Effects of sublingual nitroglycerin on human uterine contractility during the active phase of labor

Pregnancy-Associated Myocardial Infarction: A Review of Current Practices and Guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction is a principal cause of cardiovascular disease with a steadily rising incidence of 4.98 AMI events/100,000 deliveries over the last four decades in the USA. It is also linked with significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, with maternal case fatality rate ranging from 5.1 to 37%. The management of acute myocardial infarction can be challenging in pregnant patients since treatment modalities and medication use are limited by their safety during pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Limited guidelines exist regarding the management of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. Routinely used medications in myocardial infarction including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and statin therapy are contraindicated during pregnancy. Aspirin use is considered safe in pregnant women, but dual antiplatelet therapy and therapeutic anticoagulation can be associated with increased risk of maternal and fetal complications, and should only be used after a comprehensive benefit-to-risk assessment. The standard approach to revascularization requires additional caution in pregnant women. Percutaneous coronary intervention is generally considered safe but can be associated with high failure rates and poor outcomes depending on the etiology. Fibrinolytic therapy may have significant sequelae in pregnant patients, and hemodynamic management during surgery is complex and adds risk during pregnancy. Understanding the risks and benefits of the different treatment modalities available and their utility depending on the underlying etiology, encompassed with a multidisciplinary team approach, is vital to improve outcomes and minimize maternal and fetal complications.

Beta-2 Agonists May be Superior to Epinephrine to Relieve Severe Anaphylactic Uterine Contractions

BACKGROUND

Uterine contractions are recognized as a potential manifestation of anaphylaxis, but literature on their proper management is limited. It is widely recognized that anaphylactic reactions can cause uterine contractions, but little is known about their optimal management.

OBJECTIVE

Review potential treatments for painful uterine contractions associated with anaphylaxis or mast cell activation.

METHODS

This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched in English, French, and Spanish for reports of uterine anaphylaxis published up until July 2020. The search strategy used a combination of Boolean operators and included the following Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords: hypersensitivity; anaphylaxis; mastocytosis; uterus; uterine contraction; pelvic pain; labor, obstetric; labor, premature; and endometriosis.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified 19 studies reporting on 31 cases of painful uterine contractions occurring during anaphylaxis or other events associated with mast cell activation. Nine patients were pregnant. We present 2 additional cases in nonpregnant women, one associated with an oral food challenge and the other associated with oral food desensitization. The most frequent triggers were subcutaneous immunotherapy (14 cases), food (6 cases), and drugs (4 cases). Uterine cramps were associated with systemic symptoms in 24 cases and lasted on average for 2.4 hours. Pretreatment with antihistamines and montelukast generally failed to prevent recurrence, but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used successfully in some reports. Response to intramuscular epinephrine was inconsistent. Data from ex vivo models indicate that epinephrine may paradoxically contribute to uterine contractions through alpha-receptor activity. A small number of cases showed good response to beta-2 agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of quality data on painful uterine contractions occurring in the context of anaphylactic reactions and on their optimal management. In the absence of counterindication, use of a beta-2 agonist and premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be the preferred options.

Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress

BACKGROUND

Uterine tachysystole (more than 5 contractions per 10 minutes in 2 consecutive intervals) is common during labour, particularly with use of labour-stimulating agents. Tachysystole may reduce fetal oxygenation by interrupting maternal blood flow to the placenta during contractions. Reducing uterine contractions may improve placental blood flow, improving fetal oxygenation. This review aimed to evaluate the use of tocolytics to reduce or stop uterine contractions for improvement of the condition of the fetus in utero. This new review supersedes an earlier Cochrane Review on the same topic.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the use of acute tocolysis during labour for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress, or both, on fetal, maternal and neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (2 February 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole, intrapartum fetal distress, or both.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies (734 women), conducted in hospital settings, predominantly in high-income countries (USA, Austria, Uruguay). Two trials were conducted in upper and lower middle-income countries (South Africa, Sri Lanka). The hospital facilities all had the capacity to perform caesarean section. Overall, the studies had a low risk of bias, except for methods to maintain blinding. All of the trials used a selective beta₂ (ß₂)-adrenergic agonist in one arm, however the drug used varied, as did the comparator. Limited information was available on maternal outcomes.Selective ß₂-adrenergic agonist versus no tocolytic agent, whilst awaiting emergency deliveryThere were two stillbirths, both in the no tocolytic control group (risk ratio (RR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 4.55; 2 studies, 57 women; low-quality evidence). One had gross hydrocephalus and the second occurred with vaginal delivery after waiting 55 minutes for caesarean section. The decision for caesarean section delivery was an inclusion criterion in both studies so we could not assess this as an outcome under this comparison. Abnormal fetal heart trace is probably lower with tocolytic treatment (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.95; 2 studies, 43 women; moderate-quality evidence). The effects on the number of babies with Apgar score below seven were uncertain (low-quality evidence).Intravenous (IV) atosiban versus IV hexoprenaline (1 study, 26 women) One infant in the hexoprenaline group required > 24 hours in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) following a forceps delivery (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.50; low-quality evidence). There were no fetal or neonatal mortalities and no Apgar scores below seven. There was one caesarean delivery in the IV hexoprenaline group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.50; low-quality evidence), and one case of abnormal fetal heart score in the atosiban group (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 67.51; very low-quality evidence).IV fenoterol bromhydrate versus emergency delivery (1 study, 390 women) No data were reported for perinatal death, severe morbidity or fetal or neonatal mortality. IV fenoterol probably increases the risk of caesarean delivery (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.22; moderate-quality evidence). Fenoterol may have little or no effect on the risk of Apgar scores below seven (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.35 to 4.68; low-quality evidence).IV hexoprenaline versus no tocolytic agent, whilst awaiting emergency delivery (1 study, 37 women) No data were reported for perinatal death or severe morbidity. There were two fetal deaths in the no tocolytic control group (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.55; low-quality evidence). The rate of caesarean delivery was not reported. There were two babies with Apgar scores below seven in the control group and none in the hexoprenaline group (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.57; 35 women; low-quality evidence).Subcutaneous terbutaline versus IV magnesium sulphate (1 study, 46 women)No data were reported for perinatal death, severe morbidity or fetal or neonatal mortality. The decision for caesarean section was an inclusion criterion, so we could not assess this. The effects on abnormal fetal heart trace are uncertain (very low-quality evidence).Subcutaneous terbutaline with continuation of oxytocic infusion versus cessation of oxytocic infusion without tocolytic agent (1 study, 28 women) No data were reported for perinatal death, severe morbidity or fetal or neonatal mortality. There may be little or no difference in the rates of caesarean delivery in the subcutaneous terbutaline (8/15) and control groups (4/13) (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.45; low-quality evidence). There were no cases of Apgar scores below seven or abnormal fetal heart trace.Subcutaneous terbutaline versus no tocolytic agent, whilst awaiting emergency delivery (1 study, 20 women) No data were reported for perinatal death or severe morbidity. There were no fetal or neonatal mortalities. The decision for caesarean section was an inclusion criterion, so we could not assess this. There were two babies with Apgar scores below seven in the control group and none in the terbutaline group (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.08; low-quality evidence).IV terbutaline versus IV nitroglycerin (1 study, 110 women)No data were reported for perinatal death or severe morbidity or fetal or neonatal mortality. There may be little or no difference in the rates of caesarean delivery between the IV terbutaline (30/57) and control groups (29/53) (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.36; low-quality evidence). There were no cases of Apgar scores below seven.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to determine the effects of tocolytics for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress during labour. The clinical significance for some of the improvements in measures of fetal well-being with tocolytics is unclear. The sample sizes were too small to detect effects on neonatal morbidity, mortality or serious adverse effects. The majority of studies are from high-income countries in facilities with access to caesarean section, which may limit the generalisability of the results to lower-resource settings, or settings where caesarean section is not available.Further well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are required to evaluate clinically relevant indicators of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section involves making an incision in the woman's abdomen and cutting through the uterine muscle. The baby is then delivered through that incision. Difficult caesarean birth may result in injury for the infant or complications for the mother. Methods to assist with delivery include vacuum or forceps extraction or manual delivery utilising fundal pressure. Medication that relaxes the uterus (tocolytic medication) may facilitate the birth of the baby at caesarean section. Delivery of the impacted head after prolonged obstructed labour can be associated with significant maternal and neonatal complication; to facilitate delivery of the head the surgeon may utilise either reverse breech extraction or head pushing.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of tocolysis (routine or selective use) with no use of tocolysis or placebo and to compare different extraction methods at the time of caesarean section for outcomes of infant birth trauma, maternal complications (particularly postpartum haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion), and long-term measures of infant and childhood morbidity.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published, unpublished, and ongoing randomised controlled trials comparing the use of tocolytic agents (routine or selective) at caesarean section versus no use of tocolytic or placebo at caesarean section to facilitate the birth of the baby. Use of instrument versus manual delivery to facilitate birth of the baby. Reverse breech extraction versus head pushing to facilitate delivery of the deeply impacted fetal head.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised controlled trials, involving 582 women undergoing caesarean section were included in this review. The risk of bias of included trials was variable, with some trials not adequately describing allocation or randomisation.Three comparisons were included. 1. Tocolysis versus no tocolysisA single randomised trial involving 97 women was identified and included in the review. Birth trauma was not reported. There were no cases of any maternal side-effect reported in either the nitroglycerin or the placebo group. No other maternal and infant health outcomes were reported. 2. Reverse breech extraction versus head push for the deeply impacted head at full dilation at caesarean section Four randomised trials involving 357 women were identified and included in the review. The primary outcome of birth trauma was reported by three trials and there was no difference between reverse breech extraction and head push for this rare outcome (three studies, 239 women, risk ratio (RR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 5.73). Secondary outcomes including endometritis rate (three studies, 285 women, average RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.05, Tau I² = 0.22, I² = 56%), extension of uterine incision (four studies, 357 women, average RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.40), mean blood loss (three studies, 298 women, mean difference (MD) -294.92, 95% CI -493.25 to -96.59; I² = 98%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)/special care nursery (SCN) admission (two studies, 226 babies, average RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.22, Tau I² = 0.27, I² = 74%) were decreased with reverse breech extraction. No differences were observed between groups for many of the other secondary outcomes reported (blood loss > 500 mL; blood transfusion; wound infection; mean hospital stay; average Apgar score).There was significant heterogeneity between the trials for the outcomes mean blood loss, operative time and mean hospital stay, making comparison difficult. However the operation duration was significantly shorter for reverse breech extraction, which may correspond with ease of delivery and therefore, the amount of tissue trauma and therefore, significantly less blood loss. Given the heterogeneity, we cannot define the amount of difference in blood loss, operative time or hospital stay however. 3. Instrument (vacuum or forceps) versus manual extraction at elective caesarean section Two randomised trials involving 128 women were identified and included in the review. Only one trial reported maternal and infant health outcomes as prespecified in this review. This trial reported birth trauma as an outcome but there were no instances of birth trauma in either comparison group. There were no differences found in mean fall in haemoglobin (Hb) between groups (one study, 44 women, MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.59), or in uterine incision extension (one study, 44 women, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.73).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient information available from randomised trials to support or refute the routine or selective use of tocolytic agents or instrument to facilitate infant birth at the time of difficult caesarean section. There is limited evidence that reverse breech extraction may improve maternal and fetal outcomes, though there was no difference in primary outcome of infant birth trauma. Further randomised controlled trials are needed to answer these questions.

Isobaric labeling and tandem mass spectrometry: a novel approach for profiling and quantifying proteins differentially expressed in amniotic fluid in preterm labor with and without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation

OBJECTIVE

Examination of the amniotic fluid (AF) proteome has been previously attempted to identify useful biomarkers in predicting the outcome of preterm labor (PTL). Isobaric Tag for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) labeling allows direct ratiometric comparison of relative abundance of identified protein species among multiplexed samples. The purpose of this study was to apply, for the first time, the combination of iTRAQ and tandem mass spectrometry to identify proteins differentially regulated in AF samples of women with spontaneous PTL and intact membranes with and without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was designed and included AF samples from patients with spontaneous PTL and intact membranes in the following groups: (1) patients without IAI who delivered at term (n = 26); (2) patients who delivered preterm without IAI (n = 25); and (3) patients with IAI (n = 24). Proteomic profiling of AF samples was performed using a workflow involving tryptic digestion, iTRAQ labeling and multiplexing, strong cation exchange fractionation, and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-five separate 4-plex samples were prepared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Collectively, 123,011 MS(2) spectra were analyzed, and over 25,000 peptides were analyzed by database search (X!Tandem and Mascot), resulting in the identification of 309 unique high-confidence proteins. Analysis of differentially present iTRAQ reporter peaks revealed many proteins that have been previously reported to be associated with preterm delivery with IAI. Importantly, many novel proteins were found to be up-regulated in the AF of patients with PTL and IAI including leukocyte elastase precursor, Thymosin-like 3, and 14-3-3 protein isoforms. Moreover, we observed differential expression of proteins in AF of patients who delivered preterm in the absence of IAI in comparison with those with PTL who delivered at term including Mimecan precursor, latent-transforming growth factor beta-binding protein isoform 1L precursor, and Resistin. These findings have been confirmed for Resistin in an independent cohort of samples using ELISA. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was employed to reveal families of proteins participating in distinct biological processes. We identified enrichment for host defense, anti-apoptosis, metabolism/catabolism and cell and protein mobility, localization and targeting.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Proteomics with iTRAQ labeling is a profiling tool capable of revealing differential expression of proteins in AF; (2) We discovered 82 proteins differentially expressed in three clinical subgroups of premature labor, 67 which were heretofore unknown. Of particular importance is the identification of proteins differentially expressed in AF from women who delivered preterm in the absence of IAI. This is the first report of the positive identification of biomarkers in this subgroup of patients.

Differential expression pattern of genes encoding for anti-microbial peptides in the fetal membranes of patients with spontaneous preterm labor and intact membranes and those with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes

OBJECTIVE

Increased amniotic fluid concentrations of anti-microbial peptides, components of the innate immune system, have been reported in patients with preterm labor (PTL) with intact membranes and intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation (IAI), as well as in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM). This study was designed to confirm these results using a targeted approach, detecting DEFA1, DEFB1, GNLY, and S100A9 gene expression in the choriamniotic membranes in pregnancies complicated with PTL and intact membranes or PPROM, with and without histologic chorioamnionitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Human fetal membranes were obtained from patients in the following groups: (1) PTL with intact membranes (n = 15); (2) PTL with intact membranes with histologic chorioamnionitis (n = 12); (3) PPROM (n = 17); and (4) PPROM with histologic chorioamnionitis (n = 21). The mRNA expression of alpha-defensin-1, beta-defensin-1, calgranulin B and granulysin in the fetal membranes was determined by qRT-PCR.

RESULTS

(1) The expression of alpha-defensin-1 mRNA in the fetal membranes was higher in patients with PTL and intact membranes with histologic chorioamnionitis, than those without chorioamnionitis (19.4-fold, p < 0.001); (2) Among patients with histologic chorioamnionitis, patients with PTL and intact membranes had a higher alpha-defensin-1 mRNA expression than those with PPROM (5.5-fold, p = 0.003); (3) Histologic chorioamnionitis was associated with a higher calgranulin B mRNA expression in the chorioamniotic membranes of patients with both PTL and intact membranes (7.9-fold, p = 0.03) and PPROM (7.6-fold, p < 0.0001); (4) The expression of calgranulin B mRNA in the fetal membranes was higher in patients with PTL and intact membranes without histologic chorioamnionitis than in those with PPROM without histologic chorioamnionitis (2.7-fold, p = 0.03); (5) There were no differences in the expression of beta-defensin-1 and granulysin in the chorioamniotic membranes between the study groups even in the presence of histologic chorioamnioniotis.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Among patients with histologic chorioamnionitis, the mRNA expression of alpha-defensin-1 and calgranulin B in the fetal membranes of patients with PTL and intact membranes as well as that of calgranulin B in the fetal membranes of patients with PPROM is higher than in the membranes of those without histologic chorioamnionitis; (2) histologic chorioamnionitis is associated with differences in the pattern of alpha-defensin-1 mRNA expression in the fetal membranes in patients with PTL and intact membranes and those with PPROM.

Emerging tocolytics: challenges in designing and testing drugs to delay preterm delivery and prolong pregnancy

The global rate of preterm delivery (before 37 completed weeks of pregnancy) is increasing and there are no effective means available to prevent this rise. Prematurity is the principal cause of neonatal mortality and a major cause of pediatric morbidity and long-term disability. Current strategies to prolong pregnancy are based on inhibiting the mechanisms that effect uterine smooth muscle (myometrium) contractions in women who are in preterm labor. Most drugs in this group were developed for other purposes. Newer strategies are designed to maintain a state of uterine quiescence and pregnancy, preventing the myometrium from initiating contractions and entering preterm labor. Again, it may be possible to use existing drugs for pregnancy maintenance. Several financial and practical barriers exist for developing completely new drugs to delay labor. Designing clinical trials to test tocolytics is complicated, as the health of two patients must be considered and the nature of preterm birth and its outcomes are different at early preterm labor (< 28 weeks) and late preterm labor (34 - 36 weeks).

Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid to identify women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection: the use of a novel computational method to analyze mass spectrometric profiling

OBJECTIVE

Examination of the amniotic fluid proteome has been used to identify biomarkers for intra-amniotic inflammation as well as those that may be useful in predicting the outcome of preterm labor. The purpose of this study was to combine a novel computational method of pattern discovery with mass spectrometric proteomic profiling of amniotic fluid to discover biomarkers of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients with spontaneous preterm labor and intact membranes who delivered at term (n = 59) and those who delivered preterm with IAI (n = 60). Proteomic profiling was performed using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) mass spectrometry. A proteomic profile was acquired through multiple simultaneous SELDI conditions, which were combined in a single proteomic 'fingerprint' using a novel computational approach. Classification of patients based on their associated surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (SELDI-TOF) mass spectra as belonging to either the class of individuals with preterm delivery with IAI or term delivery was accomplished by constructing an empirical model. The first phase in the construction of this empirical model involved the selection of adjustable parameters utilizing a training/testing subset of data. The second phase tested the generalization of the model by utilizing a blinded validation set of patients who were not employed in parameter selection.

RESULTS

Gestational age at amniocentesis was not significantly different between the groups. Thirty-nine unique mass spectrometric peaks discriminated patients with preterm labor/delivery with IAI from those with preterm labor and term delivery. In the testing/training dataset, the classification accuracies (averaged over 100 random draws) were: 91.4% (40.2/44) for patients with preterm delivery with IAI, and 91.2% (40.1/44) for term delivery. The overall accuracy of the classification of patients in the validation dataset was 90.3% (28/31).

CONCLUSIONS

Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid allowed the identification of mass spectrometry features, which can distinguish patients with preterm labor with IAI from those with preterm labor without inflammation or infection who subsequently delivered at term.

Clinical use of nitric oxide donors and L-arginine in obstetrics

Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical that plays a fundamental role in human physiology, being involved in the homeostasis of different functions. In obstetrics this molecule is determinant in the physiology of labor and cervical ripening; it possibly plays a fundamental role in the etiology of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, and it could also be utilized in view of its ability to induce smooth muscle relaxation. Several clinical trials have ascertained the ability of the topical application of NO donors to promote cervical ripening, and also labor induction. There is much less evidence on the use of NO donors in the vascular complications of pregnancy, either as prophylactics or therapeutic agents. Due to the capacity of NO to promote relaxation of smooth muscle, NO donors have been employed as tocolytics with performance similar to other agents. Moreover, although anecdotal, the experience of sudden uterine relaxation using NO donors in obstetric emergencies remains of great clinical value.

Tocolysis for assisting delivery at caesarean section

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section involves making an incision in the woman's abdomen and cutting through the uterine muscle. The baby is then delivered through that incision. Difficult caesarean birth may result in injury for the infant. Medication that relaxes the uterus (tocolytic medication) may facilitate the birth of the baby at caesarean section.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of tocolysis (routine or selective use) with no use of tocolysis or placebo at the time of caesarean section for outcomes of infant birth trauma, maternal complications (particularly postpartum haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion), and long-term measures of infant and childhood morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1) and PubMed (1966 to January 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Use of tocolytic agents (routine or selective) at caesarean section versus no use of tocolytic or placebo at caesarean section to facilitate the birth of the baby.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

A single randomised trial involving 97 women was identified and included in the review. Maternal and infant health outcomes were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient information available from randomised trials to support or refute the routine or selective use of tocolytic agents to facilitate infant birth at the time of caesarean section.

Drug therapy during labor and delivery, part 2

PURPOSE

The drug therapy of common conditions and complications during labor and delivery and the fetal and neonatal effects of this therapy are examined.

SUMMARY

The pharmacologic therapy of common conditions that occur in labor and delivery primarily involves oxytocin and prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction and systemic and regional narcotic analgesics for pain. Because most medications used in women during labor and delivery do not have Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling, pharmacists should understand the benefits and limitations of medications used in the mother. Although induction and augmentation of labor and the control of pain often require drug therapy, other, less frequent, complications may occur in labor. Drug therapies for these complications include anti-infective agents to treat maternal infection and prevent neonatal diseases; antiretrovirals to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission from the mother to the fetus; corticosteroids to prevent fetal lung immaturity; antihypertensives to treat preeclampsia; anticonvulsants to treat eclampsia; antibiotics to prolong pregnancy and improve neonatal outcomes after premature rupture of the membranes; tocolytics for premature labor; and oxytocin, ergot alkaloids, and prostaglandin analogues for postpartum hemorrhage. The fetal and neonatal effects of therapy for the conditions that occur during labor and delivery are usually benign, but significant morbidity and mortality involving the mother, the fetus, and the newborn are ever-present risks.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the conditions and complications requiring drug therapy during labor and delivery will allow hospital pharmacists to make knowledgeable decisions about the rapid accessibility of critical medications in the labor and delivery unit.

Normal Labor: Mechanism and Duration

Labor is refers to the chain of physiologic events that allows a fetus to undertake its journey from the uterus to the outside world. The mean duration of a singleton preganancy is 40.0 weeks (280 days), which is dated from the first day of the last normal menstrual period. The period from 37.0 weeks (259 days) to 42.0 weeks (294 days) of gestation is regarded as "term". This article focuses on the onset progress, and mechanics of normal labor term. Topics such as preterm labor (labor before 37 weeks), postterm labor (labor after 42 weeks), and abnormal labor and delivery have not been addressed and are discussed in detail elsewhere in this issue.

Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase inhibitors and other tocolytics in preterm labour

Preterm delivery (<37 weeks of gestation) is the major obstetrical complication in developed countries, yet attempts to delay labour and prolong pregnancy have largely been unsuccessful. One of the many reasons it is so difficult to prevent preterm birth is that the nature of preterm labour changes as a function of gestational age, maternal lifestyle factors or infection, to list a few of the reasons. The inhibitors of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase (PGHS), known as the Non-steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs, have been viewed with interest as tocolytics with promising effectiveness under most conditions of preterm labour. Three isoforms of PGHS exist; the first two, PGHS-1 and -2, have been studied for their catalytic activity, X-ray crystallographic structure, and physiological roles in the adult and the foetus. Mixed inhibitors and isoform-specific inhibitors of PGHS have been developed, and their roles in delaying preterm labour are examined and compared to other tocolytics.