Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Optimizing Organ-Preservation Strategies Through Chemotherapy-Based Selection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From the CROC Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the viability of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an organ-preservation strategy for remarkable responders who were downstaged to stage IA after receiving induction chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with resectable ESCC (stage IB-III, Union for International Cancer Control, International Cancer Control seventh edition) were eligible for the study. All patients received 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (DCF) therapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks). Remarkable response was defined as a reduction in the tumor to T1, metastatic lymph nodes <1 cm on the short axis, and downstaging to stage IA after 3 cycles of DCF therapy. Remarkable responders then underwent dCRT, which included 2 courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4, repeated every 4 weeks, along with 50.4 Gy of concurrent radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival in remarkable responders following DCF therapy and subsequent dCRT. Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS) and esophagectomy-free survival.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients registered, 90 were analyzed. A remarkable response to 3 courses of DCF therapy was observed in 58.4% of patients. Among these responders, 89.8% achieved a complete response after dCRT. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (range, 1-85 months), the 1-year progression-free survival was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2%-95.6%, primary endpoint), and the 3-year OS was 83.7%. The 3-year OS and esophagectomy-free survival rates in the analysis group were 74.1% and 45.3%, respectively. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response after 2 courses of DCF therapy was significantly associated with OS (P = .0049).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resectable ESCC, dCRT for remarkable responders downstaging to stage IA after induction chemotherapy with 3 courses of DCF therapy is a feasible treatment option and provides an optimizing organ-preservation strategy of chemotherapy-based selection.

Clinical Impact of the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the Efficacy of Salvage Photodynamic Therapy Using Talaporfin Sodium for Esophageal Cancer

Introduction Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a salvage treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Salvage PDT is the treatment available for vulnerable patients with various comorbidities at risk of salvage esophagectomy. This study assessed the impact of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on the outcomes of salvage PDT using talaporfin sodium (TS) for esophageal cancer. Metohds Consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent salvage TS-PDT from 2016 to 2022 were included in this retrospective study. We investigated the local complete response (L-CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and evaluated the relationship between the CCI and therapeutic efficacy. Results In total, 25 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 12 patients (48%) achieved an L-CR, and the 2-year PFS and OS rates were 24.9% and 59.4%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a CCI ≥1 (p=0.041) and deeper invasion (p=0.048) were found to be significant independent risk factors for not achieving an L-CR. To evaluate the efficacy associated with comorbidities, we divided the patients into the CCI=0 group (n=11) and the CCI ≥1 group (n=14). The rate of an L-CR (p=0.035) and the 2-year PFS (p=0.029) and OS (p=0.018) rates in the CCI ≥1 group were significantly lower than those in the CCI=0 group. Conclusion This study found that the CCI was negatively associated with the efficacy of salvage TS-PDT for esophageal cancer.

Remarkable response as a new indicator for endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy of non-surgical treatments for esophageal cancer

In Japan, standard of care of the patients with resectable esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy. Patients unfitted for surgery or with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer are generally indicated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Local disease control is undoubtful important for the management of patients with esophageal cancer, therefore endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy after non-surgical treatments must be essential. The significant shrink of primary site after NAC has been reported as a good indicator of pathological good response as well as favorable survival outcome after esophagectomy. And patients who could achieve remarkable shrink to T1 level after CRT had favorable outcomes with salvage surgery and could be good candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments. Based on these data, "Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th edition" defined the new endoscopic criteria "remarkable response (RR)", that means significant volume reduction after treatment, with the subjective endoscopic evaluation are proposed. In addition, the finding of local recurrence (LR) at primary site after achieving a CR was also proposed in the latest edition of Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. The findings of LR are also important for detecting candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments at an early timing during surveillance after CRT. The endoscopic evaluation would encourage us to make concrete decisions for further treatment indications, therefore physicians treating patients with esophageal cancer should be well-acquainted with each finding.

The role of surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy in management of localized squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus - What is the verdict?

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of esophagus has significantly changed over last decade with the development of newer surgical techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial esophageal cancer and refinement of existing surgical techniques (e.g., Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy) that has been associated with an improvement in patient outcomes. The data from the pivotal CROSS study has established neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as standard of care for patients with locally advanced disease progressing to esophagectomy Simultaneously, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has emerged as an effective therapeutic modality with an added advantage of organ preservation. The present review focuses on reviewing the management of localized esophageal SqCC and exploring the evidence regarding the efficacy and caveats of different therapeutic modalities. One of the key objectives is to identify any specific features which may influence choosing a particular modality (e.g. surgery cf. dCRT) and definition of an appropriate evidence-based algorithm for management of early (superficial) and locally advanced SqCC of esophagus.

The feasibility of post-photodynamic therapy salvage esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive salvage treatment for local residual or recurrent lesions that persist after the definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) of esophageal cancer. However, esophageal cancer persistence after PDT is associated with a poor prognosis. Although esophagectomy is a curative treatment option, few studies have evaluated its efficacy. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy after PDT.

METHODS

14 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for residual or recurrent esophageal cancer after PDT between April 2006 and November 2022 at our institution, were enrolled. The short-term (e.g., blood loss, operative time, R0 rate, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay) and long-term (e.g., overall survival [OS] and recurrence-free survival [RFS]) of salvage esophagectomy after PDT were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 355 min and 350 ml, respectively. Eight patients (57.1%) had postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or more. The median postoperative hospital stay was 20.5 days. The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 23.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-48.0) and 16.3% (95% CI 2.7-40.3), respectively. Seven patients with an R0 had significantly longer OS than the seven patients with R1 and 2 (p = 0.045). The 3-year OS rate for patients with R0 was 52.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage esophagectomy after PDT carries certain risks, patients who achieved an R0 had a promising long-term prognosis. The location and size of the lesion may be critical factors in determining whether R0 can be achieved with salvage esophagectomy after PDT.

Salvage Esophagectomy After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study in a High-Volume Center

BACKGROUND

Salvage esophagectomy, indicated for some patients with locally recurrent/persistent disease after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), reportedly has high postoperative complications. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of dCRT followed by salvage esophagectomy (DCRE) with planned esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRE) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all locally advanced ESCC patients treated with DCRE or NCRE at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2018 to 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline differences. DCRE is defined as esophagectomy for recurrent/persistent disease after dCRT.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients (41 for DCRE and 261 for NCRE) were included. The median interval of chemoradiotherapy-to-surgery was 47d in NCRE, 43d and 440d in DCRE of persistent disease (n = 24) and recurrence (n = 17), respectively. DCRE was observed with advanced ypT stage (63% vs 38%), poorer differentiation (32% vs 15%) and more lymphovascular invasion (29% vs 11%) compared with NCRE (all p < 0.05). The above factors were comparable between the two groups after PSM (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences before and after PSM in postoperative complications over Clavien-Dindo grade III (e.g., respiratory failure and anastomotic leak), 30/90-day postoperative mortality, and survival.

CONCLUSION

Through a standardized surgical procedure in a high-volume center, DCRE exhibited comparable postoperative complications and prognosis with NCRE.

Waiting to Operate: The Risk of Salvage Esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess postoperative morbidity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with salvage esophagectomy (SE).

BACKGROUND DATA

A shift toward a "surgery as needed" approach for esophageal cancer has emerged, potentially resulting in delayed esophagectomy.

METHODS

We identified patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who underwent chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2019. SE was defined as esophagectomy performed >90 days after chemoradiation ("for time") and esophagectomy performed for recurrence after curative-intent chemoradiation ("for recurrence"). The odds of postoperative serious complications were assessed by multivariable logistic regression. The relationship between SE and OS and DFS were quantified using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 1137 patients identified, 173 (15%) underwent SE. Of those, 61 (35%) underwent SE for recurrence, and 112 (65%) underwent SE for time. The odds of experiencing any serious complication [odds ratio, 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.20); P =0.001] or serious pulmonary complication [odds ratio, 2.11 (95% CI, 1.31-3.42); P =0.002] were 2-fold higher for SE patients; SE patients had a 1.5-fold higher hazard of death [hazard ratio, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.25-1.94); P <0.0001] and postoperative recurrence [hazard ratio, 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16-1.77); P =0.001]. Five-year OS for nonsalvage esophagectomy was 45% [(95% CI, 41.6%-48.6%) versus 26.5% (95% CI, 20.2%-34.8%) for SE (log-rank P <0.001)]. Five-year OS for SE for time was 27.1% [(95% CI, 19.5%-37.5%) versus 25.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-41.5%) for SE for recurrence ( P =0.611)].

CONCLUSIONS

SE is associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications and shorter DFS and OS.

Network Pharmacology and in vitro Experimental Verification on Intervention of Quercetin, Present in Chinese Medicine Yishen Qutong Granules, on Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potential mechanism of Yishen Qutong Granules (YSQTG) for the treatment of esophageal cancer using network pharmacology and experimental research.

METHODS

The effective components and molecular mechanism of YSQTG in treating esophageal cancer were expounded based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. The key compound was identified by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) to verify the malignant phenotype of the key compounds in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Then, the interaction proteins of key compounds were screened by pull-down assay combined with mass spectrometry. RNA-seq was used to screen the differential genes in the treatment of esophageal cancer by key compounds, and the potential mechanism of key compounds on the main therapeutic targets was verified.

RESULTS

Totally 76 effective compounds of YSQTG were found, as well as 309 related targets, and 102 drug and disease interaction targets. The drug-compound-target network of YSQTG was constructed, suggesting that quercetin, luteolin, wogonin, kaempferol and baicalein may be the most important compounds, while quercetin had higher degree value and degree centrality, which might be the key compound in YSQTG. The HPLC-MS results also showed the stable presence of quercetin in YSQTG. By establishing a protein interaction network, the main therapeutic targets of YSQTG in treating esophageal cancer were Jun proto-oncogene, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, and RELA proto-oncogene. The results of cell function experiments in vitro showed that quercetin could inhibit proliferation, invasion, and clonal formation of esophageal carcinoma cells. Quercetin mainly affected the biological processes of esophageal cancer cells, such as proliferation, cell cycle, and cell metastasis. A total of 357 quercetin interacting proteins were screened, and 531 genes were significantly changed. Further pathway enrichment analysis showed that quercetin mainly affects the metabolic pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and nuclear factor kappa B (NF- κ B) signaling pathway, etc. Quercetin, the key compound of YSQTG, had stronger binding activity by molecular docking. Pull-down assay confirmed that NF- κ B was a quercetin-specific interaction protein, and quercetin could significantly reduce the protein level of NF- κ B, the main therapeutic target.

CONCLUSION

YSQTG can be multi-component, multi-target, multi-channel treatment of esophageal cancer, it is a potential drug for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Treatment and Outcomes of Proximal Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the treatment of proximal (cervical or upper thoracic) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), for which chemoradiation is the recommended therapy.

METHODS

Treatment and outcomes of patients with cT1-3N0-1M0 proximal esophageal SCC in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 was evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

Therapy of 2159 patients was chemoradiation (n = 1500, 69.5%), no treatment (n = 205, 9.5%), surgery (n = 203, 9.4%), radiation alone (n = 190, 8.8%), and chemotherapy alone (n = 61, 2.8%). Factors associated with definitive therapy with either chemoradiation or surgery were younger age, non-Black race, being insured, cervical tumor location, clinical T2 and T3 stage, clinical nodal involvement, and treatment at a research/academic program. Five-year survival was significantly better in patients treated with definitive therapy than patients not treated definitively (34.0% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariable survival analysis, receiving definitive therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, p = 0.017) was associated with improved survival, while increasing age, male sex, clinical T3 stage, positive clinical nodal involvement, and increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with worse survival. Esophagectomy was not associated with improved survival in multivariable analysis of the definitive therapy cohort (HR 0.84, p = 0.08) or propensity matched analysis. However, the pathologic complete response was only 33.3% (40/120) for patients who did have an esophagectomy after chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This national analysis supports definitive chemoradiation for not only cervical but also proximal thoracic esophageal SCC. Routine surgery does not appear to be necessary but may have a role in patients with residual disease after chemoradiation.

Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer and sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Salvage oesophagectomies are associated with an increased risk of mortality, although recent data suggests that long-term survival rates following salvage oesophagectomy are similar to planned oesophagectomy. The aim was therefore to meta-analyse outcomes for patients undergoing salvage versus planned oesophagectomies to assess the differences in short-term mortality and long-term survival.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed was performed to identify relevant studies. Data were extracted and compared by meta-analysis, using odds ratio and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis, which compared patients in the planned oesophagectomy group (n = 23 555) to patients in the salvage oesophagectomy group (n = 2227). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of rates of postoperative mortality (5.7% salvage oesophagectomy versus 3.1% planned oesophagectomy, P = 0.0004), anastomotic leak (20.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 14.5% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.00001), pulmonary complications (37.1% salvage oesophagectomy versus 24.2% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001) and R0 margin (87.6% salvage oesophagectomy versus 91.3% planned oesophagectomy, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference between long-term survival rates at 5 years with 39.2% for salvage and 42.6% for planned oesophagectomy (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage oesophagectomies do offer a meaningful chance of long-term survival (at 5 years) for select patients with oesophageal cancer, but the elevated risk of post-operative complications and mortality following salvage oesophagectomy should be recognized.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Esophago-aortic fistula of esophageal cancer after chemotherapy, proton therapy and salvage photodynamic therapy: a rescued case

We describe a case of esophageal cancer after proton therapy that resulted in an esophagoaortic fistula after photodynamic therapy (PDT). A 49-year-old woman with esophageal cancer (cT1bN0M0, cStage I) underwent chemotherapy (5-FU and cisplatin) and radiotherapy (proton therapy to the cancer lesion after X-ray radiotherapy to the regional lymph nodes). Despite a complete response of the primary tumor, local recurrence was observed 10 months after treatment. PDT was performed as a salvage treatment. She was transported to the emergency department in a state of hemorrhagic shock due to hematemesis 50 days after PDT. We diagnosed an esophagoaortic fistula caused by esophageal perforation, and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and thoracic endovascular aortic repair were performed. The patient was successfully rescued after three surgeries (esophagectomy, extraesophageal fistula, aortic vascular replacement, and gastrointestinal reconstruction). In addition to X-ray radiotherapy before photodynamic therapy, proton therapy in combination with the vascular shutdown effects of PDT may have caused ischemia of the esophagus, resulting in an esophagoaortic fistula. When performing PDT, the type of radiation therapy and the location of the lesion should be examined to assess the risk of penetration or perforation.

Recurrent metastasis risk factors in esophageal cancer after salvage endoscopic resection for local failure following chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Although salvage endoscopic resection is an optimal treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent metastasis (lymph node and/or distant metastasis) after salvage endoscopic resection may occur with a certain degree of unavoidable frequency and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the risk factors for recurrent metastasis are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent salvage endoscopic resection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy were analyzed in this single-center, retrospective study. We evaluated the cumulative incidence rates of recurrent metastases, overall survival, and the risk factors for recurrent metastasis after salvage endoscopic resection.

RESULTS

We analyzed 132 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate of recurrent metastases after salvage endoscopic resection was 25.7%. The 5-year overall survival rates in all patients and in patients with recurrent metastasis were 66.8% and 22.5%, respectively. Local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.34; P = 0.012) and the presence of lymphatic invasion in salvage endoscopic resection specimen (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.20; P = 0.002) were significant risk factors for recurrent metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with local failure pattern with a residual lesion after chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy and presence of lymphatic invasion have a high risk for recurrent metastasis. Thus, appropriate surveillance for these patients should be considered.

Association between Submucosal Fibrosis and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Recurrent Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers after Chemoradiotherapy

Simple Summary

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy have not been established. In this study, we focused on the fibrosis of the submucosa. As a result, we found that endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer can be performed reliably without adverse events, but the procedure takes longer for lesions with strong fibrosis of the submucosa.

Abstract

Endoscopic resection is a treatment of choice for a metachronous early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) appearing after a radical cure of esophageal cancer by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, non-curative resection, and procedural complications including perforation due to radiation-induced submucosal fibrosis, are a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the association between submucosal fibrosis and the usefulness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in ESCC after CRT. This study retrospectively analyzed 13 lesions in 11 patients in our institute. Submucosal fibrosis under the lesion (F score) was classified into three levels (F0: none or mild, F1: moderate, and F2: severe) based on endoscopic and histopathologic findings. All lesions were F1 or greater (F1: 8 lesions and F2: 5 lesions). En bloc and R0 resection rates were both 100%. The procedural speed was slower in F2 than in F1 (F1 vs. F2; 15.1 mm²/min vs. 7.1 mm²/min, p = 0.019), without procedure-related adverse events. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 14–117 months) after ESD, 7 of 11 (63.6%) patients were alive without recurrence, and without ESCC-related death. ESCC after CRT reliably and safely resected en bloc by ESD but was more difficult in lesions with strong submucosal fibrosis.

A Single-Arm Confirmatory Study of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Including Salvage Treatment for Clinical Stage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (JCOG0909 Study)

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) who refuse surgery as the initial therapy. However, poor survival, a high incidence of late toxicities, and severe complications after salvage surgery remain issues to be resolved. This single- arm multicenter trial (Trial name XXXX) aimed to confirm the efficacy of CRT modifications, including salvage treatment, for reducing CRT-related toxicities and facilitating salvage treatment for improved survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with clinical stage II/III EC (UICC 6th, non-T4) were eligible. Chemotherapy comprised cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on days 1and 29) and 5- fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1-4 and 29-32). Radiotherapy was administered at a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Good responders received 1-2 additional cycles of chemotherapy. For residual or recurrent disease, salvage endoscopic resection (ER) or salvage surgery was performed based on specific criteria. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS). The calculated sample size was 95 patients, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 80%. The expected and threshold 3-year OS were 55% and 42%, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 96 patients were enrolled, and 94 were included in the efficacy analysis. A complete response was achieved in 55 patients (59%). Salvage ER and salvage surgery were performed in 5 (5%) and 25 patients (27%), respectively. R0 resection by salvage surgery was achieved in 19 patients (76%). Five patients (20%) showed grade 3 or 4 early operative complications, and 9 patients (9.6%) showed grade 3 late toxicities during the long-term follow-up. The 3-year OS was 74.2% (90% CI, 65.9%-80.8%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of definitive CRT and salvage treatment has lower CRT- related toxicities and yields good OS, thus making it a promising novel treatment option for patients with locally advanced EC.

Comparison of Recurrence Patterns and Salvage Treatments After Definitive Radiotherapy for cT1a and cT1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer

Background

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for stage I esophageal cancer was reported to result in noninferior overall survival (OS) compared with surgery. However, only a few detailed reports of recurrence patterns and subsequent salvage treatments have been published. This study aimed to compare recurrence patterns and subsequent salvage treatments after definitive RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between cT1a and cT1bN0M0 esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods

Patients with cT1a or cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive RT or CRT were included. Survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, and salvage treatments were evaluated.

Results

In total, 40 patients with EC receiving RT or CRT were divided into two groups for evaluation: cT1a (20 patients) and cT1b (20 patients) groups. The 3-year OS rates were 83% and 65% (p = 0.06) and the 3-year progression-free survival rates were 68% and 44% (p = 0.15) in the cT1a and cT1b groups, respectively. Among those in the cT1a group, six had local recurrence and two had metachronous recurrence. Seven patients underwent salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection and one patient received argon plasma coagulation treatment. Among those in the cT1b group, six had local recurrence, one had regional recurrence, and one had both. Of these, one underwent salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection, one received photodynamic therapy, three underwent surgery, one received RT, and two received the best supportive care. Compared with the cT1b group, the cT1a group had a higher proportion of patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (p = 0.007). After the endoscopic treatments, no recurrences were observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Regional recurrence and distant metastasis were not observed in the cT1a group. A higher proportion of patients in the cT1a group received salvage endoscopic treatments, and their OS tended to be favorable.

Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers

BACKGROUND

In retrospective studies, the definition of salvage esophagectomy has been inconsistent and is a source of bias. We sought to describe how variability in the definition of salvage affects comparative outcomes of TMT and BMT therapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who completed chemoradiation (CRT) from 2002-2017 were identified. TMT included patients who had a planned esophagectomy after CRT. BMT included patients treated with CRT only, plus salvage esophagectomy, variably defined as an esophagectomy occurring either A) 3 months after CRT; B) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed recovery; C) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed work-up; or D) 6 months after CRT. Long-term survival outcomes between the TMT and BMT groups were compared for each definition of salvage esophagectomy. Time to surgery was included a priori in a multivariable model for overall survival.

RESULTS

The study included 143 patients. Ninety (63%) underwent esophagectomy; 53(37%) received CRT only. While the total patients remained the same, the composition of the TMT and BMT groups varied by salvage definitions A-D. Various definitions resulted in different 5-year survival rates for TMT vs. BMT groups. A), 56% vs. 39%; B), 61% vs. 34%; C), 50% vs. 42%; and D), 51% vs. 39%. In a Cox multivariable analysis, age and proximal/middle esophageal tumors were associated with worse post-operative survival, but time to surgery was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Slight variations in the definition of salvage esophagectomy can influence the interpretation of TMT and BMT outcomes. Future studies should consistently define treatment groups.

Active Surveillance Versus Immediate Surgery in Clinically Complete Responders After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Matched Study

OBJECTIVE

This study compared outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer and clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery.

BACKGROUND

Since nearly one-third of patients with esophageal cancer show pathologically complete response after nCRT according to CROSS regimen, the oncological benefit of immediate surgery in cCR is topic of debate.

METHODS

Patients with cCR based on endoscopic biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration initially declining or accepting immediate surgery after nCRT were identified between 2011 and 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), rate and timing of distant dissemination, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Some 98 patients with cCR were identified: 31 in the active surveillance- and 67 in the immediate surgery group with median followup of survivors of 27.7 and 34.8 months, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 2 comparable groups (n = 29 in both groups). Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a 3-year OS of 77% and 55% (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.14-1.20, P = 0.104), respectively. The 3-year PFS was 60% and 54% (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.44-2.67, P = 0.871), respectively. Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a comparable distant dissemination rate (both groups 28%), radical resection rate (both groups 100%), and severity of postoperative complications (Clav- ien-Dindo grade ≥ 3: 43% vs 45%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, OS and PFS in patients with cCR undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery were not significantly different. Active surveillance with postponed surgery for recurrent disease was not associated with a higher distant dissemination rate or more severe adverse postoperative outcomes.

Omitting surgery in esophageal cancer patients with complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment modality for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. However, patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after nCRT have been reported to have better prognosis. Further, the role of surgery in these patients is controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether surgery is still useful in patients with cCR after nCRT.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases for studies on surgical efficacy in complete responders after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The publication date was set to January 1, 2010-January 31, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio were used to compare the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and treatment mortality between the nCRT and nCRT plus surgery groups.

RESULTS

Six articles involving 609 patients were included. There was a significant benefit of nCRT for OS (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04), but not for DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.35-6.86, p = 0.56). The nCRT group tended to have lower mortality than the nCRT plus surgery group (risk ratio = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-1.18, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Omitting surgery provides better OS in complete responders after nCRT. Adding surgery could increase the morbidity and mortality and decrease the quality of life. Thus, nCRT alone could be a feasible approach for patients with cCR.

Treatment and Prognosis of Resectable Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Population-based Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for resectable cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remains controversial. This study aimed to explore prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategies in the context of staging.

METHODS

In this population-based study, 1371 patients with resectable CEC were identified in the SEER database. Univariate analysis and multivariable Cox regression model were performed to evaluate factors related to overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis based on staging was performed to assess the effect of treatments on survival and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust confounding factors.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed that age, sex, year of diagnosis, histological type, tumor size, cN stage, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors. After PSM, patients with local disease (cT_1-2N₀M₀) who received surgery alone had a higher 10-year OS rate than those received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (20.7% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.023). Compared with CRT, surgery-based multimodal therapy did not increase the OS rate of patients (14.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.084). For regional disease (cT_3-4aN₀M₀/cT_1-4aN_1-3M₀), although surgery alone did not improve the OS rate of patients compared with CRT (7.3% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.18), we observed a significant difference in 10-year OS among patients who underwent surgery-based multimodal therapy versus those who underwent CRT (20.4% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CRT, surgery alone improves the long-term survival of patients with localized disease, and surgery-based multimodal therapy increases the survival rate of patients with regional disease. Further studies are required to confirm our findings.

Long-term outcomes of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is considered a minimally invasive treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the long-term outcomes have not been fully evaluated. This study investigated the short-term and long-term outcomes of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for local recurrence or residual tumor after chemoradiotherapy from January 2006 to December 2017 were retrospectively investigated. Follow-up included endoscopic examination and computed tomography at least once every 6 months after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection. Risk factors for disease recurrence after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection were assessed using the Cox hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (33 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: local recurrence, n = 27; residual tumor, n = 6) were included. The median endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure time was 40 min (interquartile range [IQR], 33-58.5 min). En bloc resection was achieved in 31 (94%) of 33 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases. One patient with intraoperative perforation did not require surgical intervention and recovered with conservative treatment. A total of 16 patients (53%) had disease recurrence at a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR, 33-81 months). The 3-year overall, disease-specific, recurrence-free and local recurrence-free survival rates were 75%, 82%, 58% and 90%, respectively. The positive vertical margin, submucosal invasion in the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen and piecemeal resection were significantly associated with disease recurrence after salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection is a feasible treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with acceptable long-term outcomes. However, for cases with positive vertical margins and submucosal invasion in the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen, salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes were insufficient and additional treatment might be required.

Esophageal cancer patients' survival after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for esophageal cancer, with a putatively equivalent outcome. However, disease recurrence after a complete response is common and if follow-up surveillance detects recurrence, salvage treatments for potentially curable disease must follow.

METHODS

We conducted a nation-wide questionnaire survey of institutions in Japan certified by the Japanese Esophageal Society to investigate outcomes of primary thoracic esophageal cancer patients initially treated by chemoradiotherapy with complete response diagnoses. The primary endpoint was overall survival, the secondary endpoint disease recurrence. Outcomes of patients who had undergone salvage treatments were also investigated. Cases were excluded from analysis if endoscopic study, endoscopic biopsy, or computed tomography data were lacking.

RESULTS

At 41 institutes 544 case records were collected; valid data on 392 patients were obtained; 5-year survival was 74.8%, 5-year disease-free survival, 66.8%. Clinical staging before treatment significantly affected both overall and disease-free survival rates, but differences between adjoining stages were unexpectedly small. The primary relapse site was classified as primary site (n = 58), regional lymph nodes (n = 36), or distant disease (n = 34). Salvage treatments with curative intent (surgery, endoscopic treatments, and additional radiation) were performed on 38, 23, and 4 cases; 5-year survival after esophagectomy (n = 22), endoscopic treatment (n = 23), and lymphadenectomy (n = 9) was 47.4%, 70.9%, and 33.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients developed recurrent disease, mostly locoregional, after complete response. Complete response patients with originally advanced stage disease had fair clinical outcomes; salvage treatments after locoregional recurrence achieved modest long-term survival.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of salvage photodynamic therapy by talaporfin sodium for cervical esophageal cancers and lesions larger than 3 cm

BACKGROUND

Salvage photodynamic therapy with talaporfin sodium has a high local control rate for esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy. The eligibility criteria for photodynamic therapy include the absence of invasion to the cervical esophagus and a 3 cm maximum longitudinal lesion length. There is little evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of lesions outside the eligibility criteria. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy of such lesions.

METHODS

Patients with consecutive lesions between February 2016 and May 2020 (n = 36) were enrolled. The local complete response rates and adverse events were compared between patients with cervical and non-cervical lesions and those with lesions larger and smaller than 3 cm.

RESULTS

The local complete response rate was 77.8% and was significantly lower in cervical than in non-cervical lesions (20.0% vs 80.6%, p = 0.005). Esophageal stricture, laryngeal pain, and fever were significantly higher in the cervical than in the non-cervical lesion group; however, the detected adverse events were up to grade 2. Laser exposure dose was high in lesions larger than 3 cm (median, 650 vs 400 J; p < 0.001). No significant differences in local complete response rates and adverse effects were noted. One case involving a lesion larger than 3 cm needed balloon dilations for esophageal stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage esophageal photodynamic therapy was effective for local control with acceptable safety after definitive chemoradiotherapy failure, photodynamic therapy toward cervical lesions had a statistically lower local complete response rate. Lesions larger than 3 cm may be considered treatable.

Feasibility of conversion thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, patients with cT4b esophageal cancer often require conversion surgery following induction therapy, for which the standard procedure is open esophagectomy. However, thoracoscopic esophagectomy, including thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position, is increasingly used. We compared short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 14 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy, and 10 who underwent open esophagectomy, for locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer after induction therapy between March 2007 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The two groups did not significantly differ in patient background. Median total and thoracic surgical times were both significantly longer for open esophagectomy than for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Median blood loss was also greater in the open esophagectomy group than in the thoracoscopic esophagectomy group. The thoracoscopic esophagectomy group also had significantly shorter median chest drain duration; and lower C-reactive protein levels on the second and third postoperative days. The two groups did not significantly differ in total complications or postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy is as safe and feasible as open esophagectomy for conversion surgery after induction therapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Salvage Esophagectomy

Salvage esophagectomy is an option for patients with recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy or those who undergo active surveillance after induction chemoradiation therapy. Salvage resection is associated with higher rates of morbidity compared with planned esophagectomy but offers patients with locally advanced disease a chance at improved long-term survival. Salvage resection should be preferentially performed in a multidisciplinary setting by high-volume and experienced surgeons. Technical considerations, such as prior radiation dosage, radiation field, and choice of conduit, should be taken into account.

Analysis of trimodal and bimodal therapy in a selective-surgery paradigm for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival outcomes of trimodal therapy (TMT; chemoradiation plus surgery) and bimodal therapy (BMT; chemoradiation) have seldom been analysed. In a selective-surgery paradigm, the benefit of TMT in patients with a complete clinical response is controversial. Factors associated with survival in patients with a clinical complete response to chemoradiation were evaluated.

METHODS

Patients with stage II-III oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with TMT or BMT from 2002 to 2017 were evaluated. The BMT group consisted of patients who were otherwise eligible for surgery but underwent chemoradiation alone followed by observation. This group included patients who later had salvage oesophagectomy. Survival was evaluated and compared between TMT and BMT groups. Elastic net regularization was performed to select co-variables for Cox multivariable survival analysis in patients with a clinical complete response.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients, 60 (41.9 per cent) underwent TMT and 83 (58.0 per cent) BMT. Patients who underwent TMT had longer median overall survival than those who had BMT (77 versus 33 months; P = 0.019). For patients with a clinical complete response, TMT achieved longer median overall survival than BMT (123 versus 55 months; P = 0.04). BMT had a high locoregional recurrence rate (48 versus 6 per cent; P < 0.001); 26 of 29 patients with locoregional recurrence in the BMT groupunderwent salvage resection. Cox multivariable analysis demonstrated that upper-mid oesophageal tumour location (hazard ratio (HR) 2.04; P = 0.024) and tumour length (HR 1.18; P = 0.046) were associated with worse survival. Although TMT was not associated with survival, it was a predictor of reduced recurrence (HR 0.28; P = 0.028). The maximum standardized uptake value after chemoradiation also predicted recurrence (HR 1.33; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients who achieve a clinical complete response, TMT reduces locoregional recurrence but may not prolong survival. The differences in survival outcomes may be due to patient selection; therefore, a selective-surgery strategy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a reasonable approach.

Evaluation and treatment results of trimodality therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis for highly advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor, and there is currently no standard treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefits of trimodality therapy [chemoradiation plus surgery, (CRT + S)] by evaluating the surgical outcomes of patients with ESCC in Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Japan. We assessed the preoperative and postoperative adverse events, treatment effects of preoperative CRT, metastatic diagnosis of the dissected lymph nodes, and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, 148 patients with highly advanced ESCC who underwent preoperative CRT + S were analyzed for diagnosis and staging, preoperative complications, clinical and histopathological effects of CRT in the resected specimens, survival rates, and recurrences.

RESULTS

The grade 3 and higher complications of preoperative CRT were neutropenia in 3 cases and thrombocytopenia in 1 case. Among the postoperative complications, there were 2 cases (1.4%) of direct surgical death, only tracheobronchial bleeding and liver failure. Using the 11^th edition of the classification of esophageal cancer by the Japanese Esophageal Society, 60 patients (40.5%) were classified as grade 3 (negative for cancer cells, pathological complete response). However, 20 of them (33.3%) had metastatic tumor cells in the lymph nodes. The overall 5-year survival rate was 58.5%. Including references to the pathological findings and recurrence patterns, there is no effective diagnostic method for selecting the subsequent approach based on the effectiveness of CRT.

CONCLUSION

Planned surgery following CRT was the only solution for achieving better treatment results. CRT + S is a promising treatment with low direct surgical mortality.

Advances in Drug Resistance of Esophageal Cancer: From the Perspective of Tumor Microenvironment

Drug resistance represents the major obstacle to get the maximum therapeutic benefit for patients with esophageal cancer since numerous patients are inherently or adaptively resistant to therapeutic agents. Notably, increasing evidence has demonstrated that drug resistance is closely related to the crosstalk between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). TME is a dynamic and ever-changing complex biological network whose diverse cellular and non-cellular components influence hallmarks and fates of tumor cells from the outside, and this is responsible for the development of resistance to conventional therapeutic agents to some extent. Indeed, the formation of drug resistance in esophageal cancer should be considered as a multifactorial process involving not only cancer cells themselves but cancer stem cells, tumor-associated stromal cells, hypoxia, soluble factors, extracellular vesicles, etc. Accordingly, combination therapy targeting tumor cells and tumor-favorable microenvironment represents a promising strategy to address drug resistance and get better therapeutic responses for patients with esophageal cancer. In this review, we mainly focus our discussion on molecular mechanisms that underlie the role of TME in drug resistance in esophageal cancer. We also discuss the opportunities and challenges for therapeutically targeting tumor-favorable microenvironment, such as membrane proteins, pivotal signaling pathways, and cytokines, to attenuate drug resistance in esophageal cancer.

Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours' consensus guidelines for the management of oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. More than 80% of the cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy (including checkpoint inhibitors) and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of oesophageal and OGJ carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.

Association of local complete response with prognosis after salvage photodynamic therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective salvage endoscopic treatment for local failure at the primary site after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer patients. However, the contribution of local control by salvage PDT to the prognosis is unclear. We investigated whether complete response at primary site by salvage PDT could improve the prognosis.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and March 2016, 34 patients received salvage PDT for local failure of esophageal cancer limited to stage T1-2 after definitive CRT or radiotherapy. Local complete response (L-CR) rate, adverse events, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Local complete response rates after PDT were 68% (23/34; 95% CI, 50-83%) in all patients: 81% (17/21; 95% CI, 58-95%) for stage T1 and 46% (6/13; 95% CI, 19-75%) for stage T2 patients. Grade 3 esophageal stricture occurred in one patient. The median follow-up was 26.0 months (range, 3.7-93.6 months); 21 patients died. The median survival times were 54.3 months in patients who achieved L-CR after PDT (L-CR group) and 19.8 months in those who did not (non-CR group). The 2-year OS rates were 79% (95% CI, 54-92%) in the L-CR group and 40% (95% CI, 11-68%) in the non-CR group (P = 0.0389; log-rank test). The median PFS was 21.2 months in the L-CR group and 1.9 months in the non-CR group (P < 0.001; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Achieving L-CR by salvage PDT for local failure after CRT in esophageal cancer was associated with good prognosis.

Salvage Photodynamic Therapy Using Talaporfin Sodium for Local Failure of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Talaporfin sodium photodynamic therapy (TS-PDT) for local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has recently been reported to be highly effective and less invasive, compared to other treatment modalities. TS-PDT was recently introduced at the Tottori University Hospital, Japan. The aim of this study is to clarify the efficacy and safety of PDT in our hospital.

Methods

This was a single-center observational study. We examined eight cases of TS-PDT performed between January 2016 and December 2019. The main endpoints were local complete remission (L-CR) rate and the adverse events. In addition, age, gender, histology, tumor location, TNM stage, tumor depth, irradiation dose, and overall survival (OS) were examined.

Results

The patients included 7 men and a woman, with an average age of 72.1 years (range 63-82 years). The baseline clinical stages before CRT or radiotherapy were stage I in 1, stage II in 3, stage III in 3, and stage IVA in 1 patient. The T stage on endoscopic assessment before TS-PDT was T1 in 6 patients and T2 in 2 patients. Treatment outcomes and adverse events were evaluated. There were no treatment-related deaths, and no significant adverse events occurred intraoperatively or postoperatively. The L-CR rate was 7/8 (87.5%); T1 cases had 100% (6/6) L-CR, while T2 cases had 50% (1/2). The 2-year OS rates were 87%.

Conclusion

TS-PDT was observed to be safe and effective in the first eight cases of its application following its introduction in our hospital.

Repeated talaporfin sodium photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer: safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Talaporfin sodium photodynamic therapy (tPDT) is an effective salvage treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Repeated tPDT could also be indicated for local recurrence or residue after the first salvage tPDT. However, the safety and efficacy of repeated tPDT have not been elucidated.

METHODS

We reviewed 52 patients with esophageal cancer who were treated with the first tPDT at Kyoto University Hospital between October 2015 and April 2020.

RESULTS

Among 52 patients, repeated tPDT after the first tPDT was indicated for 13 patients (25%), of which six had residual tumor, four had local recurrence after complete response (CR) after the first tPDT at the primary site, and six had metachronous lesion. The total session of repeated tPDT was 25; 16 were for primary sites and nine were for metachronous sites. Among them, six patients (46.2%) achieved local (L)-CR and nine lesions (56.3%) achieved lesion L-CR. By session, 10 sessions (40%) achieved L-CR. There were no severe adverse events except for one patient; this patient showed grade 3 esophageal stenosis and perforation after the third tPDT on the same lesion that was previously treated with porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy four times.

CONCLUSION

Repeated tPDT could be an effective and safe treatment for local failure even after salvage tPDT for esophageal cancer.

Specific complications and limitations of robotic esophagectomy

Regardless of the approach to esophagectomy, it is an operation that may be associated with significant risk to the patient. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has the same potential for short- and long-term complications as does open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. These complications include among others, the risk for anastomotic leak, gastric tip necrosis, vocal cord palsy, and chylothorax. Moreover, there are additional risks that are unique to the robotic platform such as hardware or software malfunction. These risks are heavily influenced by numerous factors including the patient's comorbidities, whether neoadjuvant therapy was administered, and the extent of the surgical team's experience. The limitations of RAMIE are therefore based on the careful assessment of the patient for operability, the tumor for resectability and the team for surgical ability. This article will tackle the topic of complications and limitations of RAMIE by examining each of these issues. It will also describe the recommended terminology for reporting post-esophagectomy complications.

Review of early endoscopic findings in patients with local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUNDS

Local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy, if diagnosed early, can be cured by salvage endoscopic therapy, which allows organ preservation and contributes to maintaining patient quality of life. This study aimed to investigate early endoscopic findings of local recurrence in post-definitive chemoradiotherapy patients.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and June 2012, 17 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with no metastasis but local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. We attempted to find endoscopic hallmarks suggestive of local recurrence by comparing pre- and post-local recurrence diagnostic images. The influence of follow-up schedule on chosen salvage therapy type was also investigated.

RESULTS

Endoscopic local recurrence findings included eight submucosal tumors, five ulcers, and four erosions. Upon review of prior images, findings suggestive of local recurrence were detected in seven patients, including six submucosal tumors and one erosion, all of which were smaller than 10 mm. These lesions had changed morphologically at local recurrence diagnosis: three submucosal tumors had become larger and three submucosal tumors and one erosion had changed to ulcers. Of 12 patients with cT1 at local recurrence, four (33%) underwent follow-up endoscopy within 1 month of local recurrence findings and 11 patients (92%) were treated with salvage endoscopic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopists should be aware that SMTs or erosions, even those smaller than 10 mm, can indicate local recurrence after complete response to definitive chemoradiotherapy. Follow-up endoscopy should be performed within 1-2 months if findings suggestive of local recurrence are observed on prior endoscopy, even when biopsy results are negative.

It's not always too late: a case for minimally invasive salvage esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

Standard of care for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and surgical resection 4-8 weeks after completion of nCRT. It is recommended that the CRT to surgery interval not exceed 90 days. Many patients do not undergo surgery within this timeframe due to patient/physician preference, complete clinical response, or poor performance status. Select patients are offered salvage esophagectomy (SE), defined in two ways: resection for recurrent/persistent disease after complete response to definitive CRT (dCRT) or esophagectomy performed > 90 days after completion of nCRT. Salvage esophagectomy reportedly has higher postoperative morbidity and poor survival outcomes. In this study, we assessed outcomes, overall, and disease-free survival of patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy by both definitions (recurrent/persistent disease after dCRT and/or > 90 days), compared to planned (resection after nCRT/within 90 days) esophagectomy (PE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2019. Esophagectomy for benign disease and patients who did not receive nCRT were excluded. Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

97 patients underwent minimally invasive esophageal resection for esophageal carcinoma. 89.7% of patients were male. Mean age was 64.9 years (range 36-85 years). 94.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma, with 16 transthoracic and 81 transhiatal approaches. On comparing planned esophagectomy (n = 87) to esophagectomy after dCRT failure (n = 10), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.73), disease-free survival (p = 0.32), 30-day or major complication rate, anastomotic leak, or LOS. Similarly, when comparing esophagectomy < 90 days after CRT (n = 62) to > 90 days after CRT completion (n = 35), no significant differences were identified in overall survival (p = 0.39), disease-free survival (p = 0.71), 30-day or major complication rate, LOS, or anastomotic leak rate between groups. In this comparison, local recurrence was noted to be elevated with SE as compared to PE (64.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival and disease-free survival were equivalent between SE and PE. Local recurrence was noted to be increased with SE, though this did not appear to affect survival. Although planned esophagectomy remains the standard of care, salvage esophagectomy has comparable outcomes and is appropriate for selected patients.

Therapeutic results of proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for cT1 esophageal cancer and salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrence

BACKGROUND

Proton beam therapy (PBT) with concurrent chemotherapy is promising for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of study was to evaluate the outcome of concurrent chemo-proton therapy (CCPT), i.e., PBT with concurrent chemotherapy for cT1 ESCC and the salvage endoscopic therapy for local recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T1 ESCC who underwent CCPT (60 GyE) between April 2013 and April 2017 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were investigated. The efficacy of CCPT at the primary site was evaluated via endoscopy; primary complete response (CR) was defined as disappearance of the tumor lesion/ulcer and absence of cancer cells on biopsy. Endoscopic evaluation was performed with the same protocol of conventional chemoradiotherapy. Local recurrence after CCPT was treated with endoscopic resection for cT1a and with esophagectomy or photodynamic therapy for cT1b+.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients (median age, 70 years) that underwent CCPT, 43 patients (98%) achieved primary CR. Among the 44 patients, the 3-year overall survival rate was 95.2%. Five patients (11%) developed local recurrence without regional lymph node or distant metastasis and received endoscopic resection or photodynamic therapy. All five patients were alive with no recurrence after a median 23 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that CCPT is an effective treatment for cT1 ESCC and careful endoscopic follow-up allows preferable local control with salvage endoscopic treatment.

Esophageal brachytherapy: Institut Gustave Roussy's experience

PURPOSE

Esophageal cancer is characterized by its propension to local evolution, which conditions prognosis and quality of life. Brachytherapy may be a therapeutic option for all stages of esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective unicentric study included all consecutive patients treated for an esophageal high-dose-rate brachytherapy in our institution from 1992 to 2018.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included. They were treated in four distinct indications: exclusive (7 patients), boost after external beam radiotherapy (41), reirradiation (36), or palliative aim (6). Most frequently prescribed schemes were 3 × 5 Gy (boost) or 6 × 5 Gy (exclusive treatment and reirradiation) at applicator's surface or at 5 mm. At the end of follow-up, 50% of patients had presented with local recurrence. Seventeen percent of patients had a metastatic relapse. Median overall survival was 15 months in the whole cohort: 22 months in the boost setting, 25 months for exclusive brachytherapy, 15 months for reirradiation, and only 2 months for palliative treatment. Tumor length at brachytherapy, brachytherapy dose, and interfraction response were significantly associated to overall survival. 40% of patients presented with grade 2+ toxicity, mostly esophagitis, including three toxic deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Although local control outcomes are still poor, one must remember that patients are unfit for any curative therapeutic option and that palliative chemotherapy offers mediocre results. The most promising setting probably is reirradiation because brachytherapy offers a remarkable dose gradient allowing best organ at risk sparing, with an encouraging rate of long survivors (19% at 2 years). Esophageal brachytherapy deserves to be further investigated because some patients, even unfit, may benefit from it, with acceptable toxicity.

Photodynamic Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

Photodynamic therapy, a curative local treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, involves a photosensitizing drug (photosensitizer) with affinity for tumors and a photodynamic reaction triggered by laser light. Previously, photodynamic therapy was used to treat superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma judged to be difficult to undergo endoscopic resection. Recently, photodynamic therapy has mainly been performed for local failure after chemoradiotherapy. Although surgery is the most promising treatment for local failure after chemoradiotherapy, its morbidity and mortality rates are high. Endoscopic resection is feasible for local failure after chemoradiotherapy but requires advanced skills, and its indication is limited to within the submucosal layer by depth. Photodynamic therapy is less invasive than surgery and has a wider indication than endoscopic resection. Porfimer sodium (a first-generation photosensitizer) causes a high frequency of side effects related to photosensitivity and requires the long-term sunshade period. Talaporfin (a second-generation photosensitizer) requires a much shorter sun-shade period than porfimer sodium. Photodynamic therapy will profoundly change treatment strategies for local failure after chemoradiotherapy.

Esophagus and Gastrointestinal Junction Tumors

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma account for 95% of all esophageal malignancies. The rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma have increased in Western countries, making it the predominant type of esophageal cancer. Treatment of both types of cancer has transformed to a more minimally invasive approach, with endoscopic methods being used for superficial cancers and more frequent use of video-assisted and laparoscopic modalities for locally advanced tumors. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines advocate a trimodal approach to treatment, with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for locally advanced cancers.

Safety of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have reported that induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is an effective treatment for unresectable, locally advanced esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) after DCF for initially unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with initially unresectable T4 thoracic ESCC underwent TE after induction DCF.

RESULTS

The neighboring organs with tumors were the tracheobronchus in nine patients, thoracic aorta in 13, and pericardium and diaphragm in three each (concurrent overlapping invasion occurred in five patients). The mean total operation time was 556.3 ± 107.2 minutes, and the mean time of the thoracic procedure was 258.9 ± 83.9 minutes. The mean total blood loss was 166.2 ± 117.8 mL, and the loss during the thoracic procedure was 33.5 ± 24.6 mL. All patients achieved complete R0 resection under TE. No conversions to open thoracotomy were performed. The postoperative morbidity rate was 34.8%. The postoperative hospital stay was 24.3 (range, 13-38) days. Five patients had recurrence: four had distant metastasis (lung, two; liver, three; and one with overlap), and one had mediastinal lymph node recurrence. No local recurrence was noted at the site of the primary T4 tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

TE was safely performed in 23 patients after DCF therapy for locally advanced unresectable ESCC. Induction DCF, followed by TE, could be an alternative treatment for unresectable T4 ESCC.

Morbidity following salvage esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: the MD Anderson experience

The survival advantage associated with the addition of surgical therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who demonstrate a complete clinical response to chemoradiotherapy is unclear, and many institutions have adopted an organ-preserving strategy of selective surgery in this population. We sought to characterize our institutional experience of salvage esophagectomy (for failure of definitive bimodality therapy) and planned esophagectomy (as a component of trimodality therapy) by retrospectively analyzing patients with ESCC of the thoracic esophagus and GEJ who underwent esophagectomy following chemoradiotherapy between 2004 and 2016. Of 76 patients who met inclusion criteria, 46.1% (35) underwent salvage esophagectomy. Major postoperative complications (major cardiovascular and pulmonary events, anastomotic leak [grade ≥ 2], and 90-day mortality) were frequent and occurred in 52.6% of the cohort (planned resection: 36.6% [15/41]; salvage esophagectomy: 71.4% [25/35]). Observed rates of 30- and 90-day mortality for the entire cohort were 7.9% (planned: 7.3% [3/41]; salvage: 8.6% [3/35]) and 13.2% (planned: 9.8% [4/41]; salvage: 17.1% [6/35]), respectively. In summary, esophagectomy following chemoradiotherapy for ESCC at our institution has been associated with frequent postoperative morbidity and considerable rates of mortality in both planned and salvage settings. Although a selective approach to surgery may permit organ preservation in many patients with ESCC, these results highlight that salvage esophagectomy for failure of definitive-intent treatment of ESCC may also constitute a difficult clinical undertaking in some cases.

Salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a potentially curative treatment modality, even for patients with unresectable T4 tumors. For patients who fail dCRT, salvage esophagectomy is known to be a high-risk procedure. However, the efficacy and safety of salvage surgery for these patients remain unclear.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy after dCRT for initially unresectable locally advanced T4 ESCC were assessed, and both outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the study population, R0 resection was achieved in 19 patients (54.3%). Postoperatively, 8 patients (22.9%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb or higher complications, and 3 patients (8.6%) registered surgery-related mortality. Overall survival rates were 45.7%, 28.6%, and 5.7% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, residual or relapsed tumor limited to T2 or less was an independent prognostic factor for better survival (P = 0.010). On the other hand, postoperative pneumonia and incomplete resection were negative prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019, respectively). Nodal involvement and extent of lymph node dissection did not impact patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although salvage esophagectomy for initially unresectable T4 ESCC is considered a high-risk surgery with poor prognosis, long-term survival may be achieved in patients with ≤ T2 residual tumors. In addition, R0 resection and postoperative pneumonia prevention are crucial to improve patient survival.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for esophageal cancer invading the thoracic aorta: a questionnaire survey study

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced esophageal cancer occasionally invades the aorta, and hemorrhage from the esophagoaortic fistula can cause sudden death. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) enables hemostasis in such cases, and prophylactic TEVAR can prevent fatal hemorrhagic events during treatment. However, its efficacy in Japan has not been evaluated. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of TEVAR in esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

The Japan Esophageal Society conducted a questionnaire survey targeting authorized or semi-authorized member institutes of the Authorized Institutes for Board Certified Esophageal Surgeons. Patients who underwent TEVAR for esophageal cancer were identified from 19 institutes. Data on patient demographics, treatment performed, and survival rate were obtained using the questionnaire. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and to compare differences in survival rates between those who underwent TEVAR for hemorrhage and those for preoperative prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients identified, 20 patients underwent TEVAR for hemorrhage or impending hemorrhage from the esophagoaortic fistula, while 21 patients underwent TEVAR as preoperative prophylaxis. The median survival time after TEVAR was 135 days in the hemorrhage or impending hemorrhage group and 378 days in the preoperative prophylaxis group. Eighteen patients underwent esophagectomy after TEVAR. No hemorrhagic event was observed during the perioperative period. The median survival time of the patients who underwent esophagectomy was 373 days. Some patients who achieved R0 resection obtained long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

TEVAR is an efficacious modality to control a life-threatening hemorrhage from esophagoaortic fistula and helps to prolong the survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer invading the aorta.

Outcome of delayed versus timely esophagectomy after chemoradiation for esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Salvage and delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but recent series have shown similar outcomes compared to timely esophagectomy. We aim to evaluate outcomes for delayed and salvage esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma utilizing a large national database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database for 2004 to 2014 was queried for patients with clinical stage II or III esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CRT and esophagectomy. Patients who underwent surgery <90 days after CRT were defined as the timely esophagectomy group (n = 7822), and those who underwent surgery ≥90 days after CRT were defined as the delayed esophagectomy group (n = 667).

RESULTS

A total of 8489 patients met our inclusion criteria. The median post-CRT interval was 49 days (range, 40-61 days) for the timely esophagectomy group and 109 days (range, 97-132 days) for the delayed esophagectomy group. The delayed group was more likely to be of black race (2.3% vs 1.2%; P < .01) and more likely to have Medicare (47.9% vs 39.8%; P < .001). There were no significant between-group differences in chemotherapy regimens (P = .17), radiation dose (P = .18), or surgical approach (P = .48). The delayed esophagectomy group had higher rates of pathological complete response (22.2% vs 18.6%; P = .043) and 90-day postoperative mortality (10.4% vs 7.8%; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, delayed esophagectomy was not independently associated with decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective database study, despite increased perioperative mortality, delayed and salvage esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma appear to have similar long-term survival as timely esophagectomy. Delayed and salvage esophagectomy may be offered to patients who do not receive timely esophagectomy after CRT.

FGF5 methylation is a sensitivity marker of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to definitive chemoradiotherapy

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the major treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and prediction of the response to dCRT is important so as not to miss an opportunity to cure an ESCC. Nevertheless, few validated markers are available. Here, we aimed to identify a highly reproducible marker using multi-layer omics analysis. 117 ESCC samples from 67 responders and 50 non-responders were divided into screening, validation, and re-validation sets. In the screening cohort (n = 41), somatic mutations in 114 genes showed no association with dCRT response. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis using Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array identified four genic regions significantly associated with dCRT response. Among them, FGF5 methylation was validated to be associated with dCRT response (n = 34; P = 0.001), and further re-validated (n = 42; P = 0.020) by bisulfite-pyrosequencing. The sensitivity and specificity in the combined validation and re-validation sets (n = 76) were 45% and 90%, respectively, by using the cut-off value established in the screening set, and FGF5 methylation had predictive power independent from clinicopathological parameters. In ESCC cell lines, FGF5 promoter methylation repressed its expression. FGF5 expression was induced by cisplatin (CDDP) treatment in three unmethylated cell lines, but not in two methylated cell lines. Exogenous FGF5 overexpression in a cell line with its methylation conferred resistance to CDDP. In non-cancerous esophageal tissues, FGF5 was not expressed, and its methylation was present in a small fraction of cells. These results showed that FGF5 methylation is a validated marker for ESCC sensitivity to dCRT.

Moscatilin Inhibits Growth of Human Esophageal Cancer Xenograft and Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Radiotherapy

Esophageal cancer prognosis remains poor in current clinical practice. We previously reported that moscatilin can induce apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe in esophageal cancer cells, accompanied by upregulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) expression. We aimed to validate in vitro activity and Plk1 expression in vivo following moscatilin treatment and to examine the treatment's radiosensitizing effect. Human esophageal cancer cells were implanted in nude mice. Moscatilin was intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected into the mice. Tumor size, body weight, white blood cell counts, and liver and renal function were measured. Aberrant mitosis and Plk1 expression were assessed. Colony formation was used to measure survival fraction after radiation. Moscatilin significantly suppressed tumor growth in mice bearing human esophageal xenografts without affecting body weight, white blood cell counts, or liver and renal function. Moscatilin also induced aberrant mitosis and apoptosis. Plk1 expression was markedly upregulated in vivo. Moreover, moscatilin pretreatment enhanced CE81T/VGH and BE3 cell radioresponse in vitro. Moscatilin may inhibit growth of human esophageal tumors and sensitize esophageal cancer cells to radiation therapy.