Teng SW, Tseng JY, Chang CK, Li CT, Chen YJ, Wang PH. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004;
10:474-7. [PMID:
14738631 DOI:
10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60147-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To compare differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing women ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum.
DESIGN
Three-year, prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING
University-affiliated regional hospital.
PATIENTS
Sixty hemodynamically stable women.
INTERVENTION
Laparoscopic surgery (30 women) and laparotomy (30).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Laparoscopic surgery had significant advantages over laparotomy, including shorter hospital stay (55.33 +/- 7.67 vs 97.77 +/- 14.45 hrs, p < 0.001) without increased adverse events. Laparoscopic surgery also showed trends of shorter operating time, improved wound care, and less postoperative pain.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopy surgery for diagnosis and treatment of women with ruptured hemorrhagic corpus luteum appears superior to laparotomy. We suggest that surgeons try laparoscopy first as a diagnostic and probably therapeutic procedure.
Collapse