oocytes of which 731 were suitable for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. 421 embryos were biopsied and genetic diagnosis was obtained from 312 (74%) of these. 127 embryos were transferred during the course of 58 transfer procedures. There were 18 biologic and 12 clinical (7 singles, 4 twins and 1 triple) pregnancies. Thirteen infants have been born and 4 are expected. CONCLUSIONS PGD has gained a place among the choices offered to couples at risk of transmission of a serious and incurable genetic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Frydman
- Service d'Histologie-Embryologie-Cytogénétique à orientation Biologique et Génétique de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère (AP-HP), 157, rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92141 Clamart
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
He J, McDermott DA, Song Y, Gilbert F, Kligman I, Basson CT. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human congenital heart malformation and Holt-Oram syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 126A:93-8. [PMID: 15039979 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Holt-Oram syndrome (HOS) is a multiple malformation syndrome associated with congenital heart malformation (CHM) and caused by mutations in the TBX5 transcription factor. Effective prenatal genetic diagnosis of HOS is limited by factors that modify clinical manifestations and confound prediction of an individual's phenotype. Although preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been applied to complex disorders with some cardiovascular manifestations, its utility in Mendelian CHM has not been previously demonstrated. We tested whether PGD and in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology, including oocyte donation, can identify fertilized eggs affected by HOS for potential embryo selection. Five donor oocytes were fertilized in vitro with sperm from a HOS patient heterozygous for a Glu69ter-TBX5 mutation and then underwent embryo biopsy and genotyping. One carried the Glu69ter-TBX5 mutation; all others had wildtype genotypes. Two wildtype blastocysts were transferred to the mother, and the resulting singleton pregnancy was successfully delivered. Mutational analysis of fetal amniocytes and postpartum umbilical cord blood confirmed PGD. Fetal ultrasonography as well as postpartum electrocardiography and echocardiography also validated accurate prediction of normal skeletal and cardiac phenotypes. We conclude that PGD is an effective reproductive strategy for HOS patients. As more genetic etiologies for CHM are identified, application of PGD as adjunctive therapy to IVF will be increasingly available to prevent transmission of such diseases from affected parents to their children. Clinical application of PGD must balance the benefits of avoiding disease transmission with the medical risks and financial burdens of IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie He
- Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hui PW, Lam YH, Chen M, Tang MHY, Yeung WSB, Ng EHY, Ho PC. Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of alpha- and beta-thalassaemias in Hong Kong. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22:508-11. [PMID: 12116317 DOI: 10.1002/pd.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was an acceptable alternative to prenatal diagnosis in couples at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population. METHODS An information leaflet was distributed to the women at risk. They were asked to complete a questionnaire after having an interview with a designated investigator. RESULTS A total of 141 valid questionnaires were analysed; 82.3% of the women considered PGD either the same or better than conventional prenatal diagnosis. Women with an affected child or a subfertility problem were more willing to accept PGD and to undergo this procedure in their future pregnancies. Their main concern about PGD was damage to the embryo during the PGD procedure. The most important perceived advantage of PGD was avoidance of termination of an affected pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS PGD is an acceptable alternative to conventional prenatal diagnosis in women at risk of giving birth to a child with alpha- or beta-thalassaemia in an Asian population. This is particularly true in women with a subfertility problem and in women who already have an affected child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Wah Hui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Tsan Yuk Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ogilvie CM, Braude P, Scriven PN. Successful pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carriers of chromosome translocations. HUM FERTIL 2002; 4:168-71. [PMID: 11591275 DOI: 10.1080/1464727012000199252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Reciprocal translocations are found in about 1 in 500 people, whereas Robertsonian translocations occur with a prevalence of 1 in 1000. Balanced carriers of these rearrangements, although phenotypically normal, may present with infertility, recurrent miscarriage, or offspring with an abnormal phenotype after segregation of the translocation at meiosis. Once the translocation has been identified, prenatal diagnosis can be offered, followed by termination of pregnancies with chromosome imbalance. Couples who have suffered repeated miscarriage or those who have undergone termination of pregnancy as a result of the translocation carrier status of one partner are looking increasingly to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as a way of achieving a normal pregnancy. Similarly, infertile couples in which one partner is a translocation carrier may request PGD to ensure transfer of normal embryos after in vitro fertilization. Translocation PGD has been applied successfully in several centres worldwide and should now be considered as a realistic treatment option for translocation carriers who do not wish to trust to luck for a successful natural outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Ogilvie
- Centre for Preimplantation Diagnosis, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital Trust, St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:767-80. [PMID: 11559914 DOI: 10.1002/pd.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Today, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is offered in over 40 centres worldwide for an expanded range of genetic defects causing disease. This very early form of prenatal diagnosis involves the detection of affected embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (sex determination or chromosomal defects) or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (monogenic diseases) prior to implantation. Genetic analysis of the embryos involves the removal of some cellular mass from the embryos (one or two blastomeres at cleavage-stage or some extra-embryonic trophectoderm cells at the blastocyst stage) by means of an embryo biopsy procedure. Genetic analysis can also be performed preconceptionally by removal of the first polar body. However, additional information is then often gained by removal of the second polar body and/or a blastomere from the embryo. Removal of polar bodies or cellular material from embryos requires an opening in the zona pellucida, which can be created in a mechanical way (partial zona dissection) or chemical way (acidic Tyrode's solution). However, the more recent introduction of laser technology has facilitated this step enormously. Different biopsy procedures at different preimplantation stages are reviewed here, including their pros and cons and their clinical applications. The following aspects will also be discussed: safety of zona drilling by laser, use of Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium for decompaction, and removal of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The initial sequencing of the human genome should be regarded as a milestone in a road that stretches years into the future; the full ramifications of the Human Genome Project are still only being theorized. Researchers will benefit from the catalog of human genes in studies of the genetics of disease susceptibility and the cell biology of gene interactions. Clinicians will increasingly offer genetic or biochemical testing to identify those at highest risk for a number of diseases. Drug discovery will eventually follow newly possible studies of gene expression and protein function. However the Human Genome Project eventually shapes medicine, it is certain that physicians, particularly obstetricians and gynecologists, will need to be well versed in the scientific and ethical issues involved, inasmuch as we will likely be at the center of the most heated debates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M O Schimpf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Strom CM, Levin R, Strom S, Masciangelo C, Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Neonatal outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by polar body removal: the first 109 infants. Pediatrics 2000; 106:650-3. [PMID: 11015504 DOI: 10.1542/peds.106.4.650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Our center developed the technique of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) by sequential polar body removal (PBR) for the diagnosis of Mendelian disorders and aneuploidies. This study examines the obstetric and neonatal outcome of the first 109 live births after PGD by PBR. OBJECTIVE To determine if there were any observable effects of PGD by PBR on perinatal morbidity and mortality, birth defects, and growth parameters. DESIGN Data on perinatal outcome were gathered for the first 109 infants by parental reporting and confirmed by telephone interview and chart review when indicated. In infants >6 months old, a follow-up telephone interview was performed establishing the developmental milestones attained by the child. SETTING A research center conducting an institutional review board-approved research protocol in PGD. PATIENTS All patients who had PGD by PBR who had clinical pregnancies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Gestational age, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality, birth weight, birth length, the presence of birth defects, and developmental milestones. RESULTS There was no significant decrease in birth length or weight, or the frequency of small for gestational age infants. No specific pattern of birth defects was observed. CONCLUSION Thus far, there are no observable detrimental effects of PGD by PBR on children born after the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Strom
- Reproductive Genetics Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60657, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|