Aspirin resistance after coronary artery bypass grafting

Antiplatelet Resistance in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is commonly given to patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to reduce thrombotic events. APT resistance, the inadequate antiplatelet effect of these drugs, is a growing concern. This review aimed to assess APT resistance prevalence in patients who underwent CABG and its impact on clinical outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant studies published to date. The included studies measured platelet function through laboratory assays and reported on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent CABG. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and mortality, whereas the secondary outcomes included acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, and thromboembolic events. The meta-analysis used random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. The initial search identified 45 studies, with 11 meeting the inclusion criteria, involving 3,122 patients. The overall prevalence of APT resistance in patients who underwent CABG was 39%. Patients with APT resistance had significantly higher risks of MACEs and death (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 2.83, p = 0.03) and postoperative myocardial infarction (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.48, p = 0.02) than those without resistance. However, no significant association was found between APT resistance and stroke (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.35, p = 0.12) or other thromboembolic events (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.08, p = 0.22). In conclusion, APT resistance is prevalent in a significant proportion of patients who underwent CABG, increasing the risk of MACEs and postoperative myocardial infarction. These findings emphasize the need for further research to develop tailored antiplatelet strategies in this patient population.

Frequency of Aspirin Resistance in Ischemic Stroke Patients and Healthy Controls from Colombia

Objective

To evaluate the aspirin resistance prevalence in patients with previous ischemic cerebrovascular disease undergoing aspirin therapy for secondary prevention.

Materials and Methods

Three hundred fifty patients presenting ischemic strokes and 100 healthy controls under aspirin treatment were evaluated using the optic platelet aggregation test.

Results

Aspirin resistance was found in 7.4% of the patients with ischemic stroke and 4% of controls. Aspirin resistance was associated with stroke recurrence in univariate analysis (p = 0.004). Aspirin resistance was not associated with smoking, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia.

Conclusion

Aspirin resistance is present in Colombian patients with ischemic stroke as well as in healthy controls.

Antithrombotic therapy in ventricular assist device (VAD) management: From ancient beliefs to updated evidence. A narrative review

Platelets play a key role in the pathogenesis of ventricular assist device (VAD) thrombosis; therefore, antiplatelet drugs are essential, both in the acute phase and in the long-term follow-up in VAD management. Aspirin is the most used agent and still remains the first-choice drug for lifelong administration after VAD implantation. Anticoagulant drugs are usually recommended, but with a wide range of efficacy targets. Dual antiplatelet therapy, targeting more than one pathway of platelet activation, has been used for patients developing a thrombotic event, despite an increased risk of bleeding complications. Although different strategies have been attempted, bleeding and thrombotic events remain frequent and there are no uniform strategies adopted for pharmacological management in the short and mid- or long-term follow up. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the evidence from randomized clinical trials and observational studies with a focus on the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying bleeding and thrombosis in VAD patients and the best antithrombotic regimens available.

Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a primer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the benefits of surgical coronary revascularization, patients continue to be at risk for ischemic events in the years that follow coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), mandating the role for postoperative secondary preventive therapy. The purpose of this review was to present a summary on the subject of secondary prevention after CABG, including an overview of a recently published scientific statement, and highlight the newest studies in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aspirin and statin therapy continue to be the mainstay of secondary prevention after CABG, although newer antiplatelet and lipid-lowering medicines are being actively studied for their potential benefits. Other important elements to secondary prevention after CABG include the aggressive management of hypertension, smoking cessation, and the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation.

SUMMARY

Secondary prevention is an essential component of postoperative care after CABG. Instituting preventive therapies after surgery optimizes graft patency and helps patients achieve the highest level of physical health and quality of life following CABG.

ABC Transport Proteins in Cardiovascular Disease-A Brief Summary

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) transporters may play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic vascular diseases due to their involvement in cholesterol homeostasis, blood pressure regulation, endothelial function, vascular inflammation, as well as platelet production and aggregation. In this regard, ABC transporters, such as ABCA1, ABCG5 and ABCG8, were initially found to be responsible for genetically-inherited syndromes like Tangier diseases and sitosterolemia. These findings led to the understanding of those transporter’s function in cellular cholesterol efflux and thereby also linked them to atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Subsequently, further ABC transporters, i.e., ABCG1, ABCG4, ABCB6, ABCC1, ABCC6 or ABCC9, have been shown to directly or indirectly affect cellular cholesterol efflux, the inflammatory response in macrophages, megakaryocyte proliferation and thrombus formation, as well as vascular function and blood pressure, and may thereby contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD and its complications. Furthermore, ABC transporters, such as ABCB1, ABCC2 or ABCG2, may affect the safety and efficacy of several drug classes currently in use for CVD treatment. This review will give a brief overview of ABC transporters involved in the process of atherogenesis and CVD pathology. It also aims to briefly summarize the role of ABC transporters in the pharmacokinetics and disposition of drugs frequently used to treat CVD and CVD-related complications.

Relationship between high on aspirin platelet reactivity and oxidative stress in coronary artery by-pass grafted patients

The aim of the study was to assess the responsiveness of blood platelets to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with relation to oxidative and antioxidative plasma status. The study included 37 patients treated with the CABG procedure. During the first 24 h after CABG patients were given 300 mg of ASA with the following dose of 150 mg daily. The blood was collected before the procedure and 10 days after. Whole blood platelet aggregation induced with arachidonic acid, collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was performed together with whole blood generation of thromboxane B2 (TxB2). Oxidative stress was measured before and 10 days after CABG with total oxidative plasma status (TOS) and total antioxidative status of the plasma (TAS). TOS/TAS index was calculated. We observed a significant increase in the TOS and TOS/TAS index and ADP-induced aggregation 10 days after CABG in comparison with its level before operation. There was a significant decrease in the arachidonic acid-induced aggregation and serum TxB2 level. Patients with ADP-induced and collagen-induced aggregation in the upper quartile had significantly higher TOS and TOS/TAS index before (ADP) and after the operation (ADP and collagen). There were 19 patients (51%) with high on aspirin platelet reactivity after CABG who had also higher TOS and TOS/TAS index and lower TAS value in comparison with aspirin responders. Despite ASA use, increased oxidative stress after CABG can overcome its antiplatelet effect and increase platelet activation through other pathways.

[Prevalence and prognosis of aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and the association between aspirin resistance in critical limb ischemia patients using the VerifyNow^® bed-side platelet test, and occurrence of cardiovascular morbidity and/or death at one year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

National multicenter prospective observational study related to COPART II centers. From 2010 through 2014, 64 subjects hospitalized for critical limb ischemia and already treated by aspirin before the VerifyNow^® test were included. A VerifyNow^® test>550 ARU was defined as aspirin resistance. Critical limb ischemia was defined according to the TASC I criteria. The primary outcome was a composite including death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and major amputation during the one-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

In all, 9/64 patients were aspirin resistant, the status was confirmed in one case. The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 14.06%. There was no significant difference between aspirin resistant and aspirin non-resistant groups in terms of cardiovascular history and glycemia status. Neither was there significant difference between the two groups in terms of survival.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin resistance was not predictive of poorer survival in critical limb ischemia patients. However, our population was limited. Considering that a clear definition of aspirin resistance and standardized diagnostic tests are lacking, complementary studies might be useful.

Influence of aspirin or heparin on platelet function and postoperative blood loss after coronary artery bypass surgery

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of aspirin or heparin pretreatment on platelet function and bleeding in the early postoperative period after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

Seventy-five male patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 ( n = 25) included patients receiving aspirin pretreatment, Group 2 ( n = 22) received heparin pretreatment, and Group 3 ( n = 28) included patients who received no antiplatelet or anticoagulant pretreatment. Twenty-four hours after surgery, all patients were administered aspirin therapy that was continued throughout their hospitalization period. We assessed the following preoperative blood coagulation indices: activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and fibrinogen. We compared platelet count and platelet aggregation induced by adenosinediphosphate (ADP) before surgery, 1 h after surgery, 20 h after surgery and on the seventh postoperative day. We assessed drained blood loss within 20 postoperative hours.

Preoperative blood coagulation indices did not differ among the groups. Platelet count was also similar. One hour after surgery, platelet count significantly decreased in all groups ( p <0.001), after 20 postoperative hours it did not undergo any marked changes, and on the seventh postoperative day, it significantly increased in all groups ( p <0.001). Before surgery, the lowest index of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was found in Group 1 ( p <0.05). One hour after surgery, platelet aggregation significantly decreased in all groups, most markedly in Group 3 ( p <0.001), yet after 20 h, its restitution tendency and a significant increase in all groups was noted. On the seventh day, a further increase in the statistical mean platelet aggregation value was noted in Groups 2 and 3. Comparison of platelet aggregation after 20 postoperative hours and on the seventh day after surgery revealed a significantly higher than 10% increase of the index in 32% of patients in Group 1 ( p <0.05), 27.3% of patients in Group 2 ( p <0.05) and in 35.7% of patients in Group 3 ( p <0.001). The lowest statistically significant value of postoperative blood loss was noted in Group 2 ( p <0.01).

Our study has shown that aspirin or heparin pretreatment had no impact on the dynamics of platelet function in the early postoperative period after CABG. The lowest postoperative blood loss was noted in patients pretreated with heparin.

Aspirin influences megakaryocytic gene expression leading to up-regulation of multidrug resistance protein-4 in human platelets

Aim

The aim of the study was to investigate whether human megakaryocytic cells have an adaptive response to aspirin treatment, leading to an enhancement of multidrug resistance protein-4 (MRP4) expression in circulating platelets responsible for a reduced aspirin action. We recently found that platelet MRP4 overexpression has a role in reducing aspirin action in patients after by-pass surgery. Aspirin enhances MRP4-mRNA levels in rat liver and drug administration transcriptionally regulates MRP4 gene expression through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα).

Methods

The effects induced by aspirin or PPARα agonist (WY14643) on MRP4 modulation were evaluated in vitro in a human megakaryoblastic DAMI cell line, in megakaryocytes (MKs) and in platelets obtained from human haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) cultures, and in vivo platelets obtained from aspirin treated healthy volunteers (HV).

Results

In DAMI cells, aspirin and WY14643 treatment induced a significant increase in MRP4 and PPARα expression. In human MKs grown in the presence of either aspirin or WY14643, MRP4 and PPARα-mRNA were higher than in control cultures and derived platelets showed an enhancement in MRP4 protein expression. The ability of aspirin to modulate MRP4 expression in MKs and to transfer it to platelets was also confirmed in vivo. In fact, we found the highest MRP4 mRNA and protein expression in platelets obtained from HV after 15 days' aspirin treatment.

Conclusions

The present study provides evidence, for the first time, that aspirin treatment affects the platelet protein pattern through MK genomic modulation. This work represents an innovative and attractive approach, useful both to identify patients less sensitive to aspirin and to improve pharmacological treatment in cardiovascular high-risk patients.

Multiple daily doses of acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA) overcome reduced platelet response to once-daily ASA after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of ASA for prevention of graft failure following CABG surgery may be limited by incomplete platelet inhibition due to increased post-operative platelet turnover.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether acetyl-salicylic acid (ASA) 325 mg once-daily or 81 mg four-times daily overcomes the impaired response to ASA 81 mg once-daily in post-operative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients.

METHODS

We randomized 110 patients undergoing CABG surgery to either ASA 81 mg once-daily, 81 mg four times daily or 325 mg once-daily and compared their effects on serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2 ) suppression and arachidonate-induced platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. Platelet counts fell after surgery, reached a nadir on day 2, and then gradually increased. Although there was near complete suppression of TXB2 on the second or third post-operative day, TXB2 levels increased in parallel with the rise in platelet count on subsequent days. This increase was most marked in patients receiving ASA 81 mg once-daily and less evident in those receiving ASA four times daily. On post-operative day 4, (i) median TXB2 levels were lower with four times daily ASA than with either ASA 81 mg once-daily (1.1 ng/mL; Quartile(Q) Q1,Q3: 0.5, 2.4 and 13.3 ng/mL; Q1,Q3: 7.8, 30.8 ng/mL, respectively; P < 0.0001) or ASA 325 mg once-daily (3.4 ng/mL; Q1,Q3: 2.0, 8.2 ng/mL; P = 0.002), and (ii) ASA given four times daily was more effective than ASA 81 mg once-daily and 325 mg once-daily at suppressing platelet aggregation.

CONCLUSIONS

Four times daily ASA is more effective than ASA 81 and 325 mg once-daily at suppressing serum TXB2 formation and platelet aggregation immediately following CABG surgery.

Comparative efficacy of in vitro and in vivo metabolized aspirin in the DeBakey ventricular assist device

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are implanted in patients with end-stage heart failure to provide both short- and long-term hemodynamic support. Unfortunately, bleeding and thromboembolic complications due to the severely disturbed, dynamic flow conditions generated within these devices require complex, long-term antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. While several studies have examined the effectiveness of one such agent, aspirin, under flow conditions, data comparing the efficacy of in vitro and in vivo metabolized aspirin is lacking. Two sets of studies were conducted in vitro with purified human platelets circulating for 30 min in a flow loop containing the DeBakey VAD (MicroMed Cardiovascular, Houston, TX, USA): (a) 20 μM aspirin was added exogenously in vitro to platelets isolated from aspirin-free subjects, and (b) platelets were obtained from donors 2 h (n = 14) and 20 h (n = 13) after ingestion of 1,000 mg aspirin. Near real-time platelet activation state (PAS) was measured with a modified prothrombinase-based assay. Platelets exposed to aspirin in vitro and in vivo (metabolized) showed 28.2 and 25.3 % reduction in platelet activation rate, respectively, compared to untreated controls. Our results demonstrate that in vitro treatment with antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin is as effective as in vivo metabolized aspirin in testing the effect of reducing shear-induced platelet activation in the VAD. Using the PAS assay provides a practical in vitro alternative to in vivo testing of antiplatelet efficacy, as well as for testing the thrombogenic performance of devices during their research and development.

Impact of dual antiplatelet therapy on outcomes among aspirin-resistant patients following coronary artery bypass grafting

Coronary artery bypass grafting is pivotal in the contemporary management of complex coronary artery disease. Interpatient variability to antiplatelet agents, however, harbors the potential to compromise the revascularization benefit by increasing the incidence of adverse events. This study was designed to define the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT) on clinical outcomes among aspirin-resistant patients who underwent coronary artery surgery. We randomly assigned 219 aspirin-resistant patients according to multiple electrode aggregometry to receive clopidogrel (75 mg) plus aspirin (300 mg) or aspirin-monotherapy (300 mg). The primary end point was a composite outcome of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular hospitalization assessed at 6 months postoperatively. The primary end point occurred in 6% of patients assigned to dAPT and 10% of patients randomized to aspirin-monotherapy (relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 1.51, p = 0.33). No significant treatment effect was noted in the occurrence of the safety end point. The total incidence of bleeding events was 25% and 19% in the dAPT and aspirin-monotherapy groups, respectively (relative risk 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 2.23, p = 0.33). In the subgroup analysis, dAPT led to lower rates of adverse events in patients with a body mass index >30 kg/m(2) (0% vs 18%, p <0.01) and those <65 years (0% vs 10%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, the addition of clopidogrel in patients found to be aspirin resistant after coronary artery bypass grafting did not reduce the incidence of adverse events, nor did it increase the number of recorded bleeding events. dAPT did, however, lower the incidence of the primary end point in obese patients and those <65 years.

Clopidogrel improves aspirin response after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

We sought to assess the incidence of aspirin resistance after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery, and investigate whether clopidogrel can improve aspirin response and be safely applied early after OPCAB surgery. Sixty patients who underwent standard OPCAB surgery were randomized into two groups. One group (30 patients) received mono-antiplatelet treatment (MAPT) with aspirin 100 mg daily and the other group received dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) with aspirin 100 mg daily plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Platelet aggregations in response to arachidonic acid (PL_AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (PL_ADP) were measured preoperatively and on days 1 to 6, 8 and 10 after the antiplatelet agents were administered. A PL_AA level above 20% was defined as aspirin resistance. Postoperative bleeding and other perioperative variables were also recorded. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, average number of distal anastomosis, operation time, postoperative bleeding, ventilation time and postoperative hospital stay. However, the incidence of aspirin resistance was significantly lower in the DAPT group than that in the MAPT group on the first and second day after antiplatelet agents were given (62.1% vs. 32.1%, 34.5% vs. 10.7%, respectively, both P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complication between the two groups. DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel can be safely applied to OPCAB patients early after the procedure. Moreover, clopidogrel reduces the incidence of OPCAB-related aspirin resistance.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery up-regulates genes involved in platelet aggregation

BACKGROUND

During and shortly after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, there is an increase in thromboembolic events. CABG, a strong inflammatory stimulus, is associated with a hypercoaguable state. Platelets might contribute to this hypercoaguable state because they have a pivotal role in thrombosis. In the days following surgery there is augmented platelet regeneration in response to the inflammatory stimulus.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate any changes in platelet mRNA profiles to test the hypothesis that post-CABG surgery platelets are associated with a prothrombotic state.

METHODS

Blood was sampled and platelets purified from 11 patients before and 3-6 days after CABG. Gene expression profiling was performed using low density array (LDA) plates for seven of the patients.

RESULTS

Forty-five genes were examined and those significantly up-regulated were glycoprotein (GP)IIb, GPIIIa and cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). These findings were confirmed in four more patients, including flow cytometry analysis of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG surgery up-regulates mRNA and protein levels of proteins that are key players in platelet aggregation. Marked elevation of GPIIb/IIIa mRNA levels results in significantly increased GPIIb/IIIa expression in platelets post-CABG surgery, which may be a reason for increased thrombus formation and myocardial infarction after CABG.

Effects of aspirin responsiveness and platelet reactivity on early vein graft thrombosis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine if an incomplete response to or inadequate antiplatelet effect of aspirin, or both, contribute to saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is the predominant cause of early SVG occlusion. Aspirin, which inhibits cyclooxygenase-1 activity and thromboxane generation in platelets, reduces early SVG occlusion by one-half.

METHODS

Aspirin responsiveness and platelet reactivity were characterized 3 days and 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 229 subjects receiving aspirin monotherapy by platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen and epinephrine, Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Newark, Delaware) closure time (CT) using collagen/epinephrine agonist cartridge and collagen/adenosine diphosphate (CADP) agonist cartridge, VerifyNow Aspirin assay (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, California), and urine levels of 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) (UTXB(2)). SVG patency was determined 6 months after surgery by computed tomography coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Inhibited arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, indicative of aspirin-mediated cyclooxygenase-1 suppression, occurred in 95% and >99% of subjects 3 days and 6 months after surgery, respectively. Despite this, 73% and 31% of subjects at these times had elevated UTXB(2). Among tested parameters, only UTXB(2) and CADP CT measured 6 months after surgery correlated with outcome. By multivariate analysis, CADP CT of ≤88 s (odds ratio: 2.85, p = 0.006), target vessel diameter of ≤1.5 mm (odds ratio: 2.38, p = 0.01), and UTXB(2) of ≥450 pg/mg creatinine (odds ratio: 2.59, p = 0.015) correlated with SVG occlusion. CADP CT and UTXB(2) in combination further identified subjects at particularly high and low risk for SVG occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin-insensitive thromboxane generation measured by UTXB(2) and shear-dependent platelet hyper-reactivity measured by Platelet Function Analyzer-100 CADP CT are novel independent risk factors for early SVG thrombosis after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Relation of aspirin failure to clinical outcome and to platelet response to aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Aspirin failure, defined as occurrence of an acute coronary syndrome despite aspirin use, has been associated with a higher cardiovascular risk profile and worse prognosis. Whether this phenomenon is a manifestation of patient characteristics or failure of adequate platelet inhibition by aspirin has never been studied. We evaluated 174 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Of them, 118 (68%) were aspirin naive and 56 (32%) were regarded as having aspirin failure. Platelet function was analyzed after ≥72 hours of aspirin therapy in all patients. Platelet reactivity was studied by light-transmitted aggregometry and under flow conditions. Six-month incidence of major adverse coronary events (death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome, and/or stroke) was determined. Those with aspirin failure were older (p = 0.002), more hypertensive (p <0.001), more hyperlipidemic (p <0.001), and more likely to have had a previous cardiovascular event and/or procedure (p <0.001). Cumulative 6-month major adverse coronary events were higher in the aspirin-failure group (14.3% vs 2.5% p <0.01). Patients with aspirin failure had lower arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation (32 ± 24 vs 45 ± 30, p = 0.003) after aspirin therapy compared to their aspirin-naive counterparts. However, this was not significant after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics (p = 0.82). Similarly, there were no significant differences in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation and platelet deposition under flow conditions. In conclusion, our results suggest that aspirin failure is merely a marker of higher-risk patient profiles and not a manifestation of inadequate platelet response to aspirin therapy.

Impaired anti-platelet effect of aspirin, inflammation and platelet turnover in cardiac surgery

A reduced platelet inhibitory response to acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) has been associated with an increased risk of graft thrombotic occlusion after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We performed a prospective, observational study of 18 patients on 100 mg/day ASA before and after CABG. We assessed antiplatelet response to ASA and its relationship with platelet turnover, inflammatory markers, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) levels. All patients showed optimal response to ASA preoperatively but had higher values during follow-up. Platelet aggregation and platelet count in the perioperative period were significantly associated (P=0.05). Platelet turnover was defined as the average daily turnover (ADTO). The lowest inhibitory value (28% of patients > or =6 Omega) was recorded at the same time of the highest platelet turnover (>10% daily in 77.77% of patients), one week after CABG. ADTO >10% was associated with an increased risk of platelet aggregation > or =6 Omega. Levels of sTM were significantly higher one week after CABG (median 13 vs. 3 ng/ml preoperatively, P=0.0011). There is a transient impairment in ASA antiplatelet effect after CABG related to an increased platelet turnover caused by the inflammatory process. This could be responsible for the high risk of occlusive thrombosis.

The impact of intravenous aspirin administration on platelet aspirin resistance after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Aspirin resistance continues to be a major challenge in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We investigated the impact of intravenous aspirin on platelet function in this clinical setting. Forty-two patients received 100 mg of oral aspirin once daily, beginning on day 1 after the operation. Between day 6 and 8 post operation one oral dose was replaced by an intravenous dose of 300 mg. Platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) closure times (CT), turbidimetric platelet aggregation (TPA) and impedance platelet aggregation (IPA) induced by arachidonic acid (AA), collagen and ADP were measured prior to and 1 h and 24 h after intravenous aspirin. Results obtained prior to the intravenous aspirin were compared with respective values from 120 healthy individuals. Despite the postoperative oral aspirin that was given once daily, ADP-induced TPA (ADPTPA) and IPA values induced by AA, ADP or collagen were significantly greater in patients than in controls, while PFA-100 CT were significantly shorter. Intravenous aspirin induced a significant reduction of platelet aggregability as measured by collagen/epinephrine (CEPI) CT, TPA and IPA induced by AA and collagen 1 h and 24 h after administration. Intravenous aspirin was not found to influence collagen/ADP (CADP) CT and IPA induced by ADP. Concomitantly, the number of patients with laboratory aspirin resistance as measured by CEPI-CT and TPA but not by IPA induced by AA or collagen dropped significantly. Agreement in the detection of aspirin responders and non-responders among platelet function tests was poor. Our findings indicate that the intravenous aspirin appears to be a promising approach for reducing laboratory aspirin resistance during the postoperative phase of CABG.

Postoperative development of aspirin resistance following coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

Aspirin therapy is known to substantially reduce mortality and the rate of ischaemic complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Rates of perioperative aspirin resistance cited in the literature are up to 50% and could be influenced by extracorporeal circulation. Thus, aspirin resistance after CABG may have a significant clinical relevance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 59 patients undergoing CABG (on-pump, off-pump and combined procedures) aspirin resistance was investigated by arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregometry. Clinical relevance was assessed with 12-month follow up.

RESULTS

Two types of resistance were observed: A preoperative resistance (despite oral aspirin or in vitro addition) was present in 29% and a postoperative developing type was seen in 49% resulting in only 22% of patients with a 'normal' reaction to aspirin. If patients were already on oral aspirin at admission, the rate of resistance was significantly reduced. Off-pump surgery or pump-times exceeding 120 min had no significant impact on resistance. During the 12-month follow up (98.3%), there were three deaths (one stroke, one intestinal ischaemia, one mediastinitis after postoperative delirium) in patients with the perioperative resistance and none in other patients (P = 0.345). In none of those patients who presented with perioperative aspirin resistance, could this aspirin resistance be demonstrated when tested again after 12 months?

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin resistance is a transient phenomenon present in the majority of patients undergoing CABG. The three deaths in the resistant group may - although not statistically significant - indicate the possibility of a worse outcome for patients with aspirin resistance.

Clopidogrel provides significantly greater inhibition of platelet activity than aspirin when combined with atorvastatin after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the effects of 2 different antiplatelet agents on platelet activity in patients receiv- ing atorvastatin after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We prospectively randomized 50 patients undergoing CABG into 2 groups; group 1 started to receive atorvastatin (10 mg) plus clopidogrel (75 mg; C + A, n = 25) and group 2 atorvastatin (10 mg) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; 300 mg, ASA + A, n = 25) daily on postoperative day 1 and continued for 6 months after operation. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation and the expressions of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb, GpIIIa, P-selectin, and fibrinogen (Fg) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) binding to platelets were assessed preoperatively and at postoperative days 7, 90, and 180.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.6 +/- 7.6 years, and 82% of the patients were males. The combination of C + A markedly inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with ASA + A at postoperative days 90 and 180 (52% +/- 6.0% vs 56% +/- 7.25% and 19.6% +/- 3.2% vs 37% +/- 4.1%, P = .039 and P = .0001, respectively). The therapy of C + A significantly suppressed the expressions of GpIIIa at postoperative days 7, 90, and 180 (P = .0001, P = .0001, and P = .0001, respectively) and P-selectin at postoperative days 90 and 180 (P = .035 and P = .002, respectively) when compared to ASA + A. The expression of GpIIb was also significantly depressed at postoperative day 180 in group 1 when compared to group 2 (P = .0001). Low-density lipoprotein binding was significantly increased at day 180 postoperatively in both the groups (basal: 42.9% +/- 5.6% vs 45.3% +/- 4.4% and day 180: 60.3% +/- 4.6% vs 61.8% +/- 5.7%, P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the combination of C + A is more effective than that of ASA + A in inhibiting ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and expression of major platelet receptors after CABG.

Resistance to low-dose aspirin therapy among patients with acute coronary syndrome in relation to associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of patients have recurrence of vascular events despite daily intake of low-dose aspirin therapy. Therefore, different patients may require different aspirin dosages to achieve complete inhibition of platelet function.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to measure the response to low-dose aspirin therapy (150 mg/day) among patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and to find out whether titrating aspirin dosage to 300 mg/day, would provide a better therapeutic response in the resistant cases. Moreover, we also aimed to study any association between aspirin non-responsiveness and atherothrombotic risk factors.

METHODS

The antiplatelet effect of 150 mg/day aspirin was studied prospectively in 50 consecutive patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Platelet aggregation was measured using optical platelet aggregometry and serum thromboxane B(2) level. Aspirin resistance was defined as collagen (1 μg/mL) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (5 μmol/L)-induced platelet aggregation of ≥ 40% when compared with control values. Twenty healthy age- and sex-matched individuals were taken as a control group. All patients were subjected to complete medical history (risk factors, medications), thorough clinical examination, ECG, coronary angiography and laboratory investigations including: complete haemogram, coagulation, kidney, liver and lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1C) ).

RESULTS

Eleven of 50 patients (22%) were found to be aspirin resistant. A highly significant difference was found between the mean values of ADP, collagen-induced platelet aggregation percentage and thromboxane B(2) level after aspirin 150 mg/day when compared with the corresponding mean values after aspirin 300 mg/day among the resistant patients (66 ± 7.01%, 62 ± 4.34% and 620 ± 64.58 pg/mL, respectively, vs. 26.87 ± 2.85%, 16.5 ± 3.8% and 77 ± 11.3 pg/mL) indicating enhanced response to aspirin after escalating the dose. The presence of atherothrombotic risk factors (hypertension, smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease and previous MI) were not statistically different between aspirin-resistant and aspirin-sensitive patients. However, there was a highly significant difference between the aspirin sensitive and the resistant patients regarding the other risk factors (diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There is inter-individual variability in response to the antiplatelet effect of standard doses of aspirin (150, 300 mg/day). The response to aspirin 300 mg/day is enhanced in resistant patients when compared to 150 mg/day. There was a significant association between aspirin resistance and atherothrombotic risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and obesity).

Platelet reactivity and response to aspirin in subjects with the metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with a prothrombotic state and predicts the subsequent development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. We hypothesized that similar to diabetes, subjects with MS may have increased platelet reactivity, and reduced response to aspirin. We, therefore, compared platelet reactivity and response to aspirin among subjects with MS and healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Fifty subjects with MS, defined by Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (age 44+/-9 years, 80% women, body mass index 35+/-8 kg/m2) were compared to 50 healthy controls who met none of the MS criteria (age 40+/-7 years, 80% women, body mass index: 24+/-3 kg/m2). Blood samples were taken before and 24 hours after 325 mg aspirin (single dose). Platelet function was evaluated by aggregation in response to 1.5 mmol/L arachidonic acid, 1 microg/mL collagen, and 5 and 20 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate; the VerifyNow Aspirin assay (Accumetrics Inc, San Diego, CA); Impact-R Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer (shear-dependent test) (DiaMed, Cresier, Switzerland) and flow cytometric determination of P-selectin expression and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa expression; and reticulated platelets (reflecting platelet turnover).

RESULTS

Subjects with MS had higher baseline P-selectin levels (14.5+/-5 vs 11.3+/-4 mean fluorescence intensity, P=.002), reticulated platelets (2.8%+/-3% vs 1.2%+/-1%, P=.04) and platelet deposition under flow (Impact-R 7.5%+/-2% vs 5.9%+/-2%, P=.003). Subjects with MS also had lower response to aspirin, as evaluated by the change in all platelet aggregation assays and the VerifyNow score.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with MS appear to have increased baseline platelet reactivity and turnover and a lower antiplatelet response to aspirin. Further research is required to elucidate platelet properties in subjects with MS and find ways to modify them.

Aspirin in coronary artery bypass surgery: new aspects of and alternatives for an old antithrombotic agent

The success of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) depends mainly on the patency of the graft vessels. Aortocoronary vein graft disease is comprised of three distinct but interrelated pathological processes: thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. Early thrombosis is a major cause of vein graft attrition during the first month after CABG, while during the remainder of the first year, intimal hyperplasia forms a template for subsequent atherogenesis, which thereafter predominates. Platelets play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of graft thrombosis and aspirin is the primary antiplatelet drug that has been shown to improve vein graft patency within the first year after CABG. Nevertheless, a significant number of grafts still occlude in the early postoperative period despite 'appropriate' aspirin treatment. Moreover, laboratory investigations showed that the expected inhibition of platelet function is not always achieved. This has been called 'aspirin nonresponse' or 'aspirin resistance', although a uniform definition is lacking. The finding that a considerable number of patients show an impaired antiplatelet effect of aspirin after CABG brought new insight into the discussion concerning poor patency rates of bypass grafts: the early period after CABG shows a coincidence of an increased risk for bypass thrombosis (amongst others, due to platelet activation and endothelial cell disruption of the graft) and an increased prevalence of aspirin resistance. Hitherto, the underlying mechanisms of aspirin resistance are uncertain and largely hypothetical; amongst others, increased platelet turnover, enhanced platelet reactivity, systemic inflammation, and drug-drug interaction are discussed. Up to now available data concerning the clinical outcome of aspirin resistant CABG patients are limited, and there is evidence that platelets of patients with graft thrombosis are more likely to be resistant to aspirin compared with patients without thrombotic events. Many publications concerning aspirin resistance are available today, but reports addressing this topic in CABG patients are sparse. This review summarises recent insights into the antiplatelet treatment after CABG and describes the clinical benefit, but also the therapeutic failure of the well-established drug aspirin. Moreover, possible pharmacological approaches to improve antithrombotic therapy in aspirin nonresponders among CABG patients are discussed.

Cardiovascular thromboembolic adverse effects associated with cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and nonselective antiinflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Concerns of increased cardiovascular (CV) thromboembolic adverse effects from nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, both nonselective [NS]-NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase [COX]-2 selective inhibitors) have prevented their use despite numerous benefits.

METHODS

In this descriptive review, we critically examine the randomized, active- and placebo-controlled studies, observational trials, and meta-analyses evaluating the CV adverse effects associated with long-term and short-term use of COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs. The potential mechanisms for these CV effects are also presented.

RESULTS

Although the studies evaluating the CV risks have limitations, there appears to be an increased CV risk with both COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs, particularly in high-risk patients. Therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration has given a similar "boxed" warning highlighting the potential for increased risk of CV events associated with their use. Nevertheless, there are differences in the CV risks between COX-2 selective inhibitors (e.g., higher CV risk with rofecoxib than celecoxib) as well as differences in the CV risks between individual NS-NSAIDs (e.g., higher CV risks with diclofenac than naproxen).

CONCLUSIONS

Until long-term, prospective, randomized, adequately powered, clinical studies in relevant patient populations have been completed, the CV risks associated with the use of NSAIDs, especially in high-risk patients, will likely continue to be controversial. Nevertheless, the benefits of their short-term (e.g., perioperative) use in patients without CV risks probably outweigh their potential CV adverse effects. Finally, careful risk/benefit assessment should be undertaken and both COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs should be used with caution in patients with CV risk factors.

Heparin anticoagulation in patients undergoing off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery

PURPOSE

The authors analyzed the coagulation data of patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) in a randomized prospective trial.

METHODS

CABG and OPCAB patients received heparin anticoagulation at 400 U x kg(-1), and 180 U x kg(-1) plus 3000 U every 30 min, respectively. In addition, OPCAB patients received a rectal aspirin, 650 mg, during the procedure. Perioperative coagulation test results (platelet count, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time [PTT], activated clotting time [ACT], and thromboelastography [TEG; Haemoscope] were collected from CABG (n = 99) and OPCAB (n = 98) patients. Residual heparin activity after protamine was measured, using an anti-activated factor X (Xa) assay, in 10 patients from each group.

RESULTS

Our study showed that the current anticoagulation regimen in the OPCAB patients achieved a peak ACT of 445 +/- 73 s, and it preserved platelet counts and fibrinogen levels. A residual heparin effect was detected, with residual anti-Xa heparin activity of 0.2 U x ml(-1) up to 2 h after surgery in the OPCAB group. Despite the residual anticoagulation, the OPCAB group had a similar TEG index of native blood, postoperative chest tube drainage, and non-erythrocyte transfusion rate as compared with the CABG group.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the heparin anticoagulation regimen in OPCAB patients does not lead to an immediate hypercoagulable state. Total doses of heparin and protamine were lower in the OPCAB group compared with the CABG group, and there was a residual heparin effect on TEG and PTT in the early postoperative period in the OPCAB group.

Screening for aspirin resistance in stable coronary artery patients by three different tests

BACKGROUND

Aspirin (ASA) failure to inhibit in vitro platelet function had been termed ASA resistance. The prevalence of this phenomenon as measured with different platelet function tests varies widely among studies.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we propose to determine the prevalence of ASA non-responsiveness in stable coronary artery patients using three different tests.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-one patients with a stable coronary artery disease and receiving secondary ASA prophylaxis (250 mg/day) were tested. For each patient the ASA-induced platelet inhibition was determined using three different tests: Ivy Bleeding time (BT), collagen/epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT; PFA-100, Dade-Behring) and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (uTxB2) excretion level. The agreement between these tests was evaluated by kappa statistics test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of biological ASA resistance was 15.7% (n=30), 20.4% (n=39) and 24.6% (n=47) by BT, PFA-100 and UTxB2, respectively. Only fourteen patients (7.3%) were non-responders for two tests: 6 (3.1%) BT/ PFA-100; 1 (0.5%) BT/UTxB2; 7 (3.7%) PFA-100/UTxB2). A poor agreement was found between these three methods and only 3 patients were resistant with all the tests (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

The lack of agreement supposed that different types of aspirin resistance exist. Thus, combination of two tests or more could be a primary solution for a better identification of ASA resistant patients. This hypothesis must be confirmed by a large-scale randomized study with clinically well-defined endpoints.

Aspirin resistance, an emerging, often overlooked, factor in the management of patients with coronary artery disease

Aspirin is the most widely used medication in patients with cardiovascular disease. It has had a greater effect on patients with cardiovascular disease than any other drug. With the importance of aspirin now known for decades, it is recently becoming clearer that some patients do not derive as great a benefit from this "wonder drug" secondary to their resistance to its effects. Aspirin resistance, its prevalence, its identification, and how to overcome or avert it with other medications then becomes a central topic of discussion as important, if not more so, than the importance of aspirin itself as a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease. This review explores the current understanding of the mechanism of aspirin resistance with regard to its prevalence and the magnitude of its clinical significance. It also examines the therapeutic implications of a diagnosis of aspirin resistance.

Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition

Millions of patients use nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for relief of arthritic pain. Although NSAIDs reduce pain, their use has been linked to gastroduodenal complications. Selective inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzyme appeared to offer patients similar pain relief with an improved adverse-effect profile. However, accumulating experiences have raised concerns regarding the cardiovascular toxicities of the selective COX-2 inhibitors. Although selective COX inhibitors provide more gastrointestinal protection than NSAIDs, the unbalanced inhibition of prostaglandins may promote cardiovascular complications. Variability in study designs and inconsistency in results have made the evaluation of NSAID and COX-2 inhibitor safety very difficult, creating confusion among health care practitioners. We examine the pharmacologic and clinical evidence that defines the cardiovascular risk associated with COX inhibition.

Antiplatelet therapy in peripheral occlusive arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease (POAD) may reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality by inhibiting atherothrombosis. This article reviews the current evidence for APT in patients with stable POAD and in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for POAD.

METHODS

A Medline and Pubmed literature search (January 1966 to February 2003) was conducted to identify articles relating APT and POAD. Manual cross referencing was also used.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analyses suggest that APT (most commonly aspirin) in patients with stable POAD significantly reduces the incidence of nonfatal stroke, myocardial infarction and CV death. However, this conclusion is based on subset analysis of data predominantly involving patients with coronary and cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. There is a little direct evidence for the use of aspirin in patients with isolated POAD, but in practice, aspirin remains the most commonly used antiplatelet agent as high rates of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases are observed in this patient population. For patients with POAD without additional indicators of vascular risk, the protective effect of aspirin is unclear and dependent on the balance of risks and benefits in the individual patient. For patients undergoing peripheral revascularization, ticlopidine and aspirin in combination with dipyridamole are effective in maintaining patency after bypass procedures and following angioplasty/femoral endarterectomy. The efficacy of thienopyridines in peripheral angioplasty is uncertain, and the optimum timing and duration of APT relative to intervention are not known.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

To review the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery, including the management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and off-pump surgery.

METHODS

A review of the relevant English literature over the period 1975-2005 was undertaken, in addition to a review of international practices in antithrombotic therapy in cardiac surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary bypass is required in most procedures and makes anticoagulation mandatory. Anticoagulation is, usually, achieved with unfractionnated heparin (UFH). Unfractionated heparin is monitored by point-of-care (POC) testing, such as the activated clotting time or the determination of heparin concentration. The target values of both tests remain empirical, with no clearly validated thresholds. The target value needs to be adjusted according to the POC test, given significant variations between devices and activators. After CABG, the need for antiplatelet therapy is well demonstrated, in order to limit the risk of postoperative death or ischemic events, and improve venous graft patency. Immediately after valvular surgery, antithrombotic therapy should take into account the specific risk carried by each patient and by each prosthetic device. The risk of venous thromboembolism, though poorly defined, is also present in the postoperative period and may require additional attention. Given the frequent exposure to UFH, occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not infrequent in these patients and requires careful individual management.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is an essential component of cardiac surgery. Yet, with the exception of antiplatelet agents in CABG patients, antithrombotic therapy is often based on the clinical experience of medical teams more than on an evidence-based assessment of the literature.

Biological efficacy of low versus medium dose aspirin after coronary surgery: results from a randomized trial [NCT00262275]

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of aspirin after coronary surgery is established; however, a recent study reported the inability of low doses (100 mg) to inhibit postoperative platelet function. We conducted a double-blind randomised trial to establish the efficacy of low dose aspirin and to compare it against medium dose aspirin.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary surgery were invited to participate and consenting patients were randomised to 100 mg or 325 mg of aspirin daily for 5 days. Our primary outcome was the difference in platelet aggregation (day 5 - baseline) using 1 microg/ml of collagen. Secondary outcomes were differences in EC50 of collagen, ADP and epinephrine (assessed using the technique of Born).

RESULTS

From September 2002 to April 2004, 72 patients were randomised; 3 patients discontinued, leaving 35 and 34 in the low and medium dose aspirin arms respectively. The mean aggregation (using 1.1 microg/ml of collagen) was reduced in both the medium and low dose aspirin arms by 37% and 36% respectively. The baseline adjusted difference (low - medium) was 6% (95% CI -3 to 14; p = 0.19). The directions of the results for the differences in EC50 (low - medium) were consistent for collagen, ADP and epinephrine at -0.07 (-0.53 to 0.40), -0.08 (-0.28 to 0.11) and -4.41 (-10.56 to 1.72) respectively, but none were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to recent findings, low dose aspirin is effective and medium dose aspirin did not prove superior for inhibiting platelet aggregation after coronary surgery.

Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Despite aspirin's and clopidogrel's proven benefit in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events, recurrent CV events still occur in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Many of these patients are resistant or only partially responsive to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel, as determined by standard platelet assays. However, current clinical guidelines do not support routine screening for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance, in part because determination of the most appropriate screening test has not been established. This review attempts to (1) describe the phenomena of clinical aspirin and clopidogrel resistance (ie, treatment failure), (2) discuss the complexity of defining and identifying aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, (3) identify factors that may be responsible for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, (4) outline several standard platelet function assays and their limitations, and (5) describe potential new antiplatelet therapies that may benefit aspirin- or clopidogrel-resistant patients.