Left hepatic trisegmentectomy with right hepatic vein resection after right hepatic vein embolization

A prospective study of sequential hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization in patients scheduled for right-sided major hepatectomy: Results of feasibility and surgical strategy using functional liver assessment

BACKGROUND

Hepatic vein embolization (HVE) added to portal vein embolization (PVE) can further increase future remnant liver volume (FRLV) compared with PVE alone. This study was aimed to evaluate feasibility of sequential HVE in a prospective trial and to verify surgical strategy using functional FRLV (fFRLV).

METHODS

Hepatic vein embolization was prospectively indicated for post-PVE patients scheduled for right-sided major hepatectomy if the resection limit of fFRLV using EOB-magnetic resonance imaging was not satisfied. The resection limit was fFRLV: 615 mL/m² for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure. Patients who underwent sequential PVE-HVE (n = 12) were compared with those who underwent PVE alone (n = 31).

RESULTS

All patients underwent HVE with no severe complications. Median fFRLV increased from 396 (range: 251-581) to 634 (range: 422-740) mL/m² by sequential PVE-HVE. From PVE to HVE, both of FRLV (P < .001) and fFRLV (P = .005) significantly increased. The increased width of fFRLV was larger than that of FRLV after performing HVE. Median growth rate was 71.3 (range: 33.3-80.3) %, which was higher than that of PVE alone (27.0%, range: 6.0-78.0). All-cohort resection rate was 88.3%. Strategy of using fFRLV for the resection limit and performing HVE in patients with insufficient functional volume resulted in no liver failure in all patients who underwent hepatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential HVE after PVE is feasible and safe, and HVE induced possibility of further liver growth and its functional improvement. Our surgical strategy using fFRLV may be justified.

Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy

STUDY PURPOSE

The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

METHODS

The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection.

RESULTS

Not applicable.

CONCLUSION

DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).

Upper Transversal Hepatectomy for Pediatric Liver Tumors Based on the Inferior Right Hepatic Vein

Introduction:

Tumors located at the hepatocaval junction with the involvement of hepatic veins conventionally warrant major liver resections. Appreciation of sizeable inferior right hepatic vein can allow preservation of uninvolved inferior segments of the liver.

Operative Technique:

Preoperative and intraoperative identification of sizeable inferior right hepatic and other accessory or communicating veins in combination of intra-operative ultrasound guidance for resection to preserve inferior segments of the liver with adequate venous drainage. Application of upper transversal resections for pediatric liver tumors at the hepatocaval confluence was illustrated with description of operative technique and patient selection.

Conclusions:

Parenchymal preserving surgeries are possible for pediatric liver tumors located at the hepatocaval confluence by identification of accessory draining veins to the inferior segments. This along with meticulous parenchymal dissection with ultrasound guidance to preserve all uninvolved veins is key to safe upper transversal resections.

Deportalization, Venous Congestion, Venous Deprivation: Serial Measurements of Volumes and Functions on Morphofunctional 99mTc-Mebrofenin SPECT-CT

The objective was to assess the changes in regional volumes and functions under venous-impaired vascular conditions following liver preparation. Twelve patients underwent right portal vein embolization (PVE) (n = 5) or extended liver venous deprivation (eLVD, i.e., portal and right and middle hepatic veins embolization) (n = 7). Volume and function measurements of deportalized liver, venous-deprived liver and congestive liver were performed before and after PVE/eLVD at days 7, 14 and 21 using 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (99mTc-mebrofenin SPECT-CT). Volume and function progressed independently in the deportalized liver (p = 0.47) with an early decrease in function (median −18.2% (IQR, −19.4–−14.5) at day 7) followed by a decrease in volume (−19.3% (−22.6–−14.4) at day 21). Volume and function progressed independently in the venous deprived liver (p = 0.80) with a marked and early decrease in function (−41.1% (−52.0–−12.9) at day 7) but minimal changes in volume (−4.7% (−10.4–+3.9) at day 21). Volume and function progressed independently in the congestive liver (p = 0.21) with a gradual increase in volume (+43.2% (+38.3–+51.2) at day 21) that preceded a late and moderate increase in function at day 21 (+34.8% (−8.3–+46.6)), concomitantly to the disappearance of hypoattenuated congestive areas in segment IV (S4) on CT, initially observed in 6/7 patients after eLVD and represented 35.3% (22.2–46.4) of whole S4 volume. Liver volume and function progress independently whatever the vascular condition. Hepatic congestion from outflow obstruction drives volume increase but results in early impaired function.

Issues to be considered to address the future liver remnant prior to major hepatectomy

An accurate preoperative evaluation of the hepatic function and application of portal vein embolization in selected patients have helped improve the safety of major hepatectomy. In planning major hepatectomy, however, several issues remain to be addressed. The first is which cut-off values for serum total bilirubin level and prothrombin time should be used to define post-hepatectomy liver failure. Other issues include what minimum future liver remnant (FLR) volume is required; whether the total liver volume measured using computed tomography or the standard liver volume calculated based on the body surface area should be used to assess the adequacy of the FLR volume; whether there is a discrepancy between the FLR volume and function during the recovery period after portal vein embolization or hepatectomy; and how best the function of a specific FLR can be assessed. Various studies concerning these issues have been reported with controversial results. We should also be aware that different strategies and management are required for different types of liver damage, such as cirrhosis in hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangitis in biliary tract cancer, and chemotherapy-induced hepatic injury.

Liver venous deprivation compared to portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

To assess the safety and efficacy of liver venous deprivation (simultaneous hepatic vein embolization with portal vein embolization) compared with portal vein embolization alone before major hepatectomy in patients with small future liver remnant.

METHODS

We assessed all consecutive patients who underwent ipsilateral liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy (>4 Couinaud's segments) at the University Hospital Lausanne from 2016 to 2018. Postembolization, volumetric analysis after liver venous deprivation and postoperative outcomes were compared with patients who underwent portal vein embolization alone (portal vein embolization group) from 2010 to 2016.

RESULTS

During the study period, 21 patients underwent liver venous deprivation and 39 portal vein embolization alone. In the liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization groups, dropout rate owing to disease progression was 1 of 21 vs 9 of 39 (P = .053). There were no per procedural complications after liver venous deprivation and no difference in the postoperative outcomes. Future liver remnant hypertrophy was greater in the liver venous deprivation group (median 135%, interquartile range: 123%-154%) than in the portal vein embolization group (median 124%, interquartile range: 107%-140%) at a median time of 22 days after liver venous deprivation vs 26 days after portal vein embolization (P = .034). The median kinetic growth rate was also greater (2.9%/week, interquartile range: 1.9-4.3% vs 1.4%/week, interquartile range: 0.7-2.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Ipsilateral liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy is safe and seems to induce a greater and faster future liver remnant hypertrophy than after portal vein embolization alone. More data are needed to analyze the impact of liver venous deprivation on tumor growth.

Combined hepatic and portal vein embolization as preparation for major hepatectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Some patients remain deemed unsuitable for resection after portal vein embolization (PVE) because of insufficient hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL). Hepatic and portal vein embolization (HPVE) has been shown to induce hypertrophy of the FRL. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of the available literature on HPVE as preparation for major hepatectomy.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on online databases. Studies including patients who underwent preoperative HPVE were retrieved for evaluation.

RESULTS

Six articles including 68 patients were published between 2003 and 2017. HPVE was performed successfully in all patients with no mortality and morbidity-related procedures. The degree of hypertrophy of the FRL after HPVE ranged from 33% to 63.3%. Surgical resection after preoperative HPVE could be performed in 85.3% of patients, but 14.7% remained unsuitable for resection because of insufficient hypertrophy of the FRL or tumor progression. Posthepatectomy morbidity and mortality rates were 10.3% and 5.1%, respectively. The postoperative liver failure rate was nil.

CONCLUSION

HPVE as a preparation for major hepatectomy appears to be feasible and safe and could increase the resectability of patients initially deemed unsuitable for resection because of absent or insufficient hypertrophy of the FRL after PVE alone.

Left trisectionectomy combined with resection of the right hepatic vein and inferior vena cava after right hepatic vein embolization for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

When the inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) is present, left hepatic trisectionectomy with resection of the right hepatic vein (RHV) is theoretically possible without reconstruction of the RHV. We here report a successful case of this extended hepatectomy after RHV embolization for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old man was admitted to our clinic with abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed a cholangiocarcinoma located at the caudate lobe that involved the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the roots of the three major hepatic veins. Portal vein embolization of the left and right anterior portal veins was performed. As the IRHV was present but thin, RHV was also embolized. Left hepatic trisectionectomy with resection of the involved IVC and RHV, preserving the IRHV, was done. The IVC was reconstructed with artificial graft. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 36.

Conclusion

RHV embolization is useful in extended left trisectionectomy with resection of the RHV when the IRHV is present but thin.

A case of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma accidentally, but successfully, treated with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) therapy combined with bevacizumab: a case report

Although surgical resection is the only way to cure biliary tract cancer (BTC), most BTCs are unresectable by the time they are diagnosed. Chemotherapy is usually used to treat unresectable BTC, but its impact on survival is small. Here, we report the case of a 70-year-old woman with a locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that was initially diagnosed as an unresectable liver metastasis from colon cancer that had invaded all of the major hepatic veins. However, the tumor was noticeably reduced after treatment with CAPOX plus bevacizumab, which is an uncommon therapy for BTC. The tumor was finally resected by inferior right hepatic vein-preserving left hepatic trisectionectomy combined with a resection of the right hepatic vein after a right hepatic vein embolization.

Assessing resectability in cholangiocarcinoma

Assessment of surgical resectability in cholangiocarcinoma is more complicated than other gastrointestinal malignancies and remains unestablished. According to the primary origin and tumor extent, the applied surgical procedure varies from extrahepatic bile duct resection to right or left trisectionectomy concomitant with pancreatoduodenectomy. Portal vein resection and reconstruction during hepatectomy has been feasible. Thanks to the availability of new microscopic surgical techniques, hepatic arterial resection and reconstruction have also come to be applied for locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma cases. These vascular surgical techniques can expand surgical indications for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. On the other hand, determination of the tumor extent or staging still remains difficult and imprecise. The endoscopic approach has come to play significant roles both for preoperative biliary drainage and tumor staging. Estimation of the functional reserve of future remnant liver in cholestatic patients still remains unresolved. Hepatobiliary surgeons should carefully estimate the safety of the surgical procedure in each individual patient requiring extensive hepatobiliary resection. Early establishment of the measurement methods of the functional capacity of future remnant liver is an important and urgent issue for assessing safer surgical resectablity of cholangiocarcinoma.

Sequential preoperative hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization for extended left hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases

Background

The role of portal vein embolization to increase future liver remnant (FLR) is well-established in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. However, the role of hepatic vein embolization is unclear.

Case report

A patient with colorectal liver metastases received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to attempted resection. At the time of resection his tumor appeared to invade the left and middle hepatic vein, requiring an extended left hepatectomy including segments five and eight. Post-operatively, he underwent sequential left portal vein embolization followed by left hepatic vein embolization and finally, middle hepatic vein embolization. Hepatic vein embolization was performed to increase the FLR as well as to allow collateral drainage of the FLR to develop. A left trisectionectomy was then performed and no evidence of postoperative liver congestion or morbidity was found.

Conclusion

Sequential portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization for extended left hepatectomy may be considered to increase FLR and may prevent right hepatic congestion after sacrificing the middle vein.

Interventional oncology: new options for interstitial treatments and intravascular approaches: right hepatic vein embolization after right portal vein embolization for inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant

Extensive hepatic resection is often associated with post-hepatectomy liver failure. Owing to the regenerative capacity of the liver, preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) has been proposed to increase the functional mass of the non-embolized liver segments that will remain in situ after surgery. However, in some patients, hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments following PVE is insufficient to support major hepatectomy. Several studies have demonstrated alternative techniques for inducing hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments, including PVE in conjunction with hepatic arterial embolization or hepatic vein embolization in conjunction with PVE. Investigation of new techniques for inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant can reasonably be expected to expand the selection criteria for extensive hepatic resection.

Radical surgery of left-sided klatskin tumors

Left-sided cholangiocarcinoma includes hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), predominantly involving the left hepatic duct, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in the left liver. Left hepatectomy, or left hepatic trisectionectomy, is indicated as radical surgery of left-sided HC or ICC with or without hilar bile duct invasion. Left lateral sectionectomy, or left medial sectionectomy, is performed for the small mass-forming type ICC. Left hepatic trisectionectomy is indicated for left-sided HC with further cancer progress along the right anterior sectional duct or left-sided ICC involving the right anterior section over the middle hepatic vein and/or the right anterior pedicle. Combined caudate lobe and extrahepatic bile duct resection are mandatory in cases of HC or ICC involving the hepatic confluence. Preoperative biliary drainage should be performed not only for jaundiced patients but also for non-icteric patients with right-sided biliary dilatation of the future remnant liver. Preoperative left trisegment portal vein embolization after biliary drainage of the right posterior section should be carried out prior to left hepatic trisectionectomy. Left hepatectomy has been used as a radical and safer surgical procedure, but in European countries has still been associated with higher morbidity and about 10% operative mortality. Japanese surgeons have had no hospital deaths after carrying out left hepatic trisectionectomy done after preoperative biliary drainage followed by left trisegment portal vein embolization to increase safety and to prolong postoperative survival for patients with locally advanced left-sided cholangiocarcinoma.

Right trisectionectomy of the liver for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with bile duct invasion in a Jehovah's Witness

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is well known to have a very poor prognosis. Aggressive surgical strategies in the treatment of ICC, including major hepatectomy, have been reported to afford patients the best chance for significant survival. Recent advancements in surgical techniques concerning live donor liver transplantation have dramatically improved the results of major hepatectomy. However, surgical treatment of biliary malignancy is complex and is known to increase the likelihood of blood transfusion. We describe a Jehovah's Witness patient with ICC and concomitant bile duct invasion who had a successful right trisectionectomy with bile duct resection, lymph node dissection, and Rouxen-Y hepatico-jejunostomy without blood transfusion. A multidisciplinary preparation was crucial in obtaining this positive outcome. Importantly, bloodless liver transection techniques with inflow clamping, meticulous dissection, and hemostasis should be utilized for major hepatectomy in a Jehovah's Witness. The success of this case may alert clinicians to consider a hepatectomy as a possible option in the treatment of ICC in a Jehovah's Witness.

Subtotal hepatectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a previously unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

An awareness of variant hepatic vascular anatomy provides vital information in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The authors present a patient with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who responded to combination systemic and regional chemotherapy. Because of the presence of an enlarged inferior right hepatic vein, the patient subsequently underwent successful subtotal hepatectomy with resection of all three main hepatic veins. This case illustrates that the combination of innovative neoadjuvant chemotherapy and well-planned surgical approaches may benefit a small number of patients previously deemed unresectable.

Hepatic resections using a water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device: a new technology for safer surgery

Several techniques and devices have recently been developed in an effort to allow safer liver resections and avoid intraoperative blood loss. The aim of this study was to analyze our initial experience with hepatic resections using a new water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device--the Tissuelink Monopolar Floating Ball (Tissuelink Medical, Inc., Dover, NH)--in order to avoid bleeding during hepatic surgery. We analyzed patients who underwent hepatic surgery between January and June 2003. Sex, age, type of disease, and type of surgical procedure, in association with the duration of the surgical procedure, blood loss, use of vascular clamping of the liver, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Seven minor liver resections, two major liver resections, and one total cystopericystectomy were performed with the use of this new device. Average blood loss was 150 ml (range 50 to 300 ml). No vascular clamping was used with the exception of one patient. No deaths were recorded. Morbidity included ascites in one case and pleural effusion in another. In conclusion, the Tissuelink Monopolar Floating Ball permitted excellent coagulation of the cut liver surface, thus avoiding bleeding and vascular clamping. As a result, postoperative morbidity and mortality were low.

Extended left hepatectomy--modified operation planning based on three-dimensional visualization of liver anatomy

BACKGROUND

Based on the patient history of a 62-year-old man with a centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma we describe the potential influence of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) on operation planning in extended left hepatectomy.

METHOD AND RESULTS

By 3D reconstruction of the liver, not only variations of the intrahepatic vascular structure but also the number and extent of portal venous segments, as well as their relation to hepatic veins, can be visualized. Thus, areas at risk for either devascularization or venous congestion may be identified prior to liver resection. This is particularly important in extended hepatectomies with a small liver remnant, where already minor complications may have fatal consequences.

CONCLUSION

In these resections, operation planning may be improved substantially by pre-operative 3D reconstruction.