Renal transplantation following previous heart, liver, and lung transplantation: an 8-year single-center experience

Incidence of end-stage renal disease after heart transplantation and effect of its treatment on survival

Aims

Many heart transplant recipients will develop end‐stage renal disease in the post‐operative course. The aim of this study was to identify the long‐term incidence of end‐stage renal disease, determine its risk factors, and investigate what subsequent therapy was associated with the best survival.

Methods and results

A retrospective, single‐centre study was performed in all adult heart transplant patients from 1984 to 2016. Risk factors for end‐stage renal disease were analysed by means of multivariable regression analysis and survival by means of Kaplan–Meier. Of 685 heart transplant recipients, 71 were excluded: 64 were under 18 years of age and seven were re‐transplantations. During a median follow‐up of 8.6 years, 121 (19.7%) patients developed end‐stage renal disease: 22 received conservative therapy, 80 were treated with dialysis (46 haemodialysis and 34 peritoneal dialysis), and 19 received a kidney transplant. Development of end‐stage renal disease (examined as a time‐dependent variable) inferred a hazard ratio of 6.45 (95% confidence interval 4.87–8.54, P < 0.001) for mortality. Tacrolimus‐based therapy decreased, and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy increased the risk for end‐stage renal disease development (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.62, P < 0.001, and hazard ratio 4.18, 95% confidence interval 2.30–7.59, P < 0.001, respectively). Kidney transplantation was associated with the best median survival compared with dialysis or conservative therapy: 6.4 vs. 2.2 vs. 0.3 years (P < 0.0001), respectively, after end‐stage renal disease development.

Conclusions

End‐stage renal disease is a frequent complication after heart transplant and is associated with poor survival. Kidney transplantation resulted in the longest survival of patients with end‐stage renal disease.

Outcomes in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients After Prior Nonkidney Transplants

BACKGROUND

Recipients of nonkidney solid organ transplants (nkSOT) are living longer, and 11%-18% will develop end stage renal disease (ESRD). While our general inclination is to treat nkSOT recipients who develop ESRD with a kidney transplant (KT), an increasing number are developing ESRD at an older age where KT may not be the most appropriate treatment. It is possible that the risk of older age and prior nkSOT might synergize to make KT too risky, but this has never been explored.

METHODS

To examine death-censored graft loss and mortality for KT recipients with and without prior nkSOT, we used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to identify 42 089 older (age ≥65) KT recipients between 1995 and 2016. Additionally, to better understand treatment options for these patients and survival benefit of KT, we identified 5023 older (age ≥65) with prior nkSOT recipients listed for subsequent KT, of whom 863 received transplants.

RESULTS

Compared with 41 159 older KT recipients without prior nkSOT, death-censored graft loss was similar (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93-1.37, P = 0.2), but mortality (aHR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.28-1.54, P < 0.001) was greater for older KT recipients with prior nkSOT. Nonetheless, in a survival benefit model (survival with versus without the transplant), among older prior nkSOT recipients, KT decreased the risk of mortality by more than half (aHR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.42-0.54, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older prior nkSOT recipients who subsequently develop ESRD derive survival benefit from KT, but graft longevity is limited by overall survival in this population. These findings can help guide patient counseling for this challenging population.

Renal transplantation outcomes following heart and heart-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease is a frequent complication following heart and combined heart-lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of a subsequent renal transplant in heart, lung and heart-lung transplantation recipients.

METHODS

All heart, lung and heart-lung transplant recipients who received a subsequent renal transplant over a 27-year period in a national heart and lung transplant centre were included in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients who had previously undergone heart (n = 6), lung (n = 7) and heart-lung (n = 5) transplantation received a renal transplant. The mean duration to development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was 115 ± 45.9 months. The most common contributor to ESKD was calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. The 5-year patient survival and graft survival rates were 91.7 and 85.6%, respectively. The median creatinine level at the most recent follow-up was 123 μmol/L, IQR 90.8-147.5.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall outcome of renal transplantation following previous non-renal solid organ transplantation is excellent considering the medical complexity and co-morbidities of this patient population. Renal transplantation represents an important treatment option for ESKD in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients after nonrenal solid organ transplantation show low alloreactivity but an increased risk of infection

The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) after nonrenal solid organ transplantation (SOT) has increased to almost 5%. Knowledge on patient and allograft outcomes, infections, and alloreactivity, however, remains scarce. We studied 40 KTRs after nonrenal SOT. Seven hundred and twenty primary KTRs and 119 repeat KTRs were used for comparison. Samples were collected pretransplantation, at +1, +2, and +3 months post-transplantation. Alloreactive and CMV-specific T cells were measured by interferon-γ ELISPOT assay. Patient survival in KTRs after SOT, primary and repeat KTRs was comparable. While death-censored allograft survival was comparable between KTRs after SOT and primary KTRs, KTRs after SOT showed superior 5-year death-censored allograft survival of 92.5% compared to 81.2% in repeat KTRs. Interestingly, KTRs after SOT show less preformed panel-reactive antibodies, frequencies of alloreactive T cells, and acute rejections compared to repeat KTRs. KTRs after SOT, however, show higher incidences of EBV viremia and PTLD, sepsis, and death from sepsis. Impaired CMV-specific cellular immunity was associated with more CMV replication compared to repeat KTRs. Our results suggest comparable patient and allograft outcomes in KTRs after SOT and primary KTRs. The observed low alloreactivity may contribute to excellent allograft outcomes. Caution should be taken in KTRs after SOT regarding infectious complications due to overimmunosuppression.

Kidney transplantation as a therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease developing after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Progressive renal failure is a frequent complication after heart transplantation (HTx). It may result in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), prompting consideration of kidney Tx after HTx (KAH).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center study of 268 HTx recipients to evaluate outcomes after KAH compared with HTx recipients with and without ESRD.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 76 months, ESRD developed in 51 patients (19), and 39 of them (76%) underwent KAH. The mean time from HTx to ESRD was 83 months. The incidence of switching to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen based on sirolimus was significantly lower among recipients with ESRD (6% vs 57%, p = 0.0001), and prolonged exposure to CNI significantly increased the risk for ESRD (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.15; p < 0.005). Death-censored renal graft survival after KAH was 95%, 95%, and 83% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Median long-term survival of KAH patients was comparable to HTx recipients without ESRD (17.5 vs 17.1 years, p = 0.27) and significantly better compared with HTx recipients with ESRD (17.5 vs 7.3 years, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged exposure to CNI immunosuppression medications significantly increases the risk for ESRD among HTx recipients. KAH is a good therapeutic option for HTx recipients with ESRD, with survival benefit comparable to HTx without ESRD.

Heart Transplantation

Although the number of available donor hearts severely limits the epidemiologic impact of heart transplantation on patients with heart failure, patients with end-stage heart failure unresponsive to medical management currently have no other viable alternatives. Destination therapy with a ventricular assist device is the closest toward approaching clinical reality but has been plagued with problems of infection and stroke. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent developments in the field that may broaden the clinical impact of heart transplantation. For example, novel methods of cardiac preservation are being designed to safely evaluate and utilize “extended criteria” donors. Surgical techniques and medical management have reduced the incidence of postoperative right heart failure, and immunosuppressive regimens promise to limit chronic graft vascular disease.

Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options

Renal dysfunction after heart transplantation is a frequently observed complication, in some cases resulting in significant limitation of quality of life and reduced survival. Since the pathophysiology of renal failure (RF) is multifactorial, the current etiologic paradigm for chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation relies on the concept of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity acting on a predisposed recipient. Until recently, the management of RF has been restricted to the minimization of CNI dosage and general avoidance of classic nephrotoxic risk factors, with somewhat limited success. The recent introduction of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) (sirolimus and everolimus), a new class of immunosuppressive drugs lacking intrinsic nephrotoxicity, has provided a completely new alternative in this clinical setting. As clinical experience with these new drugs increases, new renal-sparing strategies are becoming available. PSIs can be used in combination with reduced doses of CNIs and even in complete CNI-free protocols. Different strategies have been devised, including de novo use to avoid acute renal toxicity in high-risk patients immediately after transplantation, or more delayed introduction in those patients developing chronic RF after prolonged CNI exposure. In this review, the main information on the clinical relevance and pathophysiology of RF after heart transplantation, as well as the currently available experience with renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens, particularly focused on the use of PSIs, is reviewed and summarized, including the key practical points for their appropriate clinical usage.

Long-term successful outcomes from kidney transplantation after lung and heart-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction is common after lung and heart-lung transplantation (Tx), and it limits the recipient's survival and quality of life. This study analyzed the outcomes of simultaneous and late kidney Tx following lung and heart-lung Tx.

METHODS

From a single-center retrospective chart review of 1031 lung and heart-lung Tx recipients, we identified 13 simultaneous or late kidney Tx cases in 12 patients.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent simultaneous deceased donor lung and kidney Tx. Eight patients underwent lung and heart-lung Tx, followed by nine living donor kidney Tx (including one ABO-incompatible Tx). One additional patient underwent a late deceased donor kidney Tx following heart-lung Tx. The median time from lung and heart-lung Tx to later kidney Tx was 127 (interquartile range [IQR], 23 to 263) months. Three patients died, 1 of sepsis, 1 of multiple organ failure, and 1 of transplant coronary disease. At a median follow-up of 33 (IQR, 10 to 51) months, 9 patients are alive and well. Eight patients required dialysis before kidney Tx for a median time of 14 months (IQR, 5 to 49). Kidney graft loss occurred in 1 patient at 51 months. After kidney Tx, dialysis was necessary in association with acute allograft dysfunction in 2 patients. No acute kidney rejection has been detected in any patient. Treatable acute lung rejection was seen in 1 patient. Well-preserved pulmonary function was noted in recipients of late kidney Tx.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous kidney Tx and late deceased donor kidney Tx have challenges in the setting of lung Tx. By contrast, late living related kidney Tx after lung Tx is associated with excellent long-term survival and acceptable kidney and lung allograft function.

The influence of induction therapy for kidney transplantation after a non-renal transplant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-renal transplant recipients who subsequently develop ESRD and undergo kidney transplantation are medically and immunologically complex due to comorbidities, high cumulative exposure to immunosuppressants, and sensitization to alloantigen from the prior transplant. Although prior non-renal transplant recipients are one of the fastest growing segments of the kidney wait list, minimal data exist to guide the use of antibody induction therapy (IT+) at the time of kidney after lung (KALu), heart (KAH), and liver (KALi) transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This retrospective cohort study used national registry data to examine IT use and survival after kidney transplantation. Separate multivariate Cox regression models were constructed to assess patient survival for IT+ and IT- KALu (n=232), KAH (n=588), and KALi (n=736) recipients.

RESULTS

Use of IT increased during the study period. The percentage of patients considered highly sensitized (panel reactive antibody ≥20%) was not statistically significant between IT+ and IT- groups. IT+ was not associated with improvement in 1- and 10-year patient survival for KALu (P=0.20 and P=0.22, respectively) or for KAH (P=0.90 and P=0.14, respectively). However, IT+ among KALi was associated with inferior patient survival at 1 and 10 years (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IT for kidney transplantation among prior non-renal transplant recipients may not offer a survival advantage in KALu or KAH. However, due to limited power, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. IT+ was associated with inferior outcomes for KALi. Use of IT should be judicially reconsidered in this complex group of recipients.

Peritoneal dialysis in transplant recipient patients: outcomes and management

Transplant recipient patients performing dialysis represent a growing population in the integrated model of renal replacement therapy. This includes both patients with kidney allograft loss and non-renal organ transplant recipients requiring dialysis. Although a number of possible advantages of peritoneal dialysis over haemodialysis could hypothetically favour its choice when starting dialysis, peritoneal dialysis penetration is relatively residual in this population. Questions about its safety and adequacy in these patients can explain this fact. The purpose of this review is to address unfounded fears and document evidence that peritoneal dialysis should be considered a viable and safe choice in patients returning to dialysis. Specific issues that still need further investigation are also discussed.

Peritoneal dialysis after nonrenal solid organ transplantation: clinical outcomes and practical considerations

The incidence of end-stage renal disease following nonrenal solid organ transplantation (NRSOT) is increasing and is associated with a poor prognosis. The etiology of end-stage renal disease is multifactorial, with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity being primarily responsible. The impact of dialysis modality on the survival of these patients remains unclear. Peritoneal dialysis appears to be a feasible and safe option for renal replacement therapy in NRSOT patients. Concerns that NRSOT patients are at a higher risk of infectious and noninfectious complications necessitate practical considerations when prescribing and planning for peritoneal dialysis in these patients. While nephrotoxicity is a well-recognized complication of long-term CNI use, "peritoneotoxic" effects with significant alterations in peritoneal membrane structure and function have recently been described. Further study including the role of CNI-free immunotherapy protocols to optimize the outcomes of NRSOT recipients is needed.

Wait list death and survival benefit of kidney transplantation among nonrenal transplant recipients

The disparity between the number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation and the limited supply of kidney allografts has renewed interest in the benefit from kidney transplantation experienced by different groups. This study evaluated kidney transplant survival benefit in prior nonrenal transplant recipients (kidney after liver, KALi; lung, KALu; heart, KAH) compared to primary isolated (KA1) or repeat isolated kidney (KA2) transplant. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit using UNOS data for patients wait listed and transplanted from 1995 to 2008. Compared to KA1, the risk of death on the wait list was lower for KA2 (p < 0.001;HR = 0.84;CI = 0.81-0.88), but substantially higher for KALu (p < 0.001; HR = 3.80;CI = 3.08-4.69), KAH (p < 0.001; HR = 1.92; CI = 1.66-2.22), and KALi (p < 0.001; HR = 2.69; CI = 2.46-2.95). Following kidney transplant, patient survival was greatest for KA1, similar among KA2, KALi, KAH, and inferior for KALu. Compared to the entire wait list, renal transplantation was associated with a survival benefit among all groups except KALu (p = 0.017; HR = 1.61; CI = 1.09-2.38), where posttransplant survival was inferior to the wait list population. Recipients of KA1 kidney transplantation have the greatest posttransplant survival and compared to the overall kidney wait list, the greatest survival benefit.

An emerging population: kidney transplant candidates who are placed on the waiting list after liver, heart, and lung transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ESRD has an adverse impact on patients who have had previous nonrenal solid-organ transplants (NRTxs; liver, heart, lung) and may be referred for a kidney transplant (KTx).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for all KTx candidates who had NRTx and were listed between 1995 and 2008, incidence of NRTx listings were compared with trends in KTx without NRTX. The efficacy of kidney transplantation relative to dialysis was measured in time-dependent Cox models that incorporated candidates with the applicable previous organ transplant as a reference group.

RESULTS

Overall, 4904 NRTx candidates were listed during the study period, growing from <1% of candidates before 1995 to 3.3% in 2008. A total of 38% of NRTx candidates were listed preemptively versus 21% of other candidates. NRTx candidates had dramatically shorter half-lives (≤ 4 years) after listing compared with previous KTx recipients (9.2 years). KTx demonstrated a survival advantage for each type of NRTx candidate relative to maintenance dialysis. Listing for expanded-criteria donor kidneys averaged 47% and did not differ significantly by previous transplant category.

CONCLUSIONS

KTx candidates who are placed on the waiting list after NRTx constitute a significant and more rapidly growing cohort compared with the general KTx candidate population. NRTx candidates are frequently listed preemptively but have rapid decline once placed on the waiting list. Targeted use of expanded-criteria donor and living-donor transplants in the NRTx population may be particularly important given their high mortality on the waiting list.

Kidney transplantation in previous heart or lung recipients

Outcomes after heart and lung transplants have improved, and many recipients survive long enough to develop secondary renal failure, yet remain healthy enough to undergo kidney transplantation. We used national data reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to evaluate outcomes of 568 kidney after heart (KAH) and 210 kidney after lung (KAL) transplants performed between 1995 and 2008. Median time to kidney transplant was 100.3 months after heart, and 90.2 months after lung transplant. Renal failure was attributed to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in most patients. Outcomes were compared with primary kidney recipients using matched controls (MC) to account for donor, recipient and graft characteristics. Although 5-year renal graft survival was lower than primary kidney recipients (61% KAH vs. 73.8% MC, p < 0.001; 62.6% KAL vs. 82.9% MC, p < 0.001), death-censored graft survival was comparable (84.9% KAH vs. 88.2% MC, p = 0.1; 87.6% KAL vs. 91.8% MC, p = 0.6). Furthermore, renal transplantation reduced the risk of death compared with dialysis by 43% for KAH and 54% for KAL recipients. Our findings that renal grafts function well and provide survival benefit in KAH and KAL recipients, but are limited in longevity by the general life expectancy of these recipients, might help inform clinical decision-making and allocation in this population.

Should heart, lung, and liver transplant recipients receive immunosuppression induction for kidney transplantation?

As the outcomes of heart, liver, and lung transplantation continue to improve, more patients will present for subsequent renal transplantation. It remains unclear whether these patients benefit from induction immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed induction on solid organ graft recipients who underwent renal transplant at our center from January 1, 1995 to March 30, 2007. Induction and the non-induction groups were compared by univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. There were 21 patients in each group, with mean follow-up of 4.5-6.0 years. Forty-seven percent of patients receiving induction had a severe post-operative infection, compared with 28.6% in the non-induction group (p = NS). The one yr rejection rate in the induction group was 9.5% compared with 14.3% for non-induction (p = NS). One-yr graft survival was 81.0% and 95.2% in the induction and non-induction group (p = NS). In summary, there is a trend toward lower patient and graft survival among patients undergoing induction. These trends could relate to selection bias in the decision to prescribe induction immunosuppression, but further study is needed to better define the risks and benefits of antibody-induction regimens in this population.

Renal disease in recipients of nonrenal solid organ transplantation

Worldwide, more than 250,000 individuals who have received a liver, heart, lung, or intestinal transplant are living longer. Twenty percent to 25% of these recipients experience perioperative acute renal failure, with 10% to 15% requiring renal replacement therapy. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also highly prevalent, affecting 30% to 50% of the nonrenal organ transplant population with an annual end-stage renal disease risk of 1.5% to 2.0%. Both acute renal failure and CKD contribute to increased morbidity and premature mortality. The dominant causative factor for renal disorders seen in nonrenal transplant recipients are the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and rapamycin analogues, which singly or in combination lead to a variety of nephrotoxic injury. However, 25% to 30% of nonrenal transplant recipients with CKD have other conditions such as hypertension, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, and hepatitis C infection as the principal underlying cause. Management strategies for renal disease in the nonrenal transplant recipients include the following: (1) delayed introduction of CNI after graft implantation, (2) withdrawal or minimization of long-term CNI therapy, (3) timely use of an appropriate dialysis modality, and (4) expeditious introduction of supportive measures such as anemia management, phosphate binding therapy, and dietary modification. Compared with maintenance dialysis, kidney transplantation reduces long-term mortality by 60% to 70% in nonrenal transplant recipients with end-stage renal disease.

Risk stratification for renal transplantation after cardiac or lung transplantation: single-center experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival after heart (HTx) or lung (LuTx) transplantation increases the risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). After HTx ESRD was reported to enhance mortality, and kidney transplantation (KTx) was shown to improve survival. However, prognostic factors in ESRD after HTx or LuTx are largely unknown.

METHODS

Single-center observational study in HTx and LuTx patients who accessed the KTx waiting list; baseline characteristics were correlated with mortality.

RESULTS

KTx was performed in 15 of 65 study patients. Survival was comparable on the KTx waiting list and in reference patients from the same center without ESRD. KTx significantly improved survival (5 years' survival 84.6% with KTx vs. 56.5% on the KTx waiting list, p = 0.030). None of the baseline parameters predicted mortality in the KTx group. Only on the KTx waiting list BMI (median 24.7 vs. 20.7; p < 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, median 63 vs. 53%, p < 0.008) significantly correlated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for mortality after HTx or LuTx is not increased by ESRD, provided that patients meet access criteria for the KTx waiting list. KTx improves survival in ESRD after HTx or LuTx. BMI and LVEF may predict outcome in HTx/LuTx patients on the KTx waiting list.

Switch to 1.5 grams MMF monotherapy for CNI-related toxicity in liver transplantation is safe and improves renal function, dyslipidemia, and hypertension

Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy has been successfully used in liver transplant recipients suffering from calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-related chronic toxicity, still no consensus has been reached on its safety, efficacy and tolerability. We attempted the complete weaning off CNI in 42 individuals presenting chronic renal dysfunction and/or dyslipidemia and/or arterial hypertension and simultaneously introduced 1.5 gm/day MMF. CNI could be completely withdrawn in 41 cases. A total of 32 (75%) patients are currently on <or=1.5 gm/day of MMF. Mean follow-up from the introduction of MMF is 31.5 months and mean length of follow-up from the beginning of MMF monotherapy is 27.3 months. Renal function improved in 31/36 (89%) cases. Blood levels of cholesterol and triglycerides decreased in 13 of 17 (76%) and 15 of 17 (89%) patients, respectively. Arterial hypertension improved in 4 of 5 (80%) cases. A total of 8 patients showed a single episode of fluctuation of liver function tests during tapering off CNI. This feature was interpreted as an acute rejection (AR), based on the resolution of the clinical setting after escalation of MMF daily dose to 2 gm. A further patient developed a biopsy-proven AR insensitive to MMF adjustment, requiring reinstitution of the CNI dose. No deaths or major toxicity requiring MMF discontinuation occurred. In conclusion, low dose MMF monotherapy is safe, effective, and well tolerated.

The Art and Science of Immunosuppression: the Fifth Annual American Society of Transplant Surgeon's State-of-the-Art Winter Symposium

The 2005 American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) Winter Symposium entitled 'The Art and Science of Immunosuppression' explored ways to maximize existing immunosuppressive protocols and to develop new strategies incorporating novel agents and emerging diagnostic technologies to customize immunosuppression and reduce side effects. Several presentations evaluated steroid withdrawal or avoidance protocols reflecting the significant difficulties of bone loss, glucose control and growth retardation in children associated with long-term steroid use. Calcineurin-inhibitor related renal dysfunction of both native and transplanted kidneys was identified as significant, but no consensus was reached concerning effective prevention. Similarly, recurrence of Hepatitis C following liver transplantation was identified as problematic without identifying a preferred immunosuppressive regimen in this setting. Control of T-cell mediated rejection was found to be excellent, but recognition and treatment of non-T cell causes of allograft damage (i.e. B- or NK-cell mediated) was identified as an area of current interest. Immunosuppressive agents under development, such as those blocking co-stimulation or cytokine signals, and JAK-3 inhibitors were discussed. Finally, the available technologies for molecular and genetic diagnostics and the clinical correlation in the post-transplant setting were discussed.

Switching from Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus in Patients with Chronic Transplant Dysfunction or Cyclosporine-Induced Adverse Events

BACKGROUND

Progressive renal-function decline caused by chronic allograft nephropathy is the main cause of long-term failure after kidney transplantation. Moreover, chronic cyclosporine (CsA)-induced nephrotoxicity is an important nonimmunologic factor contributing to graft dysfunction and loss, and adverse events may require CsA withdrawal.

METHODS

Tacrolimus (Tac) replaced CsA-based immunosuppression in 133 transplant patients (114 kidney, 15 kidney-pancreas, 4 pancreas after kidney) with progressive loss of renal function (71% of patients) or CsA intolerance (29% of patients) not responding to CsA dose-lowering. The primary end-points of this prospective study focusing on renal function were the safety and efficacy of Tac immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Tac was generally well tolerated but definitively withdrawn for 23 (17%) patients (21 graft failures, 1 case of diabetes, and 1 case of clinical intolerance). Differential creatinemia (creatinemia-nadir creatinemia after transplantation) decreased significantly from 85.4+/-9.8 to 39.0+/-7.5 mumol/L (P<0.001; mean+/-SEM) after 1 year and 3.6+/-18.1 mumol/L (P<0.01) after 4 years. For patients with CsA intolerance, switch to Tac improved intolerance symptoms in all cases. Blood urea, creatinine clearance, blood total cholesterol, and triglycerides improved significantly, and the percentage of hypertensive patients remained stable with no de novo hypertension. During follow-up, one patient experienced an acute rejection episode (not histologically proven), and four died. Twenty-one (16%) transplants failed, significantly more frequently in patients with advanced renal impairment before Tac (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Switching from CsA to Tac can be an alternative strategy in kidney-transplant patients suffering from chronic allograft dysfunction or CsA toxicity. The persistently improved renal function over several months of evaluation suggests that in these patients, Tac might be less nephrotoxic than CsA and could prolong transplant function despite CsA failure.

Hypertension as a marker for later development of end-stage renal failure after lung and heart-lung transplantation: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Time to renal failure after transplantation is not well known and the prognosis of lung and heart-lung transplantation with respect to end-stage renal failure and related factors has not been investigated in detail. We determined the predictors of end-stage renal failure after lung or heart-lung transplant using multivariate analysis.

METHODS

A cohort study of 115 adult patients transplanted between 1990 and 1995, who survived at least 5 years, was carried out. Characteristics and clinical findings, including blood pressure, creatinine clearance and immunosuppression levels of patients with end-stage renal failure, were compared with those without, initially in a univariate analysis. Then a multivariate logistic regression model was built to examine the association of predictor variables with end-stage renal failure after adjustment for confounding.

RESULTS

There were 19 of 115 (16.4%) patients with end-stage renal failure, with an average time of loss of renal function of 7.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5 to 8.7) after transplantation. There was no difference in survival between patients with end-stage renal failure and those without. Multivariate analysis showed that development of hypertension post-operatively was the only significant predictor variable (odds ratio 8.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 66.0, p = 0.04). Patients' age at transplantation, gender, underlying medical conditions and other post-transplant features were not associated with end-stage renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of hypertension after lung or heart-lung transplant should be used a marker for later development of end-stage renal failure. Any hypertension should be treated energetically. Acute renal failure immediately post-operatively did not predict end-stage renal failure in this cohort of patients.

Living related renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease after liver transplantation from a brain-dead donor

We report a case in which a living related renal transplantation was successfully performed for end-stage renal disease that had progressed after a liver transplantation from a brain-dead donor for liver cirrhosis associated with type C hepatitis. Because the transplanted liver function had been excellent with the use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, the same immunosuppressive agents with prednisolone were employed for the renal transplantation. Both grafts are functioning well without recurrence of hepatitis at 10 months after the renal transplantation. From our experience, renal transplantation should not be contraindicated even if the patient has undergone liver transplantation or has hepatitis C viral infection.

Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ

BACKGROUND

Transplantation of nonrenal organs is often complicated by chronic renal disease with multifactorial causes. We conducted a population-based cohort analysis to evaluate the incidence of chronic renal failure, risk factors for it, and the associated hazard of death in recipients of nonrenal transplants.

METHODS

Pretransplantation and post-transplantation clinical variables and data from a registry of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were linked in order to estimate the cumulative incidence of chronic renal failure (defined as a glomerular filtration rate of 29 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area or less or the development of ESRD) and the associated risk of death among 69,321 persons who received nonrenal transplants in the United States between 1990 and 2000.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 36 months, chronic renal failure developed in 11,426 patients (16.5 percent). Of these patients, 3297 (28.9 percent) required maintenance dialysis or renal transplantation. The five-year risk of chronic renal failure varied according to the type of organ transplanted - from 6.9 percent among recipients of heart-lung transplants to 21.3 percent among recipients of intestine transplants. Multivariate analysis indicated that an increased risk of chronic renal failure was associated with increasing age (relative risk per 10-year increment, 1.36; P<0.001), female sex (relative risk among male patients as compared with female patients, 0.74; P<0.001), pretransplantation hepatitis C infection (relative risk, 1.15; P<0.001), hypertension (relative risk, 1.18; P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (relative risk, 1.42; P<0.001), and postoperative acute renal failure (relative risk, 2.13; P<0.001). The occurrence of chronic renal failure significantly increased the risk of death (relative risk, 4.55; P<0.001). Treatment of ESRD with kidney transplantation was associated with a five-year risk of death that was significantly lower than that associated with dialysis (relative risk, 0.56; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The five-year risk of chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ ranges from 7 to 21 percent, depending on the type of organ transplanted. The occurrence of chronic renal failure among patients with a nonrenal transplant is associated with an increase by a factor of more than four in the risk of death.

The impact of immune-activating processes following transplantation on chronic allograft nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The long-term success of organ transplantation is influenced by numerous alloantigen-dependent and -independent risk factors. However, only very little information is presently available on the influence of systemic immune-activating processes following organ engraftment.

METHODS

To simulate the clinical situation of sequential organ transplantation, rat renal allograft recipients received additional immune activating stimuli (secondary donor-specific and third-party skin grafts) after transplantation at serial time intervals (4 and 8 weeks). The overall observation period was 16 weeks.

RESULTS

All control animals survived the observation period. In contrast, recipients receiving additional third-party or donor-specific skin grafts were beginning to die 12 weeks after organ engraftment with only few animals surviving 16 weeks. Systemic immune activation by additional third-party and in particular by additional donor-specific skin grafts resulted in significant temporary and long-term functional deterioration. Morphologic changes progressed significantly, particularly after a secondary challenge with donor-specific skin grafts. ED1+ monocytes/macrophages, T-cell infiltrates, and intragraft mRNA expression for CD25 were significantly elevated by 16 weeks, following an additional immune challenge. Analysis of early intragraft events showed strong up-regulation of CD25 transcripts, suggesting fast stimulation of intragraft immune processes.

CONCLUSION

Both alloantigen-specific and -unspecific systemic immune activation processes, following experimental organ transplantation, contribute to chronic graft deterioration. Those results seem relevant for long-term immunosuppressive protocols and clinical situations of sequential organ transplantation.