Injury to the spleen

American Society of Emergency Radiology Multicenter Blunt Splenic Trauma Study: CT and Clinical Findings

Background Treatment of blunt splenic trauma (BST) continues to evolve with improved imaging for detection of splenic vascular injuries. Purpose To report on treatments for BST from 11 trauma centers, the frequency and clinical impact of splenic vascular injuries, and factors influencing treatment. Materials and Methods Patients were retrospectively identified as having BST between January 2011 and December 2018, and clinical, imaging, and outcome data were recorded. Patient data were summarized descriptively, both overall and stratified by initial treatment received (nonoperative management [NOM], angiography, or surgery). Regression analyses were used to examine the primary outcomes of interest, which were initial treatment received and length of stay (LOS). Results This study evaluated 1373 patients (mean age, 42 years ± 18; 845 men). Initial treatments included NOM in 849 patients, interventional radiology (IR) in 240 patients, and surgery in 284 patients. Rates from CT reporting were 22% (304 of 1373) for active splenic hemorrhage (ASH) and 20% (276 of 1373) for contained vascular injury (CVI). IR management of high-grade injuries increased 15.6%, from 28.6% (eight of 28) to 44.2% (57 of 129) (2011-2012 vs 2017-2018). Patients who were treated invasively had a higher injury severity score (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; P < .001), lower temperature (OR, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.00; P = .03), and a lower hematocrit (OR, 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.99; P = .003) and were more likely to show ASH (OR, 8.05; 95% CI: 5.35, 12.26; P < .001) or CVI (OR, 2.70; 95% CI: 1.64, 4.44; P < .001) on CT images, have spleen-only injures (OR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.45, 3.8; P < .001), and have been administered blood product for fewer than 24 hours (OR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.58, 3.51; P < .001) compared with those chosen for NOM, after adjusting for key demographic and clinical variables. After adjustment, factors associated with a shorter LOS were female sex (OR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96; P = .009), spleen-only injury (OR, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.6, 0.86; P < .001), higher admission hematocrit (OR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.6, 0.86; P < .001), and presence of ASH at CT (OR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.88; P < .001). Conclusion Contained vascular injury and active splenic hemorrhage (ASH) were frequently reported, and rates of interventional radiologic management increased during the study period. ASH was associated with a shorter length of stay, and patients with ASH had eight times the odds of undergoing invasive treatment compared with undergoing nonoperative management. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Patlas in this issue.

Outcome of children with blunt liver or spleen injuries: Experience from a single institution in Korea

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to evaluate the demographics, injury pattern, and treatment outcomes among children hospitalized for the management of blunt liver and spleen injury at a single institution in Korea, and to document trends in treatment strategies of children with blunt torso trauma.

METHODS

Children (<20 years) with blunt liver and spleen injuries, hospitalized at our center between May 2010 and February 2016, were included in the present study. Data were retrospectively analyzed for demographic and injury-related information were obtained.

RESULTS

During the study period, 34 patients with blunt liver injury and 21 patients with blunt spleen injury presented at the center. The most common cause of liver and spleen injury was motor vehicle collision, followed by fall. Thirty patients (88.2%) with liver injuries and 18 patients (85.7%) with spleen injuries were managed conservatively. No cases of mortality occurred in patients with spleen injury group; one patient (2.9%) died in patients with liver injury due to uncontrolled bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated that 85.7% of patients with spleen injuries and 88.2% of patients with liver injuries were managed nonoperatively. Operative management was chosen more selectively, being applied in patients with high grade organ injury scores or abrupt changes in vital status. Our findings will contribute to the available data concerning children with traumatic injuries in Korea.

Blunt Splenic Trauma

The treatment of blunt splenic injury has evolved over time from splenectomy in all patients to nonoperative management in stable patients with operation reserved for failures of NOM. While rates of OPSI remain low in trauma patients, splenic salvage in stable patients should be attempted. However, clinical evidence of ongoing blood loss or instability should be addressed with prompt splenectomy. Careful patient selection is of paramount importance in nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury.

Splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma during a soccer (football) game

The spleen is the most commonly injured abdominal organ in children who sustain blunt abdominal trauma, and pediatric splenic injury may result from minor mechanisms of injury, including sports participation. We present 2 cases of splenic injury in soccer goalies because of blunt abdominal trauma sustained during game play. Although abdominal organ injuries are uncommon in soccer, emergency medicine and primary care physicians must be aware of the possibility. A high index of suspicion and careful physical examination are key in making the diagnosis.

Biomechanical analysis of the splenic avulsion mechanism

The spleen is a frequently injured abdominal organ in road accidents, with an injury frequency close to 30%. The splenic avulsion exhibit a significant ratio of morbidity. It is clinically described as the complete failure of the pancreatico-splenic ligament (PSL) which is composed of splenic vessels and connective tissues. What are the biomechanical mechanisms involved with spleen avulsion? Is it possible to quantify tolerance levels of PSL structure? The current work combines both experimental and finite element (FE) investigations to determine the splenic avulsion process. Tensile tests on 13 PSL samples were performed up to failure. The experimental results provide reference data for model validation and showed a failure process starting at a peak force of 70±34 N combined with a peak strain of 105±26%. In an attempt to identify possible vessel ruptures within the PSL, a FE model of the PSL was developed including both vessels and connective tissues. The vessel wall behaviour up to failure was reproduced using an Ogden law and calibrated by inverse analysis according to literature data. The connective tissues function was modelled by a cohesion-loss interface. Once model correlation to experimental results was achieved, numerical simulation revealed that haemorrhage could occur even before the maximum peak is reached. Indeed, the first vessel ruptures were recorded at a strain of 92% at the upper lobe vein.

Return to play after liver and spleen trauma

CONTEXT

Sport-related spleen and liver injuries pose a challenge for the physician. Although rare, these injuries can have serious and even life-threatening outcomes if not accurately diagnosed and managed in a timely fashion. Currently, there are no evidence-based guidelines on duration and intensity of restricted activity and return to play after spleen and liver injury. In addition, there is controversy on follow-up imaging after injury.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed was searched using the terms splenic or spleen and trauma and hepatic or liver and trauma from 1980 to 2013. The citations from sentinel papers were also reviewed.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

RESULTS

Ultrasound is ideal in the unstable athlete. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic and hepatic injuries is recommended for hemodynamically stable patients regardless of injury grade, patient age, or presence of associated injuries. Follow-up imaging is not routinely recommended unless clinically indicated. Athletes may engage in light activity for the first 3 months after injury and then gradual return to unrestricted activity as tolerated. High-level athletes may choose splenectomy or serial imaging for faster return to play.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice in stable athletes with blunt abdominal trauma.

STRENGTH-OF-RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY

C.

Disruption of splenic circulation using microbubble-enhanced ultrasound and prothrombin: a preliminary study

The spleen is a solid organ in which splenomegaly frequently develops and to which abdominal blunt trauma occurs. In this study, we demonstrated the potential therapeutic effect of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound (MEUS) combined with prothrombin to disrupt splenic circulation. A high-pressure-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) device was used to treat 36 surgically exposed spleens in healthy New Zealand rabbits. Eighteen spleens were treated with either MEUS (n = 9) or MEUS combined with prothrombin (n = 9). The other 18 spleens were treated with TUS only or sham ultrasound exposure and served as the controls. The TUS was operated at a frequency of 831 kHz and a peak negative pressure of 4.8 MPa. Prothrombin was administered intravenously at 20 IU/kg. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic quantification were performed to assess splenic blood perfusion. We found significant blood perfusion slowdown and drop-off in the MEUS-treated spleens. The peak intensity dropped from 20.2 ± 2.70 dB to 11.6 ± 4.58 dB immediately after treatment. The spleens treated with the combination of MEUS and prothrombin showed consistently poor perfusion within 1 h. In histologic examination of the MEUS-treated spleens, we found significant dilatation of splenic sinuses, hemorrhage, interstitial edema and thrombosis. This study demonstrated that the vascular effects induced by microbubble-enhanced, high-pressure ultrasound can slow down or block blood perfusion in the rabbit spleen. Prothrombin helps to enhance and extend the effects for up to 1 h.

Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs

Background

In recent years there has been increasing interest shown in the nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt traumatic injury. The growing use of NOM for blunt abdominal organ injury has been made possible because of the progress made in the quality and availability of the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan and the development of minimally invasive intervention options such as angioembolization.

Aim

The purpose of this review is to describe the changes that have been made over the past decades in the management of blunt trauma to the liver, spleen and kidney.

Results

The management of blunt abdominal injury has changed considerably. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination has replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage as diagnostic modality in the primary survey. MDCT scanning with intravenous contrast is now the gold standard diagnostic modality in hemodynamically stable patients with intra-abdominal fluid detected with FAST. One of the current discussions in the literature is whether a whole body MDCT survey should be implemented in the primary survey.

Surgical intensive care unit--the trauma surgery perspective

PURPOSE

This review addresses and summarizes the key issues and unique specific intensive care treatment of adult patients from the trauma surgery perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cornerstones of successful surgical intensive care management are fluid resuscitation, transfusion protocol and extracorporeal organ replacement therapies. The injury-type specific complications and unique pathophysiologic regulatory mechanisms of the traumatized patients influencing the critical care treatment are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Furthermore, the fundamental knowledge of the injury severity, understanding of the trauma mechanism, surgical treatment strategies and specific techniques of surgical intensive care are pointed out as essentials for a successful intensive care therapy.

Pediatric Polytrauma Management

Caring for pediatric trauma patients requires an understanding of the distinct anatomy and pathophysiology of the pediatric population compared to adult trauma patients. Initial evaluation, management, and resuscitation are performed as a multidisciplinary approach including pediatric physicians, trauma surgeons, and pediatric intensive care physicians. Head injury severity is the principle determinant of outcome and mortality in polytraumatized children. Abdominal injuries rarely require surgery in contrast to adults, but need to be detected. Spine and pelvic injuries as well as injuries of the extremities require age-adapted surgical procedures. However, the degree of recovery in polytraumatized children is often remarkable, even after apparently devastating injuries. Maximal care should, therefore, be rendered under the assumption that a complete recovery will be made.

Disparities in the delivery of pediatric trauma care

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. During the last few decades, trauma systems have evolved to improve the care of the injured with an ultimate goal of saving lives. As a result, pediatric trauma centers (PTC) have been established to optimize outcomes for injured children. We sought to determine whether injured children treated at PTC or adult trauma centers (ATC) with added qualifications to treat injured children receive better trauma care than those treated at other hospitals or trauma centers.

METHODS

We reviewed more than 60 published studies on pediatric trauma outcomes. The studies included registry analysis: single and multihospital experience; abdominal, head and neck, and thoracic trauma; as well as functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The data show that most injured children are not treated at PTC due to the geographically limited distribution of such specialized care, lack of pediatric surgeons, and other specialists. These limitations create persistent disparities in outcomes for injured children depending on where they are treated. Some of the larger database analyses suggest lower mortality rate, better outcome for nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal injuries, and improved overall functional outcome for those children treated at PTC. However, others fail to demonstrate differences for children treated at ATC or ATC with added qualifications.

CONCLUSION

Although this analysis does not provide a definitive answer to the question as to which type of trauma center provides better care for injured pediatric patients, it identifies current gaps and disparities in the care of injured children that can be remedied through education and training.

Management Differences for Pediatric Solid Organ Injuries in a Rural State

Pediatric liver and spleen injuries are frequently treated in specialized hospitals. Not all injured children, however, are treated in referral centers. We evaluated the management of pediatric liver and spleen injuries in a rural state without a state trauma system to determine if differences existed between trauma centers and nontrauma centers. A state database was queried for patients ≤15-years-old who suffered liver and spleen injuries from 2003 to 2005. Iatrogenic injuries were excluded. There were 115 pediatric liver and 183 pediatric spleen injuries. Fifty per cent of liver and 63 per cent of spleen injuries in nontrauma centers were isolated solid organ injuries compared with 18 per cent and 36 per cent, respectively, in trauma centers. The mortality rate for both liver and spleen injuries was similar in trauma and nontrauma centers. Hospital charges were higher in trauma centers but this was due to patients with associated injuries. The nonoperative management rate was similar for liver injuries. Pediatric patients with splenic injuries had a lower rate of nonoperative management in nontrauma centers (75% to 90%, nontrauma vs trauma). In Kentucky, pediatric solid organ injuries are usually managed nonoperatively in both trauma and nontrauma centers, but trauma centers cared for fewer isolated solid organ injuries.

Staphylococcus aureus infection after splenectomy and splenic autotransplantation in BALB/c mice

Splenectomy results in an increased risk of sepsis. The autogenous transplant of the spleen is an option for preserving splenic functions after total splenectomy. In this study, the capacity of animals undergoing autogenous spleen transplantation to respond to Staphylococcus aureus infection was investigated. BALB/c mice were divided into three groups: splenectomy followed by autotransplantation in the retroperitonium (AT), splenectomized only (SP) and operated non-splenectomized sham control (CT). Thirty days after surgery the mice were infected intravenously with S. aureus. Splenectomized mice had a higher number of colony-forming units (CFU) of S. aureus in liver and lungs in comparison with either AT or with CT mice (P < 0.05). Higher CFU numbers in lung of SP mice correlated with elevated production of interleukin-10 associated with a lower production of interferon-gamma and tumour necrosis factor-alpha. However, systemically, the level of tumour necrosis factor-alpha was higher in the SP group than in CT or AT. Lower titres of specific anti-S. aureus immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG1 were observed 6 days after infection in SP mice in comparison either with the AT or CT groups. Thus, splenectomy is detrimental to the immune response of BALB/c mice against infection by S. aureus which can be re-established by autogenous implantation of the spleen.

Is Splenectomy after Trauma an Endangered Species?

Nonoperative management of splenic trauma is now the most common treatment modality for splenic injuries and splenectomy has almost disappeared in some trauma centers. Splenectomy for cancer staging is infrequently performed suggesting that the indications for splenectomy continue to evolve. We evaluated a state database to assess a communitywide experience with splenic surgery. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes were used to determine the indication for splenic surgery. Indications for splenic surgery were listed as trauma (injury codes), medical (hematological diseases, neoplasms, or procedures in which the spleen might be removed contiguously like distal pancreatectomy), or incidental (noncontiguous procedures). Splenectomies for medical indications (n = 607, 43%) were more common than splenectomies for trauma (n = 518, 37%) or incidental splenectomies (n = 276, 20%). Splenectomy for medical reasons was associated with hematologic disease in 56 per cent, neoplastic disease in 34 per cent, and other diagnoses in 10 per cent of cases. Incidental splenectomies were most commonly associated with operations on the esophagus/stomach (32%) and colon (30%). Mortality rate and length of stay were greatest for incidental (14.4 ± 0.9 days, 10.9% mortality) compared with trauma (11.0 ± 0.5 days, 7.7% mortality) or medical (9.7 ± 0.4 days, 4.8% mortality) splenectomies (all P < 0.05 versus incidental). Our results suggest that in the era of nonoperative management of splenic injuries, medical indications now represent the most common reason for splenectomy. As laparoscopic techniques for elective splenectomy become more common, the changing indication for splenectomy has important ramifications for surgical education and training.

Prior studies comparing outcomes from trauma care at children's hospitals versus adult hospitals

Current evidence suggests that the majority of injured children are not treated in a pediatric trauma center. This review failed to provide a definitive answer to the question of whether injured children treated at children's hospitals or adult hospitals with a dedicated pediatric unit have better outcomes than those treated at adult hospitals. However, it identified areas that have been addressed, and more importantly, uncovered others that are largely unanswered. In lieu of a prospective randomized trial, the next best way to address these unsolved issues would be a prospective collection of data with careful attention to assessing injury severity, physiologic response to the injury, associated injuries and comorbidities, along with resuscitation techniques, hospital resources, and manpower training.

Effect of esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy on schistossomal portal hypertension patients' immunity

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of hemorrhagic complication in schistosomal portal hypertension in our hospital is an esophagogastric devascularization procedure with splenectomy. Infectious risks and immunological alterations imputed to splenectomy may have significant importance. To minimize the consequences of spleen absence, the use of subtotal splenectomy and spleen auto-transplantation were stimulated. AIM: To verify the immunologic alterations imposed by this procedure in our patients. METHOD: Twenty-eight patients with schistosomal portal hypertension and previous history of upper digestive bleeding due to esophagogastric varices rupture underwent elective esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy. They were prospectively studied before esophagogastric devascularization procedure with splenectomy, 15 and 30 days, 3 and 6 months after the procedure. T and B-lymphocytes, CD4 and CD8 subpopulations were determinated by monoclonal antibodies. Immunoglobulins A, M, G and C3, C4 components of the complement were determinated by radial immunodiffusion. RESULTS: We observed important reduction of all immune cells, increase of IgG and normal levels of IgM, IgA, C3 and C4 at preoperative. CD4/CD8 relation was normal. Six months after esophagogastric devascularization procedure with splenectomy, significant increase in T-lymphocytes, CD4, CD8 and B-lymphocytes were observed. CD4/CD8 relation remained normal. We noted significant increase in C3. IgA, IgM, IgG and C4 had increased, but without significant difference. CONCLUSION: Esophagogastric devascularization procedure with splenectomy determines an increase in T and B-lymphocytes, CD4 and CD8 subpopulations without compromising immunoglobulins and components of complement levels.

Failure of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nonoperative management of the spleen has been the conventional approach for dealing with blunt splenic injury in children for 25 years. Following acceptance in the field of pediatric surgery, nonoperative management of blunt injury to the liver and spleen became the template in adult trauma surgery. It has proven to be of unequivocal benefit to the majority of hemodynamically stable pediatric and adult patients who have suffered blunt liver or splenic trauma. Offsetting these gains, has been the presence of failures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature has focused on factors which may impact the nonoperative management success or failure rate. These factors include initiation of guidelines, risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, character of clinical judgment, role of computed tomography in detecting associated intraabdominal injuries, the presence of more than one solid organ injury, risk of associated hollow viscus injury, and the drawbacks of angioembolization.

SUMMARY

Despite the failures of nonoperative management outlined in this review, the approach has been generally successful. Efforts at improving organ salvage rates and diminishing failures with this approach continue. Notwithstanding our enthusiasm to advance this method of patient care, we must avoid imperiling a subpopulation of patients in our attempt to improve nonoperative management success rates.

Nonoperative management of severe blunt splenic injury: are we getting better?

BACKGROUND

Most minor splenic injuries are readily treated nonoperatively but controversy exists regarding the role of nonoperative management for higher-grade injuries. The infrequency of these injuries has made evaluation of factors critical to their management difficult.

METHODS

Through the National Trauma Data Bank, 3,085 adults sustaining severe (Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or = 4) blunt splenic injury from 1997 to 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient management, demographic information, physiologic data, procedures performed, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nonoperative management was attempted in 40.5% of patients but ultimately failed in 54.6% of those. Failure of nonoperative management was associated with increased age, low admission systolic blood pressure, higher injury severity score, and increased hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Mortality associated with failure of nonoperative management (12.3%) and successful observation (13.8%) was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of higher-grade splenic injuries is associated with a high rate of failure and prolonged hospital stay. Careful judgment must be exercised in applying nonoperative management to patients with severe splenic injuries.

[Surgical management of abdominal injury]

PURPOSE

Accompanying abdominal injuries are frequent in multiply injured patients and are a common cause of death. A search of the literature was performed focusing on key aspects of initial surgical procedures in abdominal injury.

METHODS

Literature was searched utilizing PubMed Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI) database. The articles were classified according to the level of evidence following the suggestions of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine.

RESULTS

Vertical laparotomy should be favored for the initial surgical therapy of abdominal injury. Especially in instable patients, principles of "damage control surgery" should be applied. In case of hollow organ injury, a primary anastomosis should be made whenever possible. A hand suture is most suitable for this.

DISCUSSION

Non-surgical treatment of blunt abdominal injury is gaining in importance. However, if a surgical intervention is recommended, especially in hemodynamic, instable patients, damage control principles should be favored.

A new spleen-preserving technique using radiofrequency ablation technology

BACKGROUND

Splenic salvage is the ultimate goal of the treatment for splenic injury. We experimentally investigated a spleen salvage technique after spleen injury using radiofrequency ablation technology.

METHODS

A grade IV spleen trauma was produced in 10 white male Landrace pigs (the lower pole of the spleen was sharply divided at the level where the lower hilar vessel enters the organ) under general anesthesia. A Radionics Cooltip Radio Frequency needle was used to stop the bleeding in every case. The electrode was inserted in four to six different sites and each session lasted for 2 to 6 minutes.

RESULTS

All bleeding sites were controlled intraoperatively with no additional means. Postoperatively, all animals appeared clinically healthy, and at the time the animals were killed, no blood, pus, or other fluid was identified in the abdomen or chest. Subcapsular or perisplenic hematomas were not found either.

CONCLUSION

We believe that radiofrequency ablation may be used in splenic injury to stop bleeding, especially when blood transfusion or surgery is indicated. This procedure may reduce the frequency of open surgery for repair of the injury, the number of splenectomies, and the amount of blood transfusion required. The advantage of use under ultrasound or computed tomographic guidance or laparoscopically makes it even more appealing. Thus, we suggest that further study in human subjects is required to validate our results.

[Medical imaging in the management of abdominal trauma]

There is a marked trend toward nonoperative management of abdominal trauma. This has been possible thanks to the advances in imaging and interventional techniques. Computed tomography (CT), angiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can guide the nonoperative management of abdominal trauma.

Is anything new in adult blunt splenic trauma?

Several decades ago, a shift occurred in the management of adult splenic injuries. Influenced by the experience in pediatric trauma patients, adult trauma surgeons began turning from mandatory operative treatment of all splenic injuries toward nonoperative management. Nonoperative treatment is now the most common method of management for patients with splenic injuries and is the most common method of splenic salvage. However, controversy exists about how to appropriately select patients for nonoperative treatment since bleeding from splenic injuries can incur significant morbidity and mortality. Recent refinements in the management of adult blunt splenic injuries will be reviewed.

A novel spleen-preserving laparoscopic technique using radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model

BACKGROUND

Partial splenectomy is considered to be the optimal management for a variety of diseases. At the same time, laparoscopic procedures are increasingly used because they present certain advantages against their open counterparts. In this study, the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were evaluated in laparoscopic partial splenectomy performed in a pig model.

METHODS

Eight domestic pigs were used. Four abdominal trocars were inserted under general anesthesia and the spleen was stabilized with laparoscopic clamps. A RFA needle electrode was inserted transcutaneously, and coagulative necrosis of a zone of the splenic parenchyma between the body and the lower pole was performed. Bloodless sharp division and removal of the lower pole followed. After 0, 7, 30, or 120 days, the animals were killed and examined.

RESULTS

Blood loss and operation time were minimal. Mortality and morbidity were zero. No abnormal findings were encountered during the postmortem abdominal exploration.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic RFA-assisted partial splenectomy. The RFA-assisted laparoscopic partial splenectomy adds a novel technique to the surgeon's armamentarium for the preservation of a part of the spleen.

Abdominal and pelvic trauma in children

Trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children. More than 90% of pediatric trauma admissions are the result of a blunt mechanism. Although injury to the abdomen and pelvis account for only 10% of injuries sustained by victims of pediatric trauma, they can be potentially life threatening. Optimal evaluation of the injured child may require the use of multiple diagnostic modalities. The spleen is the most frequently injured intra-abdominal organ, followed by the liver, intestine, and pancreas. Fortunately, the majority of injuries to the spleen and liver can be treated nonoperatively. Conversely, injuries involving the intestine and pancreas often require operative intervention.