Sex differences in genioglossus muscle response to changes in pharyngeal resistance

Elevated Hyoid Bone Position in Response to Mandibular Advancing Appliance Predicts Effectiveness of the Appliance for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The objective was to determine whether hyoid bone elevation induced by an anterior mandibular positioning appliance (AMP) predicts the effectiveness of the AMP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females) underwent polysomnographic recordings and lateral cephalograms before and after AMP use of at least 6 months. Measurements of sleep variables and upper airway morphology were compared between pre-AMP and with-AMP states. The AMP appliance reduced apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI) ~53% (33.77 ± 3.29 vs. 15.85 ± 3.78, P = 0.0013). Cephalograms of the oropharyngeal airway showed that the hyoid bone moved superiorly toward the inferior mandibular border (Δ H-MP) ~5 mm (23.4 ± 1.44 vs. 18.27 ± 1.86, P = 0.0377), with the AMP inserted in the oral cavity; no airway measurement other than hyoid bone position changed. No significant correlations emerged between AHI improvement (Δ AHI) and amounts of hyoid elevation (Δ H-MP) when all patients were pooled. However, when the samples were subcategorized, the correlation coefficients increased significantly (P < 0.01) in both subgroups. This outcome suggests the presence of two distinct types among the “Good-Responders” to AMP appliance use. Overall use of the AMP appliance is effective; however, the effectiveness of the appliance appears to depend on the mode of hyoid elevations, likely resulting from muscle responsiveness in patients with AMP use. The results suggest that Δ H-MP measurements may be a useful marker to segregate patients with tongue and hyoid muscles responsive to AMP from those not-so-responsive.

A comprehensive assessment of genioglossus electromyographic activity in healthy adults

The genioglossus (GG) is an extrinsic muscle of the human tongue that plays a critical role in preserving airway patency. In the last quarter century, >50 studies have reported on respiratory-related GG electromyographic (EMG) activity in human subjects. Remarkably, of the studies performed, none have duplicated subject body position, electrode recording locations, and/or breathing task(s), making interpretation and integration of the results across studies extremely challenging. In addition, more recent research assessing lingual anatomy and muscle contractile properties has identified regional differences in muscle fiber type and myosin heavy chain expression, giving rise to the possibility that the anterior and posterior regions of the muscle fulfill distinct functions. Here, we assessed EMG activity in anterior and posterior regions of the GG, across upright and supine, in rest breathing and in volitionally modulated breathing tasks. We tested the hypotheses that GG EMG is greater in the posterior region and in supine, except when breathing is subject to volitional modulation. Our results show differences in the magnitude of EMG (%regional maximum) between anterior and posterior muscle regions (7.95 ± 0.57 vs. 11.10 ± 0.99, respectively; P < 0.001), and between upright and supine (8.63 ± 0.73 vs. 10.42 ± 0.90, respectively; P = 0.008). Although the nature of a task affects the magnitude of EMG (P < 0.001), the effect is similar for anterior and posterior muscle regions and across upright and supine (P > 0.2).

A comparison of responders and nonresponders to oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study compared cephalometric variables between responders and nonresponders to a titratable oral appliance (OA) in a group of subjects matched for sex, pretreatment age, and body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Nine nonresponders as defined by an improvement in the apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <20%) and their individually matched responders were selected for this study. The difference in age for each matched pair was +/-5 years, and, for BMI, the difference was +/-15%. The pretreatment AHI was matched to the same category (moderate, >15 to < or =30; severe I, >30 to < or =45; and severe II, >45 AHI).

RESULTS

Middle and inferior airway space and oropharyngeal airway cross-sectional area were significantly larger in the nonresponders. Position of the mandible relative to the cervical spine was the only significant skeletal variable and was larger in nonresponders. Changes in BMI between the groups were statistically significant; the averages were a 2.9% increase in the nonresponders and a 0.5% decrease in responders. The wider airway in nonresponders might reflect an enhanced neuromuscular compensation while awake. The weight gain in nonresponders was relatively small, but it might have reduced the effectiveness of the OA.

CONCLUSION

When treating OSA patients with OA therapy, clinicians should pay particular attention to airway size and weight changes.