Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs

Fluid-structure interaction simulation of mechanical aortic valves: a narrative review exploring its role in total product life cycle

Over the last years computer modelling and simulation has emerged as an effective tool to support the total product life cycle of cardiovascular devices, particularly in the device preclinical evaluation and post-market assessment. Computational modelling is particularly relevant for heart valve prostheses, which require an extensive assessment of their hydrodynamic performance and of risks of hemolysis and thromboembolic complications associated with mechanically-induced blood damage. These biomechanical aspects are typically evaluated through a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach, which enables valve fluid dynamics evaluation accounting for leaflets movement. In this context, the present narrative review focuses on the computational modelling of bileaflet mechanical aortic valves through FSI approach, aiming to foster and guide the use of simulations in device total product life cycle. The state of the art of FSI simulation of heart valve prostheses is reviewed to highlight the variety of modelling strategies adopted in the literature. Furthermore, the integration of FSI simulations in the total product life cycle of bileaflet aortic valves is discussed, with particular emphasis on the role of simulations in complementing and potentially replacing the experimental tests suggested by international standards. Simulations credibility assessment is also discussed in the light of recently published guidelines, thus paving the way for a broader inclusion of in silico evidence in regulatory submissions. The present narrative review highlights that FSI simulations can be successfully framed within the total product life cycle of bileaflet mechanical aortic valves, emphasizing that credible in silico models evaluating the performance of implantable devices can (at least) partially replace preclinical in vitro experimentation and support post-market biomechanical evaluation, leading to a reduction in both time and cost required for device development.

The Effects of Implantation Orientation of a Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve in an Anatomic Left Ventricle-Aorta Configuration

We have performed three-dimensional high-resolution numerical simulations of a bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) implanted at different orientations in an anatomic left ventricle-aorta obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a volunteer. The thoroughly validated overset curvilinear-immersed boundary (overset-CURVIB) fluid-structure interaction (FSI) flow solver is used in which the aorta and LV are discretized with boundary-conforming and non-conforming curvilinear grids, respectively. The motion of the LV wall is prescribed based on a lumped parameter model while the motion of the leaflets are calculated using a strong coupled FSI algorithm enhanced with Aitken convergence technique. We carried out simulations for three valve orientations, which differ from each other by 45 degrees and compared the leaflet motion and flow field for multiple cycles. Our results show reproducible and relatively symmetrical opening for all valve orientations. The presence of small-scale vortical structures after peak systole, cause significant cycle-to-cycle variations in valve kinematics during the closing phase for all valve orientations. Furthermore, our results show that valve orientation does not have a significant effect on the distribution of viscous shear stress in the ascending aorta. Additionally, two different mathematical activation models including linear level of activation and Soares model are used to quantify the platelet activation in the ascending aorta. The results show that the valve orientation does not significantly affect (less than 8%) the total platelet activation in the ascending aorta.

Peak Flow in Model Aorta Through Bi-Leaflet Mechanical Heart Valve with Varying Orientation

This study aims to numerically investigate the effect of bi-leaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) orientation on flow pattern in a realistic human aorta model with branches. The aorta model geometry is based on anatomical shape and dimensions involving aortic arch with twist and branches. Unsteady numerical simulations have been carried out to investigate the peak systolic flow in aorta through a BMHV installed at three different orientations, marked as 0°, 45°, and 90°. Velocity, vorticity, and strain fields were obtained in various cross sectional planes for all the cases to examine the spatial flow evolution starting from the sinus along the aortic arch. The valve leaflets were seen to produce small-scale stream wise contra-rotating vortices. These vortices changed their positions around the axis of aorta while advecting from one cross-sectional plane to another; thereby, clearly indicating swirl in the aortic flow. The net viscous dissipation energy loss (EL), obtained from strain field, was found to rise because of the presence of BMHV. The increase in the EL varied depending on the valve orientation as it changed from 43% for 0° to a maximum of 53% for 90° compared with no valve case. Similarly, the wall shear stress registered an increase by up to 4 Pa in the ascending aorta because the presence of BMHV; however, no significant effect of the valve orientation was noticed.

Simulation of personalised haemodynamics by various mounting positions of a prosthetic valve using computational fluid dynamics

Diseases of the cardiovascular system account for nearly 42% of all deaths in the European Union. In Germany, approximately 12,000 patients receive surgical replacement of the aortic valve due to heart valve disease alone each year. A three-dimensional (3D) numerical model based on patient-specific anatomy derived from four-dimensional (4D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was developed to investigate preoperatively the flow-induced impact of mounting positions of aortic prosthetic valves to select the best orientation for individual patients. Systematic steady-state analysis of blood flow for different rotational mounting positions of the valve is only possible using a virtual patient model. A maximum velocity of 1 m/s was used as an inlet boundary condition, because the opening angle of the valve is at its largest at this velocity. For a comparative serial examination, it is important to define the standardised general requirements to avoid impacts other than the rotated implantation of the prosthetic aortic valve. In this study, a uniform velocity profile at the inlet for the inflow of the aortic valve and the real aortic anatomy were chosen for all simulations. An iterative process, with the weighted parameters flow resistance (1), shear stress (2) and velocity (3), was necessary to determine the best rotated orientation. Blood flow was optimal at a 45° rotation from the standard implantation orientation, which will offer a supply to the coronary arteries.

Non-Newtonian Blood Flow Simulation of Diastolic Phase in Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Implanted in a Realistic Aortic Root Containing Coronary Arteries

Coronary arteries, which are branched from the sinuses, have tangible effects on the hemodynamic performance of the bileaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV), especially in the diastolic phase. To better understand this issue, a computer model of ascending aorta including realistic sinus shapes and coronary arteries has been generated in this study in order to investigate the BMHV performance during diastole. Three-dimensional transient numerical analysis is conducted to simulate the diastolic blood flow through the hinges and in coronary arteries under the assumption of non-Newtonian behavior. Results indicate that as blood flows to the coronary arteries mainly during diastole, leakage flow from the hinge and other gaps will change considering the influence of coronary arteries. In addition, BMHV in the case of aortic replacement will increase blood flow rate into the coronary arteries about 100% as the mechanical valve resistance is higher than a native heart valve. Also, it will change the wall shear stress (WSS) distribution and increase coronary artery disease (CAD) potential. It is found out that although less leakage flow reduces the velocity magnitudes through the gaps, the shear stress acting on blood elements with non-Newtonian assumption will be detrimental in the hinge corner at the ventricular side. High WSS of 1800 Pa is observed at beginning of diastole at this region.

Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit

OBJECTIVES

Previous work suggests that aortic root and valve prostheses alter blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta, creating aberrant haemodynamics compared with those of healthy volunteers. Various valve designs have been proposed to better restore physiological haemodynamics. In this study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to non-invasively assess three-dimensional (3D) ascending aortic haemodynamics after aortic root replacement (ARR) with a mechanical valved conduit postulated to create less turbulent blood flow.

METHODS

Ten patients (40 ± 9 years) underwent transthoracic echocardiography and contrast-enhanced multidimensional four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI at 1.5 T after ARR with an On-X mechanical valved conduit. Preoperative 4D flow MRI was available in 7 patients. Ten age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (42 ± 13 years) were also analysed to characterize physiological flow. The presence of vortex/helix formation was graded by two blinded observers. Peak transvalvular pressure gradients were computed using the simplified Bernoulli equation. Patients' postoperative pressure gradients and helicity/vorticity grades were compared with preoperative gradients and those from healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Intra- and interobserver ratings showed good agreement (κ = 0.93, P < 0.01 and κ = 0.84, P < 0.01, respectively). Highly helical and/or vortical flow was observed in all patients preoperatively, which was significantly reduced postoperatively (P < 0.01 and <0.01, respectively), restoring similar flow patterns similar to those seen in volunteers (P = 0.56 and 0.56). Peak transvalvular pressure gradients (ΔP) were also significantly reduced [43 ± 21 vs 12 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.05 (Echo); 48 ± 22 vs 16 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.05 (MRI)], but remained significantly higher than those of volunteers (6 ± 1 mmHg, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary evidence suggests that ARR with an On-X mechanical valve significantly reduces aberrant aortic haemodynamics, producing flow patterns that resemble those in healthy volunteers.

Effects of Bileaflet Mechanical Mitral Valve Rotational Orientation on Left Ventricular Flow Conditions

We studied left ventricular flow patterns for a range of rotational orientations of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve (MHV) implanted in the mitral position of an elastic model of a beating left ventricle (LV). The valve was rotated through 3 angular positions (0, 45, and 90 degrees) about the LV long axis. Ultrasound scans of the elastic LV were obtained in four apical 2-dimensional (2D) imaging projections, each with 45 degrees of separation. Particle imaging velocimetry was performed during the diastolic period to quantify the in-plane velocity field obtained by computer tracking of diluted microbubbles in the acquired ultrasound projections. The resulting velocity field, vorticity, and shear stresses were statistically significantly altered by angular positioning of the mechanical valve, although the results did not show any specific trend with the valve angular position and were highly dependent on the orientation of the imaging plane with respect to the valve. We conclude that bileaflet MHV orientation influences hemodynamics of LV filling. However, determination of ‘optimal’ valve orientation cannot be made without measurement techniques that account for the highly 3-dimensional (3D) intraventricular flow.

Acute obstruction by Pannus in patients with aortic medtronic-hall valves: 30 years of experience

BACKGROUND

Acute dysfunction of mechanical aortic valve prostheses is a life-threatening adverse event. Pannus overgrowth, which is fibroelastic hyperplasia originating from the periannular area, is one cause of dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the annual incidence of readmittance resulting from acute obstruction caused by pannus during 30 years of observation in patients with Medtronic-Hall aortic valve prostheses and to analyze the risk factors associated with pannus development.

METHODS

From 1982 to 2004, 1,187 patients in our department underwent aortic valve replacement with Medtronic-Hall mechanical monoleaflet valve prostheses. As of December 31, 2012, 27 of these patients (2.3%) had presented with acute valve dysfunction caused by pannus obstruction.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of pannus was 0.7 per 1,000. The median time from the primary operation to prosthetic dysfunction was 11.1 years (range, 1.2 to 26.8 years). Of the 20 patients who underwent reoperation, 2 died. Seven patients died before reoperation. Women had a higher risk for the development of obstructing pannus, and patients with pannus obstruction were younger. Valve size was not an independent risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Women and younger patients are at higher risk for pannus development. When acute dysfunction by pannus is suspected in a mechanical aortic valve, an immediate echocardiogram and an emergency aortic valve replacement should be carried out because of the potential of a fatal outcome.

Influence of type of aortic valve prosthesis on coronary blood flow velocity

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic valve stenosis is associated with high resting and reduced hyperemic coronary blood flow. Coronary blood flow increases after aortic valve replacement (AVR); however, the increase depends on the type of prosthesis used. The present study investigates the influence of type of aortic valve prosthesis on coronary blood flow velocity.

METHODS

The blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and the right coronary artery (RCA) was measured intraoperatively before and after AVR with a stentless bioprosthesis (Sorin Freedom Solo; n = 11) or a bileaflet mechanical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical Regent; n = 11). Measurements were made with an X-Plore epicardial Doppler probe (Medistim, Oslo, Norway) following induction of hyperemia with an adenosine infusion. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiography evaluations were used to assess valvular and ventricular function. Velocity time integrals (VTI) were measured from the Doppler signals and used to calculate the proportion of systolic VTI (SF), diastolic VTI (DF), and normalized systolic coronary blood flow velocities (NSF) and normalized diastolic coronary blood flow velocities (NDF).

RESULTS

The systolic proportion of the LAD VTI increased after AVR with the St. Jude Medical Regent prosthesis, which produced higher LAD SF and NSF values than the Sorin Freedom Solo prosthesis (SF, 0.41 ± 0.09 versus 0.29 ± 0.13 [P = .04]; NSF, 0.88 ± 0.24 versus 0.55 ± 0.17 [P = .01]). No significant changes in the LAD velocity profile were noted after valve replacement with the Sorin Freedom Solo, despite a significant reduction in transvalvular gradient and an increase in the effective orifice area. AVR had no effect on the RCA flow velocity profile.

CONCLUSION

The coronary flow velocity profile in the LAD was significantly influenced by the type of aortic valve prosthesis used. The differences in the LAD velocity profile probably reflect differences in valve design and the systolic transvalvular flow pattern.

The effect of implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve on kinematics and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta

We carry out three-dimensional high-resolution numerical simulations of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve under physiologic pulsatile flow conditions implanted at different orientations in an anatomic aorta obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a volunteer. We use the extensively validated for heart valve flow curvilinear-immersed boundary (CURVIB) fluid-structure interaction (FSI) solver in which the empty aorta is discretized with a curvilinear, aorta-conforming grid while the valve is handled as an immersed boundary. The motion of the valve leaflets are calculated through a strongly coupled FSI algorithm implemented in conjunction with the Aitken convergence acceleration technique. We perform simulations for three valve orientations, which differ from each other by 45 deg and compare the results in terms of leaflet motion and flow field. We show that the valve implanted symmetrically relative to the symmetry plane of the ascending aorta curvature exhibits the smallest overall asymmetry in the motion of its two leaflets and lowest rebound during closure. Consequently, we hypothesize that this orientation is beneficial to reduce the chance of intermittent regurgitation. Furthermore, we find that the valve orientation does not significantly affect the shear stress distribution in the aortic lumen, which is in agreement with previous studies.

Intermittent regurgitation caused by incomplete leaflet closure of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet heart valve: analysis of the underlying mechanism

OBJECTIVE

Clinical echocardiographic assessments of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) prosthesis in the aortic position revealed a phenomenon identified as "intermittent regurgitation." An in vitro investigation was initiated to identify the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

In a pulse duplicator environment, 6 ADVANTAGE size 23 aortic valves were analyzed. Leaflet motion and flow through the valves were documented using echocardiography with color Doppler flow, digital high speed imaging, and flow meter assessment.

RESULTS

Intermittent regurgitation could be reproduced in all 6 of the tested valves within limited ranges of flow, pressure, and valve orientation. By virtue of high-speed imaging, the mechanism underlying intermittent regurgitation was identified. During intermittent regurgitation, the leading edge of the second-to-close leaflet makes contact with the chamfer on the leading edge of the first-to-close leaflet. The fluid closing forces working on the first-to-close leaflet prevent it from shifting back so that the leading edge of the second-to-close leaflet remains positioned against the chamfer of the first-to-close leaflet. In this position, the major radius of the second-to-close leaflet does not reach the housing's major radius. Therefore, a crescent-shaped gap remains between the leaflet tip of the second-to-close leaflet and the housing major radius during all or part of diastole. The regurgitant fraction can increase from a normal range of 6% to 25% during an intermittent regurgitation beat.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro intermittent regurgitation can be induced in the size 23 aortic ADVANTAGE valve under a limited range of conditions. To avoid possible misinterpretations, the phenomenon must be known in detail by all physicians dealing with patients with an ADVANTAGE valve.

Influence of orientation of bi-leaflet valve prostheses on coronary perfusion pressure in humans

Orientation of a bi-leaflet prosthesis (BLP) might influence coronary perfusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the orientation on coronary perfusion pressure during hyperemia and adrenergic stimulation. During hyperemia perfusion pressure determines coronary blood flow. Fourteen patients with normal coronary angiogram underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) by a BLP, and seven received a bio-prosthesis. Patients receiving a BLP were randomized to either orientation A (hinge mechanism perpendicular to a line drawn between the coronary ostia) or B (hinge mechanism parallel to the line between the ostia). Six months after surgery all patients underwent cardiac catheterization. Pressures were measured during resting conditions, during maximum hyperemia, and during maximum adrenergic stimulation with a guiding catheter in the aortic arch (P(ao)), simultaneously with a sensor tipped guide wire in the coronary artery (P(cor)) and in the aortic root (P(root)). P(ao)-P(root) described a flow-induced pressure drop in the aortic root (Venturi effect) and the gradient P(root)-P(cor) described coronary ostium abnormalities. Only small non-significant differences in myocardial perfusion pressure were found between different orientations of a bi-leaflet prosthesis or between bi-leaflet prostheses and bio-prostheses in P(ao)-P(root) and P(root)-P(cor).

Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

This prospective-randomized study investigated the effect of aortic valve design and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) on coronary flow reserve (CFR) after mechanical or biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow reserve may be an important parameter of long-term survival after AVR in patients with AS. Reduced CFR may contribute to more cardiovascular events and greater rates of mortality.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients undergoing AVR underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the measurement of coronary flow preoperatively, 5 days postoperatively, and at 6-month follow-up with measurement of CFR. Patients scheduled for mechanical AVR were randomized to a tilting disc or bileaflet prosthesis (n = 12 in each group). For biological AVR, patients were scheduled to receive a stented (n = 12) or stentless (n = 12) valve. Patients also underwent echocardiography with measurement of transvalvular pressure gradients and left ventricular mass regression.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, coronary flow increased significantly in all groups (p < 0.001). Only stentless valves demonstrated a normal CFR (3.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.1 for stented biological valves, 2.1 +/- 0.2 for tilting disc, and 2.2 +/- 0.3 for bileaflet mechanical valves). Patient-prosthesis mismatch with an indexed effective orifice area <0.85 cm2/m2 led to decreased rates of CFR in the tilting disc, stentless, and stented groups. Pressure gradients were 14 +/- 3 mm Hg for tilting disc, 12 +/- 4 mm Hg for bileaflet, 19 +/- 6 mm Hg for stented, and 10 +/- 4 mm Hg for stentless valves.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalization of CFR after AVR in patients with AS was observed only for stentless valves. Coronary flow reserve might explain the excellent long-term results for stentless valves. (Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch on Coronary Flow Reserve; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00310947?order=1; NCT00310947).

Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

In some randomized studies, stentless aortic valves have demonstrated hemodynamic advantages in comparison with stented prostheses. The effect of more physiologic flow dynamics on coronary artery flow has not been investigated yet. This study compares coronary perfusion after aortic valve replacement with stented or stentless porcine bioprostheses in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients (73 +/- 6 years) referred for treatment of aortic stenosis were randomized to aortic valve replacement with stented (Medtronic Mosaic; (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) or stentless (Medtronic Freestyle; Medtronic Inc) prostheses. Coronary flow was measured by means of magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, 5 days after the operation, and 6 months postoperatively, then with evaluation of coronary flow reserve. Echocardiography was performed to quantify transvalvular gradients and left ventricular mass regression.

RESULTS

Coronary flow increased in both groups significantly (P < .001) after aortic valve replacement. This increase was higher in the stentless group compared with that seen in the stented group (343 +/- 137 vs 221 +/- 66 mL/min). Also, coronary flow reserve was higher for stentless valves (3.4 +/- 0.3 for stentless valves and 2.3 +/- 0.1 for stented valves). Mean pressure gradients for Freestyle valves were lower (10 +/- 4 and 8 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively, vs 19 +/- 6 postoperatively and 15 +/- 4 mm Hg at follow-up for Mosaic valves, P < .05). Left ventricular mass regression was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalization of coronary artery flow after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis was more pronounced for stentless valves compared with stented valves. The fact that the stentless design also demonstrated a superior hemodynamic performance with lower pressure gradients might be explained by the design being closer to physiologic anatomy and thus the presence of lower turbulence levels in the sinuses of Valsalva.

Mechanical heart valves: are two leaflets better than one?

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with single-disc and bileaflet mechanical heart valves.

METHODS

From May 1975 through October 2001, 590 single-disc valves (7 models) were used for isolated valve replacement, and from November 1980 through July 2002, 1283 bileaflet valves (10 models) were used for isolated valve replacement. Detailed follow-up was performed to a maximum of 27.4 and 21.9 years with a total of 6872 and 5811 patient-years for single-disc valves and bileaflet valves, respectively. Survival and valve-related events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Single-disc valves were mainly implanted from 1975 through 1995, whereas bileaflet valves were mainly implanted from 1987 through 2002; thus the years of concurrent use were 1987 through 1995. The bileaflet valve had a significantly lower explantation rate, whereas the single-disc valve had a significantly lower thromboembolism rate. No significant differences were detected in early mortality, long-term survival, and other valve-related complications. When limiting the comparison to the concurrent period of 1987 through 1995, no significant difference was detected in survival or in any valve-related complication.

CONCLUSION

Single-disc and bileaflet valves provide similar clinical performance. The predominant use of bileaflet valves is not based on clinical outcomes.