A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond-strength study

Effects of contact compressive force on bracket bond strength and adhesive thickness : Study using orthodontic resins with different viscosities

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of the contact compressive force to seat orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive thickness using adhesive resins with different viscosities.

METHODS

A total of 184 premolars were divided equally into eight groups of 23. Transbond XT and Beauty Ortho Bond paste viscous self-etching adhesive systems were used with contact compressive forces of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 N (groups 1-4 and groups 5-8, respectively) via a push-pull tension gauge. SBS and adhesive thickness were measured in each adhesive system for each contact compressive force.

RESULTS

Significant differences existed in the SBSs between the adhesive systems for each contact compressive force and the SBSs were significantly higher in groups 1 (17 MPa) and 2 (16 MPa) than in groups 3 (14 MPa) and 4 (13 MPa). Significant differences existed for the adhesive thickness between the adhesive systems for the three contact compressive forces less than 3 N. The adhesive in group 1 (0.184 mm) was significantly thicker than that in groups 2-4 (from 0.098 to 0.129 mm). In groups 2 (0.129 mm) and 3 (0.121 mm) it was thicker than in group 4 (0.098 mm), and in group 5 (0.119 mm) it was thicker than in groups 6-8 (from 0.087 to 0.088 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The high-viscosity adhesive Transbond XT exhibited higher SBSs than the low-viscosity Beauty Ortho Bond paste. For the adhesive Transbond XT, lower contact compressive forces produced greater adhesive thicknesses and higher SBSs. For the Beauty Ortho Bond paste, no significant changes in the adhesive thickness or SBS values were observed for contact compressive forces greater than 0.5 N.

Amalgam Surface Treatment by Different Output Powers of Er:YAG Laser:SEM Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate amalgam surfaces treated by different output powers of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser by scanning electron microscope (SEM).

METHODS

Twenty-one amalgam blocks (8 mm × 8 mm, 3 mm thickness) were prepared by condensing silver amalgam (into putty impression material. After keeping them for 24 hours in distilled water, they were divided into 7 groups as follow: G1: Er:YAG laser (1 W, 50 mJ), G2: Er:YAG laser (2 W, 100 mJ), G3: Er:YAG laser (3 W, 150 mJ), G4: Sandblast, G5: Sandblast + Er:YAG laser (1 W, 50 mJ), G6: Sandblast +Er:YAG laser (2 W, 100 mJ) and G7: Sandblast +Er:YAG laser (3 W, 150 mJ). Then after preparation of all samples, they were examined by SEM.

RESULTS

The SEM results of amalgam surfaces treated by different output powers of Er:YAG laser showed some pitting areas with non-homogenous irregularities Conclusion: It seems that the application of sandblasting accompanied by Er:YAG laser irradiation can provide proper surface for bonding of orthodontic brackets.

Effect of surface treatment with sandblasting and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on bonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets to silver amalgam

Objectives: Satisfactory bonding of orthodontic attachments to amalgam is a challenge for orthodontists. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets to silver amalgam treated with sandblasting and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Study Design: Fifty-four amalgam discs were prepared, polished and divided into three groups: In group 1 (the control group) the premolar brackets were bonded using Panavia F resin cement without any surface treatment; in groups 2 and 3, the specimens were subjected to sandblasting and Er,Cr:YSGG laser respectively, before bracket bonding. After immersing in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, all the specimens were tested for shear bond strength. Bond failure sites were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test. Results: The highest and lowest shear bond strength values were recorded in the laser and control groups, respectively. There were significant differences in mean shear bond strength values between the laser and the other two groups (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the sandblast and control groups (p=0.5). Conclusions: Amalgam surface treatment with Er,Cr:YSGG laser increased shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Key words: Amalgam, surface treatment, shear bond strength, sandblasting, Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives

The aims of this study were to compare, in vitro, the shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to silver amalgam with the use of three different intermediate resins and two different adhesives, and to evaluate bond failure mode. Forty-five amalgam specimens were divided into three equal groups. In groups 1 and 2, the brackets were bonded with Unite (3M Unitek) using Reliance Metal Primer (RMP; Reliance Orthodontic Products) and Power Bond OLC (PB OLC; Ortho Organizers Inc.) as intermediate resins, respectively. In group 3, Resinomer and One-Step Plus (OS+; Bisco Inc.) were used. Thirty bovine teeth served as the controls to test bracket bonding to acid-etched enamel with Unite and Resinomer-OS+. After thermocycling from 10 to 50 degrees C 1000 times, all samples were tested for SBS. Bond failure sites were classified using a modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) system. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, post hoc Tukey multiple comparison and chi-square tests. The results showed that the mean SBS to amalgam surfaces were significantly lower than those to etched bovine enamel (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in mean SBS between the amalgam bonding groups (P>0.05). For the ARI, significant differences were found between the amalgam- and enamel-bonding groups (P<0.001). The mean SBS of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to amalgam surfaces with RMP, PB OLC, OS+ intermediate resins and Unite and Resinomer adhesives was significantly lower than to etched bovine enamel. Bond failure occurred at the amalgam-adhesive interface regardless of the adhesive system and without damage to the amalgam restoration.

Artificial saliva contamination effects on bond strength of self-etching primers

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the bond strength with or without contamination with artificial saliva when using two different self-etching primers (Transbond Plus and iBond) in comparison with a conventional acid-etching method (37% phosphoric acid and Transbond XT) for bonding of orthodontic brackets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred fifty extracted human premolars were randomly allocated to six different groups, with 25 teeth in each group. Orthodontic metal brackets (APC II, Victory Twin 22 UNIV) were used. For contamination, a saliva replacement (Ptyalin) was applied. After contamination the surface was air-dried for 5 seconds and the bonding procedure continued. The bonded teeth were stored in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 30 days and then thermocycled for 24 hours before debonding with a universal testing machine. The load was recorded at bond failure. The location of adhesive failure was determined under magnification using the adhesive remnant index (ARI).

RESULTS

Clinically acceptable bond strengths were found for all primers used in this study. The contamination by saliva significantly decreased the bond strength when using the conventional acid-etching method (t = 0.0001). Self-etching primers were less influenced by saliva contamination. There was no significant difference in the ARI score among the groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Saliva contamination significantly decreased the bond strength when the conventional acid-etching method was used. The self-etching primers were influenced the least. The bond strengths achieved for the self-etching primers and the conventional etching method after saliva contamination were not significantly different.

Shear bond strength comparison between direct and indirect bonded orthodontic brackets

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with either an indirect bonding technique and a new adhesive resin or a direct bonding technique and a light-activated adhesive. Fifty-four extracted premolars were mounted in acrylic blocks and randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 27). In one group, orthodontic brackets were bonded to premolars with an indirect bonding adhesive system; in the other, brackets were bonded with the direct method. Seventy-two hours later, the brackets were placed in a testing machine and subjected to a shear force with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean shear bond strengths for the indirect and direct groups were 11.2 and 10.9 MPa, respectively, both exceeding the minimum shear bond strength range of 5.9 to 7.8 MPa often cited in the literature for clinical success. Data were analyzed with Student t tests. No significant difference in shear bond strength between the 2 groups was detected (P =.76). Resin remnants on orthodontic bracket pads were observed with a dissecting microscope at 30x magnification and scored with a modified adhesive remnant index. There was no significant difference between groups (P >.05). There was also no correlation between shear bond strength and the percentage of adhesive resin remnants left on the orthodontic bracket. Under the conditions of this study, no evidence suggests a difference in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to tooth enamel, whether they are bonded with the direct or indirect technique.